News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by greenyoda on Sunday August 06, 2017 @02:53AM (#14940117)
Companies like this have been around for years, and whenever I read about them I'm surprised that people would risk going to prison (or worse) just to get a discounted air fare. I wouldn't even carry a package for a friend unless I could see exactly what was inside, let alone carry a suitcase full of unknown stuff for a total stranger.

Also, an inevitable question when going through security checkpoints in some countries is "did you pack your own luggage". I assume that if you answer "no", you'd be subjected to a very thorough search for bombs or contraband.

Calling a company "Airmule" seems to be a particularly bad choice, since the term "mule" is commonly used to denote a person who carries smuggled drugs (sometimes concealed inside their body).

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rl3 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @03:51AM (#14940268)
>Calling a company "Airmule" seems to be a particularly bad choice, since the term "mule" is commonly used to denote a person who carries smuggled drugs (sometimes concealed inside their body).

No kidding. One has to wonder how the founders can't be aware of that. Perhaps it was intended as a tongue-in-cheek name?

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by notahacker on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:48AM (#14941514)
If I'd have wanted to satirise the worst elements of the "gig economy" and SV founders' wilful exploitation of grey areas in laws, I'd probably have bought the domain name Airmule and set up a Smuggling As A Service marketplace. Of course, to make it a bit more obviously a Very Bad Idea and not just a neat little hack I'd focus my "areas of operation" on a country which executes drug smugglers and gives no preferential treatment whatsoever to naive Western backpackers whose parents and embassies can get them good lawyers.

I'm still hoping they're not actually in operation and this is just a PR stunt to promote their actual business of selling Chinese Visa arrangement services (also on the website), but I'm not holding out too much hope.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:29PM (#14941938)
Hah this would make for a great satire site with that domain name. Or maybe not. Clearly it wouldn't have gone far enough since this seems real.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by greenyoda on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:25AM (#14940392)
Perhaps it was. But security and customs officers aren't known for their great sense of humor, so it's probably best to stick with names that don't suggest drug trafficking.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:04AM (#14940680)
Side note: Just a few days ago I flew domestically within Australia just a week after some anti-terror arrests and increased security screening (which has since been lifted). As my bag went through it got flagged and the security officer flagged the aerosol can. I was already pretty nervous already, so I apologise profusely for the mistake.

Turns out the security officer was just a Regular Person, claimed deodorant cans are his "bread and bitter" and had a little chuckle as he found it in my toiletries bag.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by gtirloni on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:44AM (#14940779)
What airport security had to say about a regular person impersonating security agents?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by JadeNB on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:47AM (#14941076)
> What airport security had to say about a regular person impersonating security agents?

I initially read madeofpalk's comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14940680) as it seems that you might have, so that it seemed to say that the supposed security agent was not actually a security agent; but a second reading suggests that the meaning is instead that, in addition to being a security agent, the person in question was a Regular Person, and had a sense of humour.

Repeated readings still do not reveal whether an Australian security agent referring to something as his "bread and bitter" is a typo or intentional. :-)

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by matt4077 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:37AM (#14941245)
A bread & bitter is a typical Australian breakfast of stale bread and (when available) an anise liquor.

It's derived from the continental "existentialist breakfast" of a black coffee, cigarette, and Aspirin–but had to be adapted due to the bad availability of commercial products in the past, as well as the higher activity levels the Australian bush requires and the resulting danger of a breakfast completely devoid of calories.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by jonah on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:01AM (#14941357)
I had to look it up to see if you were serious or not. There does happen to be a brewpub by that name in Nottingham though.

http://www.castlerockbrewery.co.uk/pubs/bread-and-bitter/

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:25PM (#14941930)
I can't tell if this is real or not. I guess the joke is on me for not knowing if you're satirizing with bitter and liquor or not.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by matt4077 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @01:11PM (#14942180)
As @jonah found out, it's just a joke–only the "existentialist breakfast" is a real thing that probably started as a joke, and that I've seen on one or two menus of cafes willing to skirt the rules on selling pharmaceuticals.

