News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:36PM (#29789279)
This will sound weird but I am a collector of swag from large companies that have collapsed due to anything from mismanagement to outright fraud. While we're a rare breed there are others like me out there. Still, even with this oddly specific marketplace being small, let me tell you, the Theranos swag market is hot right now (check eBay if you're curious).

Wish I had gone big on this one earlier, because I have a feeling this verdict is going to spice things up in the short term.

All that to be said, if you've got any authentic Theranos gear hiding in storage please do let me know, I'm a motivated buyer.

For those curious as one example: Nothing raises a few eyebrows more than a note written on Lehman Brothers letterhead with a Purdue Pharma OxyContin pen with the dosage pullout.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by mehrshad on Monday January 03, 2022 @11:51PM (#29791488)
A colleague of mine was contracted by one of several firms tasked with liquidating Theranos' Newark facilities back in Aug 2018. I took the opportunity to grab the equivalent of $15,000 of tools, furniture, scientific equipment, and of course, swag. All legally - liquidators are tasked with clearing the site of everything by a set time.

Had free reign throughout the facility for two days, scavenging through 200k sqft+ of warehouse, marveling at the cringey pseudo-motivational blather posted everywhere and grabbing whatever could fit into my apartment at the time. At one point, we spotted Holmes (and her "special needs" Siberian Husky puppy who left dribbles of urine on the warehouse floor) arguing with some operators from afar.

We weren't allowed to touch specific computers, chemicals or any hardware locked in the cages (incl Edison devices), but everything else was up for grabs, from high-end Mitutoyo measuring tools to Aeron chairs to U-Line desks, Theranos bumper stickers, water bottles, etc etc etc.

So yeah, I've got a few bits of Theranos branded gear... Still waiting on the right time to sell.

[0] https://imgur.com/a/36HtZCp

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by ethbr0 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:02AM (#29791563)
If you're in the mood to sell, I'd be interested. 0 -> o + .co @ gmail.

I like hubris branding for the same (mythical) reason Canadian engineers do iron rings [0]: so that maybe when I'm waivering on an important decision, I'll look down at the logo on my coffee cup and remember that some things are more important than immediate professional gratification.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Ring

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by FooHentai on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:53AM (#29792454)
Huh. I never realized until this moment just how much I want to wear a work shirt that identifies me as 'Misty' from Theranos.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by samstave on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:04AM (#29792797)
Thats: "Misty, Mr. Manager" to you
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by nojs on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:51AM (#29792127)
Classic pics, thanks for sharing. I’d love to see the full quote in the first photo. It almost reminds me of Office Space.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by _air on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:51AM (#29792445)
I think the quote reads: "Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing."
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jaynetics on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:48AM (#29793074)
"Risk more than others think is wise", well, you have to admit they followed through on that wall tattoo.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Ansil849 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:09PM (#29789694)
> I am a collector of swag from large companies that have collapsed due to anything from mismanagement to outright fraud

That's a really cool collection! I always find it interesting to learn what obscure things folks collect.

> any authentic Theranos gear

How do you tell if it's authentic? If I was a collector in this area, my big concern would be that especially given that the market is hot, someone could just look on ebay for images of branded products, and then make replicas of them by passing the same logo onto promotional printers.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dylan604 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:54PM (#29790142)
>I always find it interesting to learn what obscure things folks collect.

A buddy of mine has a similar fascination with picking things up from defunct companies, specializing in film/video post production companies. One of the items he picked up was a standard banker's box. Inside were a pile of CD-Rs which turned out to be the entire digital back up of an unfinished 3D animated feature. The entire recordings of the actor's lines. The 3D objects, scenes, etc to an unknown level of completeness. Even though the work product was purchased from the bankruptcy auction, the copyright was still owned by the creators and could not be rendered/released just because they bought a box in auction for $20.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by barneygale on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:43PM (#29800980)
> Even though the work product was purchased from the bankruptcy auction, the copyright was still owned by the creators and could not be rendered/released just because they bought a box in auction for $20.

