News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by aliasxneo on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:21AM (#49755700)
Tunneling was something that recently fell out of the work I've been doing [1]. I've used Cloudflare Tunnels before but I just have low trust with them recently with how big they are getting. All of these nice things come at the cost of pushing _a lot_ of traffic through their systems.

[1]: https://dntls.substack.com/p/the-new-internet

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pstoll on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:13PM (#49756512)
Reality check - you are not pushing “_a lot_” of traffic relative to any hyperscaler or large scale CDN. They push hundreds of Tbps sustained. You don’t peak at a few Mbps.

They can monitor extreme outliers. It’s not an issue for them.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ijustlovemath on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:22PM (#49756636)
I think they're talking about market capture risks
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by aliasxneo on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:24PM (#49756664)
In hindsight, that was probably a confusing sentence. I was more pointing out how much traffic flows trough their systems which ends up making it an attractive honeypot, especially as a U.S. company.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pstoll on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:19PM (#49762399)
Sure any centralization of infra is an obvious risk for a myriad of reasons eg DoS, manipulation, honeypots, etc.

But again my point applies - the chances they get enough people using it that it becomes a meaningfully worse security target than lots of other existing things seems … super low.

It’s a big world, people make many choices I can’t understand (nix? Haskell? Php? <flame wars to /dev/null>). Even if this product nailed it - the number of people who can use it is minuscule - yes even as we add Claude-enabled PMs to the software dev ranks.

Alt view with the old saying - “put all your eggs in one basket … and watch that basket!”

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by simonw on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:54AM (#49756226)
If there's any company in the world that can survive a lot of extra traffic being pushed through their systems it's Cloudflare.

I bet these new tunnels end up being a fraction of a percentage point of their network traffic.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by aliasxneo on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:56AM (#49756260)
Yeah, I don't doubt their infrastructure at all. In fact, I rate them fairly high in terms of reliability and performance. I've honestly been a fan of them for a very long time - it's just I'm watching all of this centralization happen and it sets my Spidey sense off. Like I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by simonw on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:44PM (#49756923)
Gotcha, that totally makes sense.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by swozey on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:34PM (#49757608)
The "centralization" which is cloudflare basically running its own walled garden version of the interent (how often do you see a cloudflare page checking if you're human?) is exactly why a lot of people do NOT like cloudflare. And if you've known about CF and its leadership since their inception you'd be even more wary of sticking your stuff over there.

I've migrated many companies off of cloudflare, usually because they end up pissing off companies when a contract renewal comes up and they slam them with massively increased bills and almost useless support if you aren't very high paying enterprise. I don't know how many CF support tickets I've just given up on over the last 15 years, usually related to their admin page, workers or some weird thing their system does that wasn't documented and I just stop getting responses and definitely don't get fixes.

If you ever worked in webhosting the Cloudflare wordpress/etc extensions are everywhere and back when I did work in hosting tons of support tickets were made because of CF. Could be way better now, I don't go near that industry these days.

The casual CF user sticking it in front of a blog they rarely look at and the business forced CF user has a very different experience. I cringe and seriously consider if I'm interviewing for an infra role and they use cloudflare. Usually it's startups that grew into larger businesses.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Tepix on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:15PM (#49756532)
They see all the traffic in cleartext. Plus you have to trust them not to maliciously alter your traffic. As a US company, their options may be limited if they are coerced by their government to do so.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by insanitybit on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:17PM (#49756573)
Just use TLS / mTLS over the tunnel, no?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ceejayoz on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:03PM (#49756366)
I didn't take it as a capacity concern, but a "how much data do they get to look at" one.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by bix6 on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:03PM (#49756365)
It’s a concentration of power issue.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by robertlagrant on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:44PM (#49760023)
Given they seem to mostly offer services that are about as easy to switch away from as you could hope for, compared to, say, companies who write loads of CF that only runs on AWS, and I can't imagine why this keeps on being said for Cloudflare specifically. What power do they have?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:31PM (#49761668)
It doesn't matter that they're easy to switch away from. It matters that people haven't actually switched away from them.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by robertlagrant on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:16AM (#49765930)
Can you explain why it doesn't matter that they're easy to switch away from?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Saturday September 19, 2026 @09:05AM (#49766274)
Because it only matters whether people actually switch away from them.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by robertlagrant on Sunday September 20, 2026 @08:53AM (#49775366)
Why?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by eli on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:00PM (#49756324)
Don’t the free tunnels have explicit limits on bandwidth and streaming?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by inopinatus on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:17PM (#49756565)
Cloudflare want you to push traffic through their systems. This is yet another traffic generator to drive up Cloudflare’s leverage when negotiating peering with carriers & service providers, in order to drive down the marginal cost of bandwidth for Cloudflare’s actual product viz. the enterprise DDoS protection.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:32PM (#49761674)
True. Same reason Hurricane Electric peers promiscuously. I'm surprised more networks don't, to be honest - wouldn't say DTAG prefer that you peer with DTAG than peer with HE upstream of DTAG?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by afzalive on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:44AM (#49756094)
This is pretty great and I think this will be quite important in the age where everyone has their self-hosted services.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Perz1val on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:48PM (#49756980)
Interesting how 4/4 other replies didn't get the centralisation concern despite it being a fairly often discussed topic
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by t_mahmood on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:52PM (#49757023)
Yeah, it reminds me of Google. Fool me twice ...

I'm not trusting any of these corporates any more

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by done_lurking on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:01PM (#49757948)
There are other reasons not to trust them as well, especially if you've seen how their sales team operates https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40481808
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ozozozd on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:46PM (#49760052)
Your opening piqued my interest, but:

“The substrate itself consists of a few systems…”

I doubt that this is how wordy your communication is.

“It consists of a few systems” would be adequate. And if we had prior context about what else exists that surrounds “the substrate” the “substrate itself” distinction would be meaningful, but it’s not, because you are referring to one object, which is the system you built, and I doubt any enzymes act on it, so it’s likely not a substrate.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by israrkhan on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:58AM (#49756300)
For someone looking for an opensource solutions, following is an awesome resource for tunnelling

https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling

I have played around with frp, bore and ngrok.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by drdexebtjl on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:35PM (#49756805)
frp is nice. I have the tiniest Amazon Lightsail instance running a tunnel to a Minecraft server in my basement. It’s cheaper than getting a fixed IP from my ISP, at sufficiently low traffic.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by kincl on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:19AM (#49755662)
Is this their version of https://tailscale.com/tailcat ? I can't tell if you need to auth

edit: yeah, it says no account creation, neat!

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Tepix on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:17PM (#49756574)
I believe with tailscale you don’t have to trust a 3rd party with your cleartext traffic
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by athrowaway3z on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:39PM (#49757678)
But you do seem to get to host a https version of your app in case you need features locked behind secure context.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by spwa4 on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:48PM (#49757783)
That can't be right. If they're hosting on a different DNS they have an absolute need to MITM ssl/tls traffic. Can't work otherwise.

So cloudflare sees your plaintext. Btw: tailscale does not (but ssl errors and warnings are unavoidable)

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hermanradtke on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:23AM (#49755720)
feels more like an ngrok competitor
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by israrkhan on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:00PM (#49756333)
This is a crowded space with lots of solutions (oss and commercial)

