News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Ansil849 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:09PM (#29789694)
> I am a collector of swag from large companies that have collapsed due to anything from mismanagement to outright fraud

That's a really cool collection! I always find it interesting to learn what obscure things folks collect.

> any authentic Theranos gear

How do you tell if it's authentic? If I was a collector in this area, my big concern would be that especially given that the market is hot, someone could just look on ebay for images of branded products, and then make replicas of them by passing the same logo onto promotional printers.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dylan604 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:54PM (#29790142)
>I always find it interesting to learn what obscure things folks collect.

A buddy of mine has a similar fascination with picking things up from defunct companies, specializing in film/video post production companies. One of the items he picked up was a standard banker's box. Inside were a pile of CD-Rs which turned out to be the entire digital back up of an unfinished 3D animated feature. The entire recordings of the actor's lines. The 3D objects, scenes, etc to an unknown level of completeness. Even though the work product was purchased from the bankruptcy auction, the copyright was still owned by the creators and could not be rendered/released just because they bought a box in auction for $20.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by barneygale on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:43PM (#29800980)
> Even though the work product was purchased from the bankruptcy auction, the copyright was still owned by the creators and could not be rendered/released just because they bought a box in auction for $20.

Does the first-sale doctrine not apply here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-sale_doctrine

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by Ansil849 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:37PM (#29790574)
Wow, that's so fun to stumble upon a veritable treasure chest like that. Were there any big names involved in the unfinished film?
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dylan604 on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:56PM (#29790722)
There were actors you'd recognize the names of, but not sure they would qualify as A-list (at least at the time it was recorded). I'm just not able to recall who they were. That was 15-ish years ago, and it was only a story told over a lunch. Not something that made it to long term memory.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by bombcar on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:29PM (#29789898)
Promo freebies change so often that you can often work out what company and what year made a particular squeeze toy or similar.

And rip offs will often have subpar artwork obviously not using original AI/EPS files.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by dannyw on Monday January 03, 2022 @11:27PM (#29791321)
You underestimate the lengths people go to make knockoffs.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @12:25PM (#29797289)
Authenticity aside, I'd still buy that voice lowering vocoder.