Does the first-sale doctrine not apply here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Ansil849 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:37PM (#29790574)
Wow, that's so fun to stumble upon a veritable treasure chest like that. Were there any big names involved in the unfinished film?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dylan604 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:56PM (#29790722)
There were actors you'd recognize the names of, but not sure they would qualify as A-list (at least at the time it was recorded). I'm just not able to recall who they were. That was 15-ish years ago, and it was only a story told over a lunch. Not something that made it to long term memory.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by bombcar on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:29PM (#29789898)
Promo freebies change so often that you can often work out what company and what year made a particular squeeze toy or similar.

And rip offs will often have subpar artwork obviously not using original AI/EPS files.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dannyw on Monday January 03, 2022 @11:27PM (#29791321)
You underestimate the lengths people go to make knockoffs.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:25PM (#29797289)
Authenticity aside, I'd still buy that voice lowering vocoder.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by abakker on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:06PM (#29789659)
I've got two beer glasses from WeWork that say "glass half full" on them. They make me laugh every single time I see them.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by yobert on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:31AM (#29792337)
I have a WeWork shirt that says "The Future Is Awesome". I used to hate it but now I love it :D
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by iab on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:17PM (#29789769)
half Kombucha, half lies
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by arcticbull on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:27PM (#29789879)
Now that’s a powerful slogan
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by redisman on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:14AM (#29791954)
The metal ones? They still have those at the offices
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by thechao on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:40PM (#29790016)
My favorite tshirt is for a company picnic for Enron (scheduled for after it’s dissolution); the back is covered in MBAspeak: honesty, integrity, … It’s one of my favorites — up there with my Orwellian yellow plastic “Great Place To Work” Intel tamborine.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jaynetics on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:49AM (#29793081)
> my Orwellian yellow plastic “Great Place To Work” Intel tamborine

That sounds hilarious, can you post a picture?

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by thechao on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:43PM (#29803842)
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by gbronner on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:18PM (#29789775)
I worked with a guy who collected stock certificates of dead startups that he'd worked at, and displayed then in frames on his wall. I think he called them good misspent youth.

The Lehman Brothers risk management/principles cube was a hot seller for a while, but I'm curious as to long term valuations. Thought the art collection didn't actually do that well on resale.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by filmgirlcw on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:00PM (#29789592)
I am also a fucked company swag collector and Theranos has been my white whale since 2015/early 2016. Now it’s all knockoffs. I wish you luck in your search!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:04PM (#29789642)
Well well… I imagine we’ve crossed paths on eBay before - too funny.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by filmgirlcw on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:06PM (#29789662)
Amazing to meet another fucked company collector! I thought this was something only I did, genuinely.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jpm_sd on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:41PM (#29790603)
This feels like a real Colin Robinson / Evie Russell meet-cute*

[*from What We Do In The Shadows]

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dooglius on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:43PM (#29789387)
What does "authentic" mean here? Isn't company swag just the company emailing a logo to 3rd parties who print it on shirts/whatever?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:45PM (#29789424)
I try my best to only procure swag that was actually distributed by the company at time of operation. As an example, you can buy "joke" Enron t-shirts, which I wouldn't be interested in, but some authentic team building event-specific shirt distributed to 50ish people? Oh baby, I'm all ears.

I think that's part of the fun, hunting for the original stuff.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by F_J_H on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:03PM (#29789634)
Former Enron employee here - I have some swag I was given when I first started (lunch kit, values booklet, etc. Also have some golf shirts and baseball caps.

Worth anything?

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dylan604 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:56PM (#29790162)
>values booklet

Very very very curious of the text contained within.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by celticninja on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:50PM (#29790672)
This page intentionally left blank.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by threwawasy1228 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:30PM (#29789911)
Absolutely, you could get some great value for that on ebay, or grailed.com
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by ghostbrainalpha on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:03PM (#29789628)
Can you guys share your collection? I'm not a part of this hobby yet, but I'm immediately on board.

Would you be interested in an unreleased "Cosby Show" lego set that was supposed to come out right before he got cancelled?

