News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by klausjensen on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:18PM (#18807882)
Also interesting fact: Roughly another third of cars sold in Norway in 2018 were hybrid, taking hybrid+electric to a combined two-thirds of all cars sold.

Only one third were pure fossil fuel. That is quite remarkable.

Source: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/editorcharts/NORWAY-AU...

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by martinald on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:21PM (#18807914)
Not really, if you tax cars at ~100% on registration (eg: $50k car has $50k of tax on it for a total price of $100k), like Norway does, then it is pretty easy to get adoption when you zero rate or reduce that tax for (PH)EVs.

It's effectively an enormous tax credit for EVs. I'm sure of the US govt increased the federal tax credit for EVs from $7.5k to $40-60k, you'd see similar adoption in the US too.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by throwaway12iii on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:26PM (#18807958)
Fossil fuel cars get a huge discount for causing pollution and health problems. If other countries subsidized the damage that fossil fuel cars do as much as the USA then I'm sure there would be similar adoption as in the USA too.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by merpnderp on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:32PM (#18807999)
A brand new Ford Raptor will clean the air in most cities. You'd have to drive that 465HP fuel guzzling toy over 3,887 miles to equal the particulate output of 30 minutes of yard work with a 2 stroke engine.

So not as much of a discount as you might have thought.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by torpfactory on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:13PM (#18808473)
It is true that many cars will clean the air of particulate matter these days. That is the only kind of pollution that a modern ICE car will remove, but it is not the only kind of pollution worth talking about....

CO2, NOx and others are just-as, if not more important and your air filter won't do jack diddly for those.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by microcolonel on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:50PM (#18809462)
NOx exhaust aftertreatment systems are standard, so a compliant vehicle today will have considerably less NOx in exhaust as well. As for CO2, well, it's not a small chunk, but cars and light trucks account for less than half of transportation sector CO2 emissions; and the transport sector accounts for about 28% of overall CO2 emissions. It's not silly to reduce CO2 emissions in light trucks and cars, but at most reducing those sources would only cut about 15% of U.S. CO2.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by bronson on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:14PM (#18809723)
"only 15%"? That's huge!
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by microcolonel on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:22PM (#18809806)
Keep in mind, this is in a country where light trucks and SUVs account for a huge proportion of personal vehicles, and where the average age of a car on the road is about twelve years. As the window of vehicle years shifts further, you can expect that proportion to shrink.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by londons_explore on Thursday January 03, 2019 @06:27AM (#18814370)
Citation for exhausts having significantly less NOx than city air?
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by microcolonel on Thursday January 03, 2019 @05:15PM (#18819875)
> Citation for exhausts having significantly less NOx than city air?

I absolutely, unequivocally, did not say that.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by cannabis_sam on Thursday January 03, 2019 @12:21AM (#18812998)
It's LITERALLY killing the planet we all depend on, yet you can always depend on car fanatics to justify their pollution.

Seriously, sell your car and take the bus.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by mavhc on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:47PM (#18808199)
It removes CO2? magic
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by wongarsu on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:00PM (#18808941)
Not CO2, but particulate matter [1]: basically tiny solid particles caused by exhaust, tires etc that stay suspended in the air. They are linked to a range of health issues in the concentrations found in many urban cities. When you hear about cities banning diesel cars or ICE cars or old cars, that's a measure to reduce suspended particulate matter, not CO2. But luckily unlike CO2, particulate matter can be caught by a HEPA air filter.

1: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particulates

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by jacquesm on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:54PM (#18808872)
He wrote 'particulate'.
[dead]
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by dang on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @07:52PM (#18811881)
Please don't break the site guidelines by going on about downvotes. As they say, it's boring.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by creato on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @06:31PM (#18811395)
> Calling that a "discount for causing pollution" when their cost is increased by a need to reduce pollution is absurd.

What if the added costs to ICE vehicles are less than the environmental costs they incur?

