News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by allovernow on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:19PM (#22205865)
There is a recently opened P4 biolab in Wuhan within miles of the seafood market in question, with researchers who have recently been working with and publishing on the topic of Corona viruses, including research on human transmission. Not to be sensationalist, and personally I think the title is alarmist, but are a number of suspicious elements to this story that are worth examining:

https://medium.com/@siradrianbond/coronavirus-2019-ncov-part...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Fomite on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:55PM (#22206249)
- Every laboratory exposure-related outbreak I've encountered has been trivially easy to trace back to that event.

- Most high-end virology labs are doing research on human to human transmission of corona viruses. They're a major emerging type of virus we don't understand, and a Chinese lab working on them is even less surprising.

- If this was a bioweapon, it sucks.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by izzydata on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:01PM (#22206327)
Originating from a lab doesn't necessarily mean it is a weapon. Only that they have poor sterilization or something.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by agumonkey on Friday January 31, 2020 @06:56PM (#22207259)
yeah close proxmity changes everything, mistakes are not impossible. ..
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Fomite on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:35PM (#22206622)
Points one and two are originating in a lab as a general principle. Only point three is addressing the mutated version of this rumor, which is that it's a bioweapons lab.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by dk1138 on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:15PM (#22206459)
Trivially easy to trace, sure. But the Chinese government bay be highly motivated to prevent disclosing or allowing discovery of that.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by baddox on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:38PM (#22206650)
The ones that are too difficult to trace wouldn't, of course, be included among every lab exposure-related outbreak you've encountered.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Fomite on Friday January 31, 2020 @06:25PM (#22207041)
There are very, very few outbreaks where we don't eventually figure out the source.

Like, can you spin the theory that we're missing them? Sure. But there's a pretty strong absence of evidence there, despite a field that's actively looking constantly (and where showing that would further the political and scientific careers of a number of people).

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by vtail on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:57PM (#22206820)
Yes - it's a good example of a survivorship bias.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by ranger207 on Friday January 31, 2020 @11:49PM (#22208751)
>If this was a bioweapon, it sucks.

Bioweapons aren't all that effective in general for the reasons seen here: they're too slowly acting, to easy to treat, and not as lethal as, say, chemical weapons (which are also not that effective as weapons). Biological weapons are most dangerous as terror weapons.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by A4ET8a8uTh0 on Saturday February 01, 2020 @12:29AM (#22208887)
I am not sure I agree completely. Yes, the panic they induce ( and that media happily augment ) is in itself dangerous, but.. well, weaponized ebola has apparently been in existence for a while. What makes you think progress was not made since then to.. add new traits to existing strains?

I hate to say anything more, because we would easily move into wild speculation territory.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Fomite on Saturday February 01, 2020 @06:31PM (#22213981)
Agreed. I worked on biodefense stuff for awhile, and my usual argument was that bioweapons are at best panic and disruption.

But this was mostly to address the terminal version of this particular rumor, which I've also encountered on social media.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by superzamp on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:48PM (#22206174)
Currently reading a (French) book regarding France-China industrial espionage and relations that was published well before the virus outbreak. Funnily enough, the author describes quite extensively how this P4 in Wuhan came into existence and all the subsequent problems faced by France to get China to honor the deal.

I quote/translate: "In the course of these fifteen years, China has several times failed to live up to their engagement, staying relatively vague about the existence of an offensive biological program. Chinese officials had, for example, previously certified they had no other P4 and no plans to build any, but we now know they do have many, some being quite suspicious, a France official said".

The book is "France-Chine, les liaisons dangereuses" by Antoine Izambard, for those curious.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by threeseed on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:03PM (#22206339)
As I mentioned in another thread. I worked at a facilities department at university with an infectious disease research lab.

We had incidents where there were system failures eg. Air filtration.

