News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by lucisferre on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:38AM (#8791713)
Yosemite has been a major regression in almost every respect, I actually regret upgrading. Aside from the obvious and major performance and stability issues the major features are just plain broken. For example, try answering your phone from your computer. It takes way too long to actually pick up the call from the phone and then when you try to answer it bugs up so that in the end you can never actually answer the call. This is completely unacceptable behavior and a feature like this should have never been released unless it was exceptionally reliable and seamless.

It seems Apple is more concerned with showing off the concepts behind these features than making sure they actually deliver a solid experience when their released. Another case in point is the changes to AirPlay for the AppleTV. The new approach to connecting a device should be a big improvement, instead it's a buggy mess that makes it nearly impossible for us to use it anymore.

One of the most refreshing things about moving from primarily using Windows/Linux to a Mac for me was the sensibility, stability and the fact that things just worked the way you expected them to. Now that seems to be completely lost.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by tolmasky on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:45AM (#8791732)
The phone thing was infuriating. After upgrading all of a sudden every device I own would start ringing like crazy: phone, computer, Apple TV STOPS airplay because the iPad streaming to it was also buzzing like mad. I KNOW I KNOW, you can turn it off, but I hate the fact that upgrading my OS has now become "turn off the 10 gimmick features so you can get back to some level of sanity", especially because after I pick up the call I completely forget about it (I'm not going to not take the call and then start going through the prefs on my x devices). So the other day I finally gave in and just hit accept on my computer -- and ... call failed. Great. I felt like I was on candid camera or something, the employees at Apple viewing me through my iSight camera on my monitor laughing at the sucker who finally took the bait.

As far as the Apple TV is concerned, I've completely given up. Its incredible how a product can be ruined through software updates. Forgetting the lack of attention, that thing was good. AirPlay was a good feature. Hardly works anymore. I've more or less completely switched to Amazon Fire TV/Stick. The voice search on that thing is seriously impressive. And even without that, just scrolling through shows doesn't drive you up the wall. Its like someone actually considered how someone would use the device.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by ntSean on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:21AM (#8791813)
All of the features you've just canned, I use regularly, and don't see the huge issue that you're talking about. I receive calls on my laptop daily and I've very rarely had it fail. I find being able to reply to texts and calls insanely useful. Regardless of my anecdote all new technology is prone to bugs. To say "turn off the 10 gimmick features so you can get back to some level of sanity" is ridiculous. The feature you're talking about is Handoff, its 1 checkbox in your device. Airplay not working? I use it regularly again, with Plex and Beamer, its one of the most useful things I have connected. You say its ruined through software updates, but then go on to say that your gripe is the interaction interface? And of all things, scrolling. Wouldn't that be a pre-existing condition?

I feel like your frustration could be solved with just simply setting up your devices in a way that suits your uses, not the common denominator.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by lobster_johnson on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:16AM (#8791936)
If Yosemite, iOS 8 and other recent changes have shown anything, it is that that problems are not consistent across the user base -- some users are plagued by bugs, while others are somehow, inexplicably completely problem-free.

I myself have been hit hard by Yosemite bugs (graphics glitches, slowness, wifi not connecting at all, very slow wifi, Mac not coming out of sleep, AirPlay issues, Airdrop issues, Bluetooth suddenly disappearing etc., all this on a fast, fairly new MBP), but I have never experienced any iOS 8 bugs of note.

The corollary is that when someone complains, we need to take it seriously and not pretend everything is fine. Clearly many people are hit by problems, and the problems are very real.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by vardump on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:49AM (#8792509)
Similar story here, and I don't even bother complaining anymore. The product is perfect. My fault, that Wifi doesn't finds no APs (fixed now in Yosemite), Bluetooth works occasionally (better in Yosemite, not up to par with competition), camera works once in Skype + next time after reboot (still happens) and audio stutters (still happens, but not as bad as in Mavericks). Oh, and don't get me started on the power brick cable quality [1]... Neither Apple or user forums care, the posts just get deleted. Whatever. My next laptop won't have a fruity logo. I need something that Just Works. Like Macbooks once were.

[1]: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC461LL/A/apple-60w-magsaf...

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by Silhouette on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:30AM (#8793374)
My next laptop won't have a fruity logo. I need something that Just Works.