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by kingcharles on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:19AM (#29791981)
> Would you be interested in an unreleased "Cosby Show" lego set that was supposed to come out right before he got cancelled?

Can't tell if serious. If serious, was this out of Lego Ideas (Cuusoo)? [I worked on the Back to the Future DeLorean set with the designers in Denmark]

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by k12sosse on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:41PM (#29790034)
Is that where we are today? Admitting[0] to drugging women, and then sexually assaulting them under the influence qualifies as 'cancelling'? Weird.

0: https://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexua...

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dang on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:55PM (#29797656)
I'm sure it was unintentional, but your comment here is where the thread went haywire. Maybe it would be helpful to explain why.

The discussion about disgraced-public-figure memorabilia was certainly offtopic, but it was offtopic in a whimsical and unpredictable way. That's ok on HN because it's interesting. What's not interesting, and is the bad kind of offtopicness, is turning the thread into a generic argument about some inflammatory thing that has already had countless flamewars. If you review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, you'll see that we have several rules that are intended to act as flame retardant against this kind of thing:

"Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents."

"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

"Please don't pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Find something interesting to respond to instead."

The high-indignation, high-repetition flamewar topics are like black holes that suck in threads that swerve too close to them. Since they're so repetitive (and generally so nasty), they're definitely not what HN is for, so we should all try to steer clear of them.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by rfw300 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:44PM (#29790623)
Not to put words in OP’s mouth, but I think they were using “cancel” descriptively, not pejoratively. I don’t think there was a suggestion he didn’t deserve to be cancelled, just that he was.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by ghostbrainalpha on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:11PM (#29797102)
It's my fault for not being more clear with my language.

But I actually meant "literally" cancelled. The Lego set was planned to come out with an actual REBOOT of the Cosby Show, which was cancelled in the traditional meaning of the word, like the TV did not go to air.

https://tvseriesfinale.com/tv-show/nbc-kills-new-bill-cosby-....

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dragonwriter on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:15PM (#29797166)
> Not to put words in OP’s mouth, but I think they were using “cancel” descriptively, not pejoratively.

If that was the intent, it was a pretty big mistake to use “before he got cancelled” instead of “before the show got cancelled”. The former construct in modern usage is pretty exclusively used for pejorative references to actions attributed to “cancel culture”.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by filoleg on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:44PM (#29790625)
“Canceling” means removal of support and denouncement of a public figure, justified or not. In Bill Cosby’s case, it was absolutely justified, as he himself admitted to his wrongdoings. What issue do you have with that term being used to describe what happened?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by tomjakubowski on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:37AM (#29791796)
I can only speak for myself but I can't say I've ever seen anyone talk about someone having been "canceled" unless they objected to the person losing their stature or were making a joke.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dijit on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:53AM (#29792134)
Cancelling is what happens to TV shows when they stop airing or being produced.

That was the meaning before “cancel culture” and was the intent of the parent.

I didn’t at all read it the way you did, maybe I’m older than you and I’ve seen more shows cancelled. (Firefly, for a famous enough example)

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by filoleg on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @03:36PM (#29800075)
Have you missed the entire #MeToo movement? Because people were cheering themselves on for (justifiably) canceling Harvey Weinstein using that exact same word to refer to the actions taken against him.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by inopinatus on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:43AM (#29792087)
Well, now you have.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jasonfarnon on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:53PM (#29790705)
He admits nothing of the sort in your link. Maybe read the link you offered others.
[dead]
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dang on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:03PM (#29797783)
No doubt users flagged it because of the name-calling and snark. You shouldn't be posting like that here.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by alphabetting on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:21PM (#29789813)
Would seriously love to hear about your most prized items in this shitco collection
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Maursault on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:31PM (#29789916)
> As an example, you can buy "joke" Enron t-shirts, which I wouldn't be interested in

I would not be interested in authentic Theranos swag, but I would pay a lot for a new knockoff mock turtleneck with the old MPlayer logo on it. Now I can't even find the old MPlayer logo anymore.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by ImaCake on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:36AM (#29792361)
You could try the old revisions on wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MPlayer&oldid=790...
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by rozap on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:13PM (#29797140)
Other people have commented, but I'd also enjoy a post or album of your most prized dead company swag artifacts.