It can just be a simple accident that the China government is covering up because they know their population would turn on them.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by mc32 on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:50PM (#22206202)
They have to be naive as VW if they believed the CCP would honor the contract...
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by superzamp on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:56PM (#22206275)
Yeah the whole thing is basically a shitshow. The majority of the French administration was against the deal as well as many other countries but the president at the time forced the deal to go through.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by hcheung on Friday January 31, 2020 @09:28PM (#22208170)
Would be an interesting read if there is an English version of the book available.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by mustachionut on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:53PM (#22206771)
The allegation that the virus originated in a lab is appealing but unfounded. Everybody would rather believe that our problems come from circumstances humans understand and control rather than the cold randomness of the universe. Though the virus and death it has caused is terrible, at least the fight against it unites humanity in a limited way. The groundless assertion that it originated in a lab recasts coronavirus into a human vs human problem and amplifies our political differences.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by NicoJuicy on Friday January 31, 2020 @06:41PM (#22207156)
From a fake account? There is no reason for that. Is there?

Although your content seems very fatalistic ( = we can't understand nature). It seems weird and suspicious

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by mustachionut on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:55PM (#22207667)
> From a fake account?

No. From a new, anonymous account where I intend to post my opinions without them being tied to my identity. At least until I post enough for stylometric analysis to work...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by throw876545 on Friday January 31, 2020 @11:49PM (#22208746)
Unfortunately, saying rational things about China—instead of demonizing it—can be seen as defending the Chinese government and bring a lot of grief in this current “Yellow Peril” environment.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by NicoJuicy on Sunday February 02, 2020 @05:59AM (#22216372)
A new account is the same as a fake account. I didn't see any reason for not tieing it to a identity. I express my opinions also, only if it is really sensitive I would use a throw away. I think being pro/contra China is not that sensitive, except if you are in China and contra.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by allovernow on Saturday February 01, 2020 @05:23AM (#22209776)
China is literally ground zero for what will be a global pandemic if we do not contain it. I implore you not to bring nonsensical allegations of racism into this.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Aperocky on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:32PM (#22206610)
There are 23 genome publicly available, And it’s closely identifies with existing coronavirus from bats and are further away from SARS. I am not a biologist, tell me should I trust the existing science or your story? It was said that the virus might not have originated from the market itself, people who actually raised or caught these wild animals might have gotten it first. But to make a jump from that to the biolab is exactly like how the US flag looked like wind blew on it and we never went to the moon.

I’ll believe it when NIH or CDC publish corroborating evidence.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by neuralrust on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:29PM (#22205984)
There is a 2017 article on Nature on that laboratory in Wuhan:

https://www.nature.com/news/inside-the-chinese-lab-poised-to...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by archagon on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:32PM (#22206022)
Who is "Adrian Bond", I wonder? Can't find anything about the author.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by viscanti on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:40PM (#22206674)
This appears to have been debunked already. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/29/coronavirus-china-lab-m...
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by NathanKP on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:20PM (#22205881)
Medium account was suspended...
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by allovernow on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:23PM (#22205922)
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by thedudeabides5 on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:52PM (#22207654)
Did anyone check out the claim that the address of the Wuhan Lab was moved in google maps?
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by thedudeabides5 on Saturday February 01, 2020 @12:04AM (#22208805)
https://goo.gl/maps/mt1nrMnP6A8QAXpn9

Looks like it’s in both places but wasn’t “moved” like in that link

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by knolax on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:10PM (#22206406)
Article's still up for me and in the comments you have a bunch of people stalking some researcher the article mentioned. It's the Boston Marathon Bomber all over again.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by adventured on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:22PM (#22205912)
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by prostheticvamp on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:21PM (#22205886)
It’s up for me.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by NathanKP on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:23PM (#22205918)
Must still be a cache somewhere for you. When I try to view it, it says "This account is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules."
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by tinodotim on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:14PM (#22206454)
Interesting, I visited it from IPs from all around the world through different desktop browsers and it's available everywhere BUT there is no author and no author bio.

If that's (kind of) on purpose that's really weird, to suspend somebodies account but leave the article up and remove all the author references. Anybody from medium on hn :)?

