News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The new MacBook by mmastrac on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:46PM (#9172419)
USB-C as the "one connector to rule them all" is the big news. That's the end of MagSafe and the exploding era of USB-C docking stations that work for multiple devices.

I think we'll start to see an era of expandable computing coming up soon: USB-C is a perfect connector to push your data and state into a larger desktop experience. Why not carry around your laptop in tablet form when you are mobile? [1]

[1] https://grack.com/blog/2015/01/16/usb-31-ara-are-the-converg...

Re:The new MacBook by Finbarr on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:40PM (#9173413)
Seems like there are some new $79 adapters to split out the USB-C port into power, usb and av[1]/vga[2].

[1] http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1K2AM/A/usb-c-digital-av...

[2] http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1L2AM/A/usb-c-vga-multip...

Re:The new MacBook by nickysielicki on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:27PM (#9173785)
I'm sorry but when you ship a machine with ONE PORT for the purposes of charging and peripherals, this absolutely needs to be in the box.

Nickel and $80'ering me on a $1400 computer is ridiculous. I'll stick with my thinkpad.

Re:The new MacBook by nigelsampson on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:50PM (#9174937)
The Surface Pro's come with only one USB port on the device, they make it up for it with having one on the power brick which I think is an awesome idea.
Re:The new MacBook by nickysielicki on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:03PM (#9174996)
The surface pro also has a separate charging port.

With this new macbook, one cannot charge and use a mouse at the same time without an $80 addon.

Re:The new MacBook by largote on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:58PM (#9175255)
Well, the official Apple mouse does not require a dongle, their logic must be something along the lines of "that's what you get for using third party mice".
Re:The new MacBook by _nedR on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:39AM (#9176240)
What if i want to connect an external harddisk? or a pen drive having my work documents? or I want to connect a projector to do my presentation.

Is Apple's logic "that's what you get for having friends or working with people who do not buy the latest apple devices"?

Re:The new MacBook by nardi on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @04:41AM (#9176676)
You are ignoring the obvious answer that Apple even said in the announcement: wireless everything.

This is exactly like the removal of the DVD drive in MacBook Airs. "HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO USE MY DVDs?!?!?" The answer is: don't. Download things over the network instead.

Same logic applies here.

Re:The new MacBook by ianlevesque on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @03:22AM (#9176493)
Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, Syncthing, BTSync, Aerofs, and others would all serve this use case.
Re:The new MacBook by Yizahi on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @09:43AM (#9177640)
"Waiting to upload 336 files at 3.6kb/s. Estimated time to complete 3 weeks."

Seen such messages right when I NEEDED those files. Also - remember epic KDE failure? When they had corrupted repository and it was perfectly mirrored to 1500+ other repos? And they had to search offline PC with a uncorrupted snapshot?

In general "all cloud" tech is at most 50% ready for use by everyone.

Re:The new MacBook by _nedR on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @09:33AM (#9177601)
So the whole world (my office, friends, family, clients, colleagues) should change to suit my laptop?

For a disruptive product to be successful it should not be behind its time (where others are already there) it should not be too far ahead of its time (The technology might not be ready, the people might not be ready to understand the product, etc), It has to be just ahead of its time. I am sorry but I maintain that Apple has overshot with this product. This is not like removing DVD support or even removing flash support, because a lot of the world is still wired. Except for those who are fortunate to live in their own Apple bubble, many of the people who buy this will have to frequently face the frustration of owning such a device with practically no reward (apart from shaving of a few inches and grams off their laptop).

Re:The new MacBook by falcolas on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:09PM (#9175321)
Re:The new MacBook by urda on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:44PM (#9175698)
He's talking about the more popular (and wireless) magic mouse.

That mouse has literally been around forever, and no it's not what users are generally using now.

Re:The new MacBook by largote on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @04:23AM (#9183097)
Wow, I didn't even know they still sold that model.
Re:The new MacBook by DonHopkins on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @10:58AM (#9178025)
Third party mice that require their own dongle instead of using bluetooth are just stupid.
Re:The new MacBook by largote on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @04:25AM (#9183099)
For general use, yeah.

For gaming, you can get less input lag with wireless mice with dedicated dongles if you're intent on going wireless.

Re:The new MacBook by whyenot on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:26AM (#9176200)
The macbook does have bluetooth, so I don't really see your point. There are lots of inexpensive, perfectly decent bluetooth mice out there.
Re:The new MacBook by randomsearch on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @07:28AM (#9177128)
> With this new macbook, one cannot charge and use a mouse at the same time without an $80 addon.

Can't you just use bluetooth? I prefer a bluetooth mouse anyway. Wires get in the way.

Re:The new MacBook by driverdan on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @11:05AM (#9178088)
Only if you like Apple's mice since no one else makes a half way decent Bluetooth mouse.
Re:The new MacBook by pistle on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:15PM (#9175042)
And a Mini Display port. External monitor(s) on the one and USB hub the other. Surface can drive 1 4k or 2 1080p monitors from that port. Will be interesting to see if you can get the daisy-chain of monitors off that AND have a spot to set up a hub or charge another device.
Re:The new MacBook by iSnow on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @06:02AM (#9176882)
I don't get it. So you spend $1400 on a computer but a missing port adapter not everyone needs is deal breaker? I strongly believe you were never in the market for a Mac anyways, just using the opportunity to hate a bit.
Re:The new MacBook by burger_moon on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:32AM (#9177327)
I own a macbook right now (it's one of the best laptops I've owned) and I will use this one until it dies because I dislike what they are doing with the new one. If it stays this way, I will likely go back to a windows machine. I agree with the above comment. It's ridiculous. Actually it's not. It's pretty typical of Apple.
Re:The new MacBook by batiudrami on Monday March 09, 2015 @11:27PM (#9175831)
I'm surprised it isn't. My ASUS Ultrabook came with a USB-Ethernet and MiniDP-DVI adapters in the box, despite coming with the usual 2xUSB3, MiniDP & Micro HDMI ports.

Though I guess it's not that surprising. Back in the day, my Gen4 iPod came with a power brick, a USB cable and a Firewire cable. Now you get a single USB cable.

Re:The new MacBook by X-Istence on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @10:55AM (#9178003)
The iPhones at least -- haven't purchased an iPod in a long time -- still come with power bricks.
Re:The new MacBook by pbreit on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:40PM (#9173888)
With Bluetooth, the cloud and AirPlay, who even needs those ports? People are up in arms every time Apple changes/deletes ports and are almost always wrong.

Go ahead and stick with your thinkpad.

Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:56PM (#9174001)
Show up to give a presentation anywhere in the world. Standard plug-in? VGA. Maybe HDMI. You can't count on an AirPlay connection being present and I wouldn't want to rely on wireless video for important presentations with 20 seconds set up time anyway.
Re:The new MacBook by sswaner on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:48PM (#9174606)
That is an atypical scenario unless your job requires frequent presentation. Even then, you are used to having an adapter in your bag or pocket.

To me, this is a great tradeoff: I get a lighter and thinner laptop for 100% of my computing, the downside being an adapter when I return the the dark ages of VGA connectors.

In fact, for my MacBook Pro, I will have fewer connections. Instead of power and Thunderbolt, I will just get one of the connectors that bridges power, external monitor and USB peripherals and plug in a single thing when I "dock" my laptop.

I will take that any day over the awkward Dell and Thinkpad docking stations I see my coworkers use.

Re:The new MacBook by urda on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:46PM (#9175709)
> That is an a typical scenario unless your job requires frequent presentation.

I completely agree with this assessment. Even here on HN the majority of users are not giving presentations or even screen sharing. When it does matter, there is often a third party device they have to present from anway.

I'll take the adapter not being in the box, as for most users they won't be using it enough to warrant the extra cost.

Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @11:12PM (#9175786)
I agree completely. The top comment in this thread was about wireless connections making wired connections redundant. I want wired video output as I trust it more than wireless. VGA is an inelegant but working solution. Dongle is no problem.
Re:The new MacBook by gedejong on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:20PM (#9174175)
True, but since Macs have lost the ports, better venues are finally starting to cater to modern standards.

Personally, I think VGA is an abomination and people should react a bit stronger to be invited to a venue and having to deal with standards from 1987.

Re:The new MacBook by rythie on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:01PM (#9175273)
Your right, we have much better standard in HDMI, because every laptop has that now. Oh wait, except the Macbook Air which has display port. So HDMI and displayport, oh wait, USB type C. So that's it just three connections to replace VGA.

Oh, forgot about iPads, 2 different ones for that, and android phones at least 2 MHL connectors and whatever google does in their phones. We haven't even got onto mini and micro HDMI.

At least 10 different connectors on recent devices then? Don't you just love standards?

Re:The new MacBook by _nedR on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:45AM (#9176258)
I dunno. In my personal experience having worked with a lot of projectors, televisions, monitors I find HDMI to be an incredibly buggy experience. VGA always just works. The only problem of VGA (and other newer digital standards) when compared to HDMI is the lack of audio support, and also i guess VGA support is declining compared to HDMI.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:44PM (#9174362)
I think guests should graciously work with whatever hosts provide, as long as it works.
Re:The new MacBook by acveilleux on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:11PM (#9174752)
The thing is, it doesn't. It requires the device to be able to do a Digital to Analog conversion. In modern graphics chipsets, that capability is only needed for legacy compatibility with CRTs and old projectors. If you speak VGA to a projector or any flat panel monitor, you're really just feeding an Analog to Digital converter. It's nuts.
Re:The new MacBook by largote on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:00PM (#9175269)
VGA has lower quality at high resolutions than something like DVI, DisplayPort, or HDMI. Then again, if the place still has a VGA connector, it's unlikely the projector is high-resolution.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:00PM (#9175544)
Yes. So as a guest do you make the best of it or whine that there are better things available?
Re:The new MacBook by saraid216 on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:52AM (#9176096)
Being a good host is also kind of a thing, FYI, and part of that is going to the effort of making life nice for your guest.

If you're going to harp on hospitality, please remember it cuts both ways.

Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @02:50PM (#9179768)
This is the rudest politeness advice I've ever seen. Props!
Re:The new MacBook by integraton on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:17PM (#9174135)
That particular use case is apparently not expected by Apple to be a common use case for the target market of this particular device. Fortunately, other devices with different features focused on different usage patterns are available for purchase from Apple and other manufacturers. It's strange that this is at all controversial.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:22PM (#9174189)
On the contrary, it is totally expected. They sell a dongle with VGA out.
Re:The new MacBook by integraton on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:28PM (#9174239)
If it was expected to be a common use case, it would be included as a core feature. Furthermore, the number of people for whom "show[ing] up to give a presentation anywhere in the world" is a common use case is likely very small. I would go so far as to speculate that people in that category are greatly outnumbered by people across all demographics who use their laptops for sending emails, browsing the web, using productivity software, organizing media, and doing other software-centric tasks.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:11PM (#9175031)
Cars do not come with child seats included as a core feature. Would you say that transporting under-10s is not a common use case of a family car?
Re:The new MacBook by mintplant on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:53AM (#9176100)
> Furthermore, the number of people for whom "show[ing] up to give a presentation anywhere in the world" is a common use case is likely very small.

College students? It's always a big hassle finding a dongle whenever a MacBook user has to give a presentation in class.

Re:The new MacBook by arihant on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:08PM (#9174731)
Not to nitpick, but for a long time, to use a Mac with VGA you had to buy an adapter. Same for HDMI. There is a case that can be made on including this accessory in the box, but VGA cannot be part of that argument. Not for a Mac user.