I'm right there with you, but the trouble is, I'm not sure anything satisfies that criteria any more. :-(

Not so long ago, I was expecting to go the other way, with our next laptops here having that fruity logo precisely because we expected OS X to Just Work where Windows 8 was just nasty.

However, right now, neither of the major commercial platforms is at all appealing, and anything Linux-based still has the fundamental problem that there aren't enough professional quality applications available to meet our needs yet. Relying on SaaS to break the OS strangleholds is also a questionable business move that we are increasingly glad we haven't made as the stories of broken "upgrades", sharp price increases, and outright cancelled services pile up.

I'm holding out some hope that either MS will come back with the next version of Windows and promote some sort of very-long-term stability and support (which is something they have historically been good at, but it seems unlikely with their new choice of leadership) or the FOSS work will finally start to take over (but this probably requires changes in the law, specifically making clear that patents are not enforceable anywhere that matters on things used for interoperability like data formats, communications protocols, and algorithms necessary to work with them).

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by coldtea on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:17AM (#8792077)
>If Yosemite, iOS 8 and other recent changes have shown anything, it is that that problems are not consistent across the user base -- some users are plagued by bugs, while others are somehow, inexplicably completely problem-free.

Not really inexplicably: different graphics and airport cards (in different Mac models), different wi-fi routers, some have installed BS haxies while others have not, some have updated their OS on top of the previous installation for 3-4 OSes, where others start from a clean slate, etc. Regarding Hangout, it's also different iOS device version, proximity to the phone, etc.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by Silhouette on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:48PM (#8794012)
It's true that there are plenty of possible explanations, but whether those explanations should still be possible as we head into 2015 is a different question.

Wintel boxes through the 1990s and 2000s coped with a much more diverse range of hardware and related drivers than the Mac ecosystem has ever had, and while certainly there was the occasional glitch, the track record was dramatically better for a very long time than what we see today.

This idea that widespread failures are somehow acceptable and to be expected is a bizarre change in mindset that seems to have taken hold in the 2010s. It is not in any way inevitable. It is just a result of poor specification and standardisation, bad programming, and rushing junk to market for commercial reasons when it isn't up to the standards we used to expect, often with some vague promise that any flaws will be corrected by on-line updates later.

I'm increasingly of the view that the Internet has actually been the worst thing that has ever happened to the software industry. It should be a huge advantage, but in reality it is often used as an excuse to ship bad code early and to impose unwanted updates, rent-an-app pricing models, and other user-hostile strategies.

If anyone still made software that does an important job well and comes with meaningful long-term support, my businesses would be throwing so much money at them right now. Sadly, hardly anyone making core business software actually does. It appears that I am part of a small minority, and so many people are willing to accept and pay for substandard junk that this has become the dominant software business model of this decade.

The most frustrating thing is that, since apparently there aren't enough of us for our money to swing things back in a more quality-driven direction, it's not clear what any of us can do constructively to make things any better now. Maybe when things reach their logical conclusion and people are actually dying because some 13-year-old script kiddie accidentally crashed their car by remote control, the wider public will finally get the message and start demanding acceptable quality again.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by coldtea on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:02PM (#8794525)
>Wintel boxes through the 1990s and 2000s coped with a much more diverse range of hardware and related drivers than the Mac ecosystem has ever had, and while certainly there was the occasional glitch, the track record was dramatically better for a very long time than what we see today.

Perhaps rose colored glasses? I've used those Wintel systems and dealing with new and unexpected issues, with drivers, software, peripherals etc, was a day to day occurence.

It still is now, judging from Wintel friends I have, including my parents and siblings. It's just that in Wintel world there so many vendors and combinations of components, that no PC system has a multi-million units production run that a Mac has. Even for a company that pushes lots of units, like Dell, they offer 40+ different configurations at any point in time...

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by Silhouette on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:10PM (#8794550)
I honestly don't think it was ever as bad in those days as what we're seeing now, though, with the possible exception of high-end games where poor quality graphics drivers were notorious for causing crashes for a while (and still are, to some extent).

The only other big drop in compatibility that I can remember from recent years was when MS effectively moved to a different model for handling device drivers with Windows 7, which broke backward compatibility with some older devices whose vendors didn't always issue new Windows 7 drivers to replace the broken ones.

