News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by scblock on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:03PM (#36850120)
X by Google, X by Twitter, X by X. Terrible branding on all sides and I am so not interested in any of this bullshit.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by amelius on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:12PM (#36850294)
The only thing I can ask is: Y ???
Re:X, the moonshot factory by bongobingo1 on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:40PM (#36850737)
It's a combination of things really.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by kinlan on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:47PM (#36850851)
Zzz
Re:X, the moonshot factory by 101008 on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:48PM (#36850864)
This is even better in Spanish.

["Y?" is the equivalent of "And?"]

Re:X, the moonshot factory by coffeebeqn on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:51PM (#36850907)
Much more original and superior
Re:X, the moonshot factory by deadletters on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:04PM (#36851103)
Thank you
Re:X, the moonshot factory by l- on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:14PM (#36851231)
SKK=I; K=XX; S=X(XX)

  Y=S(K(SII))(S(S(KS)K)(K(SII)))=S(K(S(SKK)(SKK)))(S(S(KS)K)(K(S(SKK)(SKK))))=
  X(XX)((XX)(X(XX)(X(XX)(XX)(XX))(X(XX)(XX)(XX))))(X(XX)(X(XX)((XX)X(XX))(XX))((XX)(X(XX)(X(XX)(XX)(XX))(X(XX)(XX)(XX)))))
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31079130
Re:X, the moonshot factory by ks2048 on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:16PM (#36851273)
YCombinator needs to rebrand as Y to compete in this new world.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by CSMastermind on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:20PM (#36850407)
I'm told internally at Reddit there's a group called Reddit X working on the next big thing which recently got disbanded.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by c7DJTLrn on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:30PM (#36850577)
>the next big thing which recently got disbanded

A redesign that only applies to 30% of the website? A new video player that's even more broken?

Re:X, the moonshot factory by NBJack on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:39PM (#36850719)
Shit. Don't give them any more ideas. Just wait until they finish the current "revamp of the awards system".
Re:X, the moonshot factory by dkdbejwi383 on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:23PM (#36850456)
Re:X, the moonshot factory by crossroadsguy on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:52PM (#36850915)
It just reminds me of Telegram. This page I mean, and that too visually it kinda resembles some Telegram product pages. However, unlike Reddit, Telegram app is epic good.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by trompetenaccoun on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:21PM (#36851324)
The money/coins/rewards everywhere, the childish avatars, the lies about privacy and "empowering" redditors...

Thanks, I hate everything about it.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by cameronh90 on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:17PM (#36851283)
There was also NHSX, which got merged into NHS Digital, which then got merged into NHS England.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by JumpCrisscross on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:04PM (#36850153)
Scrolling down, this looks like Google's X.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by gre on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:27PM (#36850527)
take a dramamine before scrolling down
Re:X, the moonshot factory by ongy on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:24PM (#36850469)
It is.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by fieryskiff11 on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:37PM (#36851554)
> scrolling down

There are resources available. https://www.healthline.com/health/suicide-and-suicidal-behav...

Re:X, the moonshot factory by oh_sigh on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:21PM (#36850421)
Google X doesn't really need brand recognition, because they're supposed to pump out brands, not be the brand. IE Waymo, verily, etc.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by ConceptJunkie on Monday July 24, 2023 @07:20PM (#36855579)
"Google" is the brand name for enshittification.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by a-dub on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:09PM (#36850230)
mac os x

10 is actually a pretty special number

Re:X, the moonshot factory by omoikane on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:30PM (#36850569)
I suspect the "X" branding for these companies has less to do with Roman numerals and more to do with the prominent use of "X" in mathematics as a unknown variable, and that's due to René Descartes according to:

https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/8109/why-are-x-and-y...

Re:X, the moonshot factory by orls on Monday July 24, 2023 @02:39PM (#36852474)
There’s also a history of using ‘X’ as the designation for eXperimental planes, e.g the X-15.

I always assumed that was the inspiration for the use in tech branding like Google X - conjuring up images of skunkworks, etc.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by a-dub on Monday July 24, 2023 @05:42PM (#36854628)
hmm:

mac os: numeral

generation: variable

google: eXperimental!

malcom: variable

elon: hey yo, check it out i tried to register x.com and actually got it!

the question is... chitter or xitter?

Re:X, the moonshot factory by soco on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:16PM (#36850350)
Am I the only one thinking of that picture of ten roman legionaries, captioned "The X Men"?
Re:X, the moonshot factory by ourmandave on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:25PM (#36850484)
For me, the 90's X-Men theme doesn't work in the movie 300.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by a-dub on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:19PM (#36850403)
ten fingers, ten toes, base ten arabic numbers
Re:X, the moonshot factory by scythe on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:34PM (#36850647)
OS X at least has the excuse of having come out during the time when Generation X were the young adult audience sought after by marketers.