But the joke is most definitely not "on you". As in: It wasn't meant to expose anybody's shocking lack of knowledge of arcane Australian trivia.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by stephen_g on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:40AM (#14941721)
The idiom is definitely "bread and butter", perhaps madeofpalk was making a joke about his accent?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by alanh on Sunday August 06, 2017 @03:59PM (#14943157)
U and I are adjacent on QWERTY. Easy typo. Even worse pick-up line. “Hey baby, I prefer QWERTY because it puts U and I together.”
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rl3 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:51AM (#14940486)
I agree completely. In fact, I'd wager every time customs hears the name it's bound to trigger further scrutiny, even if subconsciously.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ptero on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:58AM (#14940805)
I remember an article at WSJ years ago on how many startup founders choose such tongue in cheek / humorous names and how that is almost always a bad choice. But calling this airmule is insane.

On the risks, I wonder if making the person carrying an extra bag the temporary owner of it (and showing him the packing of the luggage) so he can always say no would help making it safer for the user. But I personally would never do this even in this setup.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by sorokod on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:12AM (#14940705)
Perhaps to allow self selection to do its thing and interact only with those stupid enough.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by DonHopkins on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:09AM (#14940698)
If they wanted a tongue in cheek name, they should have called it RectalExpress.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by pkaye on Sunday August 06, 2017 @01:33PM (#14942323)
Maybe change the company name to "Brokedown Palace"?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by x0x0 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @02:18PM (#14942571)
Customs officials are well known for their senses of humor.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by pkulak on Sunday August 06, 2017 @01:05PM (#14942146)
Airmule is people?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by tajen on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:25AM (#14940587)
I wouldn't even carry luggage for my wife or my mother, even if traveling with them. My mother once said "We haven't had problems with my morphine when we visited China (She's old and suffers from hip arthrosis). Actually I had put half in your dad's luggage, in case they lost mine." My dad wasn't happy, especially at how casual she sounded. She didn't even carry the doctor's ordinance. Most people don't understand the risks of being abroad.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by SoftwareMaven on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:22AM (#14941432)
I had to take narcotics into Dubai for a health issue I was facing at the time. You can bet I had the clearly marked prescription bottle with the minimum amount I needed for my trip along with a note from my doctor explaining the medication. The medication was always accompanied by those, too.

As screwed up as drug laws are in the US, they are child's play compared to what some countries have. And once they think that you might be trafficking, you are in for a bad day.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by edanm on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:37AM (#14940435)
"Also, an inevitable question when going through security checkpoints in some countries is "did you pack your own luggage". I assume that if you answer "no", you'd be subjected to a very thorough search for bombs or contraband."

Yeah, but that's actually probably not the biggest problem here. A thorough search for bombs is just that - a thorough search. Some people are selected randomly for this kind of search. Unless you're actually carrying a bomb (and that is one thing this company does say it protects against), then you shouldn't have to worry about this.

(Although all the other things said against them seem exactly right to me, so I'm not in any way endorsing them.)

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:08AM (#14940695)
I always suspected if you answer 'no' to that question then they'll just refuse to check the luggage.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ptaipale on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:27AM (#14940878)
I always suspected there's a lot more than just that. Basically, an intensified inspection and whatever follows from the findings.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:37AM (#14941049)
If they allow you to continue flying that is.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ptaipale on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:55AM (#14941784)
Of course they inspect first, for as long as it takes, and whether your flight goes without you is secondary.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by futhey on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:10AM (#14940328)
This was my first thought. If you don't want people to think they're doing something shady, don't call them mules..
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by 2muchcoffeeman on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:15AM (#14940348)
Doesn't have to be shady. "Hey guy, please bring these South East Asian fruit to Australia for my family". Lack of knowledge of local laws could cause you some headaches.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by vazamb on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:04AM (#14940525)
No shit. A friend of mine brought an apple from Sydney to Perth. 500 dollar fine. Yes, from within Australia to another place in Australia.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:06AM (#14940690)
> An Apple from Sydney to Perth

Wait, what? There's no screening or security on domestic arrivals in Australia. There's no customs. There's no signage warning about this. This is the first I've ever heard of this and I have trouble believing this.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by zanchey on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:34AM (#14940757)
There is quarantine, though:

http://www.interstatequarantine.org.au/travellers/interstate...