Still, considering that this was the first such change for many years and it's hardly reasonable to expect an OS developer to support the drivers for every hardware peripheral ever used on that OS, I don't think that's a bad track record.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by tolmasky on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:31AM (#8791968)
> You say its ruined through software updates, but then go on to say that your gripe is the interaction interface?

Yeah, imagine that, multiple complaints: 1. Software updates made Apple TV AirPlay incredibly unreliable for me. And its not just me, lots of people have had this happen. I btw still think Airplay is a stellar feature and if it ever got fixed it would continue to make me stick with Apple TV. 2. The UI sucks:...

> And of all things, scrolling.

Navigating episodes/content/movies/whatever on the Apple TV is a very bad experience. Its hard to explain without first using a good experience. On Apple TV, if I'm on the last episode of a show on Season 1 that I own, getting to episode 1 of Season 2 which I don't yet own is very difficult. I have to go all the way up to "more on iTunes", then choose a season, then get to that episode. On Amazon Fire TV, its just the next episode on the list. Apple TV also strangely sorts episodes you don't own earliest to latest, but episodes you DO own latest to earliest. If I go to purchased Tv shows > all, I have no idea what the sort order is. I think it might be most recent, but then the very first show on the list I bought over a year ago, so that can't be it. And as far as I can tell I can't search the purchased section anyways, so I have to literally scroll down some non-alphabetical list of 220 shows in my case if there's a show I'm pretty sure I bought but I can't quite remember the exact name. I'm not sure how to properly describe this mess, which is why I just said "scrolling", because thats what the experience feels like on the Amazon Fire TV: you just scroll through content and don't find yourself endlessly going in and out of menu "sections". It sounds to me that you don't use the actual Apple TV UI but instead use Plex (on a jailbroken Apple TV?), which is fine, but it says nothing of the Apple TV experience.

Edit: BTW, your mention of Plex reminded me of another (long overdue) failing of Apple TV. I happen to also use Plex on my Amazon Fire TV. The install process was tapping the voice button on my remote, saying "plex", then selecting install from the app store. The process on Apple TV is either jailbreaking, running an app that pretends to be the the trailers server (which may break on any upgrade of Apple TV) or accessing your plex content somewhere else and airplaying it.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by ntSean on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @07:11AM (#8792554)
I share the same frustrations, but I guess I've also accepted that I'm not playing by the rules with my setup (especially with Plex). I hope that they do open Apple TV to more development so it isn't as foreign, it has a lot of potential, but seems to not be a focus.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by matthew-wegner on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:22AM (#8791814)
Quick FYI--you can disable this on your phone if you want to globally disable on all devices. It's weirdly in Settings->Facetime, as "iPhone Cellular Calls".
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by ianamartin on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:34PM (#8793640)
I kind of love this bug. It's the perfect excuse for never talking to anyone.

Mom/Dad/Wife/Girlfriend/Boss: "Hey! Pick up your phone!"

"Can't. No phone calls where I live."

"Oh. Where do you live?"

"Yosemite."

"Oh. Sorry."

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by gcb0 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:53AM (#8792025)
not to mention that until you realize it, your maid can answer calls to your cell phone from the tv
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by city41 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:56AM (#8791764)
I'm at my wits end with Yosemite. I'm very seriously considering switching to Linux or Windows. Of the numerous problems this OS has, my biggest problem is waking my rMBP from sleep. About 20% of the time, it just doesn't wake up and requires a hard shutdown. I never had that problem with Mountain Lion or Mavericks.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by w1ntermute on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:29AM (#8791965)
I recommend running Linux (any stable distro) with Xfce. It's worked/looked exactly the same for years[0], and there won't be any sudden/unpleasant changes in the future either.

