News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Systemic33 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:30AM (#8629211)
Well that definitely takes the ๐•ก๐•ฃ๐•š๐•ซ๐•– for most noticeable Hacker News submission.

Suggestion (if you are author): There are a lot of chars that look like another char, often used on the web, so i think that there are more advanced versions to be made. I think i read that a lot of thai signs and cyrillic look like latin chars.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by samuellevy on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:33AM (#8629217)
Yeah, it's great fun to put a cyrillic "ะฐ" into a variable name in code.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by kirushik on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:08AM (#8629748)
Russian government officials are obliged to put all their purchases on the online tender platform.

So they are using this trick (but in the opposite direction, latin `a` instead of cyrillic `ะฐ`) to avoid undesired competitors from entering those biddings and lowering the purchase prices (and not paying kickbacks, obviously). https://navalny-en.livejournal.com/52565.html

Re:Unicode Text Converter by stax012 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:52AM (#8630299)
Huh. I'm really surprised there isn't a Russian clone of tender already.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by solistice on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:41AM (#8629246)
or having your variable names in _๐•ฑ๐–—๐–†๐–๐–™๐–š๐–— which might be more appearent but none the less annoying. That'd make a nice useless language though.

  ๐–•๐–š๐–‡๐–‘๐–Ž๐–ˆ ๐–›๐–”๐–Ž๐–‰[] ๐–’๐–†๐–Ž๐–“(๐–˜๐–™๐–—๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ[] ๐–†๐–—๐–Œ๐–˜) {
    ๐•ฎ๐–”๐–“๐–˜๐–”๐–‘๐–Š.๐–‚๐–—๐–Ž๐–™๐–Š๐•ท๐–Ž๐–“๐–Š("๐•ณ๐–†๐–‘๐–‘๐–” ๐–‚๐–Š๐–‘๐–™");  
  }
  // ๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–†๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–๐–Ž๐–“๐–Š๐–“๐–˜๐–•๐–—๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š "๐•ฑ๐–—๐–†๐–๐–™๐–š๐–—" ๐•ฐ๐–Ž๐–“๐–˜ ๐•ป๐–š๐–“๐–๐–™ ๐•น๐–š๐–‘๐–‘ ๐•น๐–š๐–‘๐–‘
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jevgeni on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:43AM (#8629459)
OMG, yes:

    # ๐•ฒ๐–Š๐–’รค๐–˜๐–˜ ๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–๐–˜๐–†๐–š๐–˜๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–๐–š๐–˜๐–˜ ๐–‹รผ๐–— ๐•ฌ๐–‘๐–Œ๐–”๐–—๐–Ž๐–™๐–๐–’๐–Ž๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š ๐•ฌ๐–—๐–‡๐–Š๐–Ž๐–™ 

    ๐–๐–‘๐–†๐–˜๐–˜๐–Š ๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–š๐–“๐–Œ๐–˜๐–†๐–“๐–Ÿ๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–Š๐–‡๐–Š๐–‰๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–†๐–“๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’๐–š๐–˜: 
        ๐–‰๐–Š๐–‹ __๐–†๐–“๐–‹๐–†๐–“๐–Œ๐–Š๐–“__(๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™, ๐–๐–”๐–—๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š): 
            ๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™.๐–๐–”๐–—๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š = ๐–๐–”๐–—๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š

        ๐–‰๐–Š๐–‹ __๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–๐–“๐–š๐–—__(๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™): 
            ๐–Ÿ๐–š๐–—รผ๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–Š๐–‡๐–Š๐–“ ๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™.๐–๐–”๐–—๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š 

        ๐–‰๐–Š๐–‹ ๐–‡๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–Š๐–“(๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™, ๐–๐–”๐–—๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š=๐•น๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–๐–™๐–Š๐–๐–Ž๐–˜๐–™๐–Š๐–“๐–Ÿ): 
            ๐–‰๐–—๐–š๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š๐–“("๐•ฒ๐–š๐–™๐–Š๐–“ ๐•ฟ๐–†๐–Œ, " + ๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™.๐–๐–”๐–—๐–“๐–†๐–’๐–Š)
            ๐–Ÿ๐–š๐–—รผ๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–Š๐–‡๐–Š๐–“ ๐–˜๐–Š๐–‘๐–‡๐–˜๐–™

    ๐–‡๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–Š๐–— = ๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–š๐–“๐–Œ๐–˜๐–†๐–“๐–Ÿ๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–Š๐–‡๐–Š๐–‰๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–†๐–“๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’๐–š๐–˜("๐•ณ๐–†๐–“๐–˜-๐•ป๐–Š๐–™๐–Š๐–— ๐•ฏ๐–Š๐–š๐–™๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–" )
    ๐–‡๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–Š๐–—.๐–‡๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–Š๐–“()
Re:Unicode Text Converter by solistice on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:19AM (#8629578)
I've always found that attempts at germanization of subjects where English is the lingua franca are incredibly amusing. Further germanization of German words, such as the conversion of "Nase" to "๐•ฒ๐–Š๐–˜๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–๐–™๐–˜๐–Ÿ๐–Ž๐–“๐–๐–Š๐–“" also is at least worth a chuckle despite the solemn background that spawned the movement.

  ๐•น๐–Š๐–š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–๐–Š๐–Ž๐–™๐–˜๐–‡๐–‘๐–†๐–™๐–™ ๐–‰๐–Š๐–— ๐–š๐–“๐–๐–”๐–“๐–›๐–Š๐–“๐–™๐–Ž๐–”๐–“๐–Š๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–“ ๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–†๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–Š๐–š๐–—๐–Š | ๐•น๐–Š๐–š๐–Š๐–˜ | ๐•ถ๐–”๐–“๐–›๐–Š๐–—๐–˜๐–†๐–™๐–Ž๐–”๐–“๐–Š๐–“ | ๐•ถ๐–”๐–’๐–’๐–Š๐–“๐–™๐–†๐–—๐–Š | ๐•ฑ๐–—๐–†๐–Œ๐–Š๐–˜๐–™๐–Š๐–‘๐–‘๐–š๐–“๐–Œ | ๐•ญ๐–Š๐–—๐–š๐–‹๐–˜๐–‹๐–Ž๐–“๐–‰๐–š๐–“๐–Œ๐–˜๐–†๐–‡๐–™๐–Š๐–Ž๐–‘๐–š๐–“๐–Œ | ๐•ฐ๐–Ž๐–“๐–—๐–Š๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š
Re:Unicode Text Converter by 1ris on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:18AM (#8630456)
>"Nase" to "๐•ฒ๐–Š๐–˜๐–Ž๐–ˆ๐–๐–™๐–˜๐–Ÿ๐–Ž๐–“๐–๐–Š๐–“"

Which is bullshit and just a parody on linguistic purism.

I could write more, but i have to configure the Zuwachssicherung of my Klapprechner over DFรœ.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by jevgeni on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:07AM (#8629742)
๐•น๐–Š๐–š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–๐–Š๐–Ž๐–™๐–˜๐–‡๐–‘๐–†๐–™๐–™ ๐–‰๐–Š๐–— ๐–š๐–“๐–๐–”๐–“๐–›๐–Š๐–“๐–™๐–Ž๐–”๐–“๐–Š๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–“ ๐•ฝ๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–†๐–˜๐–ˆ๐–๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ๐–Š๐–“๐–Ž๐–Š๐–š๐–—๐–Š is seriously epic.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by smoyer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:51AM (#8629682)
Google translate doesn't seem to do well with those characters ... could someone please help with "๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—รผ๐–˜๐–˜๐–š๐–“๐–Œ๐–˜๐–†๐–“๐–Ÿ๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–Š๐–‡๐–Š๐–‰๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–†๐–“๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’๐–š๐–˜".
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jevgeni on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:03AM (#8629732)
Literally it means: Greeting-Display-Control-Mechanism. In German you can jumble the words together to get a new, more precise German word. The most notorious being this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/100...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by nathell on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:59AM (#8630344)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by quotemstr on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:28PM (#8631308)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by _deh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @02:06PM (#8631933)
I remember my German teacher struggling to get the class to remember Schwarzwรคlder Kirschtorte (admittedly two words). So she taught us Vierwaldstรคtterseedampfschiffgesellschaftskapitรคnsmรผtzensternlein instead. After that Schwarzwรคlder Kirschtorte was easy.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jevgeni on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:31AM (#8630928)
Mother of god...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Someone on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @04:23PM (#8632703)
That would be Gottesmutter or (way better) Gottesgebรคrerin (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottesgeb%C3%A4rerin)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by X-combinator on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:44PM (#8631413)
More like this is totally freaking Awesome...!
Re:Unicode Text Converter by sswaner on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:55AM (#8629695)
German for: Spend the best hours of the day on an orange website.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by dewey on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:57AM (#8629705)
basically showWelcome()
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tormeh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:46AM (#8629671)
This is now my favorite code snippet. I didn't have one before. Love "Begrรผssungsanzeigebedienmechanismus" and the hopelessly verbose way it was implemented.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tormeh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:59AM (#8630702)
I just remembered the snippet forgot "Sehr geehrte Herr oder Frau". Oh no! -1 bureaucracy point.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jevgeni on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:30AM (#8630921)
OH NEIN! MEIN LEBEN! :(
Re:Unicode Text Converter by pilif on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:53AM (#8629968)
Too bad the source code of that beautiful toy is nowhere to be found - I'd gladly provide a patch that teaches it about the umlauts which it unfortunately left alone in your piece of art you created here <3
Re:Unicode Text Converter by anon4 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:43AM (#8630257)
It's trivial to dump the tables at least. Just enter all printable ascii characters :). The umlauts would be by first fully decomposing the string down to letters+combining characters, right?