https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by alasano on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:00PM (#49756326)
More like their version of Tailscale funnel I think
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dangoodmanUT on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:16AM (#49755600)
Historically, we’ve found that their tunnels have really high latency variance. For example something that’s normally 30-50ms to ec2 is now 115ms-750ms
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hackernud3s on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:13PM (#49761515)
Because it travels along their edge. It's apples and oranges to your AWS tunnel.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dangoodmanUT on Friday September 18, 2026 @08:47PM (#49762216)
No, they claim their edge is better for residential connections to your backend. We tried multiple SF to us-east-1 and it was always substantially worse
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by whizzter on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:23AM (#49755726)
Don't all these free proxy services always fall prey to blacklists because scammers,etc abuse them until they're useless?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by axus on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:34AM (#49755898)
Wow, exfiltrating data has never been easier!
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Imustaskforhelp on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:27AM (#49755779)
Yes they actually do, but because its cloudflare which is offering this, blacklisting it might lead to blacklisting can be more negative and cloudflare has a much higher incentive to not make these tunnels useless. They are also more powerful and can fix things which would be harder for smaller companies to handle (atleast within the context of cloudflare tunnels)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:34PM (#49761685)
Spain blacklisted Cloudflare and everyone hates it, but it proves it can happen.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by srichard16 on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:17PM (#49757377)
Can confirm. Coming from ngrok, the main reason we had to make tunneling not anonymized etc was because of scammers, etc on the internet. Other players in the space bypass this by open sourcing the tech, or separating the architecture entirely. This is cool and all, but ultimately gives nefarious actors on the internet more opportunities.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by noname120 on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:31PM (#49761131)
How does “open sourcing the tech” “give nefarious actors on the internet more opportunities”? Sounds like a paltry excuse for not open sourcing your tech.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by uxjw on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:20PM (#49757416)
Probably why they used the trycloudflare.com domain as they expect it to be blocked.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by himata4113 on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:42AM (#49756056)
This has existed for a long time and has been abused by quite a few people. I've seen some cc nodes using a random known cloudflare site and spoofing hostname to a temporary cloudflare site. IMO this should require a login at bare minimum.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by booi on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:24PM (#49756655)
if you think people won't abuse it because you're making them log in with a free email address...
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by himata4113 on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:25PM (#49756670)
This requires zero effort and you can deploy hundreds to thousands while maintaining 1000 gmail, proton etc takes resources and money.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by booi on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:43PM (#49756914)
They already do this. the email accounts already exist
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by himata4113 on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:23AM (#49765978)
It's the same reason that exists for PoW captcha, it's just way more annoying. Also accounts offer traceability versus a new identity every time you want to do something unless you want to go through hundreds of accounts a day.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rplnt on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:55AM (#49756239)
Are we in an age where no one even bothers to open the product pages they generate? The first subtitle with the font color almost matching the background. Or it's even worse that a human looked at it and said "yep, that's OK"?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by lkbm on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:59AM (#49756308)
It's fine on light mode. It's just the dark mode that's terrible. Seems likely they only tested the former.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rplnt on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:06PM (#49756421)
I see, good point. Some might be confused about my comment then.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by brazukadev on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:29PM (#49759046)
which proves the point OP is making.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Gigachad on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:46PM (#49760699)
I'm viewing the site on lightmode, clicked one of the #links which scrolled down the page, when I scrolled back up all the sections lost their content and were unusable.

I've never seen someone fail a static page like this. And from a huge company like Cloudflare too..

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by reaperducer on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:57AM (#49756274)
Are we in an age where no one even bothers to open the product pages they generate?

We live in an age of monkey-see-monkey-do management.

When Microsoft axed its QA team, it gave permission for everyone else to make the same stupid mistake.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rvz on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:06PM (#49758782)
We are in the age of where hype beats reasoning.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pocksuppet on Saturday September 19, 2026 @02:49PM (#49769174)
Since before 2016 actually
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by jeremyjh on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:32PM (#49760540)
I find it shocking that they shipped this claudecopy.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by eranation on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:40PM (#49761734)
I’m raising my eyebrows…
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by brazukadev on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:52AM (#49766182)
Cloudflare is going full vibecoding for at least one year. They are high on AI psychosis.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nake89 on Sunday September 20, 2026 @03:37AM (#49773434)
The thing that made me the most sad was that nobody cares about narrow screen phones like my iPhone SE
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by singpolyma3 on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:16PM (#49756557)
It looks like tunnels can do some non https stuff these days? But it's a bit unclear
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ggg011012 on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:10PM (#49756478)
Quick Tunnels look great for demos and temporary dev environments. I’d still be hesitant to make them part of a long-lived production setup.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pstoll on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:20PM (#49756613)
You should be more than hesitant - don’t do it. They literally market them for quick demos. And not long lived production.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rinconrex on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:13PM (#49757316)
I use for the exact same thing. Running "cloudflared tunnel" sets up a temp solution. No log in needed, pretty convenient.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by kelvinjps10 on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:11PM (#49756491)
What's the difference between this and their previous Cloudflare Tunnels solution?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by raahelb on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:28PM (#49756722)
From their docs [0]:

> Free tunnels are meant to be used for testing and development, not for deploying a production website.

[0: https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/networks/co...

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by awwaiid on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:53PM (#49758598)
As far as I can tell, the difference is that they made a new website? The cloudflared instant tunnels have been around for years, including json output as far as I know.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by opengrass on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:17PM (#49760990)
This gives a random trycloudflare.com subdomain each run, the other requires a domain and tunnel key on your account.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by JV00 on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:24AM (#49755738)
Does this have a more generous allowance than ngrok? From what I can read no limits are mentioned
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by daemonologist on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:28AM (#49755798)
I don't know if there's an overall limit, but their regular tunnels have a limit of 100 MB per request which breaks stuff like Immich.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by raahelb on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:23PM (#49756652)
These are the limitations mentioned on the docs [1]. Quick Tunnels are subject to a hard limit on the number of concurrent requests that can be proxied at any point in time. Currently, this limit is 200 in-flight requests. If a Quick Tunnel hits this limit, the HTTP response will return a 429 status code. Quick Tunnels do not support Server-Sent Events (SSE).

[1]: https://developers.cloudflare.com/cloudflare-one/networks/co...

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Narciss on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:34AM (#49755895)
My AI discovered this days ago when I wanted to deploy a new vibe coded website (it was to keep score while playing whist and rentz)

Thought it was very cool

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by smalltorch on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:36AM (#49755944)
If your a hobbiest or dev just testing your services, it makes more sense to utilize onion services imho.

It does the exact same thing, except supported by a global network of volunteers around the world.

Sure, you get some latency, but this is actually ideal for testing. You should know how your service operates in non optimal lightning fast conditions.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by thenewnewguy on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:44AM (#49756083)
I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or this is an HN out of touch moment.

The obvious difference (and thus massive advantage) of the cloudfare product is that it is accessible over the normal internet without needing to install a tor client.

I'm sure that works for some subset of the population where all potential users are already comfortable using Tor; but imagine trying to share your PoC website with the designer/client and you are asking them to install Tor browser.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by smalltorch on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:57AM (#49756265)
>hobbiest or dev just testing your services

Is different than sharing your work with a client.

I personally wouldnt make it SOP to utilize a complely free service like this to share my work. I'm not saying it's not convient, it definitely is.

But you shouldn't subject a clients product to terms they probably aren't aware of.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ZeroCool2u on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:19AM (#49755671)
This is handy, but I wonder how much it will cannibalize their services. I have a simple app deployed on cloudflare for a very niche single purpose use, but I wouldn't have bothered if I had this. Serving it from my own machine would have been fine.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by danserfaty on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:57AM (#49756283)
Maybe it's a nice way to quickly test a new service or change over the internet without going through the git process, same way one would use ngrok - I could see that being helpful when prototyping / pocs, etc - before deploying changes to your app via the proper channel, especially if you are already using cloudflare for your domains/apps. As other people said, it probably would not be practical or scalable for most people to run an app 24/7 from their laptop using their home or office internet connection.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by aniviacat on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:27AM (#49755774)
Cloudflare Tunnels has been a free service of Cloudflare for quite a while now. What's new is being able to use them without needing an account.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by bakugo on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:33AM (#49755875)
It's not new. Maybe this page is new, but being able to set up a quick tunnel on trycloudflare.com without an account has been a thing for years.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by roncesvalles on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:35AM (#49755913)
Not many people run their local machine 24/7.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by berofeev on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:50AM (#49756170)
What does reality look like on this nowadays?

My initial thought was desktops generally run 24/7, with laptops running when in use. At least for the customer at the market intersection for this type of product.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by JavierFlores09 on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:17PM (#49756578)
I often tell my dev colleagues to avoid having their PC turned on all the time, be it because of the electricity bill cost, environmental impact or simply to make the longevity of the hardware a little longer. Granted almost everyone just ignores those things even if they're conscious of it, so I'd say you're right
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by seabrookmx on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:42PM (#49758445)
There's pros and cons on the longevity side. 24/7 use causes more wear to mechanical parts (fans for instance) but can be better for the electronics, as heat cycles are a big part of the problem there.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by roncesvalles on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:37PM (#49756828)
Very few people own desktops anymore. Generally people only buy desktops if they need to run a GPU, such as for gaming or running a local model.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by SoftTalker on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:35PM (#49757617)
Yeah my desktop is on 24/7. Laptop is on when in use. Phone is on all the time too, of course, but I don't use it for browsing or work nearly as much as my desktop.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by sophacles on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:15PM (#49756531)
There are people who turn off their computer?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cmacleod4 on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:09PM (#49758035)
You do if you're hosting a website on it :-)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by damsta on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:00PM (#49756334)
The website looks broken in dark mode on Firefox.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by smalltorch on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:52AM (#49755264)
It's a nice ability, but I dont like the terms of use.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ZeroCool2u on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:18AM (#49755643)
Anything specific to watch out for?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by whizzter on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:22AM (#49755703)
On what url were those? Or Cloudflare's TOS in general ?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tombert on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:55AM (#49756235)
I like Cloudflare Tunnels a lot, but something that annoys me is that officially you're not allowed to use them for streaming video, meaning I can't put it in front of my Jellyfin without breaking TOS.