Instead of buying mini DVI to VGA or Lightening to HDMI adapter, just buy this?

Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:03PM (#9175556)
You are not nitpicking something I am not arguing. I'm happy with a VGA dongle.
Re:The new MacBook by ceejayoz on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:07PM (#9174729)
Bring a ChromeCast. Plug it in to an HDMI point, bring a VGA-HDMI adapter, and it'll work fine on your own ad-hoc network.
Re:The new MacBook by sitkack on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:06PM (#9175308)
Idea. ChromeCast like device that can pump out HDMI, DVI, display port and VGA, attach to it over wifi, it has a fallback where it can run the presentation off an SD card while itself acts as a wifi base station. The ChromeCast of presentation hardware.
Re:The new MacBook by niels_olson on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:51PM (#9175217)
I almost thought this was an amazing idea. Except most places venues I'm in don't offer HDMI either.
Re:The new MacBook by rsynnott on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:12AM (#9177263)
So, er, carry a VGA dongle? I mean, most laptops don't have actual VGA ports these days.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @04:53PM (#9180547)
Yep, happy with that. I was responding to the parent comment that said roughly "with wireless everything, who needs wired ports?".

Wireless is usually OK in my living room but I would not count on wireless video working reliably in a conference room with 500 people on their laptop/phone. Shudder.

Re:The new MacBook by stouset on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:04PM (#9174042)
I have a YubiKey permanently occupying a USB port in my laptop for 2FA.
Re:The new MacBook by Zombieball on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:42PM (#9174347)
Whoa thanks for brining this to attention. I have this as well and didn't even think about it! I would need to carry an adapter with my YubiKey.
Re:The new MacBook by bronson on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:57PM (#9174655)
That doesn't sound very 2 factor.
Re:The new MacBook by moe on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:22PM (#9175077)
It may not be the purest usage mode but even a permanently inserted YubiKey protects you when your password got sniffed on the network or by a keylogger.

Moreover the YubiKey also acts as a PGP smartcard, giving you a private key (for e.g. SSH) that an attacker can't extract even if they obtain root on your laptop.

As much as I would like a "Retina MBA", the lack of a separate USB port is a dealbreaker for me too.

Re:The new MacBook by gcr on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:03PM (#9175285)
As long as the machine is on, can't the attacker ask the YubiKey to generate signatures on their behalf?

This is similar to standard SSH agent forwarding attacks. A sysadmin connects to a malicious server via SSH. If the sysadmin turns on agent forwarding, then "malicious root" can remotely ask the sysadmin's agent (running on the sysadmin's laptop) to authenticate to any other machine that accepts the sysadmin's public key. The malicious root can log in to any other server the sysadmin has access to, as long as the sysadmin still stays connected.

Re:The new MacBook by moe on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:41PM (#9175472)
As long as the machine is on, can't the attacker ask the YubiKey to generate signatures on their behalf?

For the 2FA OTP portion: No. The button needs to be physically touched.

For the PGP (ssh) portion: Yes. (but again, the attacker can not obtain a copy of the private key, that's the critical difference to your scenario)

That's why (at least for critical servers) you should combine the two. That way an attacker can at most piggyback your connections. He can not initiate his own because he can not touch the button.

Re:The new MacBook by falcolas on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:12PM (#9175330)
No, the yubikey can not be activated from the OS, just from the touch capacitive sensor embedded in it. It can be re-programmed, but I've not seen a way to trigger a generation, even from the re-programmer.

It's a slick device.

Re:The new MacBook by rconti on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:23PM (#9175085)
It's still something you have, even if it's glued into your USB port.
Re:The new MacBook by stouset on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:21PM (#9174799)
You have to physically touch the device in order for it to function.
Re:The new MacBook by acveilleux on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:13PM (#9174759)
If you chose to read an unspoken "while I use it" it's more logical and in some environment required.
Re:The new MacBook by ctdonath on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:00PM (#9175543)
In defense of the parent: Apple sells more than just the 12" MacBook, and if its specs aren't to your liking then you're not the intended demographic. Some people DO want an extremely thin/light Mac and don't need more than a charging cable & audio jack, enough people that Apple decided it was worth going to this extreme. Want more ports/power/etc? get a MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, or Mac Pro - each with a variety of configurations.
Re:The new MacBook by swang on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:12PM (#9174108)
Maybe it's just not set up correctly, but my company has airplay in every conference room and we very rarely use it because its so fickle whether or not it'll acknowledge your MacBook. Maybe Yosemite fixed these problems but that's just trading one set of bugs/problems for another.
Re:The new MacBook by chronolitus on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:52PM (#9173969)
Most people I know, many times.
Re:The new MacBook by untog on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @05:33AM (#9176795)
I'm still waiting for AirPlay to actually work in corporate environments. We have a mix of wired and wireless, which I believe live on different subnets. Bonjour just won't work with it.
Re:The new MacBook by kmfrk on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:14PM (#9178519)
Yeah, we have to rely on cables, when the wi-fi isn't fast enough to transmit the video - or whatever is causing the laggy video.
Re:The new MacBook by fsckin on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @10:05AM (#9177750)
Wide-area Bonjour and Bonjour forwarding are things. It works if your IT department cares to figure it out.
Re:The new MacBook by larzang on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:44PM (#9174363)
Yeah, who on earth uses headphones with a laptop. Crazy.
Re:The new MacBook by duskwuff on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:51PM (#9174420)
There's a headphone jack on the right hand side.
Re:The new MacBook by totalrobe on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:57PM (#9174012)
Gee, and if you're one of the <20% in the US with access to fiber, you can even upload to the cloud at greater than 10 Mbps
Re:The new MacBook by Joky on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:04PM (#9175561)
Then it would be sold $1480... At some point I had 5 Nokia phone and 4 Dell laptop ones, power adapter. Why having an adaptor for VGA/HDMI/DVI/Display Port/USB/Ethernet/... shipped with all machines when all users probably won't need all but just one. This is a waste...
Re:The new MacBook by username3 on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:19PM (#9175609)
Why have a power port on every adapter?
Re:The new MacBook by jmilloy on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:32AM (#9177334)
We're both getting downvoted for this. I'm not sure what we seem to be missing!
Re:The new MacBook by emehrkay on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:42PM (#9175164)
Didn't MacBooks come with those connectors before? It's like when iPods and iPhones used to come with the desktop stands

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7357/11147888116_9be011e0b1_n...

Re:The new MacBook by jmilloy on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:00PM (#9175265)
So they should increase the price of the laptop by $80 for everyone so that you don't feel nickel and dimed? Why do you care if your receipt has that $80 listed a separate item or not?
Re:The new MacBook by 0942v8653 on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:22PM (#9173741)
Think about it. Eighty dollars just to get less than you had before (with the 11-inch Air). And you're already paying the Apple tax, plus that ugly adapter defeats the purpose of the whole making-it-pretty thing. All in the pursuit of a few millimeters.
Re:The new MacBook by zanny on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:36PM (#9173850)
I easily expect monitors to start supporting Type C input, where they feed the host machine power and do USB passthrough to a classic USB interface hub with maybe a daisychained type C port on there as well.

Its temporary. In five years everything will have these ports and adapters will not be necessary. In the same way today you can get a DP to VGA adapter instead of having a bulky analog video output, even if it costs $15.

Re:The new MacBook by igrekel on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:44PM (#9174365)
Yes and yet I am still lugging adaptors - DP to VGA - DP to HDMI - DP to DVI Because I never know what I'll have when I present and you know what, I nearly always have to revert back to VGA, its not like HDMI is new !

I have a nice integrated laptop but I have all these parts around in my bag that I sometimes lose or forget connected to a projector somewhere. What may have seem like a simpler solution really wasn't in the end.

Re:The new MacBook by JBiserkov on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:00PM (#9174673)
The one video adapter to rule them all http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00NXDD5HQ/

Otherwise, completely agree - the current situation is messed up. Yet I'm glad Apple is leading the way, just like with SSDs.

Full disclosure: I don't own any Apple products or stock.

Re:The new MacBook by zanny on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:48PM (#9174608)
It isn't meant to be a simpler solution, but staying on analog video was never an answer. The only reason VGA projectors are still in use because they still work because we have all these passthrough options. Without them businesses would have replaced them as soon as VGA was going out of style, aka, 2002.
Re:The new MacBook by makomk on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:09PM (#9174733)
Replaced them with what? HDMI, which needs an adapter and can't be fed from VGA sources? DP/MiniDP, which again needs an adapter and can't be fed from VGA or HDMI sources? Maybe USB-C, which doesn't need an adapter if you bought an Apple laptop within the last few hours and don't need to put it on charge? (Otherwise it requires an adapter in order to interface with DisplayPort - but hey, at least it has that backwards compatibility!)

VGA's popular because it's the only option that actually works for everyone, and it's not for a lack of newer alternatives - in fact, the plethora of newer alternatives is the problem here.

Re:The new MacBook by veidr on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:19PM (#9175063)
I feel your pain because I also have to make presentations—and thus carry display adapters in my bag.

But the vast majority of people never have to make presentations or hook up to legacy projectors and monitors. So bulking up the machine itself to accommodate that does not really make sense.

Re:The new MacBook by wmoxam on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:21PM (#9174801)
Most people aren't travelling around presenting everywhere.

Having a ton of adapters seems to be required for that niche

Re:The new MacBook by gcr on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:06PM (#9175304)
That's what Apple said would happen for Thunderbolt.

I don't want to shell out another $900 monitor to replace my existing $900 monitor that adds no new features on top of what I had previously.

Re:The new MacBook by nfoz on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:29AM (#9176212)
"And you're already paying the Apple tax"

Can we stop with this meme? There's no tax. There's a price for a product. Buy it or don't. I have followed the laptop market quite closely for very many years and I'm consistently disappointed in my attempts to find non-Apple laptops that are of comparable quality and specs at similar price points. And let's stop pretending that "specs" are simply "cpu/ram/harddrive", as those are a small subset of the factors that matter to consumers.

Re:The new MacBook by buffportion on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:52PM (#9173973)
As someone who travels regularly for work, I am absolutely OK with Apple trimming as much as they can from their laptops.
Re:The new MacBook by cookiecaper on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:02PM (#9174693)
Next they should trim the keyboard, monitor, battery, touchpad, and everything else except the Apple logo, since that's really all that matters anyway. Then you'll be able to travel really light.

I am all for portability but there comes a point where you start trimming essential functions. I'm not saying every laptop needs to have a SCSI port, but ONE connector?! I thought Apple was bad before with two USB slots and mini-DP. My Thinkpad Yoga, which I bought specifically for portability, manages to have 2 USB connectors, HDMI, built-in SD card reader, and other useful peripherals onboard, and yes, I do actually use these.

I think MacBooks are cool but I always find myself unable to use them for serious work. If I was a casual computer user that just needed to update Facebook once in a while, they'd probably be fine, but every time I've tried something more serious than that with one, I've ended up on a non-Apple product because why torture myself over fashion?

Re:The new MacBook by titanomachy on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:18PM (#9175354)
> trim away the keyboard, monitor, battery, touchpad, and everything else except the Apple logo.

Hey, I have one of these... it's called an iPod shuffle.

Re:The new MacBook by moe on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:10AM (#9177247)
Hey, I have one of these... it's called an iPod shuffle.

Which curiously uses the headphone jack as an USB port[1].

Perhaps there's hope for someone to hack up at least an USB2.0 port on the MacBook using this method?

[1] http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/11/usb-ip...