๐•ญ๐–Š๐–Œ๐–—๐–šฬˆ๐–˜๐–˜๐–š๐–“๐–Œ๐–˜๐–†๐–“๐–Ÿ๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–Š๐–‡๐–Š๐–‰๐–Ž๐–Š๐–“๐–’๐–Š๐–ˆ๐–๐–†๐–“๐–Ž๐–˜๐–’๐–š๐–˜

Right :). Though it's not quite centred for me.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by afiler on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:54AM (#8631088)
I have a tool to make this text, though I'll admit I never even thought about decomposing inputs like รผ and then recomposing them after Fraktur-izing.

http://mar.cx/unicate/ or https://github.com/afiler/unicate

Re:Unicode Text Converter by pantalaimon on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:05AM (#8630375)
๐•ฌ๐–ˆ๐–๐–™๐–š๐–“๐–Œ! ๐•ฌ๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–˜ ๐•ท๐–”๐–”๐–๐–Š๐–“๐–˜๐–๐–Š๐–Š๐–•๐–Š๐–—๐–˜!

๐”‡๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐” ๐”ฌ๐”ช๐”ญ๐”ฒ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ช๐”ž๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ข ๐”ฆ๐”ฐ๐”ฑ ๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ฑ ๐”ฃ๐”ฒ๐”ข๐”ฏ ๐”ค๐”ข๐”ฃ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ค๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ญ๐”ฌ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ฒ๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ช๐”ฆ๐”ฑ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ค๐”ฏ๐”ž๐”Ÿ๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐”ซ. โ„‘๐”ฐ๐”ฑ ๐”ข๐”ž๐”ฐ๐”ถ ๐”ฐ๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ซ๐”ž๐”ญ๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ก๐”ข๐”ฏ ๐”ฐ๐”ญ๐”ฏ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”ค๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ด๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”จ, ๐”Ÿ๐”ฉ๐”ฌ๐”ด๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฃ๐”ฒ๐”ฐ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ฒ๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ญ๐”ฌ๐”ญ๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ๐” ๐”ฌ๐”ฏ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ช๐”ฆ๐”ฑ ๐”ฐ๐”ญ๐”ฆ๐”ฑ๐”ฝ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฐ๐”ญ๐”ž๐”ฏ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ. โ„‘๐”ฐ๐”ฑ ๐”ซ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ฑ ๐”ฃ๐”ฒ๐”ข๐”ฏ ๐”ค๐”ข๐”ด๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐”ฆ ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”ก๐”ฒ๐”ช๐”ญ๐”จ๐”ฌ๐”ญ๐”ฃ๐”ข๐”ซ. ๐”‡๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”ฏ๐”ฒ๐”Ÿ๐”Ÿ๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ซ๐”ข๐” ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ฐ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ฑ๐”ฐ๐”ข๐”ข๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ข๐”ญ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐” ๐”ฌ๐”ฑ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ซ-๐”ญ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ฅ๐”ž๐”ซ๐”ฐ ๐”ฆ๐”ซ ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”ญ๐”ฌ๐” ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ฑ๐”ฐ ๐”ช๐”ฒ๐”ฐ๐”ฐ; ๐”ฏ๐”ข๐”ฉ๐”ž๐”ต๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ฒ๐”ซ๐”ก ๐”ด๐”ž๐”ฑ๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ข๐”ซ ๐”ก๐”ž๐”ฐ ๐”Ÿ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐”ซ๐”จ๐”ข๐”ซ๐”ฉ๐”ฆ๐” ๐”ฅ๐”ฑ๐”ข๐”ซ.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by drdaeman on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @02:55PM (#8632225)
Oh.

This somehow reminded me of this one, in pseudo-Old Church Slavonic: http://lurkmore.so/images/d/d6/Pravoslavnii_koding.jpg

Sad thing is, Unicode still doesn't seem to properly support titlos and (not so sad, since personally I think Unicode shouldn't really do anything with fonts unless absolutely necessary) has no separate characters for Ustav and Poluustav scripts.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by nickheer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:57PM (#8631492)

    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ,.๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–‡๐–Š๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–Š,.๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–†๐–‹๐–™๐–Š๐–—{๐–ˆ๐–”๐–“๐–™๐–Š๐–“๐–™: ''; ๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–•๐–‘๐–†๐–ž: ๐–‡๐–‘๐–”๐–ˆ๐–; ๐–œ๐–Ž๐–‰๐–™๐–:100๐–•๐–; ๐–๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–๐–™: 20๐–•๐–;}
    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ{๐–‡๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–—๐–”๐–š๐–“๐–‰: #000; ๐–•๐–†๐–‰๐–‰๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ-๐–™๐–”๐–•: 20๐–•๐–}
    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–‡๐–Š๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–Š{๐–‡๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–—๐–”๐–š๐–“๐–‰: #๐–‹00; }
    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–†๐–‹๐–™๐–Š๐–—{๐–‡๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–—๐–”๐–š๐–“๐–‰:#๐–‹๐–‹0}
(https://twitter.com/nickheer/status/535129309531635712)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by solistice on Thursday November 20, 2014 @12:57AM (#8634608)

    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ,.๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–‡๐–Š๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–Š,.๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–†๐–‹๐–™๐–Š๐–—{๐–ˆ๐–”๐–“๐–™๐–Š๐–“๐–™: ''; ๐–‰๐–Ž๐–˜๐–•๐–‘๐–†๐–ž: ๐–‡๐–‘๐–”๐–ˆ๐–; ๐–œ๐–Ž๐–‰๐–™๐–:100๐–•๐–; ๐–๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–๐–™: 20๐–•๐–;}
    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ{๐–‡๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–—๐–”๐–š๐–“๐–‰: #000; ๐–•๐–†๐–‰๐–‰๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ-๐–™๐–”๐–•: 20๐–•๐–}
    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–‡๐–Š๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–Š{๐–‡๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–—๐–”๐–š๐–“๐–‰: #๐–‹๐–‹๐–‹; }
    .๐–‹๐–‘๐–†๐–Œ:๐–†๐–‹๐–™๐–Š๐–—{๐–‡๐–†๐–ˆ๐–๐–Œ๐–—๐–”๐–š๐–“๐–‰:#๐–‹00}
wouldn't this be more appropriate?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by gumby on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:34PM (#8631722)
I am inspired and will immediately switch to Fraktur for all my Fortran and COBOL code!
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Systemic33 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:40AM (#8629242)
Oh it can get much much worse... have a look at greek questionmark: "[...] canonically decomposes to U+003B ; semicolon making the marks identical in practice." [1]

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Question_mark#Greek_question_ma...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by nl on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:13AM (#8629365)
Oh that is awesome! I wonder if Java uses it as a semi-colon too?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Systemic33 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:14AM (#8629561)
I have only tested it with javescript, which gave a syntax error.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by dfkf on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:21AM (#8629586)
If you happen to use cyrillic in your source code (for comments or even strings) and constantly switch between latin and cyrillic, then this actually happens with ะฐ "c" letter, because both latin and cyrillic "c" occupy the same button. And that's not fun, btw.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by pavel_lishin on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:22PM (#8631265)
Depends on which keyboard layout you use, of course.

Russian is my first language, but English is my primary language, and I never had my chance to practice typing using the standard Russian keyboard layout, so I almost always use the "Phonetic" layout - where the latin c is the cyrillic ั†. (Also, w is ัˆ, and who the hell remembers what []\-= map to - always trial and error for me to find ัŽะถััŒัŠ.)

Re:Unicode Text Converter by gegenschall on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:53AM (#8629689)
Well Python 2 "protects" you from silly things like that and throws a syntax error.

  In [4]: class ะnotherClass():
     ...:     pass
    File "<ipython-input-4-ad6e67ea5e19>", line 1
      class ะnotherClass():
            ^
  SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Re:Unicode Text Converter by marcosdumay on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:21AM (#8630469)
Add a file encoding directive[1] at the begining of your file, and you can shoot at as many of your feet as you want.

