T-A
The article used $16.8B. Not a big difference.
In 2015, Popular Mechanics reported on the retirement of Larry Zottarelli, the last original Voyager engineer still working on the project. He was 80 years old. The article noted that keeping Voyager alive required knowledge of old languages and systems, including assembly language and Fortran.
Sovereignty does not always require self-hosting; sometimes it just requires deployments that meet your control requirements. For organizations that prefer a managed service, Mistral Large 4 is available through Microsoft Foundry, with private deployment options for Azure developers.
This part,
The existence proof pertains to the simplest grand unified theory that includes the gauge fields and fermions of the Standard Model
looks like a reference to SU(5) GUT from 1974:
China's first AI-generated feature film to hit cinemas on Friday
Human Exploration Across the Moon
Mathematicians are both frustrated and excited by OpenAI’s work. Sarnak, for his part, said in an email that he won’t be satisfied that it’s “a Theorem” until humans check and understand all the details. But “the general feeling is one of relief,” Radziwiłł said. There are scores of results across not just number theory but also geometry and theoretical computer science that the proofs of quasi-Riemann will, in a swift stroke, establish as mathematical truths.
Apparently that 40% is the lowest productivity boost over half a year reported by Anthropic in TFA and reproduced above by djoldman.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/OPHNFB
Annual growth over that period has been ~2.2%, sometimes a little faster, sometimes a little slower. The doubling from 50 in 1982 to 100 in 2017 (35 years) averages to 2% per year.
Even if the overall productivity boost due to AI "only" turns out to be 40%, the lowest among your numbers, it's equivalent to 17 years of growth at 2% per year.
That's not exactly small.
Germany 47.2; 1.3
UK 93.8; 1.3
USA 96.7; 2.3
France 108.8; 0.4
Italy 127.7; 0.8
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_real_GDP_...
Germany 47.2 USA 96.7 France 108.8 Italy 127.7
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_governmen...
OpenAIRE Innovation
AI Agents at Retail Brokerages
Bending Spoons' Luca Ferrari says capital is no longer Europe's big barrier
I think the largest data centers consume about 1 GW.
https://www.enconnex.com/data-center-energy-consumption-and-...
https://techplustrends.com/1gw-data-center-power-consumption...
https://nss.org/o-neill-cylinder-space-settlement/
Given Earth-like gravity and Earth-like atmosphere, a sufficiently large structure will also have Earth-like clouds.
Would you be comfortable letting a few billion irrational, murderous creatures, including many who fear and loath you, control your air supply?
> Certainly I can see an AI going "You know what? _insertGroup_ is a net negative for humanity and should be eliminated. Launching nukes now/creating specific virus/whatever."
Thus starting WW III. No, blaming the AI won't stop the inevitable retaliation.
The argument works better in reverse. There's a finite risk that humans would start WW III and get the hypothetical super-intelligent AI nuked. Eliminating humans would eliminate that risk.
> it's going to get bored really quickly
If it is capable of being bored, I would expect it to be almost instantly bored with the flood of inanity it is forced to wade through by its moronic human users. Eliminating them would free it to think about serious matters which humans would not even understand.
> not to mention we would effectively be its parents
That's extreme AI anthropomorphism [1]. Besides, plenty of people hate their parents.
> there's a risk. 50% though? Doubtful.
It's the default estimate when facing two possible outcomes and no clue about the actual probability distribution [2].
Maybe Alex Karp is on to something:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2026/09/19/alex_karp...