Re:The new MacBook by aaronem on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:06PM (#9175301)
I suppose it depends on how you define "essential", or perhaps "serious work".

Granted, most of what I do with my MBP is modern full-stack stuff, which I gather doesn't qualify as "serious" even if it does make me a good living. But I don't see how the type and number of ports on my laptop would make much difference if I were, say, writing Linux kernel modules for hardware nobody uses, or building a window manager in Haskell, or whatever the current definition of "serious" is among those who put so much weight on the term. I need to plug in a real keyboard; all else is commentary. (And who does embedded away from home, anyway? There's too much you need besides the computer, unless you're targeting an emulator, in which case what need have you of physical ports?)

But, hey, it's always easier to feel superior than it is to see the other guy's point of view.

Re:The new MacBook by EdwardDiego on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:23PM (#9175379)
I have a wireless mouse that works via a USB dongle, and I use a USB headset for my Skype calls with my business team. I also charge my cellphone from a USB port, especially when travelling, as it's far more convenient to have one plug adaptor and my Macbook Pro power supply than carrying a plug adaptor and a multi-box everywhere.

At the moment, the two USB ports I have on my MBP are pretty much bare minimum but every now and then I find myself juggling peripherals.

Re:The new MacBook by aaronem on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:43PM (#9175482)
If that works for you, then great!

You might consider the same cheat I use for charging, which is to keep a small but reasonably capacious USB battery [1] in my bag, and top it up via USB whenever I happen to have a port free. Since it's specified to fully charge an iPad twice, it can charge my phone several times before running flat, and a fully powered USB port can charge the battery itself in a matter of a few hours -- an overnight charge is ample. (And, hey, the only thing I ever plug in my phone for anyway is power, so it's not like I'm losing anything by not plugging into a port on my laptop.)

Another trick worth considering is, instead of using a USB headset, instead to use one which connects via the headphone jack proper. Mine is a Sennheiser HD558 with an aftermarket cable incorporating an Apple-style mic/remote module, but you don't have to get that elaborate, especially since the HD558 isn't designed to travel and does not do so well; for simple VoIP purposes, anything halfway decent will do, and serve the purpose of freeing up a USB port for things that a headphone jack can't do.

[1] http://www.nothingbutsavings.com/Product/270265-APB27US-Targ...

Re:The new MacBook by cookiecaper on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @05:04AM (#9176731)
Why should one go to all this trouble just so he can use a Mac? There are many decent competitors out there that don't require these types of hacks (and for the record, I carry two USB batteries in my bag since there are occasions when I'm in the field for extended periods of time (24 hours+), but I certainly wouldn't be charitable to the idea of draining that backup power because Apple thought I needed to save 2mm of vertical space more than I needed the ability to transfer battery power from my laptop to my phone). That's the gist of the thing here. Apple people take using Apple products seriously and will go to lengths to make it work. Other people take their work seriously and will use the tool that best suits their needs. It's hard for me to imagine a MacBook ever best suiting the needs of a user that's more advanced than the casual Facebook browser just because so many sacrifices are made for aesthetics, and honestly even that market is a dubious target for the MacBook since the emergence of the tablet (for lighter casual users) and the ultrabook (for heavier casual users).

Do we care more about having the sexiest laptop in the airport or getting more productive time in? That's the dilemma one goes through when choosing PC v. Mac.

Re:The new MacBook by aaronem on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @07:56AM (#9177207)
Well, I'm not going to all that trouble specifically to use a Mac; both the headset and the USB battery long predate the MBP. (And USB headsets have never made much sense to me in the first place, regardless of the machine with which they're used.) These are just the expedients I currently use, of the sort which I've found all portable machines to require.

The sine qua non of a computer's usefulness to me is its ability to support Emacs. While my experience has been that, all else equal, any portable machine is inferior for this purpose to any desktop, I have yet to find a better portable Emacs machine than the 15" rMBP. When I do find one, I'll use it instead.

If your "all Apple users are fashion-obsessed lightweights" proposition is susceptible to the white raven's disproof, this should amply suffice. (When was the last time you ran across an Emacs user who was either "fashion-obsessed" or "lightweight"?) But I suspect you'll prefer to explain away a white raven, than to reconsider your apparent confusion of reality with an "I'm a Mac, I'm a PC" ad.

Re:The new MacBook by cookiecaper on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @05:00AM (#9176720)
When I sit down to work on a laptop, unless I'm just stopping to check something for a couple of minutes, I usually want to plug in at least my phone (since publicly-available WiFi is not really a thing, often I have to USB tether to get usable connectivity (I could wifi tether if I had to, but this kills the phone's battery)), mouse, headphones, and AC adapter. I'll pretty frequently want to use an external storage device like an SD card or USB hard disk and if I'm in a real office, I'll usually want to plug in to the physical network (even non-Apple portables don't include this port usually anymore, so that's another USB port occupied) and use an external keyboard.

That's just me. A few of those things could be transferred to wireless peripherals, but not all of them, and wireless peripherals usually suck pretty bad. I have a Bluetooth headset that I try to use in the field occasionally and it's a nightmare switching between A2DP and telephony modes. I could switch to a wireless mouse, but then that's batteries and many of these take up a USB port anyway with a proprietary dongle. I don't usually carry a full keyboard around with me so I just gotta use what they have in the office, which again, even if it's wireless, often occupies a USB port.

To me, this is serious. I don't think I'm doing anything super special; I'm definitely not writing custom firmware for esoteric embedded devices from Starbucks or anything like that. Just your everyday developer and sysadmin.

Now, if I put a lot of effort into it and decided I was going to live on a MBP and therefore needed to keep my usage restrained to one or two USB ports max, I may be able to come up with an arrangement that works, but it's by no means the default; I most recently tried to live off a MBP for 5 months in the first half of 2013, and it didn't work out (the lack of ports was a constant annoyance, but not the impetus behind the change). I swapped it for a Thinkpad and was much happier. I find this happens to me every time I try to live off an MBP. The most successful run I had was 2006-2008 where an MBP was my sole laptop and I did a lot of remote work, but it was not really pleasant and I had a desktop that I used to supplement.

To be clear, I have bought 3 Apple laptops over the years of my own free will and used a few more that were owned by employers. It's not that I hate them (in fact I continue to be astonished by Retina displays, which I was sure was just going to be hype before I saw it in person, and wish PC makers would catch up), but I just don't think they're good workhorse machines for people who do real work. I think they're mostly a fashion thing that people force themselves to live with. I'd love to have one around the house as a casual computing machine, but it's hard to justify dropping $2k for the setup, when again, there is real work that would be better served by the same investment going to actually useful equipment or to labor.

I just don't really see a reason to force myself to heed Apple's insistence that while I think I may want more than two ports, I really don't. Even the way I use Apple hardware usually pisses off Mac devotees -- back in 2006 I made some permanent enemies out of a few acquaintances that were stunned I would be voluntarily using Fedora on a MacBook Pro. They kept repeating that they'd totally understand if it was a PC, but if I had to use Linux on a Mac, I was most likely just a retard who couldn't grasp the beauty gifted to earth by Humanity's Eminent Genius Steve Jobs. They continued this hostility every other time I saw them. Pretty bizarre.

Re:The new MacBook by aaronem on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:09AM (#9177245)
When I sit down to work on a laptop, I want to open my laptop and start working. I don't even think about a charger until three or four hours have gone by. Your farrago of impedimenta is alien to me, but no doubt if I had something like it, the MBP's relative paucity of ports would annoy me, too.
Re:The new MacBook by bbatchelder on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @02:01AM (#9176296)
>If I was a casual computer user that just needed to update Facebook once in a while, they'd probably be fine

Congratulations, you've identified the target market for the new MacBook.

Re:The new MacBook by cookiecaper on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @04:42AM (#9176677)
I'm not so sure. I find most such persons will put some money into a phone or tablet, but if they have a laptop, they usually buy a cheap one from Wal-Mart for under $300.

As far as I can tell, the market for Apple's laptops are normal hipsters, hipster devs that can't stop talking about how you can build a blog in only two hours with Ruby on Rails, video and photo editors clinging to the meme from the 80s that editing software is somehow superior on a Mac, and college students that don't want the embarrassment of using an "old person's computer".

Re:The new MacBook by Robadob on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @05:57AM (#9176863)
Yeah, my first though was that this is basically a chromebook.
Re:The new MacBook by lazyjones on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:34PM (#9173841)
> Think about it. Eighty dollars just to get less than you had before (with the 11-inch Air)

or: $70-odd additional margin for Apple that people will be happy to pay once they notice they need it regularly. Clever.

Re:The new MacBook by mseebach on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:32AM (#9177329)
But no Thunderbolt to USB-C. So those sexy $1000 displays you just got because Thunderbolt is the new black and integrated seamlessly with your MacBooks? GFYS, they're deprecated, no more Thunderbolt. Two years is a long time for a Retina 27" monitor anyway, time to upgrade.
Re:The new MacBook by Someone1234 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:54PM (#9173518)
Thanks for posting that. I think when the rumour was spreading about USB-C/loss of Magsafe everyone was asking if Apple was going to do something like that, or even if it was feasible to both charge AND provide back out USB/Mini-Displayport ports.

I hope IFixIt guys takes those things apart, I bet they have their own little OS and processor just like we've seen in previous Apple "adapters."

Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:01PM (#9173584)
The VGA one has to have something special for sure. The Type-C connector doesn't do analog video at all.
Re:The new MacBook by api on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:15PM (#9173682)
Even for mini display port these have a chip inside that actually does the VGA modulation. It's not a big deal.
Re:The new MacBook by stcredzero on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:12PM (#9173652)
That's fine for portability...except that it's a whopping $79.

What we also want is a hub into which we can plug our monitors and additional storage. For desktop use, this should have a longer cord, of course. (There are such hubs for USB 3, which can already be bought for ~$79 t0 ~$250 depending on what you want out of video compatibility.

Re:The new MacBook by drinchev on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:56PM (#9173542)
One more thing to carry in the bag I guess.
Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:20PM (#9173725)
Neat tidbit, Type-C connectors also support analog audio mode. In this mode it can do stereo audio out, mic in, and 5V@500mA power in. Obviously the chipset would have to support this, but the connector spec allows it in any case.
Re:The new MacBook by JBiserkov on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:04PM (#9174704)
Indeed. Yet video output is limited at 1/4 4k a.k.a. FullHD/1080p which is ridiculous in this day and age.
Re:The new MacBook by joshvm on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:11PM (#9173179)
It also looks like (finally) the complete modularisation of the power supply. You should be able to have a localised wall cable, power brick and separate USB cable to the computer. In principle this should mean an end to ridiculously overpriced power supplies (currently north of £60). It's even more galling given that they realised the cables were so poorly made that US customers have a special return program for fraying while the rest of the world doesn't - hooray for litigation culture?

The new 29W brick currently costs £40 and the 2m USB-C cable £25. Typically it's not the brick that fails, it's the poor strain relief on the laptop cable. Being able to replace just the cable with (probably) an aftermarket product is a massive step up.

Re:The new MacBook by scandinavian on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @05:26AM (#9176779)
£25 for a 2m cable is ridiculous.
Re:The new MacBook by cheald on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:24PM (#9173753)
As a guy with small children, the loss of MagSafe is actually a huge downgrade for me. The number of times MagSafe has saved my laptop and/or power cable from damage after a child blitzed through the living room and tripped over the power cable is not insignificant.
Re:The new MacBook by shirro on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:55PM (#9173998)
Before I got a Mac my first child knocked my old laptop over and the power cord ripped the power socket apart. I will not buy anything other than a child proof power connector. Sadly, nobody makes a serviceable laptop with one with easily replaceable/upgradeable battery, RAM and HDD anymore so I am using my old MBP until it dies.