[1] PEP 0263: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0263/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by rspeer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:10PM (#8631183)
In Python 2 that only works within string literals, though.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by scott_s on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:56AM (#8630686)
I think the original submission announcing unicode support may win that prize: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=111100
Re:Unicode Text Converter by gegenschall on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:52PM (#8631470)
Wow, that page crashes Chromium (Linux, 38.0.2125.111) every time I open it.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by thaumasiotes on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:09AM (#8629549)
Cyrillic, sure. But Thai? Their alphabet is credited to one เธžเนˆเธญเธ‚เธธเธ™เธฃเธฒเธกเธ„เธณเนเธซเธ‡เธกเธซเธฒเธฃเธฒเธŠ. I've never thought there was any resemblance between Thai symbols and Latin ones, but... judge for yourself, I guess?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_alphabet

Re:Unicode Text Converter by contingencies on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:57AM (#8629709)
Credited is a strong word. AFAIK linguists agree it was copied largely from Khmer (Cambodian).
Re:Unicode Text Converter by thaumasiotes on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:53AM (#8629974)
Would you really mind if I said that the Greek alphabet was credited to one ฮšฮฌฮดฮผฮฟฯ‚? We know that's not true, but it doesn't change the legend (and indeed, the legend of Cadmus explicitly states that the Greek alphabet was derived from the Phoenician one...).
Re:Unicode Text Converter by contingencies on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:10AM (#8630058)
Both Thai and Khmer are Indic abugida scripts that derive (just like Burmese, Lao, Sinhalese, Balinese, etc.) from Brahmi. Claiming any of these scripts is one person's work is displaying abject ignorance of one of the most significant families of writing in human history.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by byEngineer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:28AM (#8630147)
In your personal opinion, of course
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jmhobbs on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:52PM (#8631820)
These are called Homoglyphs, right? I remember reading an article about phishing that used these characters to register almost perfect looking domain names.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoglyph

Re:Unicode Text Converter by GregBuchholz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:37AM (#8630973)

            โŽง1               if n = 0;
     F(n) โ‰ก โŽจ1               if n = 1;
            โŽฉF(n-1) + F(n-2) if n > 1.
    
    โŽ› โˆ‡โˆ™Dโƒ‘ = ฯ         โŽž
    โŽœ โˆ‡โˆ™Bโƒ‘ = 0         โŽŸ
    โŽœ โˆ‡ร—Eโƒ‘ = -โˆ‚Bโƒ‘/โˆ‚t    โŽŸ
    โŽ โˆ‡ร—Hโƒ‘ = Jโƒ‘ + โˆ‚Dโƒ‘/โˆ‚t โŽ 
    
         โŒ ยน
    ฯ€ = 2โŽฎ โˆš1ฬ…ฬ…-ฬ…ฬ…xฬ…ฬ…ยฒฬ…ฬ… dx
         โŒกโ‚‹โ‚

     โŽก1 0 1โŽค โŽกรฎโŽค
     โŽข0 1 0โŽฅ โŽขฤตโŽฅ
     โŽฃ1 0 1โŽฆ โŽฃkฬ‚โŽฆ

    ฮ“ โŠข t:S    S<:T
    โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•โ€•  (T-Sub)
        ฮ“ โŠข t:T

            โŽ›   1 โŽžโฟ
    โ„ฏ = lim โŽœ1+ โ€• โŽŸ
        โฟโ†’โˆž โŽ   n โŽ 
Re:Unicode Text Converter by mxfh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:23PM (#8631650)
Great multiline stuff. Could be improved by using the actual U+2212 minus sign โˆ’, not - (U+002D HYPHEN-MINUS) when getting super pedantic. Did something like this last week making extensive use of unicode block 1D400 and different space widths. http://math.typeit.org/ helped as well.

โ€ƒโ€ƒ๐‘Ÿโ‚โ€ƒ๐‘ฃ

โ€€ ๐ทโ€‰โ†’โ€‰๐‘…โ€‰โ†’โ€‰๐‘‰

๐›ผ โ†“โ€ƒโ€ƒโ€ƒ โ†“โ€‰๐œ”

โ€€ ๐ทโ€‰โ†’โ€‰๐‘…โ€‰โ†’โ€‰๐‘‰

โ€ƒโ€ƒ๐‘Ÿโ‚‚โ€ƒ๐‘ฃ

https://twitter.com/mxfh/status/532575085337792512

formula is from http://algebraicvis.net/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by cousin_it on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:56AM (#8631106)
Nice! That's like ASCII art but with more characters, like U+2320 TOP HALF INTEGRAL, U+23A8 LEFT CURLY BRACKET MIDDLE PIECE, etc.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by lisper on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:42AM (#8631013)
That's pretty slick. Did you do that manually?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by GregBuchholz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:28PM (#8631304)

    โ•”โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•โ•—
    โ•‘ Yes.  All manually โ•‘
    โ•™โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ•œ
Re:Unicode Text Converter by GregBuchholz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @04:40PM (#8632779)
Common lisp reader macros anyone?

    โŽ›if โŽ›> (+ a b)โŽž โŽ›case x      โŽž โŽ›cond              โŽžโŽž
    โŽœ   โŽ  (- c d)โŽ  โŽœ    (1 'foo)โŽŸ โŽœ  ((> y 2) 'quux) โŽŸโŽŸ
    โŽœ              โ€„โŽœ    (2 'bar)โŽŸ โŽ  (t       'error)โŽ โŽŸ
    โŽ       โ€ƒ      โŽ    (3 'baz)โŽ    โ€ƒ            โ€ƒ  โŽ 

...(hmmm. For some reason that looks better in my editor than on the webpage. Apparently a fixed width font isn't necessarily fixed when it comes to unicode).

http://imgur.com/oI0zVm3

Re:Unicode Text Converter by emillon on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:42AM (#8629255)
Funny how it triggered a bug in Firefox. When the tab is unfocused, its title in the handle is "๐‘ผ๐’โ€ฆ", but when it gets the focus it becomes "๐‘ผ<D835>โ€ฆ" (in a square box). The next codepoint is U+1D48F whose UTF-16 BE encoding is d8 35 dc 8f.

I'd say that the truncation algorithm operates on bytes and that it can't make sense of d8 35, but I'm not too sure how to fix that since graphemes can have arbitrary length (right?). Do you have to compute the width in advance?

Re:Unicode Text Converter by jabiko on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:55AM (#8629304)
It seems like this is a known bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921528
Re:Unicode Text Converter by anon1385 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:57AM (#8629309)
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/

There are libraries for doing it in Javascript: https://www.npmjs.org/package/grapheme-breaker (is that part of the Firefox UI done in Javascript? I've no idea)

Re:Unicode Text Converter by aninhumer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:21AM (#8630853)
>I'd say that the truncation algorithm operates on bytes

This seems likely, as another notable weirdness is that even with full width tabs, where there's plenty of space for at least "๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’๐’…๐’† ๐‘ป๐’†๐’™๐’•..." it still only shows "๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’...".

Re:Unicode Text Converter by pwnna on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:14AM (#8630067)
Hm.. i'm on nightly and seems to be unaffected by this problem.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by emillon on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:18AM (#8630094)
It depends on the size of the tab headers.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by pc86 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:34AM (#8630187)
I am using FF Dev Edition and see "Unico<D835>..." regardless of focus. Weird.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by gus_massa on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:38AM (#8629642)
This is similar to the pseudolocalization (รพลกรฉรปรฐรถฤผรถรงรฅฤผรฎลพรฅลฃรฎรถรฑ), that adds random accents to English word to test the localization capabilities of a program without requiring another language knowledge.

An online version: http://www.pseudolocalize.com/

A library: http://code.google.com/p/pseudolocalization-tool/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by gojomo on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:39AM (#8629240)
Hey! I was just thinking about this site, and visited it for the first time in years, after mentioning the old San Francisco ransom-font in another thread.

By randomly mixing these Unicode letter and letterlike characters, you can simulate a cut-and-paste ransom-note. For example, an acquired company could announce changes to its privacy policy:

  wE โ„Žรฅve yรธuR ฯrIvแด€รงy โ…ˆn a แดกiNdรธwleSs โ„žoรธm,
  & โ„™โ„“aโ„• ฯ„รธ โ…†o ยตnSฯฮตaKแด€ble โ€ hiโ„•โ„Šs tโ—‹ โ…ˆt
Re:Unicode Text Converter by hanula on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:57AM (#8629311)
Heh, I created something like that in Python: https://github.com/hanula/weirdify while playing with unicodedata module.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by hbbio on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:36AM (#8629637)
Oh, no !

The cat should have stayed in a box, if this gains too much popularity, HN will read like MySpace back in the days.

And top HN news will be: "A browser plugin that translates Unicode back to ASCII".

Re:Unicode Text Converter by floatrock on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:02PM (#8631520)
I saw a thing recently where a unicode encoding trick was used in an oauth phishing scam -- using unicode characters, a scammer was able to make an oauth connector that looked like the real company but passed through the company's "if (oauthConnector.name.toLowercase().contains('our name')) { throw new DenyError();}" check.

The user though the oauth app was legit because it was the "same" as the company name, accepted the connection, and promptly had their account emptied: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2lt76n/warning_coi...

Now, it's up for debate whether any (psuedo?) financial institution should offer full oauth access (at least without having a human review possible oauth connectors), but the point is, decorative hackernews submissions are the least malicious use of this trick.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by ceejayoz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:51AM (#8629684)
Expect subsequent uses of this to get flagkilled into oblivion.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by shaunpud on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:51AM (#8629683)
๐“’๐“ธ๐“ธ๐“ต ๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ธ๐“ป๐”‚ ๐“ซ๐“ป๐“ธ
Re:Unicode Text Converter by errnoh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:29AM (#8630156)
The problem is that this doesn't stop here. This method works everywhere and it will spread.