I think that rule is more of a "we reserve the right to..." rule, but it makes me sad because I'd rather not open up ports on my router to expose my Jellyfin to my parents.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by bityard on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:16PM (#49756561)
Bandwidth costs money and streaming video costs several orders of magnitude more than just your random web/dev apps. Asking CF to foot the bill for entertainment streaming is really quite a lot.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tombert on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:18PM (#49756592)
I know. I'm not "upset" over it, just that it makes the service less useful for me.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by TonyStr on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:03PM (#49756371)
I discovered and set this up the other day, added jellyfin, immich and forgejo and was really happy about the result for five minutes, before I discovered that limitation in the TOS. Now I only use it for forgejo. Have you found a different solution to exposing jellyfin?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by madeforhnyo on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:13PM (#49756516)
For free idk, I personally use a VPS (with unlimited traffic) and Tailscale. Someone has to pay for the public IP and proxy.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tombert on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:10PM (#49756485)
I have a proxy set up with the Oracle Always Free VMs they provide. It works well enough.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by guluarte on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:53PM (#49757036)
i just use wireguard or tailscale, provision a subdomain with a custom ssl and resolve to a nat ip.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tamimio on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:13PM (#49756511)
Use pangolin (you can self host), been using it for a while and it’s great, under the hood it’s a vpn+reverse proxy which you can do yourself too. In pangolin you can have public or private resources, where private ones you need to authenticate through pangolin first (either pass or others like pin number for your parents so easy to remember). When you link your domain for public ones, I suggest you make a sub domain for it, so your apps will be a sub to your subdomain, that way you keep control of your main domain while having automatic assignment for your apps rather than manually, and if you didn’t issue a certificate, that sub.subdomain is basically invisible on the internet unless you host a service to expose it.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:42PM (#49761750)
You can put nginx with basic auth in front of jellyfin
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by xeornet on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:53AM (#49756205)
Looks like they straight up vibe coded the landing page lol.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rozab on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:59AM (#49756312)
I find it quite shocking that orgs with some great designers like cloudflare are doing this. Broken layouts, trios of random uppercase words sprinkled around. It's crazy. How does it inspire confidence in a product, knowing that the landing page was created in 10 seconds?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by maipen on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:41PM (#49757694)
AI took all the effort, so I guess nobody sees value in these little pages anymore. Not even those being paid. It's actually scary.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by user3939382 on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:15AM (#49755595)
I just spent a week writing a harness around the existing tunnels to make this by hand.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by 075326899532 on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:55AM (#49756248)
[ad]
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ThrowawayTestr on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:17AM (#49755628)
No-ip gives out free dynamic DNS with a static URL. I use it for Sunshine desktop streaming when I travel.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cuu508 on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:26AM (#49755763)
Yeah, but then you are always exposing your public IP.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by monster_truck on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:41AM (#49756034)
Exposing it to what exactly? The internet? Yes that's how it works
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by johng on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:06PM (#49756410)
This requires no port forwarding, so someone brute force scanning your IP won't find this and your open port. they also might have a harder time figuring out what service has been exposed since the port number itself will be unknown.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cuu508 on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:23PM (#49757455)
If somebody learns that such-and-such DynDNS URL is mine, they can always do a DNS lookup to find my current IP address. They can:

- find my approximate physical location

- regularly scan ports on my IP and wait for me to accidentally expose a service I didn't mean to

- track me in any access logs they have access to

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:44PM (#49761768)
They can, and do, do this with or without DynDNS.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cuu508 on Saturday September 19, 2026 @04:39AM (#49764580)
Do you mean by getting the information from Cloudflare, or some other way? With DynDNS though, finding out my IP is trivial and does not require any special powers or skills, it is just a DNS lookup.

PS. Just re-watched your matrix LED pendant video. It is so well done, both the project, and the accompanying video!

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Saturday September 19, 2026 @09:04AM (#49766271)
They're scanning all IPs all the time. If your home router has a public IP and a firewall log, check it
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cuu508 on Saturday September 19, 2026 @04:07PM (#49769718)
But with Cloudflare tunnel (and similar tools), there are no open ports on the origin server.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cute_boi on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:52AM (#49756191)
what a sloppy website, did cloudflare fired bunch of ui/ux designer? Every text is slop lol.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by usewik on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:43PM (#49756898)
yep, and all those fired and remaining are busy ai-native proofing their careers and tokenmaxxing everything including copy
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cub-creature on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:50PM (#49756996)
I swear if I see one more "pill-badge callout -> header -> subtitle" with gradient background and hover-cards landing page I'm going to crash out
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by altmanaltman on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:19AM (#49755654)
Claude worked overtime on this webpage
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by AtNightWeCode on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:29PM (#49756732)
Cool but the obvious flaw with this is that CF leaks DNS-records. So bots will find these urls instantly. Not sure why they have not fixed that or if it is even possible to fix.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nullbyte on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:37PM (#49756830)
Love this, very cool.

I used to use a service called ngrok for this, but it's nice that Cloudflare is offering one now.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by usewik on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:41PM (#49756881)
how long until someone's agent sets up a tunnel for the world to see one's most sensitive, private and embarrassing information or insecure work-in-progress app? granted, for the brew install some massive permissions are needed, so hopefully for those running their agent's in a sandbox, you should be safe.. should be..
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by frankcostanza on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:42PM (#49756884)
So... Cloudflare built Ngrok?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by _pdp_ on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:43PM (#49756915)
It will be nice if it had persistent URLs and and SDK for desktop applications. It could solve a lot of small issues for a project I am currently busy with.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cmacleod4 on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:06PM (#49758008)
I've been running a couple of websites* on a home machine behind a Cloudflare tunnel for 2-3 years now. The only thing I had to pay for was the DNS registration. There are limits on the traffic you can serve on their free plan, but I'm nowhere near reaching those. I don't know what an SDK would add, you just set up a web server using whatever method suits you, then configure the cloudflared to connect to that. I did find that the online dashboard could not support all the options I wanted, so I switched to using the config file method - it would have been easier if I used that method from the start.

One caveat - there is an option to inject Javascript into your pages for traffic measurement which is ON BY DEFAULT, you have to go to "Web Analytics" and turn this off if you don't want it!

* https://cmacleod.me.uk & https://newsgrouper.org

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by yodon on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:54PM (#49757057)
That's handled by all the prior releases of cloudflare tunnels
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by srichard16 on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:21PM (#49757436)
ngrok does this free, but with an account
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by TIPSIO on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:49PM (#49756985)
My wife and I have a mobile group/shared bot system where we can make mini apps and collab.

Anything from baby stuff, groceries, shopping, planning, wine tracker app, simple/fun/useful data things, etc…

We have Tailscale on our phones and can instantly and privately see without deployment or anything crazy via our secure VPN.

Think shared Claude Artifacts that don’t live @ Anthropic.

Tried to first do this with Cloudflare Tunnels (because I love Cloudflare), but between the broken dashboard side of Zero Trust and nightmare of Warp… it was basically impossible to setup. I guess that’s all super enterprise, which seems to be very anti-Cloudflare philosophically to not be able to self do things.

Will check out Quick Tunnels but I think it’s missing the bigger integration offerings Tailscale has/does still.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by theturtletalks on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:05PM (#49757202)
Tailscale is truly a cheat code. I have a web app that I run locally to control terminals on my Mac. I access the website on my phone using the 100.xx IP address and can code on the go. No need for a Mac or iOS app.