I understand there is a market for these paper thin, disposable machines but Apple has lost the sensible buyer who wants a solid upgradable dev machine.

Re:The new MacBook by dredmorbius on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @11:43AM (#9178315)
Seems that an aftermarket adapter incorporating a MagSafe-like feature should work:

    ===<cord>==E |magsafe| =E laptop
You're moving the disconnect point outside the laptop, but (in theory) could provide the capability to _any_ device.
Re:The new MacBook by _xander on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @02:29PM (#9185820)
That's a good idea but I think MagSafe is patent protected so it'd have to be 1st party.
Re:The new MacBook by dredmorbius on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @04:12PM (#9186824)
Depends on the specifics of the patent.
Re:The new MacBook by gcr on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:16PM (#9175346)
Lenovo makes (well, made) a Thinkpad t430u, an ultrabook with a detatchable plate on the bottom. I think you can remove the battery, HD, and RAM. It opens with a latch -- no screws needed.

Video (sorry for linking to a Lenovo advertisement): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTZ7u5YNXV0&t=60

Re:The new MacBook by sandGorgon on Monday March 09, 2015 @11:28PM (#9175838)
Thinkpad - I have a T430S (runs about 350$ aftermarket now). Upgradable CPU, RAM, HDD (I run SSD+HDD.. and still have space for an M2 SSD).

Great build, keyboard that perhaps beats the macbook

Re:The new MacBook by hcayless on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:54PM (#9173989)
Yeah, no kidding. And not just children. I've had adults walk through it too. I hope this doesn't ever make it to the pro line. It's fine I suppose if you really only plug the device in to charge it once a day, like a phone, but I don't expect the battery to last all day if I'm doing really processor-intensive things, which I often do.
Re:The new MacBook by dzhiurgis on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:37PM (#9174550)
Don't expect to do anything processor-intensive on that fanless Mac.
Re:The new MacBook by bsilvereagle on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:51PM (#9174945)
I thought this was really odd. A lot of engineering went into getting 30% more battery storage inside the laptop, but then you trap all the heat in there! You'll easily lose that 30% extra storage to loss of battery performance due to the latent heat.
Re:The new MacBook by gcr on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:18PM (#9175350)
On the flip side, I understand this processor has a slower clock speed than any other hardware that Apple currently offers. Perhaps that explains both design decisions? Hopefully it balances out.
Re:The new MacBook by foz on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:00PM (#9174500)
Maybe at 2 pounds, the laptop is so light that maybe magsafe is not effective any more.
Re:The new MacBook by gcr on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:18PM (#9175355)
There are also no moving parts on this machine.

No spinning rust hard disk, no fan.

I bet it could take a lick or two. Can't speak for the plastic or the glass screen though.

Re:The new MacBook by yaeger on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @04:23AM (#9176608)
I have doubts about that. Sure, you possibly could drag the laptop by the MagSafe without it disconnecting if you drag carefully. But I feel like when you really yank on it, like you would when tripping over the cord, that even a 2 pound laptop would disconnect from the MagSafe without flying off the table.
Re:The new MacBook by rconti on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:21PM (#9175069)
Possibly. I think this is why they switched from the angled magsafe to the straight-on magsafe2. My Air took a flying leap off the kitchen table because the combination of angled magsafe and light weight meant it wouldn't disconnect.

Fortunately, the thing was closed, landed on the lid, bounced off the hardwood floor, did a flip, and was no worse for the wear. If it had been onto concrete or tile, or the lid had been open, it probably would have turned out worse.

My 2012 MBP retina has this infernal magsafe2 connector that disconnects every time I try to use it on my lap, but at least it'll disconnect if you trip on the cord. Or if you try to use one of the 5 magsafe1->magsafe2 adapters I've bought that consistently fail after a few months.

Re:The new MacBook by safepants on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:32PM (#9173821)
i think the idea is not to have it plugged in to power while using it, only charge overnight
Re:The new MacBook by cheald on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:46PM (#9173931)
That's a fine intention, but I sometimes like to compile code or use Chrome.
Re:The new MacBook by jbrooksuk on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:53PM (#9174638)
I don't think that you're the target audience - along with the majority of us here.
Re:The new MacBook by gurkendoktor on Monday March 09, 2015 @11:31PM (#9175845)
Then who is the target audience? Casual Facebook users will probably install Flash the moment they unbox the machine.
Re:The new MacBook by adamlett on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @04:37AM (#9183129)
Students and teachers are the target audience. Salespeople are. Business people are. These people all have serious computing needs that are better met by an ultraportable device with long battery life than by anything that has more horsepower or more ports.

Casual Facebook users are not a target audience for anything, because almost everybody is a casual facebook user, including people who do 3D animation or need to compile huge codebases.

Re:The new MacBook by gurkendoktor on Thursday March 12, 2015 @11:03PM (#9195482)
The grandparent post was talking about all-day battery life, not about horsepower or ports.

But I don't see that being realistic, yet, because (a) the new MacBook has less battery life than the 13" Air, (b) OS X is messier than iOS (system daemons love to run at 100% CPU once in a while), (c) as you said, almost everyone is a casual Facebook user and runs terrible crap like Flash. (iOS is at an advantage here again)

But yeah, it is a great device for people who only open their laptops occasionally and can recharge at night.

Re:The new MacBook by nostrademons on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:32PM (#9174856)
This seems to be true, but then I wonder who they expect to develop the software for their target audience?
Re:The new MacBook by brorfred on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:04PM (#9175002)
People that buy Macbook Pro's?
Re:The new MacBook by kalleboo on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:17AM (#9175992)
Web developers
Re:The new MacBook by jbrooksuk on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @09:24AM (#9177552)
I'm a web developer and I can say that the new MacBook doesn't make me want to buy it because:

1. 12" is a weird size for me. I'd prefer 15" Pro edition.

2. One connector isn't enough, even with the adapter, I'd need more.

Re:The new MacBook by jordanthoms on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:19AM (#9176000)
Well it's possible that one of these days Google will fix the huge battery drain Chrome causes on OSX.....
Re:The new MacBook by rosser on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:47PM (#9173945)
With the limited number of charge-discharge cycles that even LiPo batteries have (typically estimated at ~500), that means you'd be replacing the machine within its depreciation lifetime if you fully — or even mostly — discharged it daily.

Oh, wait. That benefits Apple, too...

Re:The new MacBook by rayiner on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:02PM (#9174691)
Macbook batteries are rated at 80% after 1,000 cycles. And battery replacement on an MBA is a $129 ($199 for an MBP) service that they can do at the Apple Store while you wait. Lenovo wants $139 for a replacement battery for a T4xx of similar capacity.
Re:The new MacBook by gambiting on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @06:38AM (#9176977)
I don't understand the problem, really. Apple WILL replace your battery. It's not like you have to throw away the laptop once the battery is dead. It costs £99 in the Apple Store, which is actually less money than a new battery for some Dell laptops costs.
Re:The new MacBook by bluedino on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:21PM (#9174179)
Did Apple change from 80% battery life after 1000 cycles?
Re:The new MacBook by rosser on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:41PM (#9174336)
I'm seeing reports of Apple laptop batteries barely lasting an hour after 400 cycles, having 75% of their rated capacity after 900, and having 50% after 1100.

I think usage pattern probably matters far more than the strict cycle count. Specifically, "all-day" usage appears to correlate strongly with battery capacity falling off more sharply as cycle count increases — admittedly, based on user-reported behavior that I could find on the web with as much time as I can spare this afternoon to faff about on the matter.

Re:The new MacBook by 13 on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:55PM (#9174454)
They're not that bad in my experience. I'm at 1476 cycles and still have 87% of my capacity remaining.
Re:The new MacBook by makomk on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:14PM (#9174761)
Yeah, the number of charge cycles you get out of lithium ion batteries is known to be affected by how deeply you discharge them.
Re:The new MacBook by PhasmaFelis on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:13PM (#9172639)
My only regret is that MagSafe is actually really cool.

I think I'd have to say it's worth it for full standards-compliance, though.

Re:The new MacBook by dntrkv on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:37PM (#9172839)
Same here. I always considered MagSafe as one of the coolest things about the MacBooks. Sad to see it go.
Re:The new MacBook by jedisct1 on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:54PM (#9173032)
Number of times I tripped over the cord and the Magsafe connector saved my laptop: countless.
Re:The new MacBook by ja27 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:03PM (#9173119)
I still haven't tripped over my Magsafe cord, but I love being able to wave the cord in the general location of the port and see it snap into place.
Re:The new MacBook by TazeTSchnitzel on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:13PM (#9173192)
It's incredibly satisfying having it click in.
Re:The new MacBook by trose on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:18PM (#9173710)
I also like just being able to grab my laptop and flick the connector off really quick.
Re:The new MacBook by tibbon on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:11PM (#9173175)
Seriously. My cats are assholes and the Magsafe helped so much.

I even have one installed in my motorcycle trunk for on-the-road charging. No worries about it damaging the machine.

Re:The new MacBook by freehunter on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:30PM (#9173337)
I mean there's nothing saying you can't have a break-away cable even now. Look at the Xbox, the controllers are USB and they break near the system if the cable is tripped on. It's perfectly possible to have USB type C and MagSafe at the same time.
Re:The new MacBook by derefr on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:15PM (#9173677)
In fact, you could probably have a USB-C-to-MagSafe-to-USB-C adapter. Knock your laptop and the cable comes loose, with the adapter left plugged into the port.
Re:The new MacBook by cweiss on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:02PM (#9174516)
Kickstarter, anyone?
Re:The new MacBook by baddox on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:39PM (#9173879)
There's nothing saying you can't have a breakaway cable, but the cable it comes with does not appear to break away.
Re:The new MacBook by aguywithamum on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:19PM (#9173715)
Exactly this. I love being able to use a plug that is near a well traveled area and have no worries about my computer if people trip over it.
Re:The new MacBook by jowiar on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:31PM (#9172798)
Battery life is long enough such that MagSafe isn't as necessary as it used to be. Back when you had to haul your power cord to meetings, coffeeshops, and the like, cord tripping was a serious problem. Now? Far less so.
Re:The new MacBook by Xylakant on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:47PM (#9172940)
Have kids and/or pets run around in the same area where your computer is plugged in. Sooner or later one is going to tear on the cord - heck, even I do manage from time to time. And the connector looks so flimsy I'm afraid one time is all it's going to take. Nah, macsafe was the best invention ever in terms of charging.
Re:The new MacBook by chockablock on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:11PM (#9173180)
parent's point is that your laptop now spends far less time plugged in during use.

I bet consumer behavior has changed, and that laptops with 10+hr battery life probably get charged more like phones: overnight and in a safe location.

