systemvoltage
systemvoltage on Hacker News
Problem with Gitlab is that they will never stop adding features.
Snapshots have an intention behind them as a chunk that the programmer thought of. It has infinite flexibility depending on the programmer/team. IMO they are a necessary feature, but the article considers it a bug. It’s an explicit and deliberate chunking of code writing process which is what you want in a chaotic “collaborative” environment. The system doesn’t get to decide but you decide when to commit.
It's interesting that we are seeing a time when subscriptions are not preferred and usage-based billing is.
Pay-as-you go isn't a common thing in SaaS. For example, except for AWS SES, all email providers are bulk-subscription based.
Any recommendations for a trustworthy registrar?
Interesting. All 3 seems like they’re obviously going to impact quality. e.g, reducing the effort from high to medium.
So then, there must have been an explicit internal guidance/policy that allowed this tradeoff to happen.
Did they fix just the bug or the deeper policy issue?
I am not following the logic. If you’re a hobbyist, sure.
But the argument is if you’re using Vercel for production, you’re paying 5-10x what you’d pay for a VM, with 4gb.
So then what’s the rationale? You can’t be a hobbyist but also “it’s pay time” for production?
What do you do if not AWS?
workos is down too, timing is highly correlated with AWS outage:
https://status.workos.com/That means Cursor is down, can't login.
What changed? 2017 HN would be very different on this take.
No, I can’t find a single article praising wealth concentration.
Not trolling. It has served me better than most heuristics.
If there is something subjective and if you cannot find a critique of it, it’s usually a super power to assume the opposite is true barring obvious exceptions.
What’s wrong with extreme wealth concentration? It’s not like hoarding cash. The wealth is the stake in companies they built or own.
We need more wealth concentration, simply because opposite of this is the prevailing normie zeitgeist. You can just write it off based on how popular it is to hate wealth.
It encourages the 80% into group think. Flagging is a signifier that “you should not dare to think that was a good comment. Move on and don’t think for yourself”.
I agree somewhat, you can feel the tension on HN with respect to labor vs capital. Which is funny because the entire premise of YC is to infuse capital and get a huge leverage over bootstrappers.
Chess engines should come with another metric bar: "The twitchy-ness" of the position aka the gradient of primary eval metric as you pareto the possible moves from best to worst. The stronger this gradient, the more risky it is to play, and more changes to make a mistake.
That seems extreme. They’re the biggest force to combat Climate Change. Tesla existing is good for the world.
:-D Nice. The future we deserve. Now only if there was a company that was into one drop blood testing!
We need more safetyism culture. We need to ban root access completely by 2030. 10-factor security for login. 256 digit OTP and you must insert a drop of blood to login.
At least, we’ll be super secure!
100% politically motivated. Same with our DOJ which has been weaponized like never before.
Like that famous quote, Show me a man and I’ll find a crime
Why are the American progressives against progress?
Do you know what the entire booster is hanging off of? It can't be the fins. How is the load transferred to the arms?
Need to remove regulations instead and fast track SpaceX.
Every fucking time we don't need to increase the size of the Government. It only gets bigger. Never smaller.
It’s autist, I’ll allow it.
They still broadcast to millions of people despite of being occasionally wrong. Individuals can support them or not, they can be funded by other means (WaPo by Jeff Bezos). It doesn’t change the central point I was trying to make: they put out incorrect information to an extremely large audience. Often corrections are late and the damage is done. Viewership of correction is a few magnitude of orders less.
I am not advocating banning them. I was trying to make a point that by the extension of OP’s logic, the existence of press seems in line with their characterization.
By that extension, NYT or Fox News should be banned as they have and they do broadcast incorrect information all the time.