We'll need a plugin to reverse this, anyone up for it?

Re:Unicode Text Converter by peterwwillis on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:56AM (#8630324)
Go to your browser's menu bar, click 'View', go to 'Character Encoding', and select 'Western (ISO-8859-1)'. Now it's just garbage characters. (It's not reversed, but at least it's not bold?)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by robjh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:34AM (#8629221)
For others without that specific font or what have you: "Unicode Text Converter"

On my windows box with chrome all i see are empty boxes.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by TheAnimus on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:41AM (#8629247)
Use IE (wow, don't say that often) it has much better typography support, if you are on a high DPI display, chrome just looks awful.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by rossy on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:45AM (#8629267)
> if you are on a high DPI display, chrome just looks awful

I'm fairly sure this is no longer the case. Chrome is high-DPI aware on Windows now, and it uses DirectWrite for font rendering, the same as IE. It just can't display these characters for some reason.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by mahouse on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:27AM (#8629404)
I think he does not only mean the font rendering, but the UI itself.

Anyway, DirectWrite was horrible at high DPI, if I remember correctly.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by rossy on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:02AM (#8630017)
Nope, the UI got an update too. It renders at high-DPI on Windows. Chrome on a high-DPI machine looks exactly the same as on a low-DPI machine, except sharper. It used to be plagued with issues, but I'm fairly sure they're all gone now. DirectWrite isn't perfect. It still has weird hinting and kerning at high-DPI with some fonts, but it's better than GDI.

I find Chrome better than IE, actually. IE ignores my DPI settings and scales pages to 250%, so everything looks too large. Chrome renders correctly at 200%.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by robjh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:37AM (#8630560)
That's interesting. These comments make a lot more sense in IE11.

๐’ƒ๐’†๐’”๐’• ๐’—๐’Š๐’†๐’˜๐’†๐’… ๐’Š๐’ ๐’Š๐’๐’•๐’†๐’“๐’๐’†๐’• ๐’†๐’™๐’‘๐’๐’๐’“๐’†๐’“ 11

This reminds me of the 1990s. haha

Re:Unicode Text Converter by tehmaco on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:01PM (#8631139)
I had the same problem - this page has some fonts you can download, which fixed the problem for me (Windows 7, Chrome 38)

http://gschoppe.com/fixing-unicode-support-in-google-chrome/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by touristtam on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:03PM (#8631532)
Thanks I was having the same issue on Windows 7 Chromium v39
Re:Unicode Text Converter by rikkus on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:45AM (#8629470)
Here too - except in the title (tab) - I can see the text.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by teach on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:53AM (#8630672)
Same here. I wonder why Chrome on Windows doesn't work.

Fortunately I'd seen this story on my Ubuntu box before leaving home, so I wasn't totally out of the loop.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by stoolpigeon on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:53AM (#8629298)
On my Fedora box with Chrome negative circled, squared and negative squared don't show up but everything else does. Firefox and Konqueror are the same so I imagine it is a font issue.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by halviti on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:54AM (#8630675)
I thought it was emoticons at first. Now I can see the title.

Works fine on chrome for mac, doesn't work on chrome for windows.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by lsaferite on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:30AM (#8630919)
What's weird for me is that Chrome 38 on Win 8.1 is showing the title in the tab but is just boxes on the actual page.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tormeh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:55AM (#8629699)
Same with Chrome and Opera on Android 5.0
Re:Unicode Text Converter by MrBuddyCasino on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:56AM (#8629306)
This surprises me, what exactly is the point of encoding what are essentially different fonts in unicode? Isn't that the job of the presentation layer?

(the Fraktur variant is awesome btw, and is apparently in the valid unicode range for Java...)

Re:Unicode Text Converter by masklinn on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:01AM (#8629327)
The graphical difference has semantic significance in some domains: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbo...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by MrBuddyCasino on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:28AM (#8629407)
I guess that makes sense.

Personally I find it annoying how mathematical notation seems so intractable today. Things that are easily understood in code for me are a mystery in math notation. But I guess there will never be an overhaul with a more intuitive typography...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by db48x on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:06AM (#8629539)
The book Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics redefines some of the trickier parts of the standard mathematical notation, and does all of the actual computation in Scheme. They extended the standard Scheme interpreter/compiler to support algebraic manipulation of Scheme programs, which lets them do all of the higher-order computations in Scheme as well (things like transforming between coordinate systems, finding the derivative of a function, computing the Lagrange equations from partial derivatives, etc). Usually the proofs/derivations are shown in the modified standard notation, and then the resulting implementation is shown in Scheme.

I haven't finished the book (turns out I know less calculus than I thought), but the result is pretty effective. You're much less likely to get confused about which things are numbers and which are functions, and which of those functions operate on numbers and which ones operate on other functions, once you see the Scheme implementation of something.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by aethertap on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:09AM (#8630053)
This looks like a pretty cool book, thanks for the pointer. For anyone else who's interested, MIT press has it online for free here:

http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/s...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by euid on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:51AM (#8629962)
In some cases, you might be reading poor-quality mathematical writing.

According to my generalization of some advice from Knuth:[1] in a good math text, definitions of terms are presented as they go along, and they are explicit about what means what. Furthermore, one of the factors that determines the quality of mathematical writing is

- Did you use words, especially for logical connectives, whenever you could have used words (instead of symbols) to express something?

and

> Try to state things twice, in complementary ways, especially when giving a definition. This reinforces the readerโ€™s understanding. [...] All variables must be defined, at least informally, when they are first introduced.

This is repeated:

> Be careful to define symbols before you use them (or at least to define them very near where you use them).

There are some cases where "the general mathematical community is expected to know what you mean," like when publishing papers in some specialized field, but if you're writing a book, these rules hold quite true. Books certainly should explain their notation, especially since the general consensus for certain notations is expected to change over the decades ...

[1] http://jmlr.csail.mit.edu/reviewing-papers/knuth_mathematica...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by RBerenguel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:36AM (#8629437)
Keep in mind it is also true the other way around. Something can be mathematically clear to someone and totally a mystery in code form. Each one has his/her strengths and weaknesses.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by cousin_it on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:57AM (#8629515)
For some concepts that can be expressed in both code and math, I prefer the code notation because I can run it, and also make small tweaks and see what happens. For example, I got a better understanding of Lรถb's theorem [1] by translating the proof into Haskell [2].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%B6b's_theorem#Modal_Proof_...

[2] http://lesswrong.com/lw/l0d/a_proof_of_l%C3%B6bs_theorem_in_...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by RBerenguel on Friday November 21, 2014 @06:27AM (#8640800)
If it can be coded, I prefer having both, or implementing the code. It helps in understanding the algorithm behind. But maths is much larger than what can be coded, or is useful in code, so the only thing left is playing with toy examples ("coding" when working with really weird stuff.)

I'd love to see more of APL (and a "larger" set of APL functions, actually) in use. The idea of a notation we could run directly is/was awesome.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by MrBuddyCasino on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:54AM (#8629504)
Probably true, and I guess if you're a mathematician, you quickly get used the symbols. And I'm not arguing against having those symbols in the first place, its just that some of them have an 19th century feel to them, and do not seem intuitive.

The art of typography and signage really only matured in the 20th century, and I'm certain some of the symbols would look very different if they were designed today. Anything that helps with teaching math and making it appear friendlier is a plus, imho.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by RBerenguel on Friday November 21, 2014 @06:25AM (#8640792)
I'm not sure what symbols are you hinting at. First I thought it was to Fraktur kind of letters, but obviously this shouldn't be the case, as you point "teaching" as a plus of redesigning them, and Fraktur symbols are used "traditionally" in relatively high level algebra (for some reason some symbols are used more in some realms, for me Fraktur started appearing when talking about complex stuff about ideals). Once you get used to them, it's like a second language, and that's it. I remember reading Feynman used his own symbols for sin, cos and other basic functions (turning them to one-stroke symbols) but he had to give up once he had to talk with other people.

Math symbols are more or less a universal language. Once you know how the symbol appeared, or get used to "reading it right" they are totally natural. I don't see โˆ‚ as a "weird d," I read this as "partial." It wasn't natural at first, but I got used to it, just like I got used to English.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by tormeh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:53AM (#8629688)
It's like three-letter names in assembly. It's good when you're doing it, but step away from it for a while and you can't remember what the signs mean anymore.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Flimm on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:14AM (#8629370)
Indeed, this is technically a misuse of Unicode.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by masklinn on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:25AM (#8629400)
It's unclear whether you're talking about the page or the unicode block.