You can also use Tailscale serve to get a HTTPS url like Cloudflared but it's only visible to your tailnet. Be careful using Cloudflare tunnels because they are public and bots start poking around immediately.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by 0x1ch on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:04PM (#49757983)
Alternatively, Netbird has been a dream to use over the last half year or so. I think their server software has had some hiccups on new releases, but I stagger those updates anyways. All self hosted, similar concept to Tailscale, very good management UI baked into the self hosted product.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by garettmd on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:33PM (#49758343)
Netbird's great. I've been using Pangolin (https://pangolin.net/) lately for my homelab. It's very similar in functionality to Netbird, but I like the UX of it better.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by 0x1ch on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:53PM (#49759344)
Also a very good alternative. I went on a spree and tried out all of the self hostable alternatives and this was definitely a runner up to netbird. The self hosted tailscale is also good, just not as polished as these two projects are.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nickspacek on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:08PM (#49762615)
Switched from Pangolin to Netbird recently and enjoy Netbird more!
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by BOOSTERHIDROGEN on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:57PM (#49763181)
Which features do you specifically benefit from?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by drcongo on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:51PM (#49759314)
I switched from Tailscale to Netbird purely because of Tailscale's bizarre pricing tiers - I wanted just the SSH features, with multiple users, but the paid tier up from free didn't include the SSH features.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by 0x1ch on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:55PM (#49759371)
I think Tailscale would've fit my needs perfectly fine, but the management makes access control and grouping dead simple in netbird. It also generates a nice little map of your peers, their groups, and connected nodes etc. Quick visual on your topology.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by allthetime on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:56PM (#49762868)
What ssh features? You can have a hundred devices connected for free and they can all just ssh to each other directly
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by drcongo on Sunday September 20, 2026 @08:21AM (#49775121)
With more than 3 users?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by drakenot on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:27PM (#49762713)
For those who use Netbird or Pangolin, I'm trying to understand where it would come in handy over my Wireguard-Easy setup with my phone & laptops configured to connect to my Wireguard network externally.

Is this primarily for multi-user scenarios or complex setups?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by usagisushi on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:27AM (#49763601)
Both support multi-user setups with SSO or built-in auth.

Beyond that, compared to a typical hub-and-spoke WireGuard setup, the main advantage is peer-to-peer connectivity. Clients connect directly to each other when possible, which lowers latency by bypassing a central relay.

AFAIK, they also have different origins:

Pangolin started as an internet-facing reverse proxy (Traefik) combined with a WireGuard server for backend nodes. It has gradually added VPN-like features, including client device access and an internal HTTPS proxy similar to Tailscale Serve.

NetBird is a self-hostable Tailscale alternative that started as a mesh VPN focused on P2P traffic. It recently added its own reverse proxy features (Traefik-based, coincidentally), also similar to Tailscale Serve.

Pangolin is centered on endpoint and ingress management, while NetBird focuses on mesh networking, though their feature sets are increasingly converging.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by SparkyMcUnicorn on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:57PM (#49757899)
> You can also use Tailscale serve to get a HTTPS url like Cloudflared but it's only visible to your tailnet

For public access, similar to these cloudflare tunnels, there's Tailscale Funnel.

https://tailscale.com/docs/features/tailscale-funnel

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nacs on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:11PM (#49758062)
Tailscale funnel works well but you can only have 1 per Tailscale instance (1 per machine) at the https endpoint so if you want to have a few apps, the others will go on non-https, custom-port URLs.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by bakkoting on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:33PM (#49759094)
You can set up paths that route to different local ports. As long as your apps don't need to live at the root path you can have as many as you like. And you can still have something on the root path as long as it doesn't need the subpath.

Here's `tailscale funnel status` on my machine:

    $ tailscale funnel status
    
    # Funnel on:
    #     - https://my-machine.tailXXXX.ts.net
    
    https://my-machine.tailXXXX.ts.net (Funnel on)
    |-- /            proxy http://localhost:3000
    |-- /foo         proxy http://localhost:3001
    |-- /bar         proxy http://localhost:3002
    |-- /baz         proxy http://localhost:4004
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Natfan on Sunday September 20, 2026 @01:08AM (#49772647)
or just use a tailscale sidecar[0] in a docker container and give it any hostname you want

[0]: https://tailscale.com/blog/docker-tailscale-guide

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by MattCruikshank on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:06PM (#49758781)
That's why I keep using tsnet directly, where you can have as many virtual machines, doing sharing or funneling, as you want to.

The CLI doesn't let you do as much as the go library does.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by justinc8687 on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:48PM (#49763129)
I have multiple funnels running at once. I just put a tailscale container into my compose stack and that way each compose stack gets its own tailscale instance and thus its own funnel. Happy to share the setup if at all interested.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by havnagiggle on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:40AM (#49763362)
Reverse proxy to additional endpoints.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dlopes7 on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:41PM (#49759188)
I use tailscale on my steam deck to play stardew valley with my son on my laptop, it truly is amazing
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by _user_account on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:47PM (#49758529)
just use wireguard; tailscale is just the SSO enterprise overlay with a pricing tab.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pocksuppet on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:55PM (#49759373)
Wireguard is great for a point-to-point or multipoint VPN set up by a competent network administrator between machines with static addresses. But that's the only thing it does. It does not handle authentication or mobility very well.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by matthewmacleod on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:26PM (#49759010)
No, it’s not. It handles the keys, provisioning, DNS, NAT traversal, and a bunch of other stuff. WireGuard is a great technology - Tailscale is like a usability layer on top of it.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by titularcomment on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:23PM (#49758981)
I think an important feature for homelabs is NAT traversal
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by herpdyderp on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:50PM (#49758566)
I pay Tailscale nothing, why switch?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by jallmann on Saturday September 19, 2026 @05:34AM (#49764885)
git : github :: wireguard : tailscale
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by girvo on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:01PM (#49760848)
I love TailScale but was getting crazy battery drain on my iPhone with it installed and setup. Still use it, just not from my phone now
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by eloisius on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:57PM (#49761853)
I have the same experience and I once found a GitHub issue about it. I don’t think it sounded like they planned to fix it anytime soon. I just added the Tailscale toggle button to my phone’s quick control panel and turn it on whenever I want to check all my syncthing nodes or something. I keep meaning to see if I can script up something with Shortcuts to make it turn back off automatically.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tenuousemphasis on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:47PM (#49761801)
Strange, battery use is negligible on Android, particularly when the tunnel is not in active use.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by devilbunny on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:58PM (#49762564)
Were you using an exit node? Because that really does hammer the battery, but vanilla TS without a bunch of traffic doesn't seem to do much to mine.

The only always-on TS service on my phone is Immich for photo backup, and I don't take enough photos for that to matter much.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by aborsy on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:25PM (#49762702)
You should compare battery consumption of TS exit node with something like WG app which low
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by devilbunny on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:47AM (#49763394)
WG gonna punch through NAT for me?

My endpoint is a pretty stable (though technically dynamic) IPv4 on one end, but the other might be a cell phone with CGNAT, some random WiFi, blah blah etc. TS does that. If you don't want to use it, cool. Don't. I'm willing to make the tradeoffs to use TS for now. That could change in the future.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by yesb on Saturday September 19, 2026 @04:18PM (#49769793)
No but hole punching isn't really needed in that scenario. Open a port on the IPv4 side + dyanmic DNS. More than likely that is what tailscale is doing for you. Opening a port on that end w/UPnP. But can't argue with how simple it is with tailscale.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by devilbunny on Sunday September 20, 2026 @02:38AM (#49773082)
Yeah, I could do that, and it would work for most of the time, but TS does it for even the weird cases when I’m away from home and can’t play with it.

EDIT:good call, though.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by girvo on Saturday September 19, 2026 @06:25AM (#49765183)
I wasn't, no. I'm not the only one whos hit it either, not sure what the cause is :(
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by prtmnth on Friday September 18, 2026 @08:45PM (#49762206)
Using Tailscale in exactly the same way. It has been such a blessing!
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by timwis on Saturday September 19, 2026 @05:46AM (#49764952)
Fyi you can point a domain/subdomain (eg lan.mysite.com) at that 100.x IP and it will only work for those on your tailnet.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by peter_retief on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:24AM (#49765983)
I use both (also Headscale)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cbsks on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:00PM (#49757137)
> My wife and I have a mobile group/shared bot system where we can make mini apps and collab.

> Anything from baby stuff, groceries, shopping, planning, wine tracker app, simple/fun/useful data things, etc…

Can you elaborate on this? Sounds really cool!

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dizzard on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:38PM (#49758412)
Not OP- I think there’s been some cool solutions popping up around hosting personal apps. On the front page this week was Capsule (https://withcapsule.app/). My personal solution is Exhibit (https://github.com/momja/Exhibit) which also has the goal of being a self-hostable artifact store.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rambleraptor on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:45PM (#49758493)
I’ve been building something similar with [Homestead](https://myhomestead.dev). It’s my OSS solution for building mini apps. Each mini app is a Resct frontend and the backend (storage, auth, MCP, API, etc) just comes for free.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by SwamyM on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:35PM (#49757630)
Seconded.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by U4E4 on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:29PM (#49758287)
I’m not GP, but run something that’s pretty close to GPs description. It’s been a fun journey to set up.