Driving or flying to or from WA, you will see inspectors and dogs.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:45AM (#14940780)
Huh that's so interesting. I've done plenty of flying along Eastern Australia so I never had a reason to presume there was anything more over in WA.

Thanks.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by TheSpiceIsLife on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:26AM (#14941024)
I live in Launceston Tasmania, there's a fruit bin on the way in to the airport from the tarmac. Nearly every time I've been to the airport here there is a Beagle getting about on the luggage carousel.

Now that I think about it, that dog might not be there entirely for fruit. There was a bit of a spate of people bringing ice (meth-amphetamine) in through checked baggage a couple years ago. Who does that?

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by will_hughes on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:09AM (#14941590)
Unfortunately the beagles are mostly gone from Hobart airport. There's just the one now, I'm told, and s/he wasn't on duty last I flew down. Family that fly through there regularly all say they havnt seen it on duty much either.

This made my paranoid checking of whether my chosen brand of fruit-oil containing shower gel would be permitted kind of redundant.

For somewhere there's not supposed to be fruit fly, we sure saw a lot of fruit flies.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by jsjohnst on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:14AM (#14941158)
Beagles usually are used for smelling foods (vegetables and meats), not drugs.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by caf on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:29AM (#14940882)
Every eastern state airport I've ever seen has fruit bins at the gate or on the airbridge, and there is frequently an on-board announcement near TOD that some states prohibit bringing in fruit.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by SyneRyder on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:30PM (#14941950)
there is frequently an on-board announcement near TOD that some states prohibit bringing in fruit

Yup, was about to mention this. I did Sydney to Perth a couple of weeks ago & Qantas made that announcement close to landing. In particular, they mention not to bring honey into Western Australia, and to talk to a flight attendant if you were carrying honey.

I do remember seeing signage (somewhere) in Perth on arrival, but I don't remember seeing any disposal bins.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:38AM (#14941054)
They 100% don't have disposal bins at Sydney T3, nor do I remember them at Melbourne or Brisbane. I've spent a lot of time in that airport, sometimes without even flying and I've never seen anything other than just regular bins and the "oops I forgot this bottle of water" before security.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by will_hughes on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:12AM (#14941607)
Water and liquids are permitted through security on domestic flights from domestic airport terminals. No reason to dump your bottle of water.

http://travelsecure.infrastructure.gov.au/onboard/liquids-ae...

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by NamTaf on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:41AM (#14941490)
There's similar if you go north of Brisbane. Turns out, having a ridiculously sparse population is also a good defence against the spread of plant diseases.

There's actually signs somewhere north of BNE telling truckies that they can't take bananas past that point, for example.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by mcguire on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:50AM (#14941519)
Does California still have the agricultural prohibitions? I can remember the fruit fly traffic inspections in the '70s.

I've also been sniffed by a Dept. of Agriculture beagle coming back from Puerto Rico.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by vinay427 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:17AM (#14941622)
I-10 from AZ still has an inspection station that seemed to wave through most passenger vehicles.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by sl4i6j3o4i98g on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:55AM (#14941783)
Same in South Australia, mostly to prevent the spread of Fruit Fly (confined to eastern part of Australia). WA and SA rely economically on fruit plantations, so the noxious fruit fly could cause grave damage to local economies.

Don't travel with fruit in Australia, its the height of selfishness.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by callahad on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:21AM (#14940723)
Can't speak for Perth, but flights into Tasmania absolutely go through another round of biosecurity screening.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by wfunction on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:36AM (#14940611)
What in the world? Why is this?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by jpatokal on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:44AM (#14940630)
Western Australia is separated from farms in the rest of the country by ~1000 km of desert, meaning there are various pests in the rest of the country that they don't want to see introduced, and thus enforce strict quarantine measures: https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/importing-animals/quarantine-wa-...

FWIW, California also has agricultural quarantine measures, they're just much more half-assed.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by fapjacks on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:54AM (#14940655)
Hawaii does not play around with its own agricultural (et al) quarantines. Every time you fly into the state, you must declare items on a special state checklist, for exactly the same reasons.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by goatforce5 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:12AM (#14941155)
Hawaii also (?) checks for agricultural products when you leave the islands:

http://www.govisithawaii.com/2009/07/16/be-prepared-for-agri...