I worked for a "hot" a16z startup just out of college, with a trendy office and the :rocket: :moon: vibe. They went under a few years after I bailed, but I still wear the t-shirt because it makes me chuckle.

In a strange twist of fate, I decided to exercise my few options, and I had to mail my stock exercise notice to some place with a check for ~$2500 to purchase them. USPS lost the letter and saved me $2500.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by VWWHFSfQ on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:45PM (#29789420)
This is some of the scammiest markets of all time.

Hey OP, I got a Theranos-branded mug I can drop-ship you from Alibaba. $800 OBO

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by miohtama on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:01PM (#29789602)
What you do not have is called provenance :)
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by brandall10 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:05PM (#29789654)
Just out of curiosity, how does one prove provenance?

I’d think the only way is to be the original owner (ie proof of employment at the company), but even then, given such a hot marketplace it would be super easy to just purchase and resell knockoffs.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by hyperbovine on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:21PM (#29789819)
> Just out of curiosity, how does one prove provenance?

The same way they do it with art ... research.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by brandall10 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:23AM (#29791714)
But with art there is only one work produced by an artist, or if a series, probably some way to properly id it based on a number of factors.

With say a sweatshirt produced by a third party based on some digital stencil art, do you know for sure the one you're receiving was printed by the company and given to an employee/customer? Literally hundreds, possibly thousands would be in circulation. How would you be able to distinguish that from say something a former employee w/ access to the original art data having it reprinted?

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by rbobby on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:44PM (#29789411)
Shhhhhh! You'll disturb the market!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by rot13xor on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:59PM (#29791137)
I assume you could buy the stuff from the company's bankruptcy auction or when it gets auctioned off by the Feds like in the case of Martin Shkreli's exclusive Wu Tang album.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by meetingthrower on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:39PM (#29789329)
One of my biggest regrets is not getting a Kozmo messenger bag from dotcom 1.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by wrs on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:54PM (#29789535)
One of my prized possessions is a Kozmo-branded CD opener, which I got by ordering a single CD from Kozmo, with free one-hour delivery. Thanks, venture capital!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sho_hn on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:04PM (#29789640)
What intrigued me about your comment is the reference to a "CD opener". I had no idea!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by mkl on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:39PM (#29790011)
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jgwil2 on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:38PM (#29791019)
Is this for getting the shrink wrap off of a new CD case? Because I can't imagine needing a tool otherwise.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by mkl on Monday January 03, 2022 @11:23PM (#29791291)
Yes, there's a recessed blade. I don't remember needing a tool for the wrap though either, and I never saw one of these in reality. They seem to have been common swag though: MySpace https://old.reddit.com/r/nostalgia/comments/95tooc/myspace_e..., Napster https://autonomic.guru/found-items-cd-case-opener/.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by nerdponx on Monday January 03, 2022 @11:35PM (#29791367)
I remember actually using these and them not working very well, or not well enough to actually remember you had one and go get it from the drawer.

But it sure does make me nostalgic!

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:25PM (#29789860)
Yes! Double points for a dead company logo on a tool now so nearly useless
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by walrus01 on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:56PM (#29789559)
I know someone who has both beenz and flooz promotional stuff
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by proactivesvcs on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:27PM (#29789881)
blinks Do you mean to say that Beenz wasn't a fever dream I enjoyed? Next you'll be telling me that Swatch's Beats was a real, actual attempt at redefining time, and wasn't just something I overheard being invented by a bunch of Jolly People at the pub one night.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by nikanj on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:26AM (#29792917)
The crazy thing is, Beats is a reasonable idea. The whole hype surrounding it was stupid, but a fully-remote-across-seventeen-timezones team would really benefit from a single, well-defined time standard. No more "Can I call you at 8am your time?" "Sorry do you mean my time at home, or my time in Costa Rica (came here for the holidays)"
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by walrus01 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:48AM (#29793077)
This is why UTC already exists and is used for aviation, military, telecom and ISP purposes.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by subpixel on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:25PM (#29790932)
I laughed at the CueCat, but now I wish I had one of my own.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Tempest1981 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:08AM (#29791616)
Under $20 on ebay:

https://www.ebay.com/b/CueCat-POS-Barcode-Scanners/46706/bn_...

