tigershark

Are you really defending Arday harassing journalists through the police and being overjoyed because just this time the police was not overzealous enough to arrest them (very likely they were fine only thanks to the huge media attention)? Unbelievable.

Don't look up...

xcancel, nitter and all the other similar platform were disabled until a couple of days or so ago. Why use them instead of the original on mastodon?

Blender with fable and Astra is doing pretty amazing things it seems..

I would gladly enjoy to collaborate with an agent if I can learn more about video editing. I edit my video only for passion and to learn something new though, so I guess that professionals may see this in a different way. But I don’t think that it’s much different from how Claude code revolutionised the software scene.

My reading comprehension is pretty good, I'm not the one that doesn't recognize a threat even when it's perfectly clear. Verbatim from the statement:

> The reply was, “Why would you ruin your career?” I replied that I am an academic, and asked why he thought going public would ruin my career. The reply was, “If you don’t want me to be nice, then I don’t have to be nice.”

From my post above: > He explicitly reported that *he was threatened* and your answer here is to defend OpenAI no matter what.

Yes, I read fully the statement, what about you? Do you know what is a threat? What is this in your super-humble opinion if not a threat:

> The reply was, “Why would you ruin your career?” I replied that I am an academic, and asked why he thought going public would ruin my career. The reply was, “If you don’t want me to be nice, then I don’t have to be nice.”

And you are saying that I don't have reading comprehension...

So are you baselessly assuming that he is lying? He explicitly reported that he was threatened and your answer here is to defend OpenAI no matter what.

It's also full of your posts baselessly defending OpenAI. Maybe you should also heed your own advice?

Why would have they rushed the publication if this was not true? Are you also suggesting that he fully invented the call with Open AI?

Nobody makes state of the art chips without ASML

Are you not ashamed to defend your adjudicated rapist and 34 times felon that started the most nonsensical war in modern history? You guys got your ass kicked by Iran and you don’t have any cards, deal with it.

Unbelievable. So in your opinion it’s perfectly fine to sell MNPI for a fee to allow someone to do insider trading and all the other shit that he has done, of which I posted much less than 10%. Or maybe you want to explain me how it’s a great decision to move Ghislaine Maxwell in a minimum security prison after her promise that she would not implicate your pedo in chief. You could have chosen any of those points to discuss, but instead you chose to deflect and just blabber on irrelevant stuff. Enjoy the fall of your empire, I’m enjoying it much more from afar.

You are the one muddling reality trying to obfuscate it. It's not a Gish gallop when we are simply demonstrating that a person is so corrupt that there are tens, if not hundreds of examples of his corruption.

- This one is for the oil lobby mentioned above by the other user: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/05/09/trump-asks-oil-exec... finance-00157131

- Two Billion dollars from the Saudis to Jared Kushner: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/10/us/jared-kushner-saudi-in...

- multi-billion dollar deal for Oman properties: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trumps-business-deal-with-...

- China grants trademark to Ivanka: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=8997844...

- Foreign countries spending at his properties: https://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases/ove...

- Selling MNPI access to allow insider trading to anyone that can pay $100K/month: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/18/trump-media-pitched-100000/m...

Should I continue or do you finally realize how corrupt is he?

China never threatened this: "A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.". Also China never announced that it was going to attack Europe. I trust them much more compared to a malignant narcissist that doesn't care if the whole world burns now that he doesn't have much left to live.

Suddenly burning up the quota ~4x faster than usual is not a mess up in your opinion?

Claude Code cache is not 1 hour. There is a "Closed as not planned" issue in GitHub that confirms that it has been moved to 5 minutes since March: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829. I started seeing the massive degradation exactly on the 23rd of March, hence after a few days I unsubscribed because it was completely unusable, with a ~5h session being depleted in as little as 15-20 mins.

If you are speaking about the world, hundreds of millions in the next 5 years is probably closer to reality in my opinion. And from your question I think that you already know the answer.

What change did you release on March 23rd when the subscription limits collapsed and they are still way down compared to what they used to be?

How many humans have been born until now and how many Einsteins have been born? And in how many hundreds of thousands of years?

What about NVDA (~$4.5T) and AVGO (~$1.8T)?

How much more was worth USD at the beginning of the year?

Flux kontext quality is noticeably worse that nano banana, Qwen image 2509 and Seedream 4 most of the times. For pure image generation instead Hunyuan image is scarily good.

Seedream 4 is better than nano banana on average, so that test result seems accurate to me

The biggest model that they have used has only 760M parameters, and it outperforms models 1 order of magnitude larger.

Yeah, less than from Milan to my city still in Italy…

I’m not an expert, but I would say extremely small.

For comparison Hunyuan video encodes a shit-ton of videos and rudimentary real world physics understanding, at very high quality in only 13B parameters. LLAMA 3.3 encodes a good chunk of all the knowledge available to humanity in only 70B parameters. And this is only considering open source models, the closed source one may be even more efficient.

Exactly. The previous version of o1 did actually worse in the coding benchmarks, so I would expect it to be worse in real life scenarios. The new version released a few days ago on the other hand is better in the benchmarks, so it would seem strange that someone used it and is saying that it’s worse than Claude.

As I said, o3 demonstrated field medal level research capacity in the frontier math tests. But I’m sure that your use cases are much more difficult than that, obviously.

Where is the plateau? Chatgtp 4 was ~0% in ARC-AGI. 4o was 5%. This model literally solved it with a score higher than the 85% of the average human. And let’s not forget the unbelievable 25% in frontier math, where all the most brilliant mathematicians in the world cannot solve by themselves a lot of the problems. We are speaking about cutting edge math research problems that are out of reach from practically everyone. You will get a rude awakening if you call this unbelievable advancement a “plateau”.