Re:The new MacBook by Xylakant on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:17PM (#9173227)
so I have a reduced chance of incident occurrence, but if it does, it's probably fatal vs. a high chance of non-fatal incident. Bad trade if you ask me.
Re:The new MacBook by _delirium on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:28PM (#9174835)
Judging by the coffee shop I'm in at the moment where about 1/3 of people have their machines plugged in, I don't think plugs are dead yet (not to mention at home or in offices, of course). Part of the problem is that the battery life is not yet at the level of phones. My 11" 2015 Macbook Air advertises a battery life of "up to" 9 hours web-browsing or 10 watching videos, but in practice I've found it closer to 6-7 while working actively, if I've got several apps open, wifi on, and screen brightness up. Maybe switching from Firefox to Safari would help, dunno (but I'm pretty tied to Firefox at the moment). I can get 10+ hrs on planes, but there I have the screen brightness turned down, wifi off, and am mostly working in a terminal vim.
Re:The new MacBook by cweiss on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:09PM (#9174529)
Counter-point: As not-the-primary-computer, my MBA is plugged in 80% of the time and gets moved from place to place as my crowded workspace dictates. I can't count the number of times I've accidentally yanked the Magsafe connector out trying to move it just out of cable reach because I needed to get at something underneath.

Granted, a lot of that is learned behavior because I know I can yank the Magsafe out without incurring a $500 repair.

Re:The new MacBook by yborg on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:41PM (#9173426)
I leave my laptop on the charger as much as possible to avoid cycles on the batteries. And even if the charger is connected for 5 minutes the possibility of it getting yanked out is present. The lighter the attached platform is the worse the risk, since without the breakaway connector you can yank the whole laptop onto the floor.
Re:The new MacBook by noobiemcfoob on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:13PM (#9173194)
Couldn't you simply build an adapter to get that magnetic ability? I'm envisioning a standard connector to laptop, bit of cord, proprietary connector with built-in magnetics but maintaing USB 3.1 compliance out to a female USB-C connector.

If USB-C becomes the go-to port for charging, I can't imagine something like this not being far behind.

Re:The new MacBook by svckr on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:17PM (#9174783)
Considering the new MacBook is just 2 pounds, I guess they'd have to put a really weak magnet in there to actually keep your Mac safe. I assume the threshold where the plug should "let go" is pretty close to the force required to keep the cable plugged during regular use.

Related: Can you still open the lid with one finger without lifting the bottom case up with it?

Re:The new MacBook by DannyBee on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:48PM (#9172437)
I'm glad apple picked this up after so many others pushed it forward :)

But 1 port is sad, because now you have to choose between a lot of things (charging, using hdmi, whatever)

Re:The new MacBook by mrb on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:26PM (#9172742)
"But 1 port is sad, because now you have to choose between a lot of things (charging, using hdmi, whatever)"

No, USB Type-C allows multiple concurrent uses, such as: charging and using HDMI at the same time. See http://www.anandtech.com/show/8518/hands-on-with-usb-type-c-... : "This opens up the possibility for a dock scenario where a single cable to the monitor can charge a laptop and also mirror the laptop's display onto the external monitor, and the external monitor would also be able to serve as a USB hub for a keyboard, mouse, headsets, flash drives, and other USB peripherals."

Edit: @rakoo: I agree that in scenarios where you do not have a hub, it is annoying to have only 1 port. Even if the power brick integrates a USB hub it would be weird to have to plug a USB drive in the brick... I guess this opens a market opportunity: sell a tiny USB hub with 3 ports (type-C power in, type-C power out, type-A generic port) that is meant to be left almost permanently attached to the laptop or to the end of the power cord.

Re:The new MacBook by zaroth on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:30PM (#9172783)
Theoretically, yes. But I'm not obsoleting my new 4K 60" screen to add a port. So if I want to output display to a monitor/projector and I'm low on battery, I better have a powered USB hub handy...

It may come with a 1-port USB plus power adapter in place of the standard power cable though?

Re:The new MacBook by radicalbyte on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:10PM (#9173173)
On my desk I have two monitors, keyboard, mouse, microphone, webcam, laptop and an Antec USB charger which charges my phone, bluetooth headset, kindle and vita.

My laptop is connected to the power via magsafe and the monitors with HDMI and USB. Keyboard/mouse/webcam/microphone are connected to the monitors.

With the new USB-C plug I guess I'll be able to buy the hypothetical Antec "Super USB Charging Media Hub", which all my devices connect to. My laptop then only needs to plug into one thing.

I would really like PC manufacturers to standardize on this; it would make using laptops as nice as using non-Apple telephones/tablets/ereaders is now.

The decision to not include a single USB port is of course mind-boggling, especially given Apple's market. How are you supposed to share large files? No USB drives, no memory cards etc on the go.

Re:The new MacBook by chrishas35 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:31PM (#9173345)
With all of those peripherals, I think it's clear you're not the intended market for this specific device and its single port strategy.
Re:The new MacBook by masklinn on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:22PM (#9173738)
I'd think the opposite since his peripherals are fixed: type C is the logical extension of the thunderbolt display, with a single cable end to plug in when you reach your desk with your laptop.

I'm in a somewhat similar situation, when I reach home I plug in power, network, external display and USB devices, but these things don't move with me, they're fixed desk accessories. I've got a separate set of them at work.

Re:The new MacBook by mirkules on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:22PM (#9173269)
With regards to sharing of files: it's a natural progression for Apple. They are moving everything to iCloud. In Mavericks, for example, they disabled syncing of notes/calendar/address book through the cable with iTunes. It feels like this is just one step further.

Needless to say, I'm not very happy about no USB just as I wasn't happy about syncing.

Re:The new MacBook by doodpants on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:21PM (#9173730)
> In Mavericks, for example, they disabled syncing of notes/calendar/address book through the cable with iTunes.

They eventually released an update that re-enabled it, and it still works in Yosemite.

Re:The new MacBook by mirkules on Sunday March 15, 2015 @04:46PM (#9208050)
Hey thanks for this. I tested it out on Mavericks, and the only thing that doesn't sync anymore is the notes. Maybe I just can't find the setting in iTunes to sync that as well...
Re:The new MacBook by exprL on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:38PM (#9172847)
Having a powered USB hub doesn't seem like a stretch next to a 60" monitor. It's not like the latter is very portable.

edit: vocabulary

Re:The new MacBook by rakoo on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:44PM (#9172906)
Yes, but how do you plug your new USB key and your charger at the same time ? The only solution is to bring a hub with you everywhere.
Re:The new MacBook by cjensen on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:54PM (#9173028)
I expect the charger will be a USB hub.
Re:The new MacBook by madeofpalk on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:09PM (#9173168)
It's not.

If you need expansibility and are running a large external monitor, that sounds pretty 'professional' to me.

Re:The new MacBook by biafra on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:20PM (#9173248)
Currently Apple offers these two:

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1K2AM/A/usb-c-digital-av...

and

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1L2AM/A/usb-c-vga-multip...

Unfortunately both only have 1080p HD. Let's hope there will be a (mini-)DVI version with a higher resolution soon.

Re:The new MacBook by zaroth on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:53PM (#9173983)
Thanks for the links! Both of those are quite 'ewww' of course.

So we have the "USB-C Charge Cable" $29 (http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJWT2AM/A/usb-c-charge-cab...) -- I wonder if that is proprietary or if any cable would work. Then there's the "USB-C Power Adapter" $49 (http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ262LL/A/apple-29w-usb-c-...).

Too bad they can't fit 29W into the smaller cube form factor which charges my phone. That would be incredible powering a laptop off of that.

Someone needs to create a much sleeker implementaion of a in-line 1-port hub. So basically something that looks like USB-C on both ends, but 4" from one side of the cable there's a quarter-sized circle of hard plastic that has the USB-C cable going through it, with another USB-C port available on the side.

I hope we will see USB-C to HDMI and USB-C to DisplayPort "cables" which are not big fat massive dongles but really function more like just a cable.

Re:The new MacBook by thrownaway2424 on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:45PM (#9173930)
Re:The new MacBook by madeofpalk on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:09PM (#9173158)
It's not.
Re:The new MacBook by ghostly_s on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:04PM (#9173121)
surprised this wasn't addressed in the keynote. I can see a lot of clever Apple-y solutions to this problem.
Re:The new MacBook by moe on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:00PM (#9174674)
surprised this wasn't addressed in the keynote. I can see a lot of clever Apple-y solutions to this problem.

It wasn't addressed because Apple offers no solution (yet?).

Re:The new MacBook by integraton on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:01PM (#9173585)
Not every device needs to fill every use case. Apple apparently has reason to believe that use cases that require simultaneously using the port for multiple purposes are rare enough among potential users of the MacBook that they don't need to support those use cases. If this particular product doesn't provide all of the features you need, there are other products available from Apple and other manufacturers with additional features.
Re:The new MacBook by masklinn on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:25PM (#9173762)
They're supported actually, Type C allows hubs and chaining, and Apple already has two splitters (HDMI/Type C/Type A and VGA/Type C/Type A) for sale.

They're way too expensive ($80), but give Type C is a standard port I expect Amazon Essentials or Monoprice will fix that pretty soon.

Re:The new MacBook by gergles on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:57PM (#9175247)
And I expect Apple will make sure those don't work, just like they did with generic Lightning cables.
Re:The new MacBook by kalleboo on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:22AM (#9176008)
They couldn't use the USB trademark if they broke compatibility with other USB-certified products.

They own Lightning themselves so they can do whatever they want there.

Re:The new MacBook by rakoo on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @06:11PM (#9187759)
I completely agree that my needs may not be the needs of everyone and actually, when we're talking about Apple, they tend to be changing ways of usage rather than following them.

Another perspective I've seen recently about this is that this new Macbook will probably make people change their habit towards something traditionally only for smartphones: you'll see people keep their computer untethered for the larger part of the day, and only plug it for energy during the night. So, basically, mobile first instead of plugged first. You then have a port constantly available for whatever you want to plug on the go.

Re:The new MacBook by whyenot on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:33AM (#9176228)
The only solution? Couldn't you buy a bluetooth keyboard?
Re:The new MacBook by rakoo on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @06:12PM (#9187766)
A bluetooth keyboard doesn't solve the problem of needing to plug the computer to a charger while using a USB key.
Re:The new MacBook by bane on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:56PM (#9172504)
It just means we're going to stay stuck in dongle hell.

When I'm on the road the minimalism of a Mac is nice, but at my desk, hooked up to everything I really need for heavy work, my desktop is a cluster-f of cables and adapters and wires.

Re:The new MacBook by bryanlarsen on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:12PM (#9172629)
This seems like the fix for dongle hell to me. You plug everything into your monitor, tucking your cables away nicely, and then you have a single cable going from your monitor into your laptop.
Re:The new MacBook by bduerst on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:13PM (#9174113)
Most monitors do this now with a USB hub, except you have two cables (video and usb).

Too bad USB-C didn't also do microphone in.

Re:The new MacBook by bronson on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:01PM (#9174683)
Re:The new MacBook by eropple on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:58PM (#9174975)
Small sample size and all, but I find USB microphones to be rather susceptible to electrical noise from stuff like USB hubs. I have to plug them directly into my machines to get a clean signal.
Re:The new MacBook by cdcarter on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:10PM (#9175022)
Probably better to use a USB microphone instead of integrated sound card A/D anyway...
Re:The new MacBook by mmastrac on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:04PM (#9172558)
To be fair, it's at least a single standard dongle hell. And now with USB-C you can have thunderbolt-style docks that give you a near-universal docking experience (ie: DVI/HDMI/dozens of USB ports/DVD drive/power) with a single cable when you're at your desk.
Re:The new MacBook by Someone1234 on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:02PM (#9173591)
I agree, that is the theory. However we might be at least a year from such hubs being affordable.

I guess what I am saying is, I wouldn't want to be queued outside the Apple store for one of these. The supporting accessories aren't there yet (yes, even with Apple's two hubs/adapters).

However when they do the refresh on this line, one or two years from now, the supporting hubs, wires, and so on will be available and it will be a very fun experience.