Even some cases of 100 for $500.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by pcl on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:37PM (#29789987)
Ooh I used to have an amazing Kozmo keychain. When I lost those keys I was more upset about losing the chain than my house keys!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by short12 on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:45PM (#29789416)
I have a lehnen brothers decision cube type of thing and it has some pretty interesting ones like "responsible risk management" erc
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by gbronner on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:19PM (#29789797)
Practice sound risk management! I still have a coffee cup and a a garment bag that I bought for 10$
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by SkyMarshal on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:31PM (#29789929)
Maybe contact @pud and turn his old https://fuckedcompany.com/ website into an online museum for that swag.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jedberg on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:39AM (#29791803)
I have a hat that says "The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien" from the very first taping (and only seven months before the last taping!).
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jkeat on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:11AM (#29792223)
Whoa nice, how’d you get that?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jedberg on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @03:22AM (#29792610)
I was at the taping! I won the lottery for tickets and got super lucky.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by nimazeighami on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:40AM (#29792071)
It’s not totally defunct yet but I saved a bunch of super rare Magic Leap swag exactly for people like you lol
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by glenstein on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:14PM (#29789738)
>the Theranos swag market is hot right now (check eBay if you're curious).

I was curious. My ebay search for "theranos" turned up 50 items. There were fleece jackets with high asking prices, so that certainly was something. But everything else I saw for mugs and hats and t-shirts was in the $20-50 range.

https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=theranos

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:21PM (#29789824)
Most of those were likely never truly distributed specifically to employees in the first place. Reprint or print on demand swag is generally obvious with the white background. Look for real photos, especially in people’s homes.

In my totally arbitrary set of rules the item must have been available or given to employees only.

Here’s one I’d love to get my hands on if not for the price: https://www.ebay.com/itm/255014966170?hash=item3b6013939a:g:...

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by 2YwaZHXV on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:53PM (#29790131)
As someone who used to work there and has one of those water bottles and likely knows the person selling that one on ebay (based on the username) I find this hilarious...
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:51PM (#29790686)
So… how much you want for it?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by 2YwaZHXV on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:54AM (#29791866)
Until seeing your comment I had never considered that someone might actually want any of that stuff, so I had never considered selling or otherwise parting with it since it is fun to keep all that stuff around. I'll certainly let you know first if I decide to part with it, though.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by xUzFAy6c on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @12:53AM (#29805647)
I have one too. Slightly used so you know it's authentic :) How much would you pay for something like this?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dmix on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:18PM (#29789781)
> But everything else I saw for mugs and hats and t-shirts was in the $20-50 range.

Seems like plenty of new things not collectors items.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by seumars on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:12PM (#29789719)
>I am a collector of swag from large companies that have collapsed due to anything from mismanagement to outright fraud This is why I log on to this site.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by arcticbull on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:27PM (#29789873)
If anyones got a juicero lmk I’ll pay double market haha
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sushisource on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:41PM (#29789357)
This is a really cool hobby I never would've guessed existed. Good luck to you!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by bherms on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @09:18PM (#29818314)
So... Found this thread via a former coworker...