0: http://xfce.org/about/screenshots

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by blkhp19 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:52AM (#8792160)
While I'm (we're) critical of the regressions when it comes to UI performance, switching to linux means giving up an entire ecosystem of apps, completely changing workflows, and in some cases depending on the kind of development that one does, making our jobs impossible.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by joelthelion on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @05:20AM (#8792354)
That's why for me Linux is the only sensible choice of platforms. All the other platforms means giving complete control over my tools to a single company.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by gaius on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:11AM (#8793294)
You're about to give it up to Red Hat, with systemd taking over everything, whether that's your cup of tea or not, that's what's going to happen.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by tree_of_item on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:54PM (#8794282)
Yeah, soon Vim and Emacs and even GCC will be integrated with systemd!! Resistance is futile.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by vivab0rg on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @07:00AM (#8792532)
So much this. I've settled on elementaryOS 0.2 (based off Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) for all my development, staging, and production environments, being netbook, notebook, All-in-One desktop, Mac mini and all my VPS servers. Software package consistency is a invaluable, and you don't even have to give up on the looks:

https://github.com/vivaserver/MoonLion

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by hubot on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:17PM (#8794857)
to me, Ubuntu 14.10 is still very rough. there are so many inconsistency everywhere: shortcuts, software's ui, etc...

take a simple example: usually Ctrl Q (cmd q on os x) means quit. try doing on os x will quit the app 9 out of 10 times. on ubuntu? not really.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by lewaldman on Friday December 26, 2014 @12:58PM (#8799500)
Wait... You are not running Elementary on production servers are you???
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by toyg on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:40AM (#8792257)
That's ironic, considering the major wave of OSX adoption was due to linux-oriented developers who found it easier to keep working with their linux ecosystem on OSX than on Windows.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by pilsetnieks on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:06AM (#8792697)
Not major, just vocal in these circles.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by rayiner on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:06PM (#8793510)
On a laptop, the regression in battery life switching to Linux or Windows is just a no-go. Also, it's not like Linux is famous for "just working" when it comes to suspend/resume.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by keithpeter on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:19PM (#8793864)
Ubuntu 9.04 onwards no big issues with suspend to ram. Hibernate to disk can be problematic if someone uses 'guided partitioning' as the swap space is sometimes a little small.

Hardware: Thinkpads (T41, X60, X200) and Dell Latitude (E5420), currently Debian Sid.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by dllthomas on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:54PM (#8795170)
I've also had no trouble with this, lately, though I have no idea how well that generalizes to others' experiences.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by yourad_io on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:54AM (#8792521)
An alternative upgrade path would be (any distro) + Pantheon DE (from Elementary OS). Very Mac-like, it helped me with my imaginary transition pains.

Soon thereafter, I did a tour of the usual window manager suspects and ended up with i3 <3

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by eyko on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:26AM (#8792757)
Arch Linux + Pantheon DE was very buggy the last I checked. I ended up just installing ElementaryOS and regretting/missing having pacman. After a while I just gave up on eOS Luna and switched back to Arch Linux with a very minimally themed Cinnamon DE.

So I agree that any distro + pantheon would be great for those looking for an OSX-like experience in Linux, but it seems the reality is not as straightforward. PantheonDE doesn't seem to be developed like KDE/Gnome/XFCE are -- i.e. with a distro-agnostic approach. Hence you're sort of tied to eOS if you want to keep any level of sanity while getting it to "just work". That was counterproductive in my experience.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by RoseO on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:16PM (#8795100)
I second this, I just switched my MBA to Xubuntu and I'm loving it.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by MarcScott on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:24AM (#8792224)
Yosemite was just the push I needed to switch to Linux. I shoved Ubuntu server on my MBP with the i3 windows manager and have never been happier.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by carlosrg on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:29AM (#8792466)
Same here. I installed Fedora 21 and dwm as the window manager. I didn't know this computer could be this fast (2010 MacBook Air). The bad thing is the battery duration, which is significantly worse than Mavericks (but approximately the same as Yosemite... I got around 5-6 hours of battery life with Mavericks, 3-4 hours with Yosemite and Linux).

I still remember when people were impressed by the speed and smoothness of the UI with Tiger or Snow Leopard on my first Mac, a white MacBook. Good times. Now we have faster computers, SSDs instead of hard disks, but slower interfaces.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by tracker1 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:36PM (#8794891)
My (March 2011) MBP with an SSD booted Snow Leopard in about 7-8 seconds from the bong sound to the complete desktop... My current (September 2014) MBP takes so much longer (just under Mavericks, haven't gone to Yosemite yet)... I find this disappointing.. not being able to upgrade the ram doubly so.