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by atbentley on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:47AM (#14940640)
Australia is an island so it has a fairly unique biodiversity. For international flights bringing in fruits is a concern since it can introduce pests that don't otherwise exist in Australia.

Australia is also a very large island, and the biodiversity of the east coast is very different to that of the west coast, so the same concerns apply. If you drive along the highways between states you'll see signs telling you to dispose of your fruit.

http://www.interstatequarantine.org.au/

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by 2muchcoffeeman on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:53AM (#14940651)
We take protecting our agriculture very seriously. You don't want an outbreak of something in one state to spread to another.

It kinda makes sense. We're so isolated geographically, when something happens in other parts of the world, we have a very good chance of protecting ourselves.

I believe Australia actually has the oldest vineyards in the world. Something took out the vineyards everywhere else in the world.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rangibaby on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:44AM (#14940629)
Diseases in one part of the country could spread to another. Australia and NZ have strict biosecurity because their isolation means they missed out on a lot of diseases that affect produce and animals in other parts of the world.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by jomar on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:45AM (#14940631)
Because there are crop diseases endemic in one part of the country that aren't present in another. Try searching for "Nevada California fruit" if that's closer to home.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ClassyJacket on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:47AM (#14941286)
Fruit flies.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by Fiahil on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:22AM (#14940582)
Of course, this would be even worse if the fruits in questions are https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durian

This looks like this "amazing startup idea" is directly taken from a Narcos (netflix) marathon with lots of beers and a few friends.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by cerved on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:33AM (#14940419)
Next up on Australian border patrol
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rodgerd on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:25AM (#14940734)
You'd be better off trying to smuggle heroin than getting caught taking bananas to Queensland.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by hamburglar on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:22AM (#14940380)
I started a similar company where the shipments were all carried inside balloons in the "courier's" gastrointestinal tracts, and for some reason that didn't work out either.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by imron on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:16AM (#14940564)
No ones going to want stolen cheeseburgers that have been smuggled in someone else's gastro intestinal tract.

That kind of venture was doomed from the start.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:28PM (#14941936)
Hah. The name being a bad choice no matter how tongue in cheek it is, is the first thing that came up for me too. I hastily wrote a comment before seeing your top comment brings this up too.

There is no way your company name should be this tongue in cheek about something that can be as serious as international drug smuggling.

At worst they should've got the domain name and made it a marketing landing page for their actual company. Not use Airmule as their actual company name.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by smoyer on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:13AM (#14940990)
I agree completely - I also wonder how long a visible and poorly named company can get away with this since the airlines typically offer "counter-to-counter" freight service that uses their position as a common carrier to shield them from liability.

AirMule is performing an arbitrage since the price difference is making them a profit but the airlines can't be happy about it whether or not the practice has been quietly going along for decades.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ivanbakel on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:42AM (#14941058)
The target market might be people who otherwise would never be able to afford the fare, and therefore consider the discount worth the risk. If you don't have the personal wealth to travel, I can imagine that this kind of opportunity would be very attractive.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by tkfu on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:49AM (#14941301)
That's kind of the heart of what's wrong with it. People generally agree, for example, that it was a good thing when we banned the practice of selling ones' self into indentured servitude. It is almost certainly true that indentured servitude was "worth the cost/risk" for some of the people who signed up, but we make it illegal anyway because it sets up a situation where people are likely to be exploited. Same goes for, for example, selling kidneys.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by 2muchcoffeeman on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:12AM (#14940337)
This is the first I heard of such a thing. I honestly can't believe anyone would agree to such a thing.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by Symbiote on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:13AM (#14940556)
It used to be very common, but improved routes from FedEx/DHL etc and increased security have ended the business.

https://www.gonomad.com/6364-air-courier-flights-have-lost-t...

http://courierlist.com/ -- which has an announcement from 2005 saying the discounts aren't worth it any more!

