News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by blhack on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:18PM (#21337869)
WHY do these vehicles always have to look so freaking dorky? This is one of the things that Tesla nailed. Their vehicles are beautiful, and look like first-class products.

This, the "ID-3" looks like a prius. I'm sure it's a fine car, and I really do love EVs, but man oh man I wish the designers would take a page from Tesla's book.

edit: to be clear, my current car (that my wife and I share) is a chrysler pacifica minivan, which I believe to be one of the best cars I've ever owned. I have no problem with "dorky" vehicles, I am a dork. It's just that if you want to break out of enthusiasts buying your cars for the novelty, you have to make them appealing.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by lucideer on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:52PM (#21338210)
As others here have mentioned, this is obviously subjective.

I could be wrong but I think beyond that it's also highly regional/cultural.

Teslas look awful to me; they remind me of so many other examples of recent bland US car design: particularly Ford, and with a few hints of the sort of 90s-mazda-esque Corvettes of the past 10-15 years. All very popular aesthetically but to me seem a bit lacking in anything unusual or novel. I would say the same of a fair amount of Japanese car design.

European car design (particularly French, Italian) is often ugly, usually novel, sometimes beautiful. Germans are a bit more conservative (especially VW), but they definitely have their moments.

I am European so I may simply be missing the nuance of non-European design.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by erikpukinskis on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:15PM (#21347460)
This is a common misconception, but no, it’s not subjective. There is such a thing as mass appeal.

I don’t know whether the Model 3 or the ID3 has it, but this “design is subjective” meme is wrong and I think a little bit disrespectful to design as a profession, where people spend decades learning how to build things that are—objectively—appealing and functional.

Of course individual reactions and needs vary. But that doesn’t mean the design space is a totally relativistic fog.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by lucideer on Saturday October 26, 2019 @06:48AM (#21362964)
I think you're mixing up "objective" with shared lived experience / perspective / values.

"Subjective" doesn't necessarily mean "highly varied" on a per-individual level. Mass appeal is about a group of people sharing perspective as a result of a common societal context.

Talk about being disrespectful to design as a profession: the psychology and context that informs such subjective views is a big part of design. Saying it's objective reduces something of deep complexity to a set of simplistic rules that can be blindly followed by anyone.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by jliptzin on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:15PM (#21338506)
What car looks good to you?
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by nextos on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:45PM (#21338804)
While I love what Tesla is doing, I also think their external design is their least appealing part.

I think there are many fine examples of great car designs. Recently, I can think of Mini, Fiat 500, Alfa 147, Alfa MiTo, Golf Mk I & II, Lamborghini Gallardo, BMW 3 series E21-E46...

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by bumblebee4 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:33PM (#21339234)
Doesn't the Tesla 3 try too much to look like a Porsche?
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by lucideer on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:58PM (#21338938)
The two current sibling comments are pretty on the mark. Alfas, Land Rovers. I quite like some of the BMWs.

Fiat and Citroen are, on the more reasonably priced end of the spectrum, doing innovative/interesting things that are at the very least not bland.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by AtlasBarfed on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @07:04PM (#21339997)
"I quite like some of the BMWs."

GRILLs, Grills everywhere!

Yaawwwwhhhrrrrr! Grrrrrrrrr!

Grills == BBQ == Manly!

Sorry, I'm just poking fun. There are so many auto style people that go ga-ga over something that is fundamentally inefficient aerodynamically.

I'd like to note that Fiat and Citroen, based on my rather sparse knowledge, are basically not even bothering with EVs at the moment.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by lucideer on Thursday October 24, 2019 @04:47AM (#21342737)
Fiat have an electric 500, and Citroen have been reselling Mitsubishi EVs for a looong time, but yeah, not a whole lot going on. I figured GP was discussing design aesthetic in general though.

I always thought BMWs grills looked more snout-like than BBQ-ish...

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by NeedMoreTea on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:54PM (#21339448)
Tesla cars remind me particularly of Ford Europe's bland but also ugly phase of the early 90s, like the first model Mondeo that wasn't sure what it wanted to be, and the fugly frog-faced last model Granada Scorpio. Or Mazda of the same era.

They have the same ability to combine total inoffensive blandness, with some detail or corner that just looks plain wrong, ugly, the wrong size or damaged with vehicle lines that neither align nor complement each other. The Tesla Model 3 ends up looking like a poor attempt at a parts bin special, as though nothing at all was originally intended for the Model 3. Of course some actual parts bin specials were very successful - like the first model Land Rover Discovery.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by DamnInteresting on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:43PM (#21339343)
My sense is that automakers believe that low-emissions cars will not sell well unless people can acquire them as a means of signalling virtue and wealth. In other words, unless the car is instantly identifiable as a fancy new EV, a large subset of potential buyers will lack interest.