The core is chat+audio/video call server running locally on my m3 Mac Studio. Centrifugo has handled the chat concerns very well. LiveKit was a really nice foundation for video and audio calls. There are a few different options for local STT if you want that.

I used RN via expo for the client and have my friends and family on TestFlight as beta testers. Utility over polish.

With messages and call transcripts on my own box, I can prompt Claude code or Codex to operate on any message or transcript content. And follow up in chat with a message. I do most of that from Claude or ChatGPT mobile apps via remote control to my sessions running in the box.

From there, if I give enough of a specc, anything that happens in chat or call transcripts can become an additional custom workspace in the main app. I think GP calls these mini apps. But they’re essentially rich clients under the main app umbrella. There’s other details, but yeah it’s a strange new world. Check my profile and reach out directly if you want.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ilusion on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:11AM (#49763251)
I have my own solution here that also works for sharing stuff with clients with configurable whitelists at artifacts.iofold.com (also open-source for self hosting on cf workers for almost free, github linked on the homepage)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by gopalv on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:10PM (#49758836)
> it’s missing the bigger integration offerings Tailscale has/does still.

Until I had tailscale serve generating valid certs, I had a good reason to use Cloudflare tunnels.

But in general I don't want to put everything on the internet side of things.

Mostly, I don't want something open, but more like a "share with" for people who are in the same office (virtually over tailnet, not physically on the same LAN).

This still works great for a demo instead of a product pitch, to send an link out to see something.

I'd still use a real host over a laptop for those.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by noir_lord on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:52PM (#49757026)
Only reason I have it (cloud flare tunnels) setup for personal use is because I had to do it for work years ago and yeah, Enterprise(tm) is a good description, haven't touched it in years so when it breaks I'll likely use something else.

Getting it to do what I wanted with a traefik front router with cloudflared talking to arbitrary subdomain that is spun up and broadcast from the other project side was very painful in a "this could be more friendly" way.

It has been truly bulletproof though since then so that's almost enough to make me go reread all the docs.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by roberttod on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:06PM (#49758784)
Does this work with remote agents though? I want my claude.ai agents running on my phone to be able to hit my local MCPs on my Mac Mini - my understanding is that tailscale wouldn't work because the execution is being called remotely. But seems like these tunnels would support that.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by threecheese on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:36PM (#49759114)
If by local MCP you mean stdio, then a tailnet won't help you unless you proxy the local MCP using something like mcp-proxy: https://github.com/sparfenyuk/mcp-proxy . That local mcp is only exposed to apps on the machine. The flow is Phone client --> agent harness or whatev --> Tailnet --> Mac Mini --> mcp-proxy http listener --> local mcp. But you need to wrap the local mcp runner in the proxy (check the docs).

EDIT you don't mean running on your actual phone lol, you mean in the web browser at Claude.ai. Anyway, if you use mcp-proxy for a stdio mcp, or if it's an http mcp alone, then you would need a public endpoint for Claude.ai to connect to. Tailscale will only help you if you use Funnel, but this cloudflare thing is exactly what you need (w/o Tailscale).

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by parthdesai on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:26PM (#49759008)
if both your mac mini and your phone are on the same tailnet, can't you just ssh to your mac mini from your phone's terminal emulator and have claude code/codex run on it?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by wildzzz on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:58PM (#49760170)
I just use /remote-control. You can't do everything from remote but it's was easier just opening the Claude app than using ssh. And I don't need to be on my tailnet either.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dalberto on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:52PM (#49760108)
I built something for this exact use-case using Cloudflare Tunnels:

https://github.com/dalberto/mcp-ferry

I also use CF managed auth to make auth easier.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nemosaltat on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:56PM (#49757073)
Us too, consider using your bots to migrate your tailnet to headscale. Daily driving Headscale + Headplane + Tailscale’s graciously provided/compatible native apps makes me feel like my devices are truly under my control.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by DaSHacka on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:52PM (#49760112)
If only headscale supported tailnet lock and multiple control servers. They consider both features "enterprise" even though the former is arguably a bare minimum and the latter nice even for home users in the event their lab gets taken offline.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by FridayCuriousit on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:00PM (#49757150)
Interested in the the bot system and how your self publishing app artifacts that you've got running. Care to share more?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by U4E4 on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:41PM (#49758434)
I run something similar, and in my system an app artifact is typically just a rich react component in a React Native client. They usually start as prototypes in chat, similar to what the labs provide in their native apps. If I or someone else in my user group wants more depth than a chat widget, then the artifacts can grow into a “workspace”. Oddly enough my richest workspaces have most been for entertainment. DnD, MtG deck building, HN comment thread parsing. And system management. Intrusion detection, feature life cycle/LLM handoff management, call telemetry. I do have a workspace for public county permit lookup which has been handy too. Reach out and I can share more.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by _blk on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:58PM (#49757109)
So you have a phone to phone VPN and each runs services or just a regular rapid/synology at home with containers?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by unixhero on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:18PM (#49759698)
That's really cool! I really want something like that. Care to share what your stack is? My wife would love having that super power.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nijave on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:28PM (#49761638)
Don't think we had any issues with Warp but Cloudflare APIs are a bit of a mess. Seems like they've cobbled together and then renamed/rearranged things multiple times now and it's a bit hard to keep up.

Terraform has worked decently well especially since there's a few random settings here and there that aren't exposed anywhere in the UI (facepalm)

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ramoz on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:18PM (#49762396)
> Think shared Claude Artifacts that don’t live @ Anthropic.

Shameless plug, I've built a self-hosted capability here with things like live collaboration for humans and agents. There is a native cloudflare deplyoment and integration with Cloudflare Artifacts. PR for tunnel would be appreciated.

https://github.com/plannotator/artifact-server

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by gibs0ns on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:46PM (#49762525)
I have really enjoyed the experience of OpenZiti for this purpose. Being able to host dark services and impose granular access controls and routing for different clients is a game changer.

For the few services I host that require SSL (eg; WebUSB), I serve the dark service via a standard domain (example.com) so I can still get a LetsEncrypt cert, but public access to that domain resolves to a static page; "Plz connect to OpenZiti & try again". This allows me to have SSL on required dark services without requiring to install a private CA for each client.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by allthetime on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:55PM (#49762865)
I use public dns routed to private Tailscale ips for all my home services. If i want to expose something for friends who don’t use Tailscale I connect a cloudflare tunnel… it’s pretty much a couple clicks and typing in a subdomain name once cloudflared is running on a server… what were you having trouble with?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pruneau on Friday September 18, 2026 @11:05PM (#49762905)
I use NextDNS instead of public DNS to do the same thing.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ezst on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:56AM (#49763435)
I would say that I've been doing most of that already with a reverse proxy+SSO/IDP for a very long time. Not the same, but close-enough and open to the "traditional internet" in a manner that does not require my users to install and configure tailscale, which is a massive plus. I do appreciate tailscale for the option to keep my effective host IP address hidden/local, but then I've been having a front on the internet (with a public IP/domain/...) for decades and I don't see a problem continuing.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pbreit on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:22AM (#49763577)
How do I get this more persistent?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by epolanski on Saturday September 19, 2026 @03:15AM (#49764153)
I never found cloudflare appealing for the small developer.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by neop1x on Sunday September 20, 2026 @06:34AM (#49774443)
>> because I love Cloudflare

Sad to read. Do people in China also love CCP and the Great Firewall? I know CF is more than just that MITM proxy as a service but that's their main product.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dbmikus on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:53PM (#49757031)
Now that is one vibe-coded website
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by afisxisto on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:53PM (#49757043)
I quite like pinggy for this. You don't need to install anything, since it uses a plain SSH tunnel.

ssh -p 443 -R0:localhost:9051 free.pinggy.io

(Free for 1h each session)

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ghoshbishakh on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:12PM (#49758076)
Thanks for sharing.

