paulddraper
“You can’t have a machine for testing” is a weird restriction on AI, especially if you entertain even the remotest notion of possible AGI.
2. While browsers are pretty compatible nowadays, not having to deal with WebKit/Safari quirks is a plus.
3. The platform webview isn’t necessarily that much more efficient.
I'm curious for example configs that are top-level lists?
I can get to more places in my car (or someone else’s).
(And even more if you can combine them.)
"Only" is a massive amount of lifting in that sentance.
Network effects are among the most durable/effect competitive qualities. And they have that network on both sides.
(Nearly all of the remaining amount is Uber Eats.)
So if not a monopoly, then at least a duopoly.
As a rule, two-sided marketplaces are very difficult to disrupt.
But in any case, your point is “it was damaging the company, therefore it makes sense to see them gone.” And there’s your parallel.
—
In reality, whether corporate agnosticism is right depends almost exclusively on your feelings of the underlying cause.
Corporatist hellhole was your reaction to that too I imagine.
* Technically resigned, but there was significant pressure from Mozilla.
"This is what I would like AOT cache to mean."
(In fact, even a stiff fine, which is my point.)
The idea of the internet is that you can reach it across the world, globally.
> kubernetes
If you did that in Europe you'd get fined 4% of annual turnover.
Wild how much basic practices have changed in 2 decades.
Others like SciFi & Fantasy and Worldbuilding have kept relevance.
Unfortunately, these more niche sites relied on StackOverflow to drive referral traffic, so the whole platform is declining.
As with many things, you pay for the atheistics.
I'm not sure of anything that fits the bill. Are you?
Randomness generators would fail horribly.
Whether he graded it, or his assistants graded it, I’m not really sure how that matters at all to the point.
There usually is a fee for the amount of information, or for the scope of the search, lest they get spammed for low value drive-bys.
If the request was “anything anywhere anytime related to X” they could be expensive (millions is incredulous, but expensive).
If the request was “last 9 months arrest records by X” that is more scoped.
The article never says.
Or simply it falls into no one’s job?
The latter is deliberate. The former, maybe.
But the PHP team is the one that got the security disclosure.
No one needs to use their work, or indeed PHP at all.
But that's why the PHP security team exists.