I suspect this is mostly myth propped up by apocryphal assertions that Prius sold well due to its distinct look. But I am just a long-time curious observer, not an expert.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by kalleboo on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @07:18PM (#21340083)
> I suspect this is mostly myth propped up by apocryphal assertions that Prius sold well due to its distinct look

What I read was that the sales of Toyota's hybrid versions of their "normal-looking cars" (Camry Hybrid, etc) were disappointing in comparison to the Prius (especially if the theory is that people were avoiding the Prius due to design and would prefer a less-radical car that still got great gas mileage). I don't know if there's any truth to that.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by tomp on Thursday October 24, 2019 @03:04AM (#21342341)
UK might be taking an interesting approach, they're thinking of making different registration plates (green) for EV cars...
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by Smoosh on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @07:07PM (#21340014)
It's interesting then, that the new Peugeot 208 range has identical bodywork across the range regardless of whether they have electric, petrol or diesel drivetrains. Personally, I'm disappointed when a car isn't designed from scratch to take full advantage of the packaging options of an electric drivetrain, but see this as a reasonable compromise for manufacturers at the present time.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by davidgould on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:25AM (#21342161)
> automakers believe that low-emissions cars will not sell well unless people can acquire them as a means of signalling virtue and wealth

That's totally why I bought my sweet sexy Spark EV.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by viklove on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:22PM (#21337914)
It looks like a Golf... It's a very classic design for VW.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by izacus on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:23PM (#21337924)
More like the Polo, the cheapest and smallest of the VWs. For me it's also not an appealing look for such an expensive vehicle.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by gniv on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:50PM (#21339411)
I think the pictures don't do it justice (maybe b/c of the short front?). Strictly by dimensions, it's bigger than the Golf.

From wikipedia:

ID.3:

  Length 4,262 mm (167.8 in)
  Width 1,809 mm (71.2 in)
  Height 1,552 mm (61.1 in)
Golf:

  Length 4,255 mm (167.5 in)
  Width 1,799 mm (70.8 in)
  Height 1,452 mm (57.2 in)
Also much longer wheelbase (2,765 vs 2,637).
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by gambiting on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:25PM (#21337946)
Up is the smallest of Volkswagens actually, and this has the front from that. It's not a good looking vehicle by any measure.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by tyfon on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:37PM (#21338728)
I have a 2015 e-up, it's very fun to drive and it has 210 nm of torque. My Toyota Avensis had 150 (at peak RPM).

It's like driving a go-cart in the city and it charges 75% capacity in about 15 minutes on fast chargers (enough for about 100 km more).

Personally I find it looks quite cool after I did a custom paint job. You can even get it in Honey Yellow [1] from the shop, but personally I think it's a bit gaudy.. My daughters really wanted that colour but I had to nix it!

[1] https://www.greencarguide.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/V...

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by gambiting on Thursday October 24, 2019 @03:25AM (#21342435)
Oh, I don't mean to say that the Up isn't a good car, I know they are pretty practical and fun to drive for something that small(although according to Which? magazine it's consistently at the bottom of reliability charts, so take that as you will), just that the front of the Up glued onto a golf-size car doesn't look that good.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by tyfon on Thursday October 24, 2019 @08:33AM (#21343993)
I guess the reliability is for the fossil up :)