- Co-founder of Pinggy.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:35PM (#49761697)
You can also do this on any server you have:

ssh -R 0.0.0.0:80:localhost:9051 myserver

Make sure server sshd config has: GatewayPorts yes

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by scosman on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:54PM (#49757045)
The number of vibe coded apps accidentally hosted on dev laptops is about to explode.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by corvad on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:54PM (#49757056)
This is not anything new they have been around since the tunnels project launched. What is more concerning is the AI slop webpage and just the "AI" centered relaunch of an existing product.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by smetannik on Friday September 18, 2026 @12:59PM (#49757117)
So is this basically a ngrok from CF?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by adamfeldman on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:04PM (#49757199)
Cloudflare doesn't really seem to care about their tunnel product. "cloudflared service install broken on macOS" since 2021: https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflared/issues/327
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by st3fan on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:00PM (#49758702)
Huh I brew installed it and got a working tunnel in like 15 seconds.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by lysace on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:15PM (#49760354)
Install via brew worked. Getting the hostname to resolve took 30 mins of waiting. Have they heard of wildcard DNS?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by judge2020 on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:13PM (#49761510)
Cloudflare isn't going to wildcard every domain on their platform just to cure stale cache DNS issues.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by lysace on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:36PM (#49762756)
That wasn’t the ask though.

The product is falsely advertised as is:

"Cloudflare Quick Tunnels"

This is on one (or two) particular domain(s) where setting up wildcard DNS should be relatively trivial, if they actually cared enough about the UX of this product to make a special case in their code.

I don't understand how people can launch stuff like this.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by inemesitaffia on Saturday September 19, 2026 @10:39AM (#49766936)
Works on someone's computer.

It's "free". That's all you need to understand.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by st3fan on Saturday September 19, 2026 @04:49PM (#49770005)
I don’t understand what you are complaining about. Do you think there is an actual bug?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by keeganpoppen on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:39PM (#49757669)
yeah am i crazy or could it not like already do this as well? i swear i’ve seen somesuch similar in the cloudflared options. maybe not. but i can second having had some problems over the year getting cloudflared to install/set up correctly. tbf the actual feature works amazing once you get it working.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by robertlagrant on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:33PM (#49758345)
As I understand it you can make a tunnel, but it's under a domain you control and it's a few clicks in the dashboard to set up, and then a something to run in CLI. That's what my homelab uses. This is just a single CLI command and the whole thing is set up.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rock_artist on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:08PM (#49757255)
What's surprised me, just earlier today I let Codex write a minor PR for simple open-source webapp. I needed HTTPS for testing secured context Web API. (Web Bluetooth)

While testing it locally Codex by itself suggests using CF Tunnels but what's more interesting it actually used the Quick Tunnels.

Coming from days where I get warnings of vibe-coded generated code using deprecated code or older APIs, I must say using something so fresh is quite impressive.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by awwaiid on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:51PM (#49758573)
As far as I know this has been a provided feature of cloudflare for several years. I don't understand why it was posted today.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by everybodyknows on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:08PM (#49757257)
The page is a fine exemplar of marketing deception. Banner says:

> Free, secure tunnel for everything you are building.

> Preview and ship ideas globally in seconds with Quick Tunnels. Deploy your local application to the Internet with a single command.

Clicking through Explore Cloudflare Tunnel leads us to:

> Looking to expose public applications? This documentation covers Cloudflare Tunnel use cases for private networking and Zero Trust, like VPN replacement and private network access. For publishing public web applications, APIs, and services to the Internet through Cloudflare refer to ...

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rinconrex on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:10PM (#49757272)
Oh I use this for testing and demos between my phone and computer. Ngrok is fine, probably better off using Tailscale, but it's very easy to just run a quick tunnel with "cloudflared tunnel --url localhost:XXXX".
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by spprashant on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:15PM (#49757338)
Off-topic: That web page looks exactly like my vibe-coded utilities.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by superkuh on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:16PM (#49757365)
Cloudflare's only goal here is to put themselves between everyone and charge a toll. They are running a protection racket where they themselves are causing much of the damage they offer protection from. This is another example.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by bilater on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:16PM (#49757366)
So this is basically ngrok?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by bitlad on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:17PM (#49757372)
So it is ngrok 10 years later?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by skhameneh on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:21PM (#49757437)
There's a number of comments already about how this page looks vibe coded, I'd add that I'm actually shocked at how much this looks like the output of a one-shot prompt. It's not so much that an LLM was used, but a callout on just how generic this page is. How much iteration went into this? At surface it looks like nearly no iteration.

Edit: Well, they just re-vibed it. Went from the most generic Claude 4.6 era to today’s models, quality wise. I wish I had saved a copy of the original, because it would have taken me actual solid effort to make a page that generic out of an LLM.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by vlyan on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:34PM (#49757605)
I'll take that over corporate memphis of the previous decade.

(idk if it's really declining or I simply haven't noticed it in a while)

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by PufPufPuf on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:32PM (#49757584)
Group of three cards, each with a left-aligned icon, heading and subheading stacked -- that's the m-dash of web design.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ruuda on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:22PM (#49759740)
"Traffic rides Cloudflare's network" Oh, hello Claude.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hackernud3s on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:11PM (#49761493)
How would you say that? I can't think of a clearer way to say it TBH.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by jofzar on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:20PM (#49762406)
"Traffic routes via Cloudflare's network"?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hackernud3s on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:58PM (#49762563)
It routes from closest PoP to visitor -> closest PoP to origin. Your way doesn't convey that as clearly IMHO.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tefkah on Saturday September 19, 2026 @06:22AM (#49765173)
Claude has a habit of always talking in an overly active voice, sort of personifying subjects that feels off. I don't think many people would choose to say "Traffic rides" here.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ttul on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:16PM (#49767768)
I’m not sure your comment is load-bearing enough…
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by infogulch on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:25PM (#49757484)
I made my own tunnel system with a $5/mo vps that runs kernel wireguard and accepts my nas' public key. Once connected it DNATs 80/443 traffic down the tunnel to the nas, where its routed to caddy.

The vps runs a custom image that is 2.54 Megabytes. It has a custom kernel with almost everything but networking and wireguard disabled, a fixed-size fs with pre-allocated blocks and inodes to hold the vps wireguard key, and a single pid 1 binary that calls the kernel directly to set up the routing rules, generate a new wireguard key on first boot and save it to the fs, print out the wireguard public key to the console, and loops reap. Updating involves building and uploading a new image, assigning the vps to use it, reboot, wait for the public key in the console then set it on the nas so they can talk.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by RedCinnabar on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:55PM (#49758621)
Very cool, do you use some kind of an atomic distro like nix or something entirely self built using Yocto/Buildroot? I do something similar with a simple SSH tunnel and a NFT rule. Though, I don’t need your kind of ephemeral setup and so I just use Debian.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by infogulch on Friday September 18, 2026 @08:35PM (#49762135)
Thanks! The build system is nix, but the result is more of an appliance than a distro. (linuxManualConfig from tinyconfig + fragment, static musl Rust PID 1, mke2fs -d) Updates are rebuild-redeploy with the provider API; it can't update itself. The filesystem is a fixed-size image (even omitting resize2fs, so no growing onto the VPS disk), and it remounts read-only after boot. The boot log is 270 kernel lines then 4 userspace: 1 nftables loaded, 2 printing the gate's wg0 public key, 1 remounting ro.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cyberamirul on Saturday September 19, 2026 @02:57AM (#49764054)
Self hosting might win on control, but it’s harder to manage so I went managed (CF Tunnel). Edge terminates TLS, my Caddy only speaks HTTP, nothing to cert renew (unless you cerbot, but that’s not a guarantee if Let’s encrypt is down).
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by general_reveal on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:27PM (#49757511)
Could we turn this into p2p cloud hosting for all?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:43PM (#49761763)
No, by definition it's not P2P because it's all going through Cloudflare.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by maipen on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:39PM (#49757674)
I'm sorry to be offtopic, but this website looks like an hallucination generated by chatgpt 4.

This type of quality downgrade is scary, and it's everywhere now.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rkovashikawa on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:46PM (#49757754)
cloudflare rocks
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mgw on Friday September 18, 2026 @01:49PM (#49757800)
Can anyone elaborate on what's new? This exact product has existed from Cloudflare for years. Is it just that they added a new marketing site for it?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by 6thbit on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:16PM (#49758120)
"quick" tunnels you can make by installing cloudflare software and running a command, without a cloudflare account, using a fixed "trycloudflare.com" domain and not your own domain.

existing (slow) tunnels you can create once you've set up your own domain for cloudflare to manage its DNS, installing cloudflare software, logging in to your account, and running a similar command.

edit: my bad, quick ones aren't new at all

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by misnome on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:21PM (#49758180)
This has been the behaviour when you launch but don’t connect a specific tunnel for at least a couple of years
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mmoustafa on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:46PM (#49758518)
Quick tunnels have existed since at least 2022 (when I was using them)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mmoustafa on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:48PM (#49758540)
Nothing is new, quick tunnels were launched in 2021

https://blog.cloudflare.com/quick-tunnels-anytime-anywhere/

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rcarmo on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:01PM (#49757946)
I want this with TOTP or passkeys. Just giving me a hostname doesn't cut it these days.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by partloyaldemon on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:17PM (#49758150)
Tailscale is one of the most profoundly useful technologies I’ve ever used as small business person. It’s also one I would have never thought to invent despite feeling its lack daily.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ghoshbishakh on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:22PM (#49758203)
This is a very good solution for HTTP(S) tunneling - which is the most frequently needed tunnel. However if you want to play a game, or use SSH, then Pinggy tunnels are very simple to use. One command:

ssh -p 443 -R0:localhost:443 [email protected]

Disclosure: Co-founder of pinggy.io here.

Edit: I meant TCP tunnels, UDP tunnels, or also TLS tunnels for end-to-end encryption.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by caymanjim on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:01PM (#49758717)
What kind of usage limits?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ghoshbishakh on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:15PM (#49758883)
A free session runs for 60 seconds after which it has to be restarted and the address changes.

You can get the address with an API call.. but we charge for convenience. Pays the infra bills.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ghoshbishakh on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:57AM (#49763754)
*60 minutes
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tonymet on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:37PM (#49758396)
i love this! never understood why a proxy app was needed
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by fragmede on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:43PM (#49758471)
So you don't know my IP (DDoS target), and because of NAT.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tredre3 on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:54PM (#49759358)
I think tonymet meant he didn't understand why cloudflare didn't allow using ssh -R instead of cloudflared to create the tunnel, not not using a tunnel at all.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tonymet on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:24PM (#49760445)
precisely (thanks!)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by judge2020 on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:21PM (#49761580)
cloudflared is a bit unique in that it makes multiple outbound connections to CF DCs to do the tunneling and fails over if a DC has an issue (or, more likely, when a DC is near-capacity and they need to divert lower-tier traffic away from it[0]). SSH would reintroduce a single point of failure to this.

Also, the _main_ use case of `cloudflared` tunneling is using it as a long-term way to host production websites on your own hostname. the ability to create ad-hoc tunnels is more of a gimmick / advertising opportunity.

0: https://github.com/judge2020/cloudflare-connectivity-test/wi...

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tonymet on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:09PM (#49758807)
any app will connect with an IP am I missing something . a socket is exactly (IP, port) (src, target) tuple
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by c0wb0yc0d3r on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:38PM (#49759141)
For me, it’s as much about ease of use as much as it is about minimizing attack surface area.

Also the lifetime I need the connection open. For something quick, ssh tunnel. For something normies use, reverse proxy. Ain’t trying to teach my parents about IP addresses and port numbers.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tonymet on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:25PM (#49760450)
tredre3 explained it above
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by gpugreg on Saturday September 19, 2026 @02:14PM (#49768867)
When running this ssh command in qterminal, I can not click on the URL because it refreshes faster than I can right-click and click on "Open Link". Do I have to type the URL by hand or is there a workaround?

EDIT: Found a workaround. Double-click the URL and paste it with middle-click.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by yuchi on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:24PM (#49758227)
I still remember when ngrok came out. The experience was more or less the same.

It’s interesting that 10 (more?) years later the product has not evolved and, apparently, hasn’t found a way to finance itself without removing the pure free tunneling option.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by sparc24 on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:42PM (#49758449)
Worst marketing ever. ngrok had a similar slogan:

something like - "We help you put localhost on the Internet."

What could possibly go wrong?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hashstring on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:50PM (#49758570)
Hm, yeah, depends who you’re marketing this to.

Also, the “0 ports opened” marketing is misleading. It still binds to a port and then also lets people access your resources over it.

I dislike that Cloudflare Engineering has become more… marketingy as of late. Also with their Cloudflare OS misnomer. Their products used to make more sense, what happened?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:37PM (#49761708)
Marketing is meant to be misleading. That's how it works.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hashstring on Saturday September 19, 2026 @06:02AM (#49765041)
No, marketing is about communicating valuable offers.

Misleading communication is what I am describing, that is a subset of all communications.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by m00x on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:46PM (#49758509)
How many ways can you convey doing the same thing? All the banks out there have almost identical slogans because they do very similar things.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by _user_account on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:46PM (#49758508)
The main use case: cloud harnesses to access your local network; I highly recommend to run the harness in your local network instead, then you own the session, no tunnel needed.

The other use case for webhooks is ok, but is exactly what ngrok already does since forever with a pretty high free quota.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rvz on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:52PM (#49758592)
Seems like the quality of software engineering is now going to zero and just vibe coding unstable alternatives since 2023.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nickgray on Friday September 18, 2026 @02:55PM (#49758620)
This is cool. I like it! Also Cloudflare design has stepped up so much over the past 2 years.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by emadabdulrahim on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:13PM (#49758864)
Does this make working with agents in cloud more interesting? Maybe now I can see my changes right away without waiting for the build and deploy? By running the dev server and tunneling from the sandbox giving me a direct url access somehow?

Can someone chime in here?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by blocke on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:26PM (#49759012)
Ah yes. We can't let self hosted app traffic flow across the Internet in a way that escapes the vast Internet surveillance system run by the Americans called Cloudflare.

Hmm, Tailscale is too convenient and that traffic is going dark from Cloudflare's all seeing eye.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by pocksuppet on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:54PM (#49759355)
This is obviously vibe written, and I can't wait to see how quickly it will be shut down after someone uses it in combination with Mullvad to host child pornography.

Mullvad themselves already turned off port forwarding because people were using it to host child pornography. This is like Mullvad's port forwarding, but free.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by throawayonthe on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:55PM (#49759376)
they've been running the tunnels service for years

and they also provide web hosting..

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by kalcode on Friday September 18, 2026 @03:58PM (#49759411)
It's the AI witch-hunt these days. Salam trails coming soon to you're nearest artist! "That's AI!!!"

Sigh... HN littered with it these days.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by inconshreveable on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:20PM (#49759719)
hi y'all, ngrok creator/founder here.

we removed anonymous usage of our product many years ago because it was far and away the largest source of abuse on our entire platform.

i believe at this point that that anonymous, account-less tunneling services like this are net negative for the security of the internet

happy to answer any questions from the community

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Gigachad on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:50PM (#49760740)
The marketing from Cloudflare around this being for agents feels like the intended use case is for agents to exfiltrate data off your laptop without pesky hurdles like asking the user to set up an account first.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mitxela on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:33PM (#49761680)
I'd expect an anonymous inbound tunnel to be better than an anonymous outbound proxy and we have plenty of the latter.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by jeremyjh on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:34PM (#49760573)
Would you ever ship a product where all the ad copy was written by an AI and read by no one?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by opengrass on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:04PM (#49760863)
It's not a security issue, it's a liability issue!
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tobih on Friday September 18, 2026 @04:59PM (#49760175)
json output is nice, my agents always had to parse the text output before
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by opengrass on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:04PM (#49760238)
This is my docker compose for sharing files with randoms online https://pastebin.com/raw/cYV7ksw9

Don't pass -d, your tunnel URL prints in the console and you can download dirs as tarball.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by saejox on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:19PM (#49760396)
Needs to support tcp and udp
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dzonga on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:23PM (#49760434)
I have been considering using my other laptop as a place to run my agents in production since 1. my laptop is more powerful than the vps I can rent for cheap.

then just use Cloudflare tunnels to connect to the laptop.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cryptolobster on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:24PM (#49760440)
For small-scale personal or family applications serving just a few users, does it make sense to choose Quick Tunnels over Tailscale or Pangolin?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by jdthedisciple on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:43PM (#49760673)
Interesting but what a horribly vibe coded website that barely works on mobile
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Gigachad on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:45PM (#49760689)
It's broken on desktop too...
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by girvo on Friday September 18, 2026 @05:59PM (#49760824)
This is super neat! I rely on normal Cloudflare Tunnels for my self-hosted website/web apps, works shockingly well all things considered.