I'm not saying that's definitely the case or not, but just because ICEs spend money on mitigation doesn't mean they are not still getting a subsidy. You are acting like it is obviously wrong because ICEs do some things to mitigate pollution, which is clearly not obvious.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by francisofascii on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:03PM (#18808959)
mitigate, but nowhere near eliminate
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by YetAnotherNick on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:17PM (#18809094)
+1. So many people confuse CO2 with pollution. CO2 emission is not a pollution and causes near zero negative effects to human directly in the current concentration or in the most pessimistic prediction for future.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by juliendorra on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:29PM (#18809873)
Studies show that CO2 reduce cognitive capacities at common indoor level https://thinkprogress.org/exclusive-elevated-co2-levels-dire...
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by heyjudy on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @07:19PM (#18811689)
Externalities aren't paid by the perpetrator in America because they don't truly believe in personal responsibility.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by rimliu on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:06PM (#18810192)
Fossil fuels are heavily taxed in Europe, it’s not even funny.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by tomcam on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:50PM (#18809472)
What kind of health problems? I was under the impression that the emission standards for the last 40 years or so have been quite stringent.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by thinkcontext on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @07:01PM (#18811579)
Air pollution, of which transportation is a huge contributor, kills tens of thousands per years in the US. There are many other effects like asthma which afflict millions. Transportation is certainly a lot cleaner than it was but there's still a lot of improvement that can be done. Below is a link to a basic overview, it can give you hints on where to dig if you are interested in specific studies.

https://www.ucsusa.org/clean-vehicles/vehicles-air-pollution...

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by erikpukinskis on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @07:59PM (#18811907)
Brake pads are pretty bad, in addition to the auto emissions. Electric vehicles help a lot there too.

Are there brake pad emission standards? I don’t know.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by baroffoos on Thursday January 03, 2019 @12:19AM (#18812992)
I just looked up the brake pad emissions. Pretty scary stuff but it seems like it would be trivially solved by some form of containment around the brake and the disc that captures all of the dust. Probably needs laws to enforce it before car makers would add such a thing.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by 05 on Thursday January 03, 2019 @03:34AM (#18813684)
Regenerative braking sounds more useful than dust containment (not to say dust containment can’t be cost effective).
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by sbov on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:35PM (#18809321)
Cars in Norway have a CO2 tax. But EVs get breaks on things not related to CO2 in Norway. According to Tesla's website, you don't have to pay VAT.

https://www.tesla.com/no_NO/support/incentives?redirect=no

Edit: from an old reddit post, it seems like there's a VAT, weight, engine, CO2, N0x tax. In theory, in an 'even playing field', I'm guessing EVs should be paying VAT, weight, and engine taxes. Not completely sure which of these they pay (or if the list is even correct).

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by NickM on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:36PM (#18808692)
I'm sure of the US govt increased the federal tax credit for EVs from $7.5k to $40-60k, you'd see similar adoption in the US too.

I get your point, but to be fair, the numbers in your comparison are a bit off, since a $40-60k tax credit would make many electric cars effectively free. That would be a much bigger incentive than what Norway has.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by olivermarks on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:24PM (#18807937)
EV's are enormously subsidized in oil rich Norway, as they are in China. It is encouraging that such a cold country can run EV's though, it seems they generally perform much better in warmer climates
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by pi-rat on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:45PM (#18808165)
As an interesting side note to this, while we might (temporarily) lose some range on cold winter days, our car batteries have remarkable little degradation compared to EVs from warmer climates. Used EVs imported from i.e. southern France to Norway usually have significantly lower remaining battery capacity than a car that has spent it's entire life in Norway.

Seems heat really kills these things :)

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by olivermarks on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:52PM (#18808250)
Better performance from batteries in hot climates but faster degradation due to heat soak. I believe this is also a significant issue with battery fire risk- the hotter the battery the more of an issue it is extinguishing compromised battery cells that are still powerful stores of energy after an accident. The recombustion issues after fires have been put out are more serious in hotter climates
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by pedrocr on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:50PM (#18808226)
I had never heard about this. Do you have a reference? How big is the difference?
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by pi-rat on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:30PM (#18809266)
I don't have any actual numbers, sorry. I just remember being warned to be careful about cars from hot climates (like southern europe, and some US locations) a few years ago when I was looking for a used Leaf. Demands for EVs were very high in Norway, and resellers had to import (and still do) used EVs from other countries.

I found a life expectation chart for 3 US cities at [0].

It's well know that high temperatures (while in use and while in storage) degrade li-ion batteries[1]. However, electric cars have thermal management systems to try to protect the batteries from this effect (extreme heat and cold). Tesla have active water cooling, while Nissan Leaf use a simpler air cooling.

They also use different battery chemistries that handle temperatures differently. If you have a look quick look at this talk[2] you'll hear that Nissan is using a chemistry that experience higher degradation under high temperatures than for example Tesla's choice.

[0]: https://images.hgmsites.net/lrg/hot-weather-bad-for-electric...