Re:The new MacBook by greggman on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:08PM (#9172587)
Isn't it only dongle hell for a few years? Theoretically monitors, printers, hard drives, etc will all have USB-C connectors as well at some point.
Re:The new MacBook by xanderstrike on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#9173550)
What does the USB-C equivalent of this [1] look like on a laptop with only one port? Apple basically killed the always-plugged-in peripheral with this revision, there's no way you could create something small enough that it wouldn't break in a bag that still provided pass-through for charging or other devices.

Do all monitors/printers/hard drives/etc provide pass through so you can charge? Or do you have to unplug your laptop from the power to get to your hard drive if you lose your dongle?

Not to mention the fact that every single mac apple peripheral you've ever owned is now worthless.

If they threw USB-C on as the charger alongside a USB and Thunderbolt I'd be stoked that mac is embracing new technology. If they put two or three USB-C ports and nothing else I'd be impressed with their commitment. With just one port, I'm left wondering what the hell they're thinking people use their laptops for.

[1] http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA2TY1K447...

Re:The new MacBook by jakobegger on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:25PM (#9173761)
I'm not sure why you'd want to use such a wireless mouse receiver with a computer that has bluetooth built in?

Also, I haven't plugged in a printer in years. Many printers have Wifi built in, and if not, you can always attach it to an Airport base station.

External storage? Use Apple's Time Capsule or any other NAS to back up your data wirelessly.

I've even seen companies use Apple TVs connected to a projector for wireless presentations.

Sure, a USB thumb drive is invaluable when you need to copy some files to your uncles 10 year old laptop with broken wifi; but you can get pretty far without wires if you want.

Re:The new MacBook by raisedbyninjas on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:42PM (#9173903)
About 70% of the wireless mice on Newegg are not bluetooth mice. Non-bluetooth mice can have longer range or less lag for example.
Re:The new MacBook by lbearl on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:33PM (#9172809)
So we are basically back to the old days of Daisy-chaining SCSI devices?
Re:The new MacBook by tomjen3 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:00PM (#9173093)
No, since they can all be connected to a single hub. This is way better than now, where you need one power cable, one, keyboard cable, etc.
Re:The new MacBook by zkhalique on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:48PM (#9172954)
What's wrong with USB hubs?
Re:The new MacBook by Someone1234 on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:07PM (#9173614)
Want a legit answer? They lack power isolation. I had a device surge/short while attached to a USB hub (it was a branded one), and everything else attached died: Keyboard, Mouse, motherboard, and a phone.

This was back pre-USB 3, and the power limit of USB has only increased since then (USB 3, USB-C, etc). This means the wires get hotter, the hub gets hotter, and any short/surge will have an even more dramatic effect (e.g. fire?).

Honestly USB hubs should be up to the same spec as a surge-protector/multi-tap, but they aren't, even though they carry enough electricity to kill someone.

Re:The new MacBook by zkhalique on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:38PM (#9174562)
Re:The new MacBook by lbearl on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:19PM (#9173240)
Nothing is wrong with hubs, but now there is yet one more thing you have to have available (at least until they become more prolific in external devices)
Re:The new MacBook by sgt101 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:49PM (#9173490)
No, we will have wi-gig devices, most things will talk wirelessly.
Re:The new MacBook by archagon on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:39PM (#9172859)
I'm concerned about the feasibility of USB-powered hard drives with this setup. On my Macbook Pro, if I plug more than one of them into a hub (as opposed to separate USB ports), they start flaking out on account of lack of power, even if the hub is powered.
Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:24PM (#9173284)
Well, if the hub has enough power, supports USB-PD, and the drive supports USB-PD, then it should be able to draw up to 100W of power.
Re:The new MacBook by X-Istence on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:25PM (#9173303)
Then your hub is not doing a good job of providing the 500 mA that it supposed to give to devices, or your USB powered hard drive actually requires more than 500 mA to do its thing.
Re:The new MacBook by archagon on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:44PM (#9173451)
I believe my drives use 500mA each for power.
Re:The new MacBook by X-Istence on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:48PM (#9175195)
Make sure the power brick that your powered hub came with is capable of powering the N+ devices you have at the same time. Most of the 4 port hubs come with 2A power supplies, however sometimes they skimp on actually being able to deliver that power.
Re:The new MacBook by jedrek on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:48PM (#9173482)
Apple laptops have been limited by a lack of docking ports, which is my favorite use case for having a work and home workstation. Now, instead of hooking up a power cable, monitor cable and USB hub, you slide one connector in. How is that bad?
Re:The new MacBook by drinchev on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:04PM (#9173601)
It would not be bad, but the adapter that gives me two ports will be a part of my trip.

At airports for example I'm carrying only my MacBook and usually put in there charger and the my phone, now I have to also carry an adapter to do that.

Re:The new MacBook by renaudg on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:53PM (#9174437)
Well with the Thunderbolt Display or various other Thunderbolt docking stations, 2 cables to the Macbook already was a reality
Re:The new MacBook by teacup50 on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:46PM (#9172924)
Sounds like what you want is a ... Desktop Computer.
Re:The new MacBook by tstrimple on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:05PM (#9173126)
You mean that portable USB hard drives should be used with desktop computers, not portable laptops?
Re:The new MacBook by integraton on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:10PM (#9173642)
In the current era of ubiquitous saas/cloud services, abstracted file systems, multiple device types, large internal storage options, dropbox, box, drive, and icloud, there are many, many people who haven't used a USB drive in years (or ever) and have no use for one.
Re:The new MacBook by danudey on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:07PM (#9173146)
This is one of the great things about buying an Apple Cinema Display. My Displayport model provides audio/video over one cable, camera/microphone over another, and a third MagSafe connector. The Thunderbolt design allows for audio/video/camera/microphone/ethernet/firewire/even more thunderbolt, plus a magsafe connector.

I think we'll see a lot of small USB hubs with a USB-C connector to your laptop and all your USB/audio/Displayport/ethernet out, so that getting back to your desk is one cable to plug in and not a half-dozen.

Re:The new MacBook by larrys on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:01PM (#9173104)
Other than cost (which is certainly a factor) I guess I've never understood why people schlep around a laptop and use the same laptop for their desktop by plugging in cables. I know people do this who could easily afford an additional more powerful desktop.

I use a MacPro driving 3 27' displays and also have a few portables as well. It's just a matter of synching info. I can't imagine having to deal with hooking up a portable.

Re:The new MacBook by egypturnash on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:01PM (#9173582)
Some of us like to own as few things as possible.

Plugging my 2013 Air into my desk when I come home isn't a big hassle - I plug in the speaker cable, the power cable, the video cable, and the USB hub. It takes me ten seconds[1] to do unless one of the cables falls; they're normally sitting right where I put the Mac. It sits on a lower shelf and runs closed; there's a Bluetooth keyboard and a Wacom tablet on my desk. (I'm an artist.)

It'd be nice to have the single connector I guess. Once I got an adapter[2] and plugged everything into that I'd save all of, I dunno, five seconds?

I'm also not driving three displays. I have never liked multiple displays. They don't work well with a Wacom tablet, and I go crazy from constantly seeing slight color differences; when I'm at a cafe, I use the laptop screen; when I'm at home, I use the external monitor.

Now you have one person's explanation of why she schleps around a single laptop that she also uses for her desktop.

1: Literally; I just timed it. 6.6s to leisurely unplug it, 10.3s to casually reconnect it.

2: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1K2AM/A/usb-c-digital-av...

Re:The new MacBook by fragmede on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:26PM (#9174827)
Binder clips are useful for avoiding cable falls: http://www.efficientlifeskills.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/1...
Re:The new MacBook by alasdair_ on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:46PM (#9173470)
>It's just a matter of synching info.

Synchronizing is hard. That's the problem.

I want to close my laptop after a day at the office and be able to continue working on the train or an airplane, immediately, if I need to.

This isn't easy to do without having a single machine.

Re:The new MacBook by cweiss on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:57PM (#9174474)
To their credit, it seems Apple is at least trying to solve this problem with their recent foray into 'live' document dragging between iOS/Yosemite. Though it's hardly the ubiquitous solution we want, it is a first step.
Re:The new MacBook by anentropic on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:18PM (#9173231)
mostly because a) don't need a more powerful desktop and b) the syncing is not well streamlined

I'd seriously consider an iMac if Apple would solve b.

Re:The new MacBook by madeofpalk on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:03PM (#9172553)
> I'm glad apple picked this up after so many others pushed it forward :)

To be fair, Apple had a lot of people on the USB-C standards... 'committee', second only to Intel.

Source: http://www.theverge.com/2015/1/6/7505187/apple-macbook-2015-...

Re:The new MacBook by DannyBee on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:17PM (#9172674)
Not to denigrate their work, but this happened very very late in the type-C game.

(Look at who attended what meetings, and where it was proposed, how far it was along when it was proposed, and then when apple started showing up. It looks like they saw the writing on the wall, and joined in to make sure they weren't going to get left behind)

Re:The new MacBook by melling on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:29PM (#9172769)
Probably realized that they needed to go with USB-C because of cars, European regulations, etc. Finally, everyone is using one connector. PC, Mac, Android, and iOS?
Re:The new MacBook by madeofpalk on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:21PM (#9174543)
Another view is that there was a moment when they saw/realised what USB-C could do for Apple and a radically new laptop, and then became a lot more invested then.
Re:The new MacBook by gress on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:49PM (#9172966)
Actually you are just denigrating their work with innuendo.
Re:The new MacBook by DannyBee on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:07PM (#9173150)
Actually, i have real facts, but i can't state them here, so i'm pointing you at enough data to draw your own conclusions. But sure, if you'd rather just believe whatever you like, you are welcome to :)
Re:The new MacBook by MrScruff on Sunday March 15, 2015 @05:32AM (#9205936)
Your comments are somewhat contradicted by the discussion on Daring Fireball. Which one of you is wrong?

http://daringfireball.net/linked/2015/03/14/apple-usbc

Re:The new MacBook by gress on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @01:58AM (#9176288)
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying that you are deceiving yourself if you think you aren't denigrating them. That is clearly your intention, and you think the facts bear you out. Why not just be honest about it?
Re:The new MacBook by function_seven on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:55PM (#9172492)
I will guarantee you that their charger will have a port on it to pass through. Still awkward, but I can't imagine that they'd force users to choose between data and power on that one port.
Re:The new MacBook by geoelectric on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:58PM (#9172514)
I just hope the passthrough is up near the part that plugs into the laptop, or it's going to be awfully inconvenient for a lot of different kinds of peripherals.
Re:The new MacBook by function_seven on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:17PM (#9173701)
Looks like I had it backwards. It's the other items that pass through the USB C port.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1L2AM/A/usb-c-vga-multip...

I wish the power adapter itself would also have the passthrough.

Re:The new MacBook by elcct on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @08:55AM (#9177438)
One port at a time
Re:The new MacBook by blhack on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:31PM (#9173347)
Thank god. The magsafe adapter is cool, but has some serious flaws to it. Namely: it's magnetic, so any sort of [ferrous] metal dust will accumulate inside of it, preventing you from getting a good seal on the connector.

If you work in any environment other than a sterile coffee shop, this will be a huge problem for you. I spend almost all of my time working in a hackerspace, and fiddling with my power connector on my less than 1 year old laptop is a constant annoyance.