For the page, that's fairly obvious when you look at the pseudoalphabet converters.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by coldtea on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:48AM (#8629487)
If you refer to those characters, no it's not. It's not just a different style for the same character, it has semantic meaning.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by afandian on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:01AM (#8629721)
For an enlightening read, buy a copy of the Unicode standard. An amazing book, containing what I think is the single greatest achievement in anthropology. And read about the history and the imperfect process that has produced a system with duplicates, inconsistencies, but a system nonetheless.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Houshalter on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:42AM (#8629457)
You can copy and paste them, use them in applications that don't support formatting, save them to a text file, etc.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by mxfh on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:26AM (#8630490)
Since it wasn't mentioned here earlier, it's worth to take a look at shapecatcher to see what glyphs might resemble latin letters.

Scribbling something resembling the latin capital letter A returns for example any of these codepoints: A๐˜ˆฮ‘ะร…๐– โˆ†ะ”ฮ”๐ด๐ŸบะดแŽช฿ก๐›ขโ„ซ4๐›ฅแดฌแƒโต ๐Œ€๐˜ผ๐›ฌฮ›โ–ณ๐Ÿฆฤ„๐œŸ๐“โŒ“โงแ—‹๐Ÿœ‚โฒ†๐Ÿ—ป๐Ÿ™โฒ‡ัฆแ—ฉแ—…

http://shapecatcher.com/ (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5150107)

Also the Unicode Consortium has some reports on security:

http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/

http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/

listing all kind of spoofing methods you haven even thought of.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by horse_continuum on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:41AM (#8629244)
One of my friends, moving to China for a semester to teach, was thinking of using a proper Chinese name to make it easier for students to address him. He had a good idea, even, which he shared on Facebook.

I proposed that we should name him after the lack of unicode support in our browsers, and we ended up calling him "Box Boxbox" for a couple of months.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by TorKlingberg on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:51AM (#8629291)
Does anyone know why there are separate Unicode code points for letters in bold, bold italic and Fraktur? Normally this sort of thing should be handled by different fonts / font variants. Is it for compatibility with some legacy encoding?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by rossy on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:55AM (#8629303)
They're mathematical symbols. I guess they're for situations where, say, a double-struck letter has a different meaning to the regular letter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_Alphanumeric_Symbo...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by jfmercer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:17AM (#8629574)
I couldn't help but notice that this converter was copyrighted by Eli the Bearded. Google "Eli the Bearded", but not from work. You'll get some very interesting results.

https://encrypted.google.com/#q=Eli%20the%20Bearded

Re:Unicode Text Converter by qeorge on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:29AM (#8630912)
I was once bilked into buying some scraped content as original work by this method. It passed copyscape, and my test of Googling a a random sentence in quotes didn't bring anything up. I let it go because I had already accepted the work, and the lesson was worth more than the article anyway.

Don't be fool as I was! Had I manually transcribed a sentence into Google instead of copying + pasting the Unicode chars, I would have found hundreds of copies of the same article.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by sthlm on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:44AM (#8629265)
In Javascript, many unicode characters are allowed [0], so hรกฤ‡แธฑรฉล•ลƒรฉแบƒล› is a valid variable name [1].

Note: The number of ั–llัะ‘ั–ัŠlัVะฐั“ั–ะฐัŠlัะ˜ะฐะผัั• [2] used in your production code is inversely proportional to the number of friends you'll make in the maintenance team.

[0] https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/javascript-identifiers

[1] https://mothereff.in/js-variables#h%C3%A1%C4%87%E1%B8%B1%C3%...

[2] http://www.panix.com/~eli/unicode/convert.cgi?text=illegible...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by jarek on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:20AM (#8629387)
I had quite a lot of fun defining ๆฑ‰ๅญ— variable names in C#. Though definitely not something to put into production code of course...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by edgarallenbro on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:37AM (#8630212)
This is great, but why is the Australian translation called 'upside down pseudoalphabet'?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by cgranier on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:02AM (#8630362)
What I need is something that takes all the extended characters (think Spanish or Swedish) and turns them into alternative safe versions.

For instance, รก into a, รฑ into n, รฅ into a, etc.

Had my hopes up when I saw the title.

Does anyone have any ideas or links to working scripts that I can turn into something useful? I need to "sanitize" a database of foreign documentaries before uploading to YouTube (their metadata input system chokes on extended chars). Thanks!

Re:Unicode Text Converter by cataphract on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:05AM (#8630381)
You can use ICU transliterators. Example for the PHP ICU bindings: http://php.net/manual/en/transliterator.transliterate.php#11...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by cgranier on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:13AM (#8630424)
Thanks. This looks very promising. I'll dig into it and hopefully come out with a clean database ;-)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by driax on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:11AM (#8630412)
When you say safe alternatives, you mean ASCII right. You should think about looking into something which also understand the characters a bit better. For example รฅ,รฆ,รธ can mostly be turned into aa,ae,oe for danish and norwegian. Just turning them into a,?,o would change the meaning.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by cgranier on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:14AM (#8630430)
Exactly. I need to turn them into something meaningful.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Pxtl on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:02AM (#8630721)
Well, there are two separate problems.

First is phonetic similarity. This is mostly just to allow users to be able to understand each other and to help automatically catch alternate latinizations so you find out "Hey, he already registered under a latinized-spelling name".

The second is glyph similarity. This is the security concern where you have two glyphs that are graphically similar but phonetically completely different, but can easily be mistaken for each other. These glyphs are used to trick and confuse users. The first kind of check won't catch these, but they're the reason we don't have unicode in domain names.

Probably a correct system would have a very liberal interpretation of glyph similarity and would treat strings as matched when they contain similar glyphs.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by berdario on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:39PM (#8631383)
Have a look at unidecode

https://github.com/iki/unidecode

Originally Perl, there are ports for python, node, ruby,.Net, etc

Obviously it's imperfect and lossy, but it might be what you want

Re:Unicode Text Converter by notatoad on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:33PM (#8631349)
I use a python library called unidecode to do this on my site.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by pud on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:07AM (#8629542)
I made an iPhone app that does kind of the same thing, but converts letters to their upside-down unicode equivalent. It's fun for sending upside-down texts.

Free and ad-free, just a fun project:

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/texting-upside-down-free/id4...

Re:Unicode Text Converter by tgcordell on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:39AM (#8629902)
Would it be possible to use the new third party keyboard API in iOS8 to have a regular styled keyboard that types in an upside down fashion? This would allow the user to continue having the same input experience, but translate the output experience? Once confirmed this is possible, you could take OP's idea and apply as well.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by drfuchs on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:08AM (#8630767)
On my vanilla iPhone 6, all it does is turn the whole screen white.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by thomasfl on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:22AM (#8629819)
Now you have an idea for how to extend it with funny fonts as well.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by kcorbitt on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:42AM (#8629254)
Just a PSA for discoverability: since the replacement characters use different code points than their more standard equivalents, the default HN search (https://hn.algolia.com) at least doesn't find this submission when searching for "unicode."
Re:Unicode Text Converter by lazyjones on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:51AM (#8629292)
Great, now we'll have to rely on IDEs with clickable drop-down lists of variables and function names because simple text input just got a lot harder for languages where Unicode is allowed for symbols!

http://play.golang.org/p/2zYfCx_J-O

Re:Unicode Text Converter by 1010 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:16AM (#8629790)
Presumably, we are now in a situation where it is actually more difficult to learn computer programming if you happen to have had the misfortune to be born into a 'non-western' language and, to some extent, even non-english. That is an absurd situation and means that, as a collective species, we are wasting a huge amount of resources and potential. Definitely something we should look to resolve.

Having a drop-down for variables certainly isn't a solution, granted. Hopefully, there are some more sensible compromises - e.g. being able to specify a locale-dependent subset of unicode in your personal environment, appropriate use of metadata to describe the language of a file, etc.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by recursive on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:53AM (#8631083)
Auto-complete is already in most decent editors and almost every IDE.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Immortalin on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:38AM (#8630223)
On iOS 8.1 safari all I see is a bunch of squares ;(
Re:Unicode Text Converter by petecooper on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:18PM (#8631244)
My iOS/Safari shows squares in the page itself, but a row of boxed aliens in the `Bookmarks and History` list:

http://imgur.com/l98p9oN

(image is safe for work, though other stuff on imgur.com is likely not)

Re:Unicode Text Converter by tezza on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:50AM (#8629496)
๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ท๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ…ด ๐Ÿ…ถ๐Ÿ…พ๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ†‚ ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ณ๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ฑ๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ†ˆ, ๐Ÿ†‚๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ…ท๐Ÿ…ฐ๐Ÿ…ฑ๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ…ป๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ†ˆ
Re:Unicode Text Converter by crb on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:12AM (#8630791)
Ctrl-F "there goes" found this comment just fine.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tezza on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:31AM (#8630927)
No dice on my system, in-page search does not work. Mac or Windows Firefox.

Also some of the menu of glyphs are only visual analogues, not 1-1 replacements.

Plenty of systems and indexers will not be sophisticated enough to cope.