This will probably be my last mac hardware purchase... I like the screen and the touchpad so much better than any other laptop, but don't really use it that much, and even then I could have gotten something with similar hardware for half the price... I've thought about installing Ubuntu on it, but haven't taken the plunge just yet... I spend almost 2/3 of my time on my laptop in either a windows or linux vm, so it's kind of a wash.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by keithpeter on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:22PM (#8793873)
I imagine Powertop is installed and that you have the cpufrequtils installed and set up. What areas does powertop highlight as taking a lot of power/triggering cpu higher states?
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by carlosrg on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:24PM (#8794185)
I didn't even know about Powertop! I was a GNU/Linux user before switching to the Mac but a lot has changed since then... I'll investigate, thanks!
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by collyw on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:35PM (#8794888)
Yosemite must be bad if you found Ubuntu good. I constantly get "a problem has been detected" messages whenever I boot. Got Manjaro (a user friendly Arch spin off) on my other laptop. Way less problematic and XFCE behaves predictably.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by rajeevk on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:16AM (#8791806)
Same with me. Before upgrading I always used to close the lid to make my macbook to sleep. The wake-up experience was good. But after upgrading, after waking up the system becomes too slow to use. I have to restart. So stopped putting my mac book pro to sleep. Now I always have to shut down when not using. Apart from sleep-wakeup problem, in general this has become much slower compared to mavericks

Probably this could be related to hardware config. I have a mac book pro at work with 8GB ram and it works fine. My personal mac book pro has 4GB ram and it has problem.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by mullingitover on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:03AM (#8792055)
That's no problem, just upgrade your ram!

Oh wait...

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by raverbashing on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:30AM (#8792242)
You can upgrade the RAM on the MacBook Pro

Source: using 16GB here

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by lwh on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:43AM (#8792497)
Many recent models are non-upgradeable
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by mullingitover on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:52PM (#8795166)
None of the rMBPs, nor the minis have upgradeable ram. If I had to put money on it I'd bet a dollar the next-gen iMacs will be in the same boat. Just too hard to pass up that 400% markup.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by raverbashing on Thursday December 25, 2014 @07:48AM (#8796149)
Yeah, this is ridiculous.

Especially when the default RAM they sell with is usually too small.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by rdsubhas on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:48AM (#8792144)
Go to "System Preferences - Accessibility" and enable "Differentiate without Color" and "Reduce Transparency". Made a world of a difference to me, and I no longer think about Mountain Lion.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by doomlaser on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @05:30AM (#8792366)
Even "Reduce Transparency" has a nice big graphical glitch:

https://twitter.com/Doomlaser/status/538539277978972160

Yosemite breaks rounded rect corners in UI overlays, like the ones triggered by volume and brightness changes. The masking is broken when the translucent blur shaders aren't applied.

You'd think that'd something they would easily catch in QA before 10.10 shipped, but it's still broken even in 10.10.1.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by OxO4 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @07:26AM (#8792590)
In OS X 10.10.2 (14C81h), this does not seem to be a problem anymore.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by 0942v8653 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:28AM (#8793369)
Finally! I was sure they would never fix it. I'm actually considering downloading the beta now. Any other improvements?
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by superuser2 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:08AM (#8792198)
Linux is unlikely to be better at power management than OSX, sad as that is.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by humpt on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:04AM (#8792416)
not only it's unlikely, it's true. I've changed distro many times over the years and always noticed the poor power management
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by sr3d on Tuesday December 30, 2014 @03:33AM (#8813813)
I had this issue too with non-waking up from sleep. Somehow the problem dissapeared after I upgraded the HDD to SSD. Now everything is working fine. Nonetheless, I'm still on Mavericks, no Yosemite upgrade yet. Just a potential solution to your sleep problem.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by sandGorgon on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:48AM (#8791867)
Please do try Gnome 3.14 - Right now, it is only part of Fedora 21. But I think you will love it. Do give it a shot.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by DanBC on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:33PM (#8794885)
Gnome software has switched to an infuriating naming scheme.

The file manager (gnautilus) is now called "files". The video player (totem) is now called "videos". This is so obviously broken for people who are trying to web-search for answers to problems that they're having.

Whats worse os that the renaming is inconsistent - software will get one name in the menu, another name in the help > about, and another name on the Internet.