But beauty is as always in the eye of the beerholder. I don't really fancy how the back of the e-up looks either, but I didn't mind the ID3 all that much.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by Ninn on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:46PM (#21338157)
The ID.3 is more spacious than a golf.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by PopeDotNinja on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:44PM (#21339353)
Isn't a European Polo virtually identical to the American Golf?
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by Tsiklon on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @06:06PM (#21339552)
Nope - the Polo is a good bit smaller than the Golf, it's a Supermini. Think of it like how the Golf used to be back 1970's. The Polo is in the same class as the Ford Fiesta, Mini and Fiat 500.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @06:12PM (#21339618)
Up! is the cheapest and smallest.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by r00fus on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:33PM (#21338022)
Yeah, it's basically eGolf v2 (or v3?) with a decent range. I considered an eGolf - I think it looks nice.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by danans on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:48PM (#21338172)
IIUC, the eGolf was built on an existing ICE vehicle platform. The ID3 is built on a ground-up designed EV platform. So really, they are totally different vehicles.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by petre on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:47PM (#21338168)
Not really, it looks like a VW Up. I used to think the BMW i3 was butt ugly but then realised that if it's not light coloured it looks okay. Then the ID.3 was announced. Whatever. Their ICE entry level cars are totally worthless with that VW Up 3 cylinder 1L engine they install on just about every model. I wouldn't be surprised if they equipped a Touareg with that coffee grinder excuse of a "poweplant".
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by RobertRoberts on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:25PM (#21337952)
I think this is pretty subjective. My preferences have changed over the years, and I think this is a pretty cool design. Call me super dork I guess...
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by loceng on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:45PM (#21338144)
Indeed, what people like is strongly tied to personality.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by WhompingWindows on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:27PM (#21338617)
Aerodynamics is a big design factor for EVs, as lower coefficient of drag leads to higher efficiency and less battery capacity needed. Tesla clearly has much more aesthetically pleasing aerodynamic cars better than others like Chevy and Nissan...in fact those cars are both uglier and less aerodynamic.

I am not a fanboy, but Tesla simply has the best EVs on the market.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by jonplackett on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:31PM (#21338010)
Completely agree. I remember reading Musk had a fights with the original Tesla designer because he wanted to make something weird and funky and ended up firing him. Just make it normal looking, but you know, the good normal.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by clouddrover on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:00PM (#21338959)
> WHY do these vehicles always have to look so freaking dorky?

The ID.3 looks like a nice hatchback to me. Here's Volkswagen's ad for it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPjvgXWA78E

The augmented reality heads up display looks interesting.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by CalChris on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:04PM (#21338374)
I get a sense that the auto executives at these non EV companies do not want their EVs to succeed. Of course that started with the EV1 but the CEO of Fiat begged customers not to buy the 500e.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by viburnum on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:59PM (#21338292)
They do try to make them weird-looking. The BMW i3 was bonkers. All I want is a regular Golf or Golf wagon that can go 160 miles or so on a charge.

It’s not just electrics. Honda used to make sleek cars but now they have weird shapes and curves for no reason. Comes off as desperate.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by lukifer on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:36PM (#21338058)
I drive a Gen-1 Volt (which I love), and it's as sporty and sedan-y as a car can get while still being a hatchback. There's no reason that a non-dorky design can't be made in this form factor.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by rb808 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:25PM (#21337944)
I agree a normal looking car is better, but the Audi e-tron is very pretty.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by viburnum on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:01PM (#21338331)
The Honda E is quirky without being try hard. Kind of like a Nissan Figaro.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by novok on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:38PM (#21338734)
I like the interiors of teslas, but the front of the model 3 looks fairly dorky to me, and the back looks like any other corolla. I don't think tesla is free from the dork factor.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by agumonkey on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:00PM (#21338318)
I can't say but I think a lot of people want cars like the id3.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by voisin on Friday October 25, 2019 @10:15AM (#21355143)
Good quote I’ve heard on this topic: “we don’t want your electric car; we want your car, electric.” Just give us all of your normal lineup with an electric option and stop trying to create a different looking vehicle just because it is electric. It is like having a gas and diesel option!
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by AgloeDreams on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:52PM (#21338221)
I mean, on the other hand, it is kinda like the iphone effect, Apple realized that new colors sell because people want others to know their choices and that they have the new thing. People who want an electric car so far have shown that they want that fact to be obvious.

That said, have you seen the new Honda city car? It's beautiful.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by admax88q on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:23PM (#21338574)
> People who want an electric car so far...

The so far is key. BMW said the same when they launches the i3, that EV owners want to make a "statement."

But I think that's actually holding EVs back. I don't want to make a statement with my car (or phone for that matter). Always making EVs look exotic says that this product is only for enthusiast. I want the android of EVs not the iPhone.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by brailsafe on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:00PM (#21338306)
Looks like kind of a standard boring Honda to me. What sets it apart for you?
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by petre on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:22PM (#21338566)
More like a Golf 1, which was a dorky but quite functional car. I prefer that look to many of the modern small windows, no windows cars with lots of dead angles. Like the new Mazda 3 or the Toyota CH-R. We already have a Civic and I hate driving it in around town because of the low visibility.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by brailsafe on Friday October 25, 2019 @01:29PM (#21357238)
This confused the hell out of me, because I'm quite fond of Golfs and agree. Turns out I had to append the word "electric" to my search, otherwise I got a very Civic-looking car.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by AgloeDreams on Monday October 28, 2019 @02:12PM (#21379807)
My apologies, that car was called the Honda e
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by unlinked_dll on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:35PM (#21338044)
>WHY do these vehicles always have to look so freaking dorky?

