A portable runtime isn't that hard. An effective and approachable authoring tool is the real challenge.
Anyone whose made an Instagram filter or TikTik effect recently - it was like that, though even easier, but allowing you to do actual coding right down to very low level stuff should you desire.
and you could get push your creation to any screen in the known universe with essentially zero testing.
Pretty sure half the internet surfers had plugins that made flash run only when user activated by the time it started to wane.
Personally I only activated it for games i wanted to play, so most of that creativity was lost on me.
I remember the time when pc fans hearable meant 95% that i opened a web page with a flash component by mistake...
Humanity has proven it can't handle anything else than static pages. Then the developers themselves have to pay for their bloat rather than the users.
Obviously flash was not designed for small screens or small batteries.
But it could have been adapted! If Adobe had been in any way competent or caring the flash runtime could have been converted to html5
But Adobe suck
It was the same even before mobile phones. Laptops had batteries too. CPU fans sounded even worse than today when pegged at 100%.
I think a Bret Victor, "Inventing on Principal" style editor would be perfect, combined with some sort of scratch like Python IDE where each element is defined in terms of its reactive behaviors with other elements on a timeline.
I didn't say easy, I said not too difficult. Order of magnitude difference. :)
https://youtu.be/PUv66718DII?t=634
With some http://lighttable.com/
And yes, locking unmergeable files is essential either way.
It isn't great that are now so many Git GUI clients written in Electron?
The new Flash is a whole other pair pants. Also if people want to make easy things for the web in a closed platform, Unity already exists.
And those were THE best vector art tools, because when you drew a shape and the shape overlapped with another, it automatically erased the other shape like you would expect it to in a raster graphics editor. In pretty much every other software I tried, e.g. Inkscape, Affinity, Corel Draw, Illustrator, you just get two separate shape objects one on top of the other. They seem to be designed for drawing the outlines, not to actually paint with brushes. Flash understood what was intuitive for artists.
Honestly, the older I get the stranger I feel about the fact that there was a brilliance in creating interface for people to be productive with back then that seems to be completely gone. I think this may be in part because desktop applications are unusual nowadays, but it's just really strange that the things I remember seeing have been done exactly once and never copied by anybody despite how well they worked.
If you just want to make animations, skip actionscript entirely. If you want some extra Easter eggs, just turn any symbol into a button and you can trigger any movie clip you want. Want to make this a whole game, heres the whole action script editor.
Maybe wasm+Canvas is getting close to being stable. But if you code up a webgl game and test it on desktop Chrome, odds are it'll just be a black screen on anything but the most popular Android devices, and you'll need to do tons of work and testing to get it to run on an iPhone.
And WebGPU is probably at least 5 years away from being stable enough to be considered to "run everywhere".
I strongly considered trying to do this a few times, but ended up writing an swf parser in C++ and used Skia to render. It's probably the best we can do right now, but we still regularly get players who complain about just seeing a black screen.
To the point they gave a free flagship Android smartphone with Flash installed on it to every employee, to try forcing some internal dog-fooding.
What was happening is this: Adobe inherited Flex Framework from Macromedia. It was atrocious. Bloated, slow, unusable for games or simple interactive applets which made Flash popular in the first place. They tried to market that for creation of admin tools like what VSPhere used to have. The community was crying and complaining to Adobe that they aren't making any effort to support what Flash was good at.
Then smartphones appeared. And Adobe's engineers came up with Flash Catalyst. Conceptually, it was supposed to work similar to Flash or Fireworks, but it was supposed to render its output into generated Flex Framework code. Tons of unjustifiable bloat. Everything was too slow and too big. And whenever the people able to get their hands on the preview complained about it, the answer was always "it's not going to get faster / smaller".
Catalyst came with templates for "typical" phone apps and they were a disaster to deal with. So slow users would probably understand them to be simply broken / frozen. Oh, but Adobe assigned a bunch of career managers to these projects. People came made a lot of promises and got promoted into another department. It was painful to watch.
At the same time, I wrote a project that I called "Frameworkless MXML", it was more of a demonstration than an actual useful library, but the goal was to say that the original inherited framework might be stripped off a lot of bad components and made to be a lot faster and smaller. But it was just that, a PoC that never went anywhere.
I had no interest in working with Flash on smartphones because I see smartphones as proprietary jails and am not interested in contributing to that market. Few people in Flash OSS community probably also felt distaste for the smartphones... and the vast majority were the "non-contributing" users. They waited until the tower completely crumbled and jumped ship.
2advanced was the epitome of flash design. I don't think I was ever really paying much attention to the content, but it was fun to interact with the UI.
https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/gallery/2advanced-studios-v1...
EDIT: They're still going!
All on canvas now, but same kinda feel. Makes me think of command and conquer.
It was overused, terribly, and often used for questionable purposes (e.g., rendering a static website, or the dreaded SIFR). But it was like MySpace in how well and quickly it democratized creativity on the web, except it also afforded motion and games and video. Flash was great.
Adobe is awful, though. I’m not sure if Flash is the most useful thing they’ve killed outright, but it might be. I almost wish I could believe it was intentional, that they bought it to kill it. I really do think it was pure greed and stupidity, though. Most of what Adobe has done in the last 20 years is rent-seeking.
Imagine if they’d been a good steward of the tech, made it stable and performant on low-power devices. Yeah, Steve Jobs put the final nail in the coffin. Adobe administered the poison and tailored the funeral suit. Screw Adobe.