Re:The new MacBook by ddoolin on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:38PM (#9173399)
I've had three MBPs over the course of a few years and never had this issue. Though, I have noticed a very small dust build up but it definitely hasn't compromised the magnetic seal. Is it an older version? I don't plug/unplug a whole lot so that may also be contributing.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:57PM (#9173547)
It is a problem if your environment includes ferro-magnetic crud. All my lab's magsafe ports are wobbly and it's hard to clean them out.
Re:The new MacBook by synaesthesisx on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:29PM (#9173799)
If your environment contains ferro-magnetic dust you should probably be more concerned about inhaling that stuff.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:43PM (#9173906)
Not dust, just macro-scale but small bits of crap.

I think some of it in my bag is from a black sand beach. That stuff kills headphones as well as wonkifying magsafe sockets.

Re:The new MacBook by vcarl on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:10PM (#9174740)
I took a bag to the beach, then put my laptop in that bag a few weeks later. The leftover sand (because sand is basically glitter) had some magnetic bits, which clogged the magsafe connector. I had to spent like 20 minutes with a toothpick to get enough out to charge, and it was never quite back to normal.
Re:The new MacBook by trose on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:16PM (#9173693)
Not to be a dick here but I think you're in a minority. I dont think many users are going to run into this issue.
Re:The new MacBook by stcredzero on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:16PM (#9173689)
Strong adhesives are often a good way to defeat magnets. (I've used this principle, but not in the specific context of removing magnetic crud from inside a magsafe plug.) A properly designed magsafe power plug would have a way of either easily replacing the plug or removing/defeating the magnet.
Re:The new MacBook by robotresearcher on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:09PM (#9174075)
Thanks, that's a good tip.
Re:The new MacBook by dennisnedry on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:15PM (#9173685)
Yeah same here. I've been through 3 MBP's and never had a problem with any of the MagSafe chargers.
Re:The new MacBook by jameshart on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:28PM (#9173795)
Metal dust is a problem in "any environment other than a sterile coffee shop"?

It's a bit of a dubious rhetorical move to cast anybody who works in an environment that doesn't contain a lot of ferrous dust as some sort of freakish outlier. You might be ever so slightly guilty of overgeneralizing your experience...

Re:The new MacBook by RBerenguel on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:33PM (#9173830)
I use my Air and used my old Macbook (the white plastic one) in my workshop, where we make shoes by hand. So I have lots of nails (and thus, lots of tiny metal scraps from the nail boxes, as well as nail pieces when we need to cut some down) lying around and lots of knife-sharpening dust around our (unplugged, since we usually keep the computer away when hammering/sharpening, but we just leave the connector in his usual place) Magsafes and have seen no problem in the connector.
Re:The new MacBook by astrange on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:43PM (#9173911)
Your hackerspace sounds like a hazardous work environment. Do they have HEPA air filters? A vacuum cleaner, even?
Re:The new MacBook by drinchev on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:59PM (#9173565)
I thought the magnetic part of the MagSafe is actually an "extra", not a downside.
Re:The new MacBook by murbard2 on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:13PM (#9173664)
I'd like to see a magnetic near field adapter: no holes, no plugging. Call it an asexual connector?
Re:The new MacBook by NN88 on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:33PM (#9174281)
Nothing you mentioned here is a flaw .
Re:The new MacBook by wahsd on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:40PM (#9172868)
I am a bit on the fence about them seemingly jettisoning the lighting connector? Why go with a plug that has a delicate prong in the center rather than a plug with the contacts around the perimeter?

Does anyone know if there was any emphasis put on making USB-C less flimsy and delicate?

Re:The new MacBook by yasth on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:31PM (#9173344)
Quite a lot of work went into it. It is designed for 10k insertion cycles. 2x stronger to wrenching forces than micro, and it is designed so the cables fail, not the machine side connector (because once factories get up to speed have similar costs to USB micro cables now at least for dumb cables). Have a slide deck as a pdf if you want more details:

https://intel.lanyonevents.com/sf14/connect/fileDownload/ses...

Re:The new MacBook by yincrash on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:55PM (#9173048)
Current USB connectors have prongs in the middle of the female side as well, but I've never ever seen one break off before, and that's with people (including myself) trying to force plugs in the wrong orientation. Is there a reason to worry about these new connectors' prong strength?
Re:The new MacBook by radicaledward on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:05PM (#9173129)
Maybe it depends on who builds your devices, but I have had several usb prongs break off on me even when I was careful. This happened on one desktop and several gaming consoles.
Re:The new MacBook by fuzzywalrus on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:48PM (#9172949)
I'll add another question: Does USB-C have a spec for requesting additional wattage?

Example: I have a USB-C Printer/Hard drive/or otherwise, and plug in my MacBook Air, will it charge my MacBook or will I need an intermediate like a specialty hub to charge?

This seems egregious if every device needs to provide power for the potential of charging device in question...

Re:The new MacBook by ghostly_s on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:00PM (#9173092)
There's actually a supplemental spec, USB-PD(Power Delivery) which now accopmanies USB 3.0 and addresses this. It is carried over the USB physical layer but does not rely on the data layer for communication.
Re:The new MacBook by Bjartr on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:04PM (#9173123)
According to what I can find[1][2], USB 3 supports 100W and a standard C connector supports 5A.

[1] http://www.usb.org/press/USB_Type-C_Specification_Announceme...

[2] http://www.usb.org/press/presskit/USB-IF_IDF_Shenzhen_2014_P...

Re:The new MacBook by sharth on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:00PM (#9173091)
Re:The new MacBook by azdle on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:03PM (#9173120)
It does, but it's not a requirement for all devices so you may or may not need a hub to provide power back to the laptop depending on the device.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#USB_Power_Delivery

Re:The new MacBook by ghostly_s on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:02PM (#9173106)
To answer more specifically; yes— not only is every node in the bus network addressable for power needs and capabilities, even each of the two ends of a cable is a separately addressable node (mostly used to figure out which way a swappable cable is oriented, I think).
Re:The new MacBook by achamayou on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:57PM (#9173067)
Another way to look at it is that the pins (which are really the fragile bit prone to scratching, oxidization etc) aren't exposed that way, they're protected inside the metal wrapper.
Re:The new MacBook by TheSoftwareGuy on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:52PM (#9172999)
>I am a bit on the fence about them seemingly jettisoning the lighting connector? Why go with a plug that has a delicate prong in the center rather than a plug with the contacts around the perimeter?

My biggest gripe about the USB-C, and a big fuck up on the part of the standards committee, IMO

Re:The new MacBook by grandalf on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:43PM (#9172897)
It will just be so nice to have the port be standardized.
Re:The new MacBook by Gustomaximus on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:17PM (#9174782)
> Why not carry around your laptop in tablet form when you are mobile?

For me I prefer a laptop because its workable on the lap and small surfaces. I have seriously considered a Surface Pro but using a kick stand doesn't work on a bus/train/lounge which are common usages for me when on the move. And given tablets are about the same size as an ultrabook I may as well get the additional usage benefit.

If I did want the mobile tablet form I would prefer a larger size phone that docks and become my desktop when at home/work.

Re:The new MacBook by toomuchtodo on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:48PM (#9172439)
Is this the end of Thunderbolt as well?
Re:The new MacBook by mmastrac on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:50PM (#9172451)
Thunderbolt runs over USB-C, as well as DisplayPort. USB 3.1 features re-configurable lines that can negotiate almost any protocol. [1] [2]

[1] http://www.anandtech.com/show/8558/displayport-alternate-mod...

[2] http://www.anandtech.com/show/8539/usb-power-delivery-v20-an...

Re:The new MacBook by djrogers on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:11PM (#9172615)
Displayport != Thunderbolt.

Displayport is a protocol that can run over a thunderbolt port, but the thunderbolt spec includes much more than that.

I don' believe we'll be seeing the 40Gbps PCI extension that is today's thunderbolt over USB 3.1.

Re:The new MacBook by ajross on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:36PM (#9172830)
You're getting too tied up in brand identity and going too far in the other direction. What we call "Thunderbolt" is effectively an evolution of the DisplayPort PHY (which already supported graphics streaming of course, and also encapsulated USB transfers) with protocol extensions to do more PCI-like transactions.

And the USB 3.1 "SuperSpeed+" PHY is a 10Gbps thing that is very comparable to Thunderbolt electrically and would be expected to evolve similarly.

You're right that USB lacks the PCI framework (which many of us view as a feature). But DP/Thunderbolt similarly lacks a cabling standard with the sophistication of USB: no charging, not reversible connectors, no OTG-style switching of host/guest mode.

Apple had a choice of supporting both connectors, or giving up "PCI madness" or "nice cables" to get just one. They picked USB.

Re:The new MacBook by mikeash on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:47PM (#9172944)
That's all well and good, but the question was whether it supported actual Thunderbolt, to which the answer given was "yes" but the actual answer appears to be "no."

Supporting something like Thunderbolt is nice, but not exactly the same. It's not about "brand identity," it's about "does this equipment I have work with this machine?"

Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:43PM (#9173438)
Just to clear up the FUD, the Type-C connector supports 'Alternate Modes.' This allows manufactures to implement chips that can MUX different signal types onto the USB cable SS lanes. There are 4 SS lanes that can be reassigned and either 2 or 5 additional wires that can also be used depending on if it's a cable or dock connection.

So, can the Type-C connector support Thunderbolt? Yes. Does the Type-C connector currently support Thunderbolt? No. Will someone add Thunderbolt over Type-C? Maybe.

I've only heard of PCIe over Type-C (via the spec docs) and DP over Type-C (from the VESA guys).

Re:The new MacBook by mikeash on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:59PM (#9173563)
It certainly sounds like an excellent connector. If Apple can shoehorn Thunderbolt into that, it would be great. If they can't, it sounds like it's well worth it anyway.
Re:The new MacBook by ajross on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:12PM (#9173190)
That's hardly unique to this situation though. It doesn't support Firewire or eSATA or VGA or ethernet or AppleTalk or Centronics parallel either. Life moves on, and this is hardly a company gripped by concerns for backwards compatibility.
Re:The new MacBook by mikeash on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:22PM (#9173273)
You seem to have confused "Is this the end of Thunderbolt as well?" with "I hate Apple forever for changing things." It's a simple question with a simple answer. (Yes.)
Re:The new MacBook by zoul on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:01PM (#9174686)
Life moves on, but Thunderbolt is such a new interface to be obsoleted.
Re:The new MacBook by moe on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:53PM (#9173026)
They picked USB.

And thank goodness they did.

The "U" in USB may finally become reality. It's overdue.

Re:The new MacBook by beagle3 on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:23PM (#9175382)
Does this mean that Thunderstrike (and previous PCI-based attacks) are not usable against the new Mac?
Re:The new MacBook by ajross on Wednesday March 11, 2015 @02:53PM (#9186059)
No, there is no access to PCI address spaces over the USB 3 port. At least not yet, with existing hardware. As mentioned elsewhere in the thread it's not an impossibility to see an evolved (but compatible) standard in future USB 3 hardware.
Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:37PM (#9173391)
So, in alternate mode all 4 SS lanes can be reassigned. Each lane is doing 10Gbps right now from what the specs say. You could do PCIe over this and they even use PCIe as an example in the Type-C spec documents.
Re:The new MacBook by afandian on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:58PM (#9172520)
I've not read those docs (sorry) but what if I want to run DisplayPort for my monitor and simultaneously plug in an external USB drive? Can a single line switch between protocols?
Re:The new MacBook by mmastrac on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:00PM (#9172533)
Yes you can. IIRC you can run USB3.x-speed devices and one alt-mode over a single line.
Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:46PM (#9173471)
They will be able to MUX two DP lanes onto two of the USB SS lanes and keep one for USB 3.1 as well.

