chx
if you flag this too then I will repost it on every HN post.
Try me.
I already asked dang to delete my account weeks ago.
Until he does I will try to be the voice of reason in a world gone mad from drinking too much LLM koolaid.
>I would quit the day you set an AI to review my code. Not the day, no, sorry. The very second. Miss me with that noise. I need insightfulness on my code reviews, not an automated bullshit generator plagiarizing past reviews, badly.
if you flag this too then I will repost it on every HN post.
Try me.
I already asked dang to delete my account weeks ago.
Until he does I will try to be the voice of reason in a world gone mad from drinking too much LLM koolaid.
Yes, yes, database with AI written code. NoSQL with a database that can't be trusted with your data? I. have. seen. this. before. To quote a classic:
> I suggest you pipe your data to devnull it will be very fast
In defense of the database that video was about, I worked as a software architect for the company which became the first commercial user of it, Eliot hilariously didn't want to accept money for support at first. Good old days. However, around 2015 when all three large open source SQL databases --- SQLite, PostgreSQL, MySQL -- added JSON support I felt there was no more need for these NoSQL systems, though.
Your face scan is now online waiting for the next data breach.
I have seen neobanks requiring such 3D face scans but not Ryanair yet.
WPEngine (and a horde of Emanuel Urquhart lawyers led by Rachel Kassabian) are taking him to the cleaners. This won't be pretty. A preliminary injunction is not easy to get, it's really likely WPEngine will win at least something.
The first 90% is easy, it's the second 90% that is very hard.
Recommended reading: Dawn Of Everything.
(Also, I uploaded Volkov Commander to SIMTEL 31 years ago and the ignorant asshole running that site reported me to the university for pirating Norton Commander and they banned me from the university VAX leading me straight to Linux. Funny how that worked out.)
Sure, there are words saying "the Russian Federation [...] reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine [...] to respect the Independence and Sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine" but what if they don't? tough luck. No one promised help, there's no built in penalty mechanism, nothing.
And despite this total failure they spent many tens of on stock buybacks https://ycharts.com/companies/INTC/stock_buyback no less than ten billions in 2014 and in 2018-2021 over forty billions. That's an awful, awful lot of money to waste.
Also, basic exercises are boring because we did them ten thousand and one times already just with slightly different syntax.
as I said above: I already asked dang to delete this account, I do not want to be here anymore
Hopeless, as I said.
Suppose the source language has words which could be translated into multiple English words -- look at all the power banks which are advertised as charging treasure for example. One can see how bank vs treasure are close, after all. Further, even in English multiple phrases could be used "don't preserve" "bin it" "throw it away" and countless others. Even worse, it could be a company specific phrase which would only stand out as odd "apply procedure 66 to it".
If given a little thought this is exactly the kind of task where a native speaker would shine and LLM might just miss or if given a wide enough net produce a million false positive.
> Where I live, you can only select from a central, though frequently updated, list of names when naming your child
I was born in such a country too and still have frequent connections there and I can confirm the laws only apply to citizens of said country so indeed immigration creates exceptions to this rule even if they transliterate their name.
Jump forward twenty years and I got my first Western programming job for the then-unimaginable 5000 USD a month. This company also happened to be headquartered in Vancouver where I decided to immigrate to and they helped me doing so. And when this company got acquired four years later, I got a salary high enough to buy my own apartment on the beautiful seashore of Vancouver.
Thanks Speccy for what my life could become.
variable-length lookbehind assertions are now supported.
yay! I needed that so many times.
Again, an ancient enough codebase which contains a library using array_find will need enough upgrades to run on PHP8 much less PHP8.4 the change from array_find to something else is the least of your worries.
To me it is obvious hooks won't use other hooks because that could lead to an infinite loop in a hurry
> Does reading `$this->countryCode` use the getter hook, even it's from a `countryCode` hook?
same
> If not, is there a way to call the `countryCode` getter from this setter?
There is although it's a bit tricky and not intuitive but I feel this falls under the "it is enough this is possible, there's no need for it to be easy": "Be aware, the detection logic works on $this->[propertyName] directly at compile time, not on dynamic forms of it like $prop = 'beep'; $this->$prop. That will not trigger a backing value." Using dynamic properties in what should be simple code should be rare enough this is not a problem. It's like a bridge convention, the benefits vastly outweigh the drawbacks.
Surrendering the global namespace to the language is not so bad an idea.
__get / __set was doing that already and some frameworks very heavily rely on those.
> It implies that `$this->x` has a different meaning if it's inside a hook or outside hooks.
this is a valid critique but hopefully hooks will be super short and this won't be a major issue. Indeed, if your get is not an arrow function -- which only allows one statement -- then it needs a good thinking over whether this is indeed the best solution. Ie if your get is so complicated then perhaps a helper method is best and then you have get => $this->foo($this->thing) and that's the only place where $this->thing is special.
Of course there is but the Western allies are slow to arm Ukraine because they fear the Russian nuclear retaliation.
To recap, Ukraine received very few , around a hundred ATACMS missiles with severe restrictions on targets. They got less than two dozen F-16 jets. This is just nothing compared what the US might be able to send if they wanted to, they have over 300 Falcons at Davis-Monthan AFB (aka Boneyard) to begin with. There are near four thousand ATACMS missiles manufactured so far. And so on, with tanks etc.
If the "tap" were to open full stream instead of dripping, the war would be over very fast. The question is, which end would we get.