Someone once explained to me that it was because EVs try and minimize the weight of the chassis to extend the range of the vehicle, and it's difficult to get more traditional curvatures in the chassis while doing that and balancing with safety/cost.

No idea how accurate that is.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by petre on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:05PM (#21338392)
Excuses. Build it out of carbon fiber, aluminium or a steel chasis and plastic panels like the Smart. The Smart looks like crap too but it's not like one cannot mold plastic to look good. Just pay some Italian designers to do it.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by muzika on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:00PM (#21338310)
This can’t be true, because most of the dorky features of these cars are definitely not affecting structure/auerodymanics etc.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by petre on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:07PM (#21338419)
They affect sales bigtime, nevetheless.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by rad_gruchalski on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @06:10PM (#21339592)
> This is one of the things that Tesla nailed. Their vehicles are beautiful, and look like first-class products.

Beauty is relative. I find the look of Tesla “dorky”, especially the piggy nose of the Model 3. However, I’d not defend a design of id.3.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by harshaw on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:21PM (#21339130)
I have the hybrid Pacifica and it is a great car. The transmission and electric drive is amazing. I think the car sells itself, as I suspect the ID-3 will. But I don't think the ID-3 will be available in the US :(
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by vkou on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:45PM (#21338149)
> WHY do these vehicles always have to look so freaking dorky?

Because when the first Prius launched, it looked like a normal car.

Nobody wanted to buy one.

The second-generation Prius had an incredibly conspicuous shape, and it sold like hotcakes.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by JohnBooty on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @06:12PM (#21339619)
It's true that companies generally style hybrid/electric vehicles to look a little weird, but....

    Because when the first Prius launched, it looked like a normal car.
It was rather ugly in most people's opinions. From some angles it looks more bizarre than the subsequent Priuses.

See the various generations here: https://global.toyota/en/prius20th/evolution/

Seriously, it was a very odd-looking car: http://www.imcdb.org/i044705.jpg

To the extent that it looked like "a normal car", it looked like an absolute bargain-basment Toyota along the lines of a Tercel or something. Different is one thing; different and ugly is quite another.

    Nobody wanted to buy one.
It was only sold "in limited numbers" in the US.

According to Toyota, the company was only "breaking even" on each one sold. They weren't really pushing them either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Prius#First_generation_...

    The second-generation Prius had an incredibly conspicuous 
    shape, and it sold like hotcakes. 
Convenient narrative, but I'd say it's completely false. At best, it's only a small part of the story.

It's not as if the second-gen was a simple rebadge of the first-gen with weirder looks.

First-gen was a funky sedan of limited utility and performance. Additionally the concept of a hybrid vehicle was bizarre and foreign at the time.

The second-gen was a massive improvement in every way. Significant and objective improvements in power, range, comfort, capacity, and so on. Furthermore the hatchback/fastback body style is of much greater convenience and utility.

As far as looks... while it was certainly unconventionial and perhaps not beautiful, the second-gen model looked more "futuristic family car" and less "weird ultra-budget sedan" like the first one.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by dmix on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @07:16PM (#21340070)
It doesn't look like a Prius at all, looks much nicer in the videos than in pictures. The non-white models with typical rims could easily be mistaken for a hatchback Golf.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by gok on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:13PM (#21338483)
In the mind of a lot of traditional carmakers, the main reason someone might buy an EV is to signal their environmental bona fides. So they make them look purposely weird.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by mikestew on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:47PM (#21338829)
Their vehicles are beautiful

Their vehicles are so bland-looking that a buddy of mine stated a few years ago that he'd never seen a Tesla. Even a few years ago, if you worked at Microsoft like he does, I guarantee you parked next to one some time this week, and saw at least one on your way to or from work today. To quote another MSFT friend: "buying a Tesla is like a rite of passage around here."

I'll bet he remembers the singular time he saw that Ferrari 458 that parks in building 32, though.

Personally, Ford Taurus, Tesla 3/S, same difference: nothing wrong with it, nothing memorable.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by simonh on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:27PM (#21339184)
Most cars are bland looking for a reason though.

Most VWs are pretty bland. They're maybe slightly at the more recognisable end of the spectrum, but only incrementally, because that's the look that works at mass market scale. So given that, why does their mainstream, bet the company EV have to look like something from a 90s SF action movie?

