ceejayoz

The local population is probably allowed to complain that you built the reservoir with toxic waste, too.

Correct. NFL payers are better paid, get better medical care, have better training and equipment, and their brains are more developed.

This will virtually always be the case of a reputable news article about a PR announcement written by a corporate marketing department of this nature.

I would also note the same guideline says to use the original title, which was (and remains, as submitted) "Google Will Turn Off Search for Schools That Reject A.I."

This particular bit of juice didn't have the "AI summaries" ingredient for 93% of its existence.

Schools invested enormously in Google Classroom and Google for Education, and now the deal's changing. Not for the benefit of students.

It's almost always possible to do worse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Cor....

Breaking stuff sometimes is a way to learn "don't break that".

Broken children can be tough to fix.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_for_Education

C'mon, it's right in the article.

The school can control AI on/off. Off means no search too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National...

But that's... already on the map, and you described it as "a major presence" upthread?

> nothing at the scale of the US midwest

Again, I note the very different ingress/egress requirements of AI compute. The main bottleneck has been power, not bandwidth.

But it's the lines between that matter, yeah?

Again, your map would say datacenters in the Australian outback would be insane, but there's huge dark fiber capacity passing through it.

> I also think you're massively underestimating the amount of ingress/egress traffic needed for one of these facilities.

Ingress/egress for AI compute is clearly different than some other use cases. One needs only to watch Claude's network activity for evidence of this.

(Like, it's the least problematic part of the in-space datacenter idea, versus cooling and maintenance.)

> Compare to the US where the entire middle of the country is covered in PoPs measured in terabits per second

A problem if you're Netflix. Less so if you're Claude, where giant clusters of RAM and compute generate a few kilobytes of text leaving the datacenter at a time.

A couple thousand people live in Svalbard, though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc._v._Ru....

> In regard to collections of facts, O'Connor wrote that copyright can apply only to the creative aspects of collection: the creative choice of what data to include or exclude, the order and style in which the information is presented, etc.—not to the information itself. If Feist were to take the directory and rearrange it, it would avoid the copyright owned in the data. "Notwithstanding a valid copyright, a subsequent compiler remains free to use the facts contained in another's publication to aid in preparing a competing work, so long as the competing work does not feature the same selection and arrangement", she wrote.

A lot of this shit is gonna have to wind its way through the courts before we know for certain.

The headline says "allegedly leaked".

I presume we aren't using most bridges as interstellar antennas.

The "I just manage the Gantt chart" folks are screwed, I think.

The ones that are good at translating between teams can be a huge force multiplier.