Gnome - and I say this as politely as I can - makes me fucking hate using a computer.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by eeZi on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:26AM (#8792095)
Arch Linux too.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by humpt on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:07AM (#8792422)
it's a desktop environment, it can be part of any distro you want, especially when an upgrade hits the decimals
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by arianvanp on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:18AM (#8792442)
Sure. But for now only Fedora 21 and ArchLinux actually release this in their official package repository because they're both very upstreamy Linux distros. You won't be able to install this without fiddling with PPAs in Debian or Ubuntu.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by keithpeter on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:29PM (#8794427)
Gnome 3.14 appears to be the default desktop environment in Debian Unstable. Unstable is subject to change and occasionally things stop working for a bit but many people find it acceptable for non-critical use.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by caycep on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @10:01AM (#8793039)
Had this happen once, apparently fixed with zapping NVRAM/PRAM. Never happened again...
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by raverbashing on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:27AM (#8791961)
Did you try a PROM reset? (I think that's how it's called)
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by jbrooksuk on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:57AM (#8792171)
Isn't it PRAM? Or is that a different thing?
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by raverbashing on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:28AM (#8792234)
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by rotten on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @06:26AM (#8792459)
I tried it on a Mac Mini. It didn't help. Yosemite performance is abysmal. I really regret upgrading.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by jdhawk on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:20AM (#8793327)
Why not downgrade to Mountain Lion? Security updates?
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by calciphus on Friday December 26, 2014 @04:22AM (#8798522)
My office recently started using Keynote for a lot of our presentations. Keynote presentations created on the version that is compatible with Yosemite (and nothing prior) cannot be opened on earlier versions.

Even if security updates still come for what...usually 20-30 months with Apple...they still don't care about any other kind of backward compatibility and happily break their own file formats at will.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by mcintyre1994 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:26AM (#8793358)
Just to check, do Apple only provide security updates to the newest OS X?
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by chrisdroukas on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:09PM (#8793816)
No. Apple provides security updates for several versions. They most recently patched NTP for Mountain Lion, Mavericks and Yosemite at the same time.

http://support.apple.com/en-us/HT1222

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by calciphus on Friday December 26, 2014 @04:23AM (#8798523)
Apple provides security updates back somewhere between 36 and 44 months for the OS. Unfortunately, you won't know until they announce some exploit and don't patch your OS if you've been left behind or not.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by EGreg on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:04AM (#8791908)
Remember iOS 7?

Same thing.

Who was the joker who kept insisting that iOS 7 was really better and very few complained? I warned about this, post-Jobs Apple design and attention to detail.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by coldtea on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:13AM (#8792070)
>Who was the joker who kept insisting that iOS 7 was really better and very few complained?

The majority of the population?

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by Silhouette on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:34PM (#8793932)
Obviously any one person's experience is only anecdotal, but I'm still waiting to discover that anyone I know in real life actually likes iOS since v7. However, I seem to know plenty of people who wish they hadn't upgraded, or even who returned a new iPad with a recent iOS because they thought they were getting what they'd seen before (iOS 5/6 generation tablets that friends/family had) and hated the new one so much.

Personally, we're still pre-v7 on our iPad here, after reading way too many reviews about severe performance drops on this device after the "upgrade" and learning that there is no way to go back once you've done it. We literally ignore any updates for the system from Apple and just carry on happily enjoying the product as we bought it, making us almost uniquely satisfied among iPad purchasers we know.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by EGreg on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @05:42AM (#8792382)
Just like you'll deny that people are complaining about Yosemite
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by sbuk on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @10:31AM (#8793138)
Just some very vocal individuals on a niche website, and some trolls.

My own experience of Yosemite has been the polar opposite of many here; better stability, faster, longer battery life etc. All on a 2011 MacBook Air. I never had any kind of issue with iOS 7 either. The odd reset over the last year on my iPhone 5, but the significant majority of the time (99% at least) it worked and it worked well. Sorry to rock your world view, but have you at least posited that these people vociferously complaining are not representative of the whole? Ditto iOS? I know you will chalk me up as another "fanboy"...

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by pilsetnieks on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:10AM (#8792710)
It has nothing to do with Jobs, there were plenty of bugs and other problems during his reign, too. So much that, in fact, it was an axiom for tech minded people not to install any new versions of the OS until at least 10.X.1 version.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by gnarmis on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:22AM (#8791946)
Nope. Battery life and stability has been way better for me. And the UI improvements help a bunch. Also, the tight integration with iOS is so great.

Stability is not "completely lost"

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by blkhp19 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:53AM (#8791756)
Answering calls on my Mac is one of my favorite new features. When it works, it works well. When it doesn't work, it fails upfront. You really have to play with your icloud and FaceTime settings to trick it into working. It's absurd how complicated the whole relationship between iCloud, FaceTime, iMessages, and my devices is. The settings need to be perfect for things to work correctly. I can't even imagine if it was someone who wasn't tech-savvy trying to use these features.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by derefr on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:46AM (#8792139)
You should see what you have to do to get SMS Continuity working if you have a phone provider that hasn't been "verified" by Apple as supporting iMessage: http://www.theonlinemac.com/windhelp
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by gcb0 on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:51AM (#8792020)
buy a phone from Motorola. the pc phone integration for that is pretty good. and been there for ages
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by vbezhenar on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:46AM (#8791864)
One major drawback for me is a constant flickering in Intellij Idea and Emacs. I'm not sure who is responsible for this, but user experience is just terrible. I'll definitely downgrade to 10.9 when I'll have enough spare time.

I didn't see much problems besides it. I like new design, animations are smooth enough for me and everything works well enough.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by cmsimike on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:26AM (#8792092)
I noticed the same in IntelliJ 12. Tried 14 and still had issues. I noticed the flickering goes away once I've turned off Flux (or, at least it doesn't flicker as often).

Not saying it is Flux's fault but I'm curious if you're running Flux and get the same result when exiting.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by vbezhenar on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:25AM (#8792229)
No, I don't use Flux.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by lastofus on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:27AM (#8791960)
I noticed the same flickering in PyCharm (Python flavored Intellij Idea). I hadn't realized it started after upgrading to Yosemite but it makes sense now. I had assumed it was caused by upgrading to PyCharm 4.0 from 3.x.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by Schlaefer on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:00AM (#8792179)
There's an extended ticket for that issue [1]. The gist is to update to the latest Java 1.8.

For PHPStorm JetBrains has also released a version with a bundled JDK 1.8 which fixes the flickering for me [2].

[1] https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-131593 [2] http://blog.jetbrains.com/phpstorm/2014/12/phpstorm-8-0-2-bu...

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by __david__ on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @04:07AM (#8792191)
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by mrmondo on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:52AM (#8791754)
I could not agree more with your frustrations and observations luciferre, I do hope someone out there from Apple will spot the concerns raised here and take them more seriously than those reported as bugs.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by atmosx on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:07AM (#8791912)
I answer my mobile from my iMac regularly without issues. I don't have the 'continuity' feature due to Apple's choice to block old iMacs (mine is a late-08 model), other than that, it's a bit slower at app-launching but I didn't had any major issues.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by pilif on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:25AM (#8791957)
>due to Apple's choice to block old iMacs

this wasn't a choice of blocking older Macs. The fact is that continuity requires Bluetooth LE (or you would be complaining about greatly reduced phone battery life) and your old iMac doesn't have BT-LE capable hardware (BT-LE and BT only share the name - aside of that they are quite disimilar)

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by kmowery on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:47AM (#8791999)
It's a little less clear than that, unfortunately. Apple chose to not support third-party Bluetooth LE dongles, which might be a reasonable engineering limitation. However, if you upgrade your Mac with a BT-LE capable board used by other Continuity-capable Macs, you still can't use Continuity by default; you need to patch some kexts and disable kernel kext signing[1].

It really does feel like Apple blacklisted older machines from using Continuity; only third-party kext hacking can get things started again.

[1] https://github.com/dokterdok/Continuity-Activation-Tool/

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by kyriakos on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:46AM (#8791863)
Sorry for the ignorance, Windows user here. Can't you somehow downgrade?
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by ntSean on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:55AM (#8791880)
You can, its actually easier than in Windows since theres no licensing issues to handle.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by basch on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:11PM (#8793824)
Windows doesnt really have licensing issues. You call a phone number, tell them you want to activate windows, read them a number, and a machine reads you a number. It takes about 6 minutes of your life, and Microsoft always activates when you ask.