I have a friend who is cousins with Elizabeth Holmes. His mom was her first investor and she has the original stock certificates... They're planning on turning them into NFT's and selling them.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by nyjah on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:42PM (#29790041)
That's funny. I was just talking a friend of mine the other day that is printing a bunch of swag gear for Nikola Motors. I would guess he doesn't know the history of Nikola Motors and I didn't say anything, but I was thinking, how much swag does a potential scam company need?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sokoloff on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:54PM (#29790138)
Perhaps trucks roll downhill better if the occupant is wearing branded swag?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Legogris on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:00PM (#29789589)
I can totally get behind this. Holding tight on my Blockchains LLC swag half-hoping there will have a wider audience of recognition than the other people at that Prague conference. The other half hoping they actually manage to create something of lasting value, of course ;)
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by chunkyks on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:07PM (#29790286)
I worked at Lehman for a year around 1999/2000. While I was there, they handed out these plinths, I still have mine: https://imgur.com/a/NKnJh
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by anigbrowl on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:46PM (#29790636)
I wish I'd known that notorious S.W.A.G. was A Thing because I pegged her as a scam artist when she first entered the public sphere. Next time my spidey-senses tip me off I'm gonna acquire as much promotional material as possible.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by civilized on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:39PM (#29790009)
I totally get this! I would LOVE to have some Theranos crap. Then I would fabricate stories about why I have it, just like a real Theranos CEO!

(Hmm... might as well fabricate the collectibles themselves, as some other commenters have suggested...)

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by BeefWellington on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:46PM (#29789434)
Along these lines an old investor I knew kept a framed Bre-X share on his wall.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by walrus01 on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:57PM (#29789574)
The whole bre-x saga really amazes some Americans when I explain the depths of fraud that have historically existed in AB and BC small cap mining stocks...

For the longest time the historical Vancouver stock exchange, vsx, was known as something like the fraud capital of North America.

All of that is before we even get into the ugly history of some Canadian mining companies that have got into bed with non-democratic regimes in places in the developing world, where they did actually have a real mineral resource to extract, and damn the consequences.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jazzyjackson on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:39PM (#29790008)
Never heard of this, reading the wiki on bre-x now...

" ...one of the five women who considered themselves his wife... "

This is some serious drama. Have you got any reading you can recommend on the topic? I recently bought "The Prize" to catch up on my oil & gas history, perhaps there is a sibling book for minerals?

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by walrus01 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:57PM (#29790729)
as I recall several Canadian journalists wrote books on it. It was also extensively covered in the western provinces' newspapers and national papers (the globe and mail, etc) at the time.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jafo on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:14PM (#29789737)
Holy cow...Bre-X that takes me back. People were actually suicided in that one.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by minism on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:13PM (#29790837)
Happen to own a juicero? Its a dream to have that on a shelf one day.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by rrrrrrrrrrrryan on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:22PM (#29790427)
For anyone who wants to read more about this hobby: https://outline.com/TCdngY
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by anduru_h on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:51PM (#29789491)
I never knew this was a thing, but now that I do...I want in!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by EZ-Cheeze on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:21AM (#29792279)
That's hilarious and cool. You got a list of desirable brands? Off the top of my head I can only think of Enron, Lehman Brothers and Theranos.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by 12ian34 on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:59AM (#29792483)
stock up now on swag from Exxon, BP, Shell, etc., and leave it a few decades!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by wepple on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:20PM (#29800699)
Juicero!
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by incanus77 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:35PM (#29789966)
About 15 years ago, I worked at a small tech/political agency in DC. We got a new office just off NW 16th & K near the lobbying & financial areas. While I was setting up the server closet, I found a rolled-up blueprint from the office design. We unrolled it and... turns out it was built by Enron. Ken Lay had just died, so we always kinda-sorta felt haunted by his ghost.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by marnett on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:26PM (#29789871)
What an awesome collection/hobby Thanks for sharing. Is there any way to see all that you have?. I became interested in this after seeing someone with an Enron shirt on at a music festival earlier this year. Surely it was not an “original”, as you collect, but it had me reflecting on the artistic value.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Bud on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:04PM (#29790255)
I do have two refrigerator magnets from Webvan, which died in 2001. Was a pretty cool service while it lasted.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dangle1 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:18PM (#29789777)
Someone in my neighborhood wore a Theranos sweatshirt while jogging last year, I made up a story in my head that it was in solidarity with Ms. Holmes. If I'm right, I assume she wouldn't be willing to part with it.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by cwarzel on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @11:49AM (#29811376)
I've actually wanted to write about people who do this kind of collection! If you're interested in talking more about it, lemme know! [email protected]
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by paxys on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:46PM (#29789436)
How exactly do you check if something is authentic? I can have a hundred Theranos-branded t-shirts, mugs, pens, diaries, socks and whatever else you want made and shipped to me in like 2 weeks.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Danieru on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:53PM (#29789528)
That's your job. Sellers are motivated to provide evidence. "I just have it lol" is not going to command much premium over your costs.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by throwawaylinux on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:48PM (#29790090)
Yes that's hilarious but you're missing the interesting part. How does the seller provide convincing evidence that withstands scrutiny such that a diligent buyer would be satisfied that it is authentic then.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by bener on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:45PM (#29803868)
I would suggest checking some of the high value auctions and seeing what their proof is.