This may be very frustrating if you have visual impairments and need a screen reader.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by vhost- on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:13PM (#8631591)
Same here on windows, mac and debian with firefox.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by grimgrin on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:46AM (#8629275)
My friend made a similar tool that you may enjoy:

http://antglove.com/erger

Re:Unicode Text Converter by akavel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:38AM (#8630219)
And seems to have more "proper fonts" than the originally linked one, actually.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by rossy on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:43AM (#8629256)
I wish this worked on Windows/Chrome, or I knew why it didn't work so I could star the issue on their bug tracker.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by gojomo on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:44AM (#8629261)
Interesting; the title displayed OK minutes ago, on the main page, in Firefox/OSX. But now it's showing as unsupported-glyph boxes inside the page... but still looks OK in the titlebar of the item (comments) page.

Did some automated or administrative process mutate the characters? Or is this just Firefox drifting, in choice of font?

Re:Unicode Text Converter by hesselink on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:46AM (#8629273)
Strangely, for me on Firefox 33.1 on OS X, the title shows up fine on the main page. But when I click through to the comment, I get boxes only, and from then on, the main page also doesn't work anymore until I restart Firefox. I suspect an extension, but I'm not sure.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by hesselink on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:54AM (#8629301)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by spindritf on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:44AM (#8629263)
Also, strike-through. Which is the one I find genuinely useful because I like the suggestive way to say sฬถoฬถmฬถeฬถtฬถhฬถiฬถnฬถgฬถ then visibly correcting to something else.

http://adamvarga.com/strike/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by endgame on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:42AM (#8629659)
People have written ^H and ^W since forever^W^Wfor a very long timg.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by spindritf on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:17AM (#8629797)
Those are lost on many people nowadays. And strike through imho looks better.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by guardian5x on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:50AM (#8629288)
I only saw boxes in the title with Chrome 38. Tried out IE10 and it works just fine.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by rplnt on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:52AM (#8629297)
Boxes with (Blink) Opera as well. Works in firefox.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by guardian5x on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:10AM (#8629356)
I just noticed that in the Chrome tabs it shows the title correctly, i guess its because it just uses Windows unicode support there. But everywhere else its not showing.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by umurkontaci on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:37AM (#8630214)
Chrome 38 on MacOSX Yosemite. Works just fine both focused and unfocused.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by geekam on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:00AM (#8629718)
This fails to show up on my iPhone 5S Safari and I thought it supported Unicode.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by ck2 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:40AM (#8630240)
Note that XP cannot show

    Negative Circled
    Squared
    Negative Squared
    Double-struck
    Bold
    Bold italic
    Bold script
    Fraktur
At least not with the fonts I have.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by aruggirello on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:49AM (#8630285)
Firefox on my Ubuntu 14.04 PC cannot show:

    Negative Circled
    Squared
    Negative Squared
Re:Unicode Text Converter by huuu on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:47AM (#8629277)
๐•ฏ๐–”๐–Š๐–˜ ๐–†๐–“๐–ž๐–”๐–“๐–Š ๐–๐–“๐–”๐–œ ๐–œ๐–๐–ž ๐–™๐–๐–Š ๐–‘๐–Ž๐–“๐–Š ๐–๐–Š๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–๐–™ ๐–”๐–‹ ๐–™๐–๐–Š๐–˜๐–Š ๐–ˆ๐–๐–†๐–—๐–†๐–ˆ๐–™๐–Š๐–—๐–˜ ๐–Ž๐–˜ ๐–˜๐–” ๐–๐–Ž๐–Œ๐–?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by scarygliders on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:53AM (#8629299)
๐•€'๐•ž ๐•ก๐•ฃ๐•–๐•ฅ๐•ฅ๐•ช ๐•ค๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•– ๐•’ ๐•ฅ๐•™๐•ฃ๐•–๐•’๐•• ๐• ๐•— ๐•ฃ๐•–๐•ก๐•๐•š๐•–๐•ค ๐•”๐• ๐•ž๐•ก๐•ฃ๐•š๐•ค๐•–๐•• ๐•–๐•Ÿ๐•ฅ๐•š๐•ฃ๐•–๐•๐•ช ๐•ฅ๐•™๐•–๐•ค๐•– ๐•ฆ๐•Ÿ๐•š๐•”๐• ๐••๐•–-๐•”๐• ๐•Ÿ๐•ง๐•–๐•ฃ๐•ฅ๐•–๐•• ๐•ฅ๐•–๐•ฉ๐•ฅ๐•ค ๐•จ๐•š๐•๐• ๐•“๐•–๐•˜๐•š๐•Ÿ ๐•ฅ๐•  ๐•˜๐•–๐•ฅ ๐• ๐•๐•• ๐•ข๐•ฆ๐•š๐•”๐•œ๐•๐•ช ;)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by solistice on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:04AM (#8629336)
Hey, we got this toy and we want to play with it.

There's this great quote that anything that was fun when you were five is still fun when you're thirty five, and playing around with funky letters was certainly fun at the age of 5.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by scarygliders on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:17AM (#8629381)
Oh I agree entirely - my post was meant for the irony rather than being a 45-year old curmudgeon ;)

(And I had fun too!)

Re:Unicode Text Converter by huuu on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:01AM (#8629726)
It was a serious question tho..
Re:Unicode Text Converter by sanxiyn on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:36AM (#8629235)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by sovok on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:01AM (#8630356)
Very cool. Although the upside-down text doesn't work with รผmlauts and numbers. A reverse function would also be nice.

I wrote a similar tool that does this (http://lunicode.com). It's on Github if you want to use the code: https://github.com/combatwombat/Lunicode.js

Re:Unicode Text Converter by cturner on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:26AM (#8629850)
Different problem, but someone who knows about unicode will probably know this -

When I paste from microsoft documents into putty, characters will often be transformed to weird versions. Example - emdash is a different character to '-'. It comes through as a weird tilda character instead of a dash. Mmm. Frustating.

Is there a robust program you can run on putty to catch such type and flatten it to ascii?

Re:Unicode Text Converter by benjaminjackman on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:33AM (#8629875)
I use Linux but there are similar problems, I usually will paste text like that into sublime to remove all the special formatting, then re-copy paste it. I also found this stack overflow post, which mentions a program (puretext) that maps win+v to do a text only paste: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/122404/how-to-copy-and-pa...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Siecje on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:29AM (#8630159)
Does Ctrl+Shift+v (paste without formatting) work?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by netheril96 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:53AM (#8629502)
๐•ฟ๐–๐–Ž๐–˜ ๐–‹๐–Š๐–Š๐–‘๐–˜ ๐–‘๐–Ž๐–๐–Š ๐–™๐–Š๐–—๐–—๐–Ž๐–‡๐–‘๐–Š ๐–๐–†๐–ˆ๐– ๐–‡๐–š๐–™ ๐•ด ๐–‘๐–Ž๐–๐–Š ๐–Ž๐–™. ๐•น๐–”๐–œ ๐•ด ๐–ˆ๐–†๐–“ ๐–š๐–˜๐–Š ๐–†๐–‘๐–‘ ๐–๐–Ž๐–“๐–‰๐–˜ ๐–”๐–‹ ๐–‹๐–†๐–“๐–ˆ๐–ž ๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–’๐–†๐–™๐–™๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ ๐–”๐–“ ๐–™๐–๐–”๐–˜๐–Š ๐–˜๐–Ž๐–™๐–Š๐–˜ ๐–™๐–๐–†๐–™ ๐–‰๐–”๐–Š๐–˜๐–“'๐–™ ๐–˜๐–š๐–•๐–•๐–”๐–—๐–™ ๐–‹๐–”๐–—๐–’๐–†๐–™๐–™๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by masklinn on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:53AM (#8629687)
Except when the site in question is completely broken wrt astral codepoints.

Which is unexpectedly common as MySQL's "utf8" can't handle codepoints outside the BMP and will just truncate text at the first astral codepoint[0]. You need MySQL 5.5.3 (because adding a whole new encoding in a minor version makes perfect sense) and "utf8mb4" (because why would a codec called "utf8" actually do UTF8?). And then the regex are probably broken because it's PHP and developers use neither UNICODE mode nor properties (PCRE's "\w" will not match all unicode letters, you need "\p{L}" for that, also note that e.g. "๐Ÿ†„" is a symbol not a letter, although "๐”น" is a letter)

[0] https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/mysql-utf8mb4

Re:Unicode Text Converter by TazeTSchnitzel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:16AM (#8630443)
MySQL is horrible for all the same reasons PHP is horrible, and this applies to Unicode too, except PHP is actually trying to fix its Unicode problems (UTF8 is the default now, moves towards adding a UString class), while MySQL isn't fixing them.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by egypturnash on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:28AM (#8630906)
Like ๐‘ป๐’˜๐’Š๐’•๐’•๐’†๐’“! https://twitter.com/egypturnash/status/535105548761309184
Re:Unicode Text Converter by anjbe on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:39AM (#8629905)
Iโ€™ve never been a fan of this sort of thing. The Unicode characters in these font blocks are not letters for making words; at least the doubleโ€struck, fraktur, bold, italic, and bold italics are semantically for use in mathematical equations.

This can have some strange effects if you try to use them like letters. Example: Whatโ€™s the lowercase transform of ๐‘ผ? ๐‘ผ! Not ๐’–.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by petercooper on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:02AM (#8629329)
If you like this sort of thing, you might like this piece I wrote some time back about writing a Ruby script using whitespace for all identifiers: http://www.rubyinside.com/the-split-is-not-enough-whitespace...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by TheLoneWolfling on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:29AM (#8630916)
This sounds like it could be abused.