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday January 31, 2020 @10:13PM (#22208385)
At first it was like that for me too. After a reload, because trying to click on that Adrian Bond icon to see what else he posted, it's now gone completely like parent poster described.

The funny thing about that is when you go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wuhan_Institute_of_Virology the geocoordinates there lead you into the same forest on all major mapping services, while the pictures are recent or even from this year.

Interesting edit history, 'patriots' proudly performing Psyberwar...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by allovernow on Saturday February 01, 2020 @05:26AM (#22209786)
That's weird...it looks like an empty forest separating farmland.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by dirtyid on Saturday February 01, 2020 @08:55AM (#22210501)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restrictions_on_geographic_dat...

It's probably one of the adjacent buildings.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by T-A on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:30PM (#22205995)
Here's an article from last week about it:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7922379/Chinas-la...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by ibeckermayer on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:19PM (#22206505)
“Indian scientists have just found HIV (AIDS) virus-like insertions in the 2019-nCov virus that are not found in any other coronavirus. They hint at the possibility that this Chinese virus was designed ["not fortuitous'].” [1]

“BOSTON (CBS) – Three people tied to universities and a hospital in the Boston area were indicted on charges they lied about their ties to China or tried to help the Chinese government. Among them was Dr. Charles Lieber, the chair of Harvard University’s Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology.

Prosecutors said Lieber had a contract with Wuhan Institute of Technology. He also ran a group that had contracts with the Department of Defense and National Institutes of Health” [2]

[1] https://twitter.com/ARanganathan72/status/122332087916298649...

[2] https://boston.cbslocal.com/2020/01/28/massachusetts-china-i...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by justinzollars on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:45PM (#22207600)
This paper is not yet peer reviewed. I'm sure this claim will be studied exhaustively in the coming days/weeks.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by topmonk on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:17PM (#22206479)
Heres another article: https://www.zerohedge.com/health/man-behind-global-coronavir...

What also leads me to believe this may be the case is that there was (according to the article) experiments on bats being run, and in China, people often find random animals, in drainage ditches, etc., and then go on to sell them for meat. It's possible that the bats they were working on were improperly disposed of, and then picked up and sold at the wet market.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by yorwba on Friday January 31, 2020 @06:00PM (#22206845)
> Something tells us, if anyone wants to find out what really caused the coronavirus pandemic that has infected thousands of people in China and around the globe, they should probably pay Dr. Peng a visit.

> Or at least start with an email: Dr Peng can be reached at [...], and his phone# is [...]

Have they no shame? They've found a bat immunologist (a different one than the virologist in the Medium post upstream; it's almost as if there are many experts on bat viruses), strongly suggest that this makes him the one responsible, and then ask people to contact him? This is basically orchestrating a harassment campaign. I hope they can be sued for that (defamation? IANAL).

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by notadoc on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:43PM (#22206692)
Zerohedge? Their primary product is fear porn for clicks, how reliable of a source do you think that is?
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by topmonk on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:22PM (#22207425)
Nowadays, what source is completely reliable? The best you can do is sample a bunch of them and try to piece together the whole truth from that, because everybody seems to have an angle.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by WaitWaitWha on Friday January 31, 2020 @06:02PM (#22206855)
Forget the local content, but follow the links and make your decisions with those additional resources - discard them or not. Even a click-bate site can have links that help dis/prove a hypothesis.
Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by ficklepickle on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:32PM (#22207494)
Here is an article from CBC[0], the source of the original article that sparked this theory. It claims to debunk the sensational claims, going as far as to call them fake and a conspiracy.

No coronavirus was sent to Wuhan from that lab, it was a henipavirus and Ebola. It also wasn't sent by Dr. Qiu.

That doesn't prove the coronavirus didn't escape from the Wuhan lab. But it does debunk this popular theory that it was Dr Qiu.