The point about Teslas looking like other cars is that being an EV should be a normal, everyday thing. That's exactly the future that Tesla is aiming for. Whether a car is bland looking, weird looking or whatever should be entirely decoupled from whether it's an EV or not. They are orthogonal concerns. The weird look of this car is a worrying sign that VW does not get this, and is therefore missing the plot in a near future where EVs will be just cars.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by bproven on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:24PM (#21337934)
yeah, I don't get it either. Although this one is not that bad.

(tinfoil hat) Seems like they want this to fail to keep ICE and all the supporting industries alive for more $$. After all service/parts is where the real money is...

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by turbinerneiter on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:40PM (#21338103)
Oooooooooooor, they are just good engineers and shape the car around the drive train. The id3 is spacious like a big car in the footprint of a small car. No engine means you can move the cabin forward, hatchback means extra trunk space and headspace for the second row.

Everyone in Europe is happy about getting more space in a smaller car. And this compact car shape is common here as well.

The car is completely normal and good looking. Limousines and SUV are not the only valid shapes for cars.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by clouddrover on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:08PM (#21339037)
> Seems like they want this to fail to keep ICE and all the supporting industries alive for more $$

That doesn't make sense. They are not spending tens of billions of euros on a project they want to fail.

In any case, the world's two biggest car markets (Europe and China) are introducing stricter fleet emissions standards. If car companies want to stay in the car business they have to electrify to meet the new standards.

It's a matter of urgency for Volkswagen so they can avoid as many EU emissions fines as possible. Paying fines is just dead money. You're much better off investing that money in new car models, which is what Volkswagen is doing.

Toyota's in a better position to meet the standards because they sell a lot of hybrid vehicles.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by nosrednehnai on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:38PM (#21338089)
I don't think your tinfoil hat theory is so far-fetched. Like every other car company before Tesla, they've optimized for ICE cars. From their perspective, the ideal scenario would be that the electric car trend dies out as a fad, leaving their core business (ICE cars) unaffected.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:42PM (#21338123)
It's pretty far fetched. There's money in service but not for VW or any other OEM. The dealers make money on service. The OEM makes money on cars and financing. It wouldn't surprise me if subtracting warranty from parts sales resulted in a net negative for many models. I'm painting with a broad brush here but that's the gist of it. Going all EVs would simplify a heck of a lot of things for the OEMs.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by refurb on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:56PM (#21338267)
I think Tesla has shown that if the current car makers don't get on the electric bandwagon fast enough, they are going to be left behind.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by Ninn on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:43PM (#21338124)
> This is one of the things that Tesla nailed.

And

> Model 3 - Bug Edition.

Choose one...

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:40PM (#21338102)
>This, the "ID-3" looks like a prius

The Pruis is highly optimized for minimal aerodynamic drag. It's no coincidence the wound up with roughly the same shape. The Model 3 is a similar shape but more sleek because they have more length to work with.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:24PM (#21337937)
Aerodynamics dictates some form of Kammback. Tesla is leaving potential efficiency gains on the table by going with a "normal" shape.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by r00fus on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:40PM (#21338100)
Tesla has some of the best drag coefficients in the industry (0.23 cd for Model3). Only some specialized versions of other vehicles get better than that.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @03:47PM (#21338165)
The model 3 is a kammback. It's just much more gradual than a Prius because they have much more length to work with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kammback

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by r00fus on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:51PM (#21338870)
The original comment metioned Tesla could do better than a 0.23 cd. I'm just wondering how that's possible.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by dsfyu404ed on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:39PM (#21339302)
More rounded front and more boat-tail rear. Small wheels and tires would help too. It would wind up looking 90s up front and 2000s hyper-miler out back. It would certainly not look how we expect a 2019 luxury car to look. When you're courting new car buyers with good credit you can't build something that's all function and no form.
Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by Alex3917 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:52PM (#21339428)
> WHY do these vehicles always have to look so freaking dorky?

Because they're targeting early adopters who want to buy a car that looks like a science project. Once they move onto targeting early mainstream, it will start looking more like other cars. Just look at how the Prius changed its look over time.

Re:VW’s $50B Bet on an Electric Hatchback by davidgould on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:38AM (#21342213)
That's totally why I got my first Spark EV in 2013. It has a tiny badge that says EV so you can tell I care about saving the earth. Although to be fair, the otherwise identical gas Spark looks dorky too.