Someone submitting a path to an open-source program (in Ruby) with a NBSP somewhere that changes the program logic or something. (a<NBSP>or<NBSP>b, where earlier you did a<NBSP>or<NBSP>b=x, or something similar, is the first example that comes to mind.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by TheLoneWolfling on Thursday November 20, 2014 @10:50AM (#8636266)
Whoops. Patch, not path.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by edent on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:09AM (#8629354)
This is the wฬถoฬถrฬถsฬถtฬถ bฬฒeฬฒsฬฒtฬฒ use of Unicode!
Re:Unicode Text Converter by hliyan on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:34AM (#8629222)
Impressive! Hopefully, this won't end with HN sanitizing everything except latin + latin extended from submissions.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Cthulhu_ on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:57AM (#8629308)
Well it does / should make people rethink allowing UTF-8 by default in user-generated content. I wonder if the stuff generated by http://www.eeemo.net/ works here:

Zฬกฬ–ฬฅฬ™ฬฑอ“AฬถอšฬฌฬบLฬทอ–อ“Gฬงอ•Oฬณฬฎ!ฬ—

Re:Unicode Text Converter by joezydeco on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:48AM (#8630281)
#ูอคาˆอจอฅา‰า‰อฆาˆา‰อจาˆอฉา‰อชาˆอฃอฏอซา‰อฅอฌอจาˆอญา‰อฎาˆอฏา‰อจาˆอญอญอฌา‰องอฅาˆอฃา‰อจา‰า‰าˆองอฅา‰อฏาˆอฎอฅา‰อญาˆอคาˆอฆาˆอฅา‰องาˆอฉอฏา‰อญาˆอจา‰อจอฅา‰า‰อฃา‰อฃอชา‰องาˆอญา‰อฉาˆอคา‰อฎาˆอฏอฅาˆอฌาˆอญาˆอฆาˆอจอฃา‰อฅาˆอฏา‰า‰อฃองาˆอซา‰อญาˆอฅอฏอฏา‰อฆาˆอฅา‰องา‰าˆอฉา‰อญาˆอฃอจา‰อฃอฅาˆอชา‰องาˆอญแ… 'ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬ แ… แ… 'ฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ฬ‹ เธเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธเน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เธเน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เธเน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เน‰เธเน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เน‡เธเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธดเธด อฅอฆองอฃอค อฆองอฃอคอฅ องอฃอคอฅอฆ อฃอคอฅอฆอง อคอฅอฆองอฃ อฅอฆองอฃอค อฆองอฃอคอฅ องอฃอคอฅอฆ อฃอคอฅอฆอง อคอฅอฆองอฃ อฅอฆองอฃอค อฆองอฃอคอฅ องอฃอคอฅอฆ อฃอคอฅอฆอง อคอฅอฆองอฃ อฅอฆองอฃอค อฆองอฃอคอฅ องอฃอคอฅอฆ อฅอฆองอฃอค อฆองอฃอคอฅ องอฃอคอฅอฆ อฅอฆองอฃอค อฆองอฃอคอฅ โ–ฒโ–ฒโ–ฒฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬฬ Works for me.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by spyder on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:45AM (#8630596)
This comment has a strange behavior in Firefox, which is not surprising but it's probably a bug: When I scrolling to this comment there is no characters outside of the comment box but when i switch back to this page from another tab then the characters are going outside the comment box.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by joezydeco on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:20AM (#8630844)
You should try it on mobile. Every browser does something different. Twitter has a /real/ fun time with this stuff, I've been inspired by @glitchr_

https://twitter.com/glitchr_

Re:Unicode Text Converter by rikkus on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:46AM (#8629477)
Nice utility. What should I tag it with in my bookmarks though?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Cthulhu_ on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:33AM (#8629876)
ฬถHeา‰ who Waฬงiฬดtฬขs ฬดBehอŸinอ dฬข Tอขhอe Wอกallอ.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by NoMoreNicksLeft on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:53AM (#8630307)
I don't really speak/read Russian, but I have a passable understanding of Cyrillic, and those always look dumb. It doesn't look like "the" to be, it looks lik "guh-buh-yeh" or something.

Same thing with the Borat DVD cover.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by dang on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:39PM (#8634320)
Or Toys Ya Us.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by calineczka on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:17AM (#8629798)
Finally a way to express myself on facebook properly ;) I wonder if bold text would lead to better conversion from ads using this trick. And I wonder when is facebook going to ban this because obviously it works :)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by dsjoerg on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:48AM (#8629942)
แด…แดแด‡๊œฑ แด€ษดyแดษดแด‡ แด‹ษดแดแดก ษช๊œฐ แดฉแดแดฉแดœสŸแด€ส€ ๊œฑแด‡แด€ส€แด„สœ แด‡ษดษขษชษดแด‡๊œฑ แด…แด‡-แดœษดษชแด„แดแด…แด‡ แด›แด‡xแด› แดกสœแด‡ษด ษชษดแด…แด‡xษชษดษข?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by phpnode on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:34AM (#8630188)
they definitely don't. Search for "แดœษดษชแด„แดแด…แด‡ แด›แด‡xแด›" and you'll see the only matches are exactly that.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by TazeTSchnitzel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:18AM (#8630459)
They usually don't, because the text isn't supposed to be equivalent to "non-'Unicode'" text.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by guipsp on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:26AM (#8630139)
Google does, atleast for fullwidth.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by TazeTSchnitzel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:18AM (#8630452)
Which makes sense, as fullwidth is likely to be accidentally typed when using a Chinese/Japanese/Korean IME, and is entirely equivalent to normal characters, it just fits in with CJK text layouts better.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by grayclhn on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:13AM (#8629558)
I look forward to a Hacker News front page that looks like a ransom note.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by protomyth on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:16PM (#8631233)
I think of it as a karma backlash from Apple naming a new font San Fransisco for the iWatch instead of leaving the name for the old ransom font.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by arikrak on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:36AM (#8630205)
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7383672 though they changed my title to normal text.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by codemonkeymike on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:52AM (#8630298)
Continued use of this would be a good way of making me not use HN.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by DanBC on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:01AM (#8629725)
Chrome on iOS is giving me the character unavailable boxes. Normally I'd just change the font but I can't do that here.

This doesn't feel like the future.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by rplnt on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:53AM (#8629300)
Does not really work for characters like รบรดรค, not sure if there isn't anything similar in those "styles" or it was just ignored.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by parasj on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:23AM (#8630119)
๐“–๐“ป๐“ฎ๐“ช๐“ฝ ๐“ฏ๐“ธ๐“ป ๐“น๐“ช๐“ผ๐“ผ๐”€๐“ธ๐“ป๐“ญ๐“ผ
Re:Unicode Text Converter by seba_dos1 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:33AM (#8630942)
๐•ด ๐–‹๐–Š๐–Š๐–‘ ๐–† ๐–“๐–Š๐–œ ๐–›๐–Ž๐–—๐–†๐–‘ ๐–™๐–๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ ๐–”๐–“ ๐–˜๐–”๐–ˆ๐–Ž๐–†๐–‘ ๐–’๐–Š๐–‰๐–Ž๐–† ๐–ˆ๐–”๐–’๐–Ž๐–“๐–Œ.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by pbhjpbhj on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @02:58PM (#8632243)
This has been a โ“ฃโ“—โ“˜โ“โ“– [thing] for quite some time - guess it might be making a come back, I've seen zalgo (http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/zalgo NSFW; ฬ–อˆฬชอ™อ‰ฬฐอˆZอ“อŽฬฌอ“ฬฏฬ–Aฬถฬฏฬฬ–อฬฅฬžLฬปGฬขฬฃฬ˜อ‡ฬ–อฬ™O [Zalgo] generator http://www.eeemo.net/) and flip and reverse text live on my Facebook in the past at least.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by seqizz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @11:25AM (#8630879)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by darkstalker on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:37PM (#8633145)
I've used this page for a long time. ๏ผท๏ฝ’๏ฝ‰๏ฝ”๏ฝ‰๏ฝŽ๏ฝ‡ ๏ฝ“๏ฝ”๏ฝ•๏ฝ†๏ฝ† ๏ฝ‰๏ฝŽ ๏ฝ†๏ฝ•๏ฝŒ๏ฝŒ๏ฝ—๏ฝ‰๏ฝ„๏ฝ”๏ฝˆ ๏ฝ•๏ฝŽ๏ฝ‰๏ฝƒ๏ฝ๏ฝ„๏ฝ… ๏ฝ†๏ฝ๏ฝ’ ๏ฝ“๏ฝ•๏ฝ’๏ฝ… ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ‹๏ฝ…๏ฝ“ ๏ฝ‰๏ฝ” ๏ฝŒ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ‹ ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ’๏ฝ… ๏ฝ†๏ฝ•๏ฝŽ๏ฝŽ๏ฝ™
Re:Unicode Text Converter by getdavidhiggins on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:57AM (#8630329)
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jrometty on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:43AM (#8629915)
It should be mentioned that this returns a blank title on the android app.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by cm2012 on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:27AM (#8629852)
On my android all the unicode characters (including the title) are blank.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tempodox on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:36AM (#8629232)
It works :)

๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’๐’…๐’† ๐‘ป๐’†๐’™๐’• ๐‘ช๐’๐’๐’—๐’†๐’“๐’•๐’†๐’“

comes in a fancy bold italic font in my HN list. I love this hack.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by eterm on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:42AM (#8629251)
Oddly in Firefox the tab name showing the title only gets as far as ๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’ before giving up with what looks like a box with D835 in it.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by acqq on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:48AM (#8629280)
The tab name is shortened in the middle of the sequence.