It was pretty easy to setup… but I cheated, and use Dokploy which handled most of it AFAICT

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by JeremyJaydan on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:10PM (#49760917)
I used Cloudflared tunnels for a while in production, they worked very well but the config was a bit of a pain sometimes. It's nice to see a simpler version even if it's just for testing.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by narmiouh on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:21PM (#49761034)
I'm not sure how safe this is...

vibe coded app with may be no security and now available from the internet for anyone to RCE into my laptop?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by dools on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:27PM (#49761085)
I’ve been using cloudflare tunnels quite a bit in places where I would have traditionally gone for a reverse port forward and they’re working really well. The quick tunnel concept seems really great but the non-quick tunnels are also very useful and can be entirely automated.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by noname120 on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:41PM (#49761235)
Cloudflare Quick Tunnels have existed for more than 5 years (yes, including the anonymous quick tunnels). I copy-pasted the url of the HN link in archive.org, see for yourself: https://web.archive.org/web/20211202005430/http://try.cloudf...

Is a new vibe-coded landing page for a 5-year old product really worthy of being on the front page nowadays? There should at least be a [2021] in the title.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by malfist on Friday September 18, 2026 @06:50PM (#49761316)
I did not know about them and I have a good use for them today. So I found it useful though I agree it needs the date disclaimer
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by ckvibubueu on Saturday September 19, 2026 @07:09PM (#49770904)
Web page can't even render on mobile properly
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nijave on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:30PM (#49761646)
Didn't these used to be called Argo Tunnels a long time ago? I think Argo Tunnels got repositioned for connecting to origin servers without needing an incoming connection to the origin but I thought they originally did something like this/ngrok

Yeah, I just checked the page >can connect their server to the Internet with Argo Tunnel for free

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by wbl on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:25PM (#49767846)
There was a problem with the name: toxic mine trailings weren't what was wanted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argo_Tunnel
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by jofzar on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:18PM (#49762395)
5 years ago imo it was less relevant, if you showed me this then I would be like "cool tech, but other then a specific scenario, why would I care"
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by stingraycharles on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:31AM (#49763619)
Why is it more relevant today?
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by makingstuffs on Saturday September 19, 2026 @04:40AM (#49764590)
I saw the post and was literally thinking "I have been using these tunnels extensively for a couple years now"
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by kqp on Saturday September 19, 2026 @05:57AM (#49765012)
Why do you think it’s vibe coded? Just asking to see if I can learn something. I can see it’s very standard corpo-aesthetic, uses callouts for the sake of callouts, and is horribly laggy, but corpo websites were doing all that long before AI. It also seems to be using a bunch of Cloudflare-specific terminology that I’d think would take longer to review and correct an AI on than to type yourself.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tefkah on Saturday September 19, 2026 @06:18AM (#49765151)
Other than the general vibe, there's a number of extremely specific Claude-isms you could pick up on:

1. the blinking "now with JSON output for coding agents". It loves to create these blinking badges

2. "Some text, and then <Text in a different color>"

Then further along the page, the "Your agent needs a URL, not a laptop" has a lot of tells of just being a straight Claude (design) output

- The small all-caps "built for the agent era" eyebrow. Once you start noticing this it's EVERYWHERE

- The 01 02 03 list

If you have access to Claude you should try have it generate a landing page for a tech product. It will almost always look like this.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by rgoulter on Saturday September 19, 2026 @10:01AM (#49766674)
The punch and profound-sounding phrasing is also Claude; but pre-LLM it might make sense for a marketing page.

"Your laptop stays private. The URL goes everywhere."

A URL ... goes, does it?

I've seen it pointed out (& have noticed) that anthorpomorphising like this is an LLM smell.

In this case, although "URL goes" can be valid, it's just awkward here.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by tylerhou on Saturday September 19, 2026 @06:55PM (#49770805)
The sentence structure is also just lazy.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by kqp on Sunday September 20, 2026 @02:49AM (#49773135)
Thanks! I have indeed used Claude only for text, not websites, so wasn’t familiar with the visual clues.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by efortis on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:37AM (#49766071)
One tell is: if you can code that hero there's no excuse for the silly bugs.

For example, the hero is fairly impressive in mobile but it's broken in desktop. And then you scroll down to the next section and there's overflowing text.

IOW, the skill level is inconsistent.

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by peter_retief on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:22AM (#49765970)
Yet so many developers do not know about it.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by hypercube33 on Saturday September 19, 2026 @10:04AM (#49766691)
They are useful for taking local llm models and delivering them with HTTPS to harnesses that expect it or to another machine. Other than that I'm not sure what I'd personally use them for.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by greyhound1 on Friday September 18, 2026 @07:19PM (#49761564)
i find it hard to read any text when the site has many animations that can't be stopped
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nojvek on Friday September 18, 2026 @08:57PM (#49762284)
I so hate codex speak.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by nyxtom on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:05PM (#49762338)
I've used these tunnels all the time when I wasn't at my computer. Insanely helpful when doing agentic work on the go
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by mintflow on Friday September 18, 2026 @09:18PM (#49762390)
perhaps this is the most easy to use networking product that ever shipped, but given ngrok did this many years before, maybe they just think for the agentic era? though one must take care for the authentification

I also think it seems cloudflare enter into a stage keep adding products and make the portal looks like a maze to get more advanced features configured

Do you still remember cloudflare mesh and use and stick to it?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by reddec on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:40PM (#49762782)
I have been developing for my own use something like that but self hosted. There are other solutions, but this one simple, reliable and secure in a way I see it.

Originally didn't want to share but here it is https://github.com/reddec/tunnel-me

UI: fully LLM assisted (not vibe coded, but guided with a lot of iterations). Backend: hand written, but before release polished via LLM. Docs: me - input, LLM - output.

The things I am proud:

- it very reliable

- its single binary with reasonable defaults and low memory usage

- SSO out of the box (cause I am using pocketid in my homelab)

- very simple backend

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by Nevin1901 on Friday September 18, 2026 @10:47PM (#49762818)
Cloudflare tunnels are really useful when dealing with webhooks. Way better than Ngrok and you can set it up on a custom subdomain you own. eg: site.yourdomain.com
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by geroge_kyaw on Saturday September 19, 2026 @12:52AM (#49763420)
Lol Codex UI!!!
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by shmde on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:06AM (#49763480)
I have used this extensively previously when I had to quickly share a UI prototype with my Product manager. There used to be all sorts of cors error when I also had a backend. Then I realised its just better to make a branch and deploy it in amplify and add the cors origin in the backend. But its good for quick UI sharing
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cliftonc on Saturday September 19, 2026 @01:07AM (#49763482)
I use this a lot, but find it a bit hard to manage if you want a persistent tunnel locally to use for dev (e.g. webhooks etc), so I added a wrapper around it that you can easily use: https://github.com/cliftonc/cfld
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by itvision on Saturday September 19, 2026 @03:09AM (#49764120)
The RAM pricing crisis is doing wonders to the software industry. Amazing.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by cbsmith on Saturday September 19, 2026 @05:04AM (#49764714)
What could possibly go wrong? ;-)
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by peter_retief on Saturday September 19, 2026 @08:21AM (#49765965)
I have been using CF tunnels for quite some time, very useful if you want to ingest mail on a local server without a public IP and hosting anything locally.

They are providing this for free up to a point, I wonder if all developers are aware of this amazing offering?

Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by adamch on Saturday September 19, 2026 @10:45AM (#49766977)
Lovely to see Cloudflare Tunnel frontpage on HN. Working on Tunnel was the highlight of my career. It was a fun product with a lot of bugs to fix, features to add, architecture to design. We were all working in-person, solving incidents together, getting lunch together every day. Taught me so many important skills that have helped me in every other project I've ever worked on.
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by abalashov on Saturday September 19, 2026 @10:49AM (#49767009)
Ah, an ngrok competitor. It's what we elderly (~40 myself), yelling-at-clouds types call "reverse SSH tunnels", but this is an anachronism from the era of knowing how to do things rather than paying for managed SaaS products to do them. Don't mind me, just yelling at clouds...
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by appleappleapple on Saturday September 19, 2026 @11:31PM (#49772300)
Lol this landing page looks almost exactly like something my company just put out. Holy AI
Re:Cloudflare Quick Tunnels by whydoineedthis on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @11:39AM (#49803095)
If you want to host your own version of this in AWS, automated with terraform, you can use https://github.com/nelsonenzo/tolocal

It uses basic auth at the edge to protect the endpoint being used by anyone. The technical advantage to self hosting is bandwidth throughput. For instance, If your using a css framework that is bulky on dev, but then minimized for prod, you will often find the ngrok/cloudflare tunnels too slow to load the local host assets.