For example, if you buy Windows 8.1 you have downgrade rights to every earlier version. All you do is speak with a person, say "I would like to activate windows" and they say ok. Its not a hassle unless you do it daily.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by r00fus on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @05:14PM (#8794714)
It's a hassle if you have to call the vendor at all. Not all Windows versions have downgrade rights (see Vista, certain editions of 7).

Also pricing is an issue: all recent desktop versions of MacOSX are either free or very inexpensive ($30 or less).

You could likewise say that filing an insurance claim is easy... sure, but for some folks even knowing to make the call is an undue burden - exactly how the vendor wants it.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by pedalpete on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @09:21PM (#8795212)
As a counter argument, Apple fans are always telling me "just go to the genius bar, they'll sort it out". As if that isn't a hassle. I've never had the need to take any of my windows machines in to be serviced.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by cmelbye on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:53AM (#8792024)
Old versions of OS X that you've previously downloaded are always available for re-download in the Mac App Store. You can use those downloads to downgrade.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by joesmo on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @03:41PM (#8794460)
I do regret upgrading. My wireless trackball and mice no longer work smoothly and this is a known problem apparently with RF and bluetooth pointing devices. It's one thing to make things slower or for new features to be buggy, but making the system unusable is unacceptable, IMO. I'm looking at dual booting Linux now and possibly making the switch back. The only reason I haven't yet is because I luckily still have wired versions of the same trackball.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by jseliger on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:41AM (#8793416)
Aside from the obvious and major performance and stability issues Here's another one, which I've been experiencing: https://discussions.apple.com/message/27289663#27289663

I don't know why WindowServer keeps crashing in this fashion.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by protomyth on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:53PM (#8794037)
Mavericks and Yosemite have broken Finders and some major crashing problems. Lion was also pretty horrible. I wish Apple would do another "Snow Leopard" so we can get back to a stable system. Yosemite also has some weird issues with SMB connections to servers.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by abandonliberty on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @02:52PM (#8794273)
>One of the most refreshing things about moving from primarily using Windows/Linux to a Mac for me was the sensibility, stability and the fact that things just worked the way you expected them to. Now that seems to be completely lost.

Ha! No one cares about desktop any more.

When you're ready you can try Windows 8, a surprisingly mature and stable OS that runs on a hardware ecosystem several orders of magnitude more complex.

You get used to the fact that it was clearly designed to run on a tablet. The metro start page is actually quite good, even on desktop.

But if you were serious, I'd look for a non-prism-compromised OS.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by oscargrouch on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @12:58AM (#8791773)
I've always thought of Apple as a marketing company that happens to sell technology, and not a technology company that sells through marketing.

Also the capitalism of today with all of its lust for profits, sales, budgets, and deadlines its kind of luddite, can have a predatory behaviour for innovation and advancements in technology in general.

I think if tech companies want to survive for more than 10/20 years, they will need to get into the core of the system, of THE machine, and figure it out better ways to survive by really delivering good tech and innovation, and not by just promissing a world with rainbows and unicorns

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by code_duck on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @01:37AM (#8791844)
A marketing company that happens to sell technology would be selling some sort of standard solution. As Apple develops everything from their protocols to chips to operating systems to complete devices in house... I'd say they're a technology company who also takes marketing very seriously.
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by oscargrouch on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @09:09PM (#8795191)
My point is, Apple is not successful because they have the best technology, they are successful because they have the best marketing (and cult followers)
Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by simonh on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @11:48AM (#8793447)
They design their own CPUs, displays, operating systems, consumer and professional applications, connectors, development tools and languages, desktops, laptops and mobile devices in house.

Which company would you say has a greater engineering footprint across technologies and business sectors than Apple? There are a few tech companies that actually do one or two things that Apple doesn't, but I can't think of any that do everything that Apple does.

Re:UI Performance Decline – OS X Tiger to Yosemite [video] by oscargrouch on Wednesday December 24, 2014 @08:52PM (#8795165)
Oh forgive me priest of the Apple church, cause i've committed a sin.. How many ipads i have to buy to be forgiven?

creepy..