[1]: https://www.plugincars.com/lithium-ion-batteries-can’t-stand...

[2]: https://youtu.be/pxP0Cu00sZs?t=1516

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by pedrocr on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:50PM (#18809468)
> a few years ago when I was looking for a used Leaf

The Leaf was notorious for not actually cooling the battery so I can see how they would do better in Norway. Maybe the newest generations have improved on that. I'd be curious if that was the same for Tesla though, which supposedly keeps the battery temperate under much better control.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by outworlder on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:47PM (#18810017)
Some Leaf generations are more sensitive than others (chemistry was slightly different). Sustained heat will still degrade them more quickly than expected though. Tesla has active temperature management, but also has a different chemistry which should be more sensitive than the one used in the Leaf.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:27PM (#18808608)
There are cold parts to the country, but a lot of the population lives in the South near the sea where the winter night time temperature doesn’t go much below zero Celsius.

And your vehicle is exposed to more moderated temperatures if parked indoors (even the pad of an unheated garage retains heat).

Plenty of parts of the US and Canada deal with much colder temperatures for months at a time.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by acchow on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:47PM (#18809430)
According to the graphs here, the most significant drop in range is cooling from the 10-20C bracket down to the 0-10C bracket

https://cleantechnica.com/2018/07/15/tesla-range-plotted-rel...

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:43PM (#18809991)
That makes sense (but wow the variability on their initial plots!).

It would be nice to see plots for ranges of temps below 0C or temperatures where AC is desired.

I think a lot of people think of Norway in winter like they think of N. Minnesota in winter.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by ars on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @12:56PM (#18808294)
I think the issue in cold climates is not the battery itself, it's heating the cabin.

With a combustion engine you use waste heat, but with a battery engine you use resistive heat and that comes right from your battery.

A/C also uses battery, but heat uses more energy.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:42PM (#18808760)
Recommendation #1: heat the occupant, not the cabin

Recommendation #2: pre-heat the cabin

Recommendation #3: if/when driving in stop&go traffic, use the regen energy directly for heating to save some charge/discharge cycles.

Recommendation #4: along with #2, use some phase change materials to “charge” some thermal batteries.

#1&2 are a thing. Not sure about 3 and 4.

3 may require some predictive modelling to know if you’ll be driving in stop&go or not.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by londons_explore on Thursday January 03, 2019 @06:34AM (#18814387)
Pretty much no vehicles currently do #3, despite many being capable of it with software-only changes.

I believe this is because most vehicles do a fixed amount of regen(which goes into the battery) when the foot is off the accelerator, but no additional electric braking when the brake pedal is used. I think that's because current regulations have pretty much stopped modifications to the braking system in cars, and prevent tweaking it to do electric braking when available to do cabin heating, and mechanical braking otherwise.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by icebraining on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:15PM (#18809065)
How is #1 done?
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by jusssi on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:51PM (#18809484)
With a seat heater. They were popular in the old times, when engines were not digitally controlled and took a long time to heat up enough to provide any warming effect inside the car.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by LinuxBender on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:13PM (#18809709)
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by kwhitefoot on Thursday January 03, 2019 @12:58PM (#18817282)
Every car I've been in in Norway has had heaters in at least the front seats. The Tesla S has rear seat heaters as a configuration option when you buy the car as well as an option for a heated steering wheel. Quite a lot of the cars I rented in the US had heated seats, even in North Carolina.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:35PM (#18809327)
Heated seats and steering wheels.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by baroffoos on Thursday January 03, 2019 @12:21AM (#18813002)
Dress properly for the weather.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by avar on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @07:30PM (#18811752)
With clothing.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by londons_explore on Thursday January 03, 2019 @06:37AM (#18814397)
Heat pumps can be used to heat the cabin with far less energy than resistive heaters. It's tricky to design them to be cheap, light, and work all the way down to -30C and up to 60C that cars are expected to be able to work in.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by goodcanadian on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:25PM (#18808593)
A/C also uses battery, but heat uses more energy.

I can't speak for all cars, but mine uses a heat pump for heat. Should have similar efficiency to A/C as that is exactly what a heat pump is.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by tigershark on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:36PM (#18808691)
Heat pump with outside temperatures below zero has same or lower efficiency than resistive heating.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by g8oz on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:15PM (#18810267)
A modern heat pump with a variable speed compressor can be more efficient than resistive heat down to about -25 degrees Celsius (-13F). See Mitsubishi's Mr. Slim series.

http://cdn.agilitycms.com/mesca/productdownloads/mem-201806-... (page 13)

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by tigershark on Thursday January 03, 2019 @03:18AM (#18813629)
And if you use a ground source heat pump (that has to be interred) it would be even more efficient. So? I don’t think that you can put either of them in a car...
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by g8oz on Thursday January 03, 2019 @10:34AM (#18815823)
The offerings from Mitsubishi and similar ones from other Asian manufacturers like LG and Fujitsu are air source heat pumps. I see no reason why the tech can't be scaled down to fit a car. It's certainly a reasonable goal for auto parts suppliers to aim at.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Faaak on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:58PM (#18810123)
I suppose the cars heats resistively below zero, and with a heat pump above
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Scoundreller on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:33PM (#18808661)
Their efficiency goes way down the colder it gets. They’ll work well at 5-10C, but frost up and require electrically-expensive defrost cycles when it’s colder than -2 or -3 C.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by p1mrx on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:25PM (#18808595)
Some EVs produce heat more efficiently using a heat pump, which is basically an A/C running backwards.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by xxs on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:54PM (#18808877)
this works at 3-4C, falling down the efficiency drops off rapidly.

House geothermic heating is very similar, except the collector is buried under the ground where the temperature doesn't really go negative C (until -30C and depends on the soil, etc). Overall for EV cars in cold winters producing heat is a non-trivial task.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by olivermarks on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @02:37PM (#18809343)
IC engines drive all associated 'accessories' via belts where EV has to have dedicated battery draining motors for everything from windscreen wipers to hvac
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by Rinzler89 on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:49PM (#18810579)
That's not completely true. For fuel efficiency, most modern ICE cars drive all the accessories with electric motors, with only the AC and brake booster being powered by the ICE in some cases.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by olivermarks on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @05:28PM (#18810932)
Alternator charges battery
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by rhacker on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @05:22PM (#18810886)
Not really remarkable?

Even if it's just "legislative decisions", it's fucking incredible that a country did what it did to get there. Do you really think the US is 2 inches away from shutting out it's internal big-oil?

Even if tech isn't the solution, and it's just decisions, it can still be remarkable.

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by paulddraper on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @05:32PM (#18810981)
> Not really, if you tax cars at ~100% on registration

Your facts are correct, but that makes it no less interesting or incredible.

> I'm sure of the US govt increased the federal tax credit for EVs from $7.5k to $40-60k, you'd see similar adoption in the US too.

Okay. And if such an event happened, you'd not think it incredible?

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by theon144 on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:07PM (#18808394)
No matter the reason, it's still just as remarkable, I'm not sure what you're implying.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by walshemj on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @01:52PM (#18808853)
Its the same reason that diesel was so popular in Europe (with out the particlates though) also in some countries LPG.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by johnchristopher on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:15PM (#18809735)
Is there a market for second hand electric cars like there is for oil powered cars ? Usable cars starting as low as 2000€ ?
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by pi-rat on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @04:04PM (#18810167)
Demand is high for both new and used EVs in Norway.

EVs are free (or significantly cheaper) on most toll roads, parking, and pay at most 50% of regular fees for ferries.

Owning an old short range EV as a second car can easily save you 1800€ a year[1] in toll fees alone. Even an old electric wreck is easily worth 10000€ just in reduced toll fees if it's able to do 5 more years of just rolling past that toll station barrier. Even banged up and with a 50% degraded battery the car is still valuable, as long as it can get you to work and back home again.

There was a time some years ago when you could essentially cover the down payments for a Tesla Model S from saved ferry fees if your daily commute crossed Trondheimsfjorden (cost like 30 USD per way, this "bug" has since been fixed, you now have to pay 50% of the ticket).

[1]: https://www.nrk.no/rogaland/dette-vil-bomringen-koste-deg-1....

Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by hn_throwaway_99 on Wednesday January 02, 2019 @03:33PM (#18809905)
There is certainly a strong market for secondhand electric cars - I own one and it's the best car I've ever purchased. In terms of the "starting as low as 2000€", though, no. The battery alone in any usable electric car is likely worth more than that.
Re:Norway's electric cars zip to new record: almost a third ... by ric2b on Friday January 04, 2019 @07:00AM (#18823404)
About the battery... Does that mean electric cars should have much better short/medium term depreciation and probably worse long term (as the batteries become too degraded for reuse)?