It would be trivial to prove you worked at a company if that's how you were given it, you might even have photos of an event where stuff was given out, emails detailing a "welcome pack", I'm guessing it's these sort of things that are used as proof.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by whatever1 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:03PM (#29789633)
Do you have the epic ENRON intern Tshirt in your collection ?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by AdamN on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:05PM (#29789645)
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dmix on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:08PM (#29789691)
Only 3 left in stock!

Also I love that website. As a recent casual collector of paper currency. I never thought to buy some old stocks/bonds.

Edit: it’d be hilarious I’d the Enron stock was fake

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by systemvoltage on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:19PM (#29789799)
My intern job back in 2005 was to take Enron's wind turbine division's technical handbooks and scan them on large flat bed scanners. They were all stored in Tehachapi desert, flooded and with water damage. I found a bunch of cool stuff in these boxes including a binder containing Enron's branding assets and standards manual.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by CPLX on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:41PM (#29789359)
I’ve got a nice looking Ozy coffee mug if you’re interested.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by spyspy on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:34PM (#29790990)
I have some yik yak socks I got a few months before they went bankrupt. Didn’t know there’s a market for that.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dannyphantom on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @10:45AM (#29795978)
Oh wow, I remember using that app in high-school. That's awesome.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by jjordan on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:49PM (#29790093)
Great timing! Not sure if this qualifies, but I just listed a copy of the Oct 2015 Inc Magazine where she was touted as "The Next Steve Jobs". Was a subscriber back in the day. https://ebay.com/itm/255312572520
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by hnacct2001 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:26PM (#29790467)
thanks for sharing -- most entertaining thread i've read in quite some time
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by y2kenny on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:44AM (#29791827)
This reminds me of the Black Mirror's "Black Museum" episode...
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by TaylorAlexander on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:59PM (#29791134)
Reminds me of the water bottle from Palantir I have that seems very cursed.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Tepix on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:07AM (#29794271)
We still have a nice Webvan magnet on our fridge somewhere. Good times.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by daenz on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:37PM (#29789299)
What a super interesting niche. Do you see returns on your investments?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by javajosh on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:41PM (#29789369)
I don't remember where I first heard this, but it's good advice: don't collect as an investment, collect because you really enjoy the objects. I collect rare books, but never because I think they'll go up in value (although they probably will). I just like having them around. Socially, infamous corpo-swag is really even better - what a conversation starter! But I personally wouldn't want that sort of stuff in my shared spaces. Interesting or not, its still just corpo-swag.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dehrmann on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:27PM (#29789878)
> don't collect as an investment

I've seen a lot of Pawn Stars in the past six months. They never say this, but you can put it together. Most things that people collect trade in low volumes, so pricing is hard, and the bid/ask spread kills you. If you decide to sell, you'll either get 70% of the value if you sell it fast, or maybe 100% if you're ready to wait two years. If you want to liquidate everything, it might depress the market. There's also a discount when you have it as a collection because someone could part it out, but that's even more time. That, and the drive to collect is building the collection, so there's less utility in getting an instant collection.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by volkl48 on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:10PM (#29790823)
While I totally agree about not collecting as an investment, "because you really enjoy the objects as a person who likes this stuff" is probably not actually a terrible metric for future desirability of an item in a niche area of collecting. Other fans/collectors likely feel the same. Of course, it doesn't tell you if that niche will die out and no one will want anything, although I suspect rare books are less at risk of that.

As a collector of memorabilia for a band that's been around a while: The items I was drawn to, either because I just loved the look or because they were from a show/tour/album I particularly found special, have often turned out to be the ones that have appreciated much more in value than the average thing of that level of rarity for the band.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dmazin on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:56PM (#29789560)
Cool! Do you focus on any subjects?

Also, have you seen The Booksellers?

It took me a while to realize I was collecting books. Before, the way I thought of it was "I would never walk past an out-of-print book about computing history! I might never come across it again!" But now I am a bit more focused on the collection aspect, for example, there are now specific titles and authors that I seek out.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by javajosh on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:25PM (#29789858)
I have a good collection of old science books. One of my favorites is called "The Perfect Woman", publish in 1896, and it is a manual for women. It's precisely as horrifying and unintentionally hilarious as you would expect. But mostly I collect early editions of my favorite stories, or occasionally limited editions like from Subterranean Press. And no, I have not seen The Booksellers. I got into this because as a kid I'd buy a lot of books from our neighborhood used book dealer, mostly cheap science fiction paperbacks. I've tried ebooks a couple of times, and I just don't like them. I wish I did because it's highly convenient. But I just really prefer paper. For one thing you can give away your book when you're finished with it, or loan it to a friend, neither of which you can do with an ebook.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by brandall10 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:08PM (#29789686)
I could imagine having a little ‘altar’ of failed company swag on a shelf in your office could be fun and motivating in a way.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:40PM (#29789342)
To be completely honest, I'm more of a buyer than a seller. I have a few items that are "worth" (in a loose sense) in the hundreds and thousands, but most are nothing more than a rare conversation piece I have on my desk.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by filmgirlcw on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:04PM (#29789644)
Did you get the MSCHF fucked company toys? The tiny Theranos machine is adorable.

Like you, I collect fucked/defunct company merch, tho my collection isn’t just fraud related, I’ve got Quibi merch — most of it is. I’ve got MoviePass, Fyre Festival legit merch with tags, Ozy Media was a recent one, Enron business cards, Arthur Andersen tote bags, Worldcom mugs, etc. I’ve even got some old Internet Explorer merch, because it’s kitsch!

What is your favorite piece?

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by celticninja on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:43PM (#29789379)
Do you have a website to show some of them off? I would love to see some of your gravestones.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:49PM (#29789478)
This thread is the most interested anyone has ever been in this stuff, I'll have to consider some sort of catalog as the collection grows, not a bad idea.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by celticninja on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:47PM (#29790643)
I'm assuming it's lots of dot-com era, do you also collect outside of tech? E.g Lehman Brothers or Enron
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by sharkweek on Monday January 03, 2022 @10:38PM (#29791018)
08 graveyard is actually some of my favorite stuff. I love Lehman and Bear stuff.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by OnlineGladiator on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:41PM (#29789368)
> I have a few items that are worth in the hundreds and thousands

At first I read 'worth in the hundreds of thousands' and I was really curious what garnered such value. Language ambiguity is fun.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by lbotos on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:39PM (#29789328)
They said collector, so I suspect they aren't holding to sell :P
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by testplzignore on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:52PM (#29789512)
A Theranos memorabilia pump and dump scheme would be quite something.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by rwmj on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:36AM (#29794517)
I still have the Enron mug which I nicked from their London office.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by com2kid on Thursday January 06, 2022 @05:27PM (#29831333)
Do you have an email for contacting you at?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by donkarma on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @05:32AM (#29793351)
Now I want some, look at what you've started.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by annoyingnoob on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:25PM (#29789864)
Collector or Speculator?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by cammikebrown on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:57PM (#29789568)
Got any Clinkle swag?