Even if it did escape from the lab, it doesn't mean it's a bioweapon. Although the CCP are almost certainly working on them, possibly in their only known level 4 lab in Wuhan. I imagine there is a research overlap between bioweapons and treating people. They both require a deep understanding of how the viruses function.

There is an interesting unanswered question: what is the RCMP investigating Dr. Qiu for? They are very vague. It could be nothing, or it could be related to her helping setup the lab in Wuhan. The RCMP is a vain, inept organization IMO.

[0] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/china-coronavirus-on...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by testis321 on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:41PM (#22206677)
> 410 > This account is under investigation or was found in violation of the Medium Rules.

Hmm...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Aperocky on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:29PM (#22205987)
s/biolab/World Trade Center/

s/biolab/Apollo/

‘Number of suspicious elements’

Even the VOA has came out to classify this as a hoax. Sometimes people just want to believe in conspiracies.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by dang on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:16PM (#22206470)
"Eschew flamebait. Don't introduce flamewar topics unless you have something genuinely new to say. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by allovernow on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:33PM (#22206024)
Did you read the article before you dismissed this? The links are a little more substantial than 9/11 conspiracies.

And the mechanism is far less far-fetched, considering that on at least one instance SARS was confirmed as having escaped a research lab much like the one in question.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20040423/china-sars-death

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by Aperocky on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:44PM (#22206136)
There are 23 genome publicly available, And it’s closely identifies with existing coronavirus from bats and are further away from SARS. I am not a biologist, tell me should I trust the existing science or your story? It was said that the virus might not have originated from the market itself, people who actually raised or caught these wild animals might have gotten it first. But to make a jump from that to the biolab is exactly like how the US flag looked like wind blew on it and we never went to the moon.

I’ll believe it when NIH or CDC publish corroborating evidence. Or are they part of the ‘system’ to you?

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by soperj on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:58PM (#22206289)
The part about not going to the moon that always baffles me, is when I start asking questions like "Were the Saturn Rockets fake? were the satellites launched fake? Do you believe the ISS is currently being faked? the Space Shuttle? Any of the SpaceX stuff that is currently happening?" and they believe that stuff is real.

If that's all real, then why couldn't they land on the moon?

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by LargoLasskhyfv on Friday January 31, 2020 @11:00PM (#22208560)
Because anything which currently involves humans in tin cans in earth orbit happens below the van Allen Belts, which is one point the non-believers are holding up.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

Their point being to cross the Belts in tin cans even going fast would have toasted them nicely and afterwards being toasted further by having no protection from cosmic rays or solar winds at all.

Which won't happen if you stay in LEO where every human space flight happened afterwards.

To return back to the current topic, there was a (good!) movie about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capricorn_One from 1978 where they faked it to proactively saving face in case of any real mishaps. Though that was for traveling to Mars, not the Moon.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by filoleg on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:56PM (#22206268)
I don't think that the author of the parent comment has some "i don't believe the system" sentiment, tinfoil hat style.

For example, I definitely trust CDC (the US one). However, I am vary of trusting Chinese authorities and agencies when it comes to this issue, as they have shown before that they are willing to go to extreme lengths to hide the truth when revealing it casts a bad light or reveals some info. I have no strong opinion on the true source of the virus, as there isn't simply enough info and time to do a proper investigation by CDC, but it is easily imaginable how much the reputation of China will get damaged if it gets discovered that the virus was born out of one of their labs.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by hnuser123456 on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:16PM (#22206471)
The CDC still recommends circumcision for "health" reasons, so they definitely are part of the system.

There's a bio lab there studying Coronaviruses, industrial accidents happen all the time, it's not hard to believe.

Blatantly calling out such an accident with government departments probably wouldn't bode well for relations.

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by claudeganon on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:35PM (#22206045)
Yes, I hate conspiracy theorists who ridiculously claim that governments tested out things like toxic chemicals, radioactive substances, and pathogens on civilian populations throughout the entire 20th century:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentat...

Re:Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spr... by opless on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:58PM (#22206294)
It's not even funny that the UK had this; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contaminated_blood_scandal_in_...