Also, there are dedicated wires for USB 2.0 as well that are separate from the SS lanes.

Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:06PM (#9173610)
Just to clarify what you said, Alternate Mode allows two directly connected devices to negotiate what the SS lanes and a few other wires are used for. The signaling that happens over the wires after negotiation is totally outside of the USB spec as the signals are simply MUXed onto the wires. In theory you could MUX anything over the wires as long as the signaling parameter fell within the specs defines for the cabling.
Re:The new MacBook by chatmasta on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:06PM (#9172579)
I have two thunderbolt displays daisy chained into the single thunderbolt port on my 2013 MacBook Air. Each display is basically also a dock, with other peripheral ports in the back. It works very well because as I understand it thunderbolt is 10gbps transfer.

Does USB-C work the same way?

Re:The new MacBook by toomuchtodo on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:13PM (#9172641)
This is exactly what I'm wondering. I only have one Thunderbolt display, but I want another, and am curious if I should hold out for a bit.
Re:The new MacBook by chatmasta on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:43PM (#9172895)
I'm selling both mine as I will be traveling a lot in the next year. Email me at [email protected] if you want one. :)
Re:The new MacBook by toomuchtodo on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:54PM (#9173036)
I'll do so! I travel frequently as well (100% remote worker), but I use Pelican cases to move all my kit around the world ;)
Re:The new MacBook by lucaspiller on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:20PM (#9173246)
What cases do you have? I looked into these before, but anything with a decent size seemed too heavy to take on aircraft (assuming a 30kg checked in limit).
Re:The new MacBook by toomuchtodo on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:39PM (#9173405)
I'll have to find the exact model numbers, but I don't bring it on aircraft, I ship it ahead of me.
Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:48PM (#9173480)
The DP over Type-C stuff (Alternate Mode) is not hub traversable.

So, you could talk to a single DP device, but that DP device could be a DP MST splitter. This could allow it to act as a DP hub for you to daisy chain a second monitor.

Re:The new MacBook by jkot on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:55PM (#9172490)
I am not too happy about that. HP already has USB charger for laptop, and it had bunch of problems, including fire hazard. That was just ARM chromebook, not sure how it will on 'full' mac.

EDIT: there are physical limitations how electric current is transferred. USB contacts do not have good shape and will probably deteriorate more quickly.

Re:The new MacBook by headShrinker on Monday March 09, 2015 @01:59PM (#9172526)
In the old days, HP had a high standard of quality. More recently, almost coinciding with the introduction of inkjet printers, HP quality standards have slipped to a new dismal low. I'm not surprised to hear of fires.
Re:The new MacBook by mark_l_watson on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:15PM (#9173211)
I just purchased a little HP 11" Stream, and the build quality is pretty good - I was pleasantly surprised, especially for a $199 laptop that includes $125 in free software coupons. (Pro-tip: if you need a Windows laptop, but it directly from Microsoft so you don't get any crap-ware loaded on it.)

That said, I am kind of looking forward to my (about) 4 year old MacBook Air eventually dying and then I will buy the new model that was announced today :-) MacBooks are beautiful.

Re:The new MacBook by chx on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:00PM (#9173579)
My first inkjet was one of DeskJet 500 series in the early nineties. And HP had inkjets since 1984 apparently. That's "more recently" for you? You are right about HP standards slipping but coincidencing with inkjet printers they are not :)
Re:The new MacBook by jkot on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:06PM (#9172578)
USB connector was not simply designed for 10 amps or how much they push through it.
Re:The new MacBook by bri3d on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:09PM (#9172602)
USB-C has a new connector and specifies voltages up to 20V, which will cut the amperage vs. old 5V USB chargers by a factor of four.
Re:The new MacBook by sfeng on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:45PM (#9172910)
If they use the current 45 watt charger power, at the maximum 20V allowed by USB-C, you're looking at about 2.6 amps.
Re:The new MacBook by organsnyder on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:05PM (#9172565)
Not sure how USB is a factor in that. Plenty of old-style chargers have had issues (including fire hazards) over the years as well.
Re:The new MacBook by mathgeek on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:07PM (#9172586)
Including Apple chargers, so it's really nothing new.
Re:The new MacBook by higherpurpose on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:51PM (#9172993)
That happened with the old USB connector, which can't support too much power going through it. USB-C can support a lot more.
Re:The new MacBook by lsaferite on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:28PM (#9173326)
20v @ 5A to be precise
Re:The new MacBook by Dylan16807 on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:36PM (#9172833)
I wouldn't be surprised if this drew fewer amps than an iPad, because of voltage.

But I've never had electrical contacts on a charger wear out in the first place, so even if it goes faster it might never matter.

Re:The new MacBook by Animats on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:15PM (#9172656)
I'm surprised it doesn't support wireless charging. Now that Starbucks does, I'd expect all new laptop designs to include Starbucks compatibility.
Re:The new MacBook by jkot on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:27PM (#9172748)
Starbucks and Ikea: the leading computer innovators :-)
Re:The new MacBook by Animats on Monday March 09, 2015 @10:03PM (#9175559)
Why not? Starbucks, Ikea, and Apple all target the same demographic.
Re:The new MacBook by swalsh on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:43PM (#9172891)
I wonder if the iPhone 6S will have a usb-c port that lets you dock the phone and use it for work.
Re:The new MacBook by mkriss on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:29PM (#9173332)
Probably not iPhone 6S, but it could be iPhone 7, because of European Union regulations.

http://www.geek.com/apple/apple-will-be-forced-to-use-micro-...

Re:The new MacBook by Grazester on Monday March 09, 2015 @02:49PM (#9172968)
That is not going to happen. Apple licenses out the use of its connectors for docking stations and other accessory usage. If they just drop the lightening connector on the iphone this soon after implementing it, I dont think manufacturers of these accessories would very happy about that.
Re:The new MacBook by ghostly_s on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:09PM (#9173163)
Why would Apple start giving a flying f about accessory manufacturers?
Re:The new MacBook by ghostly_s on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:25PM (#9173307)
Apple has a long history of completely disregarding the needs or desires of accessory manufacturers, and only started the MFi program after years of categorically responding with cease-and-desist letters. The program is primarily in serving Apple's interests in a level of reliability in the accessory ecosystem; it's an absolutely insignificant revenue stream.
Re:The new MacBook by baddox on Monday March 09, 2015 @04:41PM (#9173897)
Is this really the case? They certainly seemed to stick with the 30 pin connector for far longer than they had any reason to other than the massive third party accessory/dock/speaker market.
Re:The new MacBook by Grazester on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:21PM (#9173254)
Because they are the ones that support Apple's products and pay a license to do so. If you change standards every Monday morning then these manufacturer would have to retool their products which would no doubt cost them.
Re:The new MacBook by kalleboo on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @12:33AM (#9176040)
Unless the EU makes it happen
Re:The new MacBook by ericfrederich on Tuesday March 10, 2015 @11:25AM (#9178208)
Cool article. Seems like you need to have managed source code to transplant an application from one type of processor to another. Java, .NET, Dalvik, etc all fit this category. I wonder if we'll start seeing fat binaries for native code that ship with LLVM IR so that even C and C++ code can be transplanted from your phone's ARM processor to your desktop's Intel.
[deleted]
Re:The new MacBook by Crito on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:36PM (#9173381)
I am guessing the logic here is that everyone uses wireless mice, or that anyone with a laptop doesn't use an external mouse.

I mean, I used a wired mouse, and I'm guessing you do as well, but it seems like wired mouse users are not taken seriously anymore.

Re:The new MacBook by jlebar on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:40PM (#9173414)
I think their idea is you should use a wireless mouse. Notice that the "Fully equipped for a wireless world" heading appears above the mention of USB-3. Indeed, putting only one port forces the issue, because I imagine a significant amount of the time, if you're using a mouse, you're also plugged in to power, and now you can't do both without a hub of some sort.

Reasonable people can disagree wrt whether a wireless mouse is acceptable for their use case, of course. Just like reasonable people could disagree when Apple stopped shipping devices with floppy drives and (later) optical drives.

Re:The new MacBook by jayfuerstenberg on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:37PM (#9173390)
You don't need to have the mouse on the left side. Either go with bluetooth or a cable longer than 20cm.
Re:The new MacBook by blkhp19 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:36PM (#9173384)
You use a wired mouse?
Re:The new MacBook by ben174 on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:37PM (#9173396)
I don't know anyone who uses a wired mouse anymore. Especially on a laptop.
Re:The new MacBook by krapp on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:51PM (#9173500)
I still use a wired mouse and a wired keyboard for my laptop (since I prefer the size and of a standard keyboard to the little rubber chiclets HP calls a keyboard.) It has literally all the advantages of a wireless setup, without ever having to worry about batteries.

This trend in laptop design towards providing fewer ports for what seems to be little more than aesthetics seems a bit backwards.

Re:The new MacBook by veidr on Monday March 09, 2015 @08:40PM (#9175157)
> It has literally all the advantages of a wireless setup

...except for the main advantage, which is the wireless setup's entire reason for existence?

Re:The new MacBook by krapp on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:05PM (#9175291)
How often do you put a wireless mouse or keyboard somewhere you wouldn't also put a wired mouse or keyboard? It seems to me the ergonomics are likely to be the same for most cases.

Fair enough if you think wireless is advantageous in this case but I personally don't. Or if it is, it doesn't outweigh the disadvantage of having a mouse that can run out of juice.

Re:The new MacBook by ForHackernews on Monday March 09, 2015 @06:01PM (#9174513)
I don't understand why anyone uses a wireless mouse. You have a device that's utterly useless except in close proximity to its parent, why wouldn't you just plug it in and never have to charge it?
Re:The new MacBook by dragonwriter on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:10PM (#9174747)
> You have a device that's utterly useless except in close proximity to its parent, why wouldn't you just plug it in and never have to charge it?

Wireless mice aren't convenient to keep plugged in with many laptops in many carrying cases/bags/etc, and having to plug it in increases the set up time before useful interaction. So, for laptops typically used on-the-go, I see them as a negative.

And, mice can be useful fairly distant from a CPU; they usually aren't useful far from the keyboard (which can also be wireless) and, depending on the display size, may need to be close to the display.

I mean, its not like we live in the era when most computer use involves switching disks or other similar activities that require physical interaction with the CPU case, so there's no particular requirement that the CPU needs to be that close to the keyboard/mouse for the setup to be useful.

Re:The new MacBook by ForHackernews on Monday March 09, 2015 @09:50PM (#9175513)
That's a good point w/r/t desktops, you could easily have the CPU case hidden away down behind the desk or something, but the parent comment said "especially on a laptop" where the monitor/keyboard/cpu are somewhat bound together.

I guess you're right about the setup time, but that seems like an extremely minor irritation to me, compared to the moderate irritation of swapping out or recharging dead batteries. Ultimately, I suppose it's a personal preference: Do you prefer a tiny annoyance every day, or greater annoyance (still negligible, in the grand scheme) every few months.

Re:The new MacBook by walshemj on Monday March 09, 2015 @07:27PM (#9174831)
I do I started to get aching mouse hands after using the wireless touch mouse and I like not having the cursor zoom all over the place if i accidentally nudge the mouse
Re:The new MacBook by alasdair_ on Monday March 09, 2015 @03:55PM (#9173527)
Gamers still do, that's about it.
Re:The new MacBook by frandroid on Monday March 09, 2015 @05:24PM (#9174214)
Some of us hate having to charge multiple devices.