I still don't know what the sequence is though, any Unicode expert to explain? Apparently is d835 "invalid"?

http://www.charbase.com/d835-unicode-invalid-character

Edit: I see now emillon explains:

"U+1D48F whose UTF-16 BE encoding is d8 35 dc 8f."

That's:

http://codepoints.net/U+1D48F

"MATHEMATICAL BOLD ITALIC SMALL N"

Re:Unicode Text Converter by razzmataz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:42AM (#8629660)
I get ๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’„๐’...
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Flott on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:53AM (#8630668)
This is not good news if it bypasses the spam filters! Does it?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by sjwright on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:36AM (#8629890)
The question I have is, what's the easiest way to strip this ๐Ÿ…น๐Ÿ†„๐Ÿ…ฝ๐Ÿ…บ out of unicode strings submitted by web users? With a nod to Cunningham's Law, surely the right answer is a regular expression?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by atlbeer on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:39AM (#8629904)
Depends on the language... but, the "correct" answer is support unicode and welcome yourself into a world of pain.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by dsjoerg on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:48AM (#8629941)
Glad you put "correct" in scare quotes, because that "correct" answer is certainly not correct.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by NaNaN on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:43AM (#8629917)
You can use โ€œAdobe Blankโ€[1] and CSS @font-face{unicode-range:} to hide them.

[1]: https://github.com/adobe-fonts/adobe-blank

Re:Unicode Text Converter by TazeTSchnitzel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:15AM (#8630433)
So now the text won't show up at all?

Wonderful :/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by gpvos on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:44AM (#8629922)
I do feel that Unicode is slowly jumping the shark.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by aruggirello on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:01AM (#8630352)
!๊™…แด™ษ˜Tli๊Ÿป mAq๊™… ๊Ÿปo Tษ˜๊™… wษ˜แดŽ ษ˜loHw A ๊™…bษ˜ษ˜แดŽ ๊™…iHT ,oแดŽ HO
Re:Unicode Text Converter by edem on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:59AM (#8630701)
Can you do zฬฬ—aอˆฬฃฬณอ“lอgฬฑฬญอ–ฬœฬ™oฬขฬฆฬซฬฏ as well?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by JulianMorrison on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:32AM (#8630180)
๐•ธ๐–Š๐–Ž๐–“ ๐•ท๐–š๐–‹๐–™๐–๐–Ž๐–˜๐–˜๐–Š๐–“๐–‹๐–†๐–๐–—๐–Ÿ๐–Š๐–š๐–Œ ๐–Ž๐–˜๐–™ ๐–›๐–”๐–‘๐–‘๐–Š๐–— ๐•ฌ๐–†๐–‘๐–Š.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by getdavidhiggins on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @09:58AM (#8630334)
๏ฝ”๏ฝˆ๏ฝ‰ั• ๏ฝ‰ั• ๏ฝ‡๏ฝ’รฉรค๏ฝ”, ฦ…รผ๏ฝ” รฌ๏ฝ”'๏ฝ“ ๏ฝƒ๏ฝŒ฿€๏ฝ“รจิ ๏ฝ“รฒรน๏ฝ’๏ฝƒรจ!!!

รผ๏ฝŽรญ๏ฝ”๏ฝ฿€ษญ๏ฝ“ รฌั• ฯปรน๏ฝƒีฐ ฦƒ๏ฝ…๏ฝ”๏ฝ”รซ๏ฝ’!!

https://www.unicod.es/

Re:Unicode Text Converter by noobermin on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:29AM (#8629210)
๏ผฑ๏ฝ•๏ฝ‰๏ฝ”๏ฝ… ๏ฝ ๏ฝ—๏ฝ๏ฝ™ ๏ฝ”๏ฝ ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ‹๏ฝ… ๏ฝ”๏ฝˆ๏ฝ… ๏ฝ๏ฝ๏ฝ‰๏ฝŽ๏ฝ”๏ผŽ
Re:Unicode Text Converter by shaurz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:11AM (#8629360)
What is the point of having different codepoints for FONTS in Unicode? What a load of nonsense.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Arnt on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:16AM (#8629376)
Unicode generally includes these things because an older encoding did, in the name of roundtrip compability. I expect some older font encoding did it to cater to people who need more than 26 symbols in their maths papers. Let ๐’‰ be the...

Unicode's name for ๐’‰ explains it all, really.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by lmm on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:32AM (#8629423)
And yet the Unicode consortium went with Han unification, which is still blocking adoption for a significant potential userbase (pretty much any software that needs to display Japanese names).
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Arnt on Friday November 21, 2014 @05:29AM (#8640653)
I went to a unicode meeting about a decade ago, and asked one of the luminaries over beer one night. He told me that they did some practical research, including reading newspapers and talking to editors. In Japan they would ask questions like "I see that you mention Shanghai in today's paper, and you use Japanese glyphs for the city's name, not the same as Chinese newspaper use. Why?". The answer was generally "that's how we write Shanghai here" and out of that came Han unification.

I suspect that if you could find a couple of mainstream publishers in Taiwan or Japan that prefer to print the names of mainland Chinese using the same glyphs as are used on mainland China instead of the glypths used on Taiwan or in Japan, you might be able to reopen the discussion of han unification.

Re:Unicode Text Converter by Arnt on Friday November 21, 2014 @05:54AM (#8640718)
Or even better: A directive from the someone's ministry of education decreeing deunified Han in school books, so at least one country's pupils would actually learn to read deunified Han.

Now wouldn't that be fun: "When history textbooks coverthe civil war in 1927-50, they shall use traditional Chinese for the names of then KMT-held cities and simplified Chinese for the names of then communist-held cities."

Re:Unicode Text Converter by anjbe on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:42AM (#8629913)
Well, the original reasoning behind Han unification was the (horrendously impractical) idea of storing all of Unicode in 16 bits. Most of these characters were added later; you can tell because their codepoints are greater than U+FFFF.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by TazeTSchnitzel on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:20AM (#8630466)
They're not encoding different fonts. They're encoding distinct character forms, often necessary for historical texts and such. Some of these are actually symbols, too.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by ryanjmo on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @01:47PM (#8631793)
เน€ ั’เธ„ืฉั” ี‡เน ี‡ะณืฅ ี‡ั’เน€เธฃ เนเธขี‡.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by vjvj on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @12:05PM (#8631152)
๐Ÿ†ƒ๐Ÿ…ท๐Ÿ…ด ๐Ÿ†‚๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ…ฒ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ…ด๐Ÿ†ƒ ๐Ÿ…ธ๐Ÿ†‚ ๐Ÿ…พ๐Ÿ†„๐Ÿ†ƒ.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by sakri on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:07AM (#8629545)
fun for passwords
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tmmm on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:43AM (#8629257)
How does it work?
Re:Unicode Text Converter by tibbon on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:07AM (#8630393)
It appears to work on Facebook and Twitter.

๏ฝ‰๏ฝŽ๏ฝƒ๏ฝ…๏ฝ๏ฝ”๏ฝ‰๏ฝ๏ฝŽ

Re:Unicode Text Converter by fiatjaf on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:44AM (#8629663)
.วษ”ฤฑu ษนวdns sษส sฤฑษฅส‡
Re:Unicode Text Converter by yAnonymous on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:57AM (#8629706)
๐“˜ ๐”€๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ญ๐“ฎ๐“ป ๐“ฑ๐“ธ๐”€ ๐”€๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ต ๐“๐“ข๐“ ๐““๐“Ÿ๐“˜ ๐“ผ๐”‚๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ฎ๐“ถ๐“ผ ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ท๐“ญ๐“ต๐“ฎ ๐“ฝ๐“ฑ๐“ฒ๐“ผ.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by jackmaney on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @10:54AM (#8630677)
I'd like to buy a vowel, please. Let's go with "e".
Re:Unicode Text Converter by kalops on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @07:59AM (#8629713)
teh cancer that is HN. predicting next post someone shows off rageflipping text
Re:Unicode Text Converter by PSeitz on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @08:19AM (#8629807)
๐“š๐“๐“ฆ๐“๐“˜
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Kiro on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @05:44AM (#8629264)
Twitch chat will love this.
Re:Unicode Text Converter by Houshalter on Wednesday November 19, 2014 @06:46AM (#8629475)
โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜ โ˜โ˜โ˜ โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜ โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜ โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜โ˜