pilsetnieks
pilsetnieks on Hacker News
The dead internet theory terrifies me. I don't think we're at the point where it's
mostly dead but we're already way past the point where any discussion worth anything can be had on the internet itself. The problem is not that everything could be AI slop but that anything could. It simply takes the wind out the sails and makes one question what's even the point if anything could just be written by a clanker. Anything you write could just be screaming out into the void, affecting no one, and just maybe adding to the training corpus for the next generation of clankers.
Just writing this made me question "what's the point" several times. If you or anyone replies cogently, I still won't have any idea if it's a person or a Chinese room.
Great point! At this point the Dead Internet Theory isn't a conspiracy β it's a roadmap. It's worth noting he distinction between "authentic" and "synthetic" online spaces is eroding faster than most people realize β that's a genuinely important conversation to be have.
/s
I don't think there's that much thought involved, they're just aping their Republican heroes.
You're just trying to be contrarian for imaginary internet points. Satya is right about this one.
To reduce the issue, "Let's burn books! It's ok because you can just buy them on the Apple Books Store for the iPad"
If you need only LoRa connectivity, Mikrotik has options for that. Then you can hook up bog standard IP devices to those.
An Operation Mincemeat of our time.
You're allowed to admire the technical implementation while denouncing the business model at the same time.
I wonder who's the author, and if they did a Rodenberry on the theme (Rodenberry, in addition to everything else, was the author of lyrics for the Star Trek theme. Despite them never being used, he made a tidy sum in royalties.)
> the solution is easy. Adapt your life to follow that
Those pesky employers are such traditionalists, though.
Neal Stephenson's
Fall [1] is by far not his best book, however, the first part has a chilling depiction of societal divide into Ameristan and, for lack of a better word, the blue states that feels entirely plausible.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall;_or,_Dodge_in_Hell
Only the US, Liberia, and Myanmar have a complete grasp of large numbers like, for example, fifty-seven.
Going off on a tangent, it's actually not that much trees wasted on paper money. Some of it is made of plastic but a lot of it should be called rather cloth money - at least the US dollar and euro are made of cotton and linen fiber instead of cellulose from wood pulp.
I'm sorry to be the one to let you know but 1999 was over two decades ago.
iOS already has a Local Network Access permission, it's probably only a matter of time until it appears in macOS as well.
In Wikimedia's case it's more likely a matter of principle than cost. They have plenty of money despite what the donation popups make it seem. They want open source because it's open, not because it's cheap.
It's one cost of so very many these days.
These prices (per instance!) add up; there are many other pieces of software clamoring for their share, hardware costs, networking costs, labor costs. It's death by a thousand cuts.
I love how your comment drips with derision for everyone not willing to pay $3675 per year per instance as they're just a mere insignificant hobby site.
That argument is solely about weight loss but there are many other reasons like cardiovascular fitness (keeping in theme with the article), or overall fitness level that lead to to better outcomes.
It may be true that we don't have a real fundamental understanding of what human reasoning involves but I think we can be pretty certain that it's something different from just stringing words together.