In contrast, today we have Gen X executives who are seemingly trying to recapture the glory days of the late '90s.

[dead]
Re:X, the moonshot factory by iopq on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:06PM (#36850174)
I commented on Reddit's latest moves, downloaded their app just to use it for a while and give it a bad review. Deleted the app and haven't gone there in a while

Just because you comment on something doesn't mean you'll use it

Re:X, the moonshot factory by kspacewalk2 on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:10PM (#36850235)
God that thing is fucking terrible.

You can't change font size? But what if I don't like to read walls of tiny text?

And what the hell is with the video playback UI? I want to see comments under a video post, why do you take me to full-screen video playback no matter what I do? About 50% of the time I manage to tap something somewhere which makes it work on 3rd try, but I wish that percentage was higher.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by nehal3m on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:12PM (#36850280)
"We should improve society somewhat."

"Yet you participate in society. Curious! I am very intelligent."

Re:X, the moonshot factory by larvaetron on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:07PM (#36850188)
Heaven forbid someone should type out a comment to voice their disinterest about something.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by dpifke on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:17PM (#36850362)
Low-effort comments are against the HN guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

It's possible to voice disinterest in a thoughtful and substantive way. The GP comment (and arguably your reply) does not.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by Rexogamer on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:21PM (#36850423)
Their comments seem fine to me? They pretty clearly explained the reason for their dislike of the name - if anything, their ability to do so concisely should be praised
Re:X, the moonshot factory by dpifke on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:28PM (#36850549)
I guess I find the name collision with Google X—quoting the guidelines again—to be "too common to be interesting." But one man's pithy is another's snarky, so to each their own.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by postmortembees on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:08PM (#36850208)
Having a critique of a thing is orthogonal to being interested in the thing.

There are plenty of topics I find fun to engage in dialog about, despite having no interest in the topic itself.

We, as humans, seem to generally enjoy being a part of the zeitgeist, being swept away with whatever the latest fascination is, even if we aren't interested in the actual topic. And that's ok. We are allowed to enjoy that social experience on both the micro ("all my friends are getting really into houseplants, I will too!") and the macro ("lol, Elon Musk is an unbelievable idiot") scale.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by roland35 on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:08PM (#36850215)
Let's see if anyone is still commenting in a few years!
Re:X, the moonshot factory by intelVISA on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:12PM (#36850287)
Mission successful...
Re:X, the moonshot factory by micromacrofoot on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:10PM (#36850254)
This is not the same as "lol logo is bad" and "all news is good news" there's a legitimate case for confusion across these companies
Re:X, the moonshot factory by barbazoo on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:44PM (#36850794)
WTH, I totally 100% thought this was Musk's new company. There is already a company called X by Alphabet, what a goof.
Re:X, the moonshot factory by Tuna-Fish on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:52PM (#36850922)
Musk's original web payments company was x.com, which he started in the late 90's. Then it did a very early merge with some other startup, and the combined company rebranded to PayPal. At some point, Musk bought back the domain from PayPal.

I do not understand why anyone would think that it's a great idea to do a this major rebranding of an existing company with a well-known brand.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by chx on Monday July 24, 2023 @01:26PM (#36851399)
This entire endeavour not sure whether conscious or unconscious is Musk trying to -- gosh, there's a word for this but my English is failing me -- to finally get even with Thiel, to show Thiel he can do everything Thiel did but better. Someone like Musk never fully recovers from getting fired from his dear X.com post-merge. Make no mistake: back then Musk was doing a stupid by trying to force a Windows tech stack on a payment company which was using Unix.

Thiel was one of the largest donors of Trump in 2016, is a true darling of the alt right so of course Musk must rub shoulders with them.

Between the erstwhile x.com and Confinity the company which launched PayPal, the latter succeeded, gobbled up x.com so now of course Musk must show to Thiel that he can make a successful payment company called x.com. He must.

That's the reason for all this bullshit, I am certain.

Re:X, the moonshot factory by smarnach on Monday July 24, 2023 @03:44PM (#36853253)
> gosh, there's a word for this

one-upmanship?

Re:X, the moonshot factory by khazhoux on Monday July 24, 2023 @12:56PM (#36850990)
"Google X" actually made (and maybe still makes) a lot of sense.

The history is that around 2010 Google wanted to kick off experimental projects, in part because they were starting to lose top talent to startups. Since they had Google Maps and Google Images and Google Earth and Google Mail etc, they named the new org Google X as a space for the new and undefined projects.