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by vermontdevil on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:11AM (#14940981)
When I flew to Amsterdam in 95, guy next to me had a career as a courier for Ford and GM (I flew from Detroit). He mostly brought over specialized tooling parts for engineering depts in US and Europe. Always a carry on he says to prevent theft. He was in his 60's back then but said he's been doing this for a number of years and got to travel the world. I guess these companies still do it.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by planteen on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:21AM (#14941180)
It happens in the space industry too. I've never seen a dedicated career courier, but rather someone who worked on the project handles it. It's useful when the project is late and the person csn head out for the flight immediately without any shipping company time overhead.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rwmj on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:56AM (#14940802)
Back in the 90s I knew people who would fly back to Japan carrying parcels, in return for reduced tickets (not $99 though, but it might have been £300 instead of £400). I always thought it was kind of sketchy, but as I understand it what was carried were documents, and no one I know ever got into trouble.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by randyrand on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:47PM (#14943787)
Why not just open the package and inspect it yourself? Then reseal it? It seems like you would get in way less trouble for opening a package given to (and you're not even a common carrier so does the non-opening law apply?) you than getting caught trafficking drugs.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by Exuma on Sunday August 06, 2017 @02:57PM (#14942815)
Seriously ... lol. What a BAD name. They should just call it the Escobar Courier Service
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by GreaterFool on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:02AM (#14940674)
If I were to sign up for this I would make it clear that it is not my luggage. In fact it is the first thing I would say to the airport staff: that I'm carrying this package on behalf of this company and everything is supposed to be arranged an in order. If anything is off and airport security would decide to confiscate / disallow the package, that is not my problem. I'd shrug and say "do what you've got to do". It's the Airmule's responsibility to make sure that whatever papers need to be filed are filed.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by paganel on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:07AM (#14940694)
>It's the Airmule's responsibility to make sure that whatever papers need to be filed are filed.

As the article says, it doesn't work like that in countries like China (and I suppose it doesn't work like that in many other countries). You're 100% responsible for the package you're carrying unless this happens:

> One of those exceptions is to be the authorized representative of a “common carrier.” These are companies like FedEx, UPS, or DHL, or the airlines themselves

So, as the article says, if someone decides to fill your bag with heroin up to the top Airmule will have nothing to do with it, the death-sentence will be all yours.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by gus_massa on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:49AM (#14940787)
> it doesn't work like that in countries like China

It doesn't work also in countries like USA. (I think we agree.)

And it doesn't work in other countries where the security is not so tough like Argentina. [Hi from Argentina!]

It's not exactly the same case, but ... from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/magazine/the-professor-the...

> [...] but when he arrived at the airline counter, he was greeted by several policemen. Asked to identify his luggage — “That’s my bag,” he said, “the other one’s not my bag, but I checked it in” [...]

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by LeifCarrotson on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:19AM (#14941175)
>> These are companies like FedEx, UPS, or DHL, or the airlines themselves

The question that needs to be asked is "Is Airmule one of these companies, and are Airmule couriers authorized representatives of Airmule?".

The distinction is not that Airmule is a company that provides services in the manner of a common carrier. It's whether they're recognized as such by the government. This is probably done by filing papers in the US and in China. Then they could answer "We are a common carrier, license number XYZ. Users sign form ABC to become an official Airmail representative."

A slightly less important but still relevant question is whether operating a courier service using an airline which itself offers the same service is a violation of the airline's TOS.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by zyx321 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:26PM (#14941932)
The article gives an example of why that wouldn't work either: Certain items (e.g. alcohol) would not be legal for a common carrier to import, but you can take small amounts with you for your own consumption.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ptaipale on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:26AM (#14940875)
In fact, it doesn't work like that in any country. For a good reason, when you come to think of it. What you bring in to the country is yours, you can't escape responsibility except by becoming a freight company which is then subject to entirely different responsibilities (and lack of rights).
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rwallace on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:11AM (#14940703)
If you're planning to trust that strategy with your life, first check with a lawyer to make sure it will actually work. Remember, making an argument about how you think the law should work, and a prediction about how it will work, are two completely different activities that it's very easy to get confused.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by camillomiller on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:03AM (#14940677)
I think that it can't work like that. Checked bags are tied to your ticket, so you're responsible for them.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by quickben on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:27AM (#14941451)
There are countries that do not care what you think.

In the same fashion they will shrug, say, we don't care, and throw you in jail or take your life away.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:33PM (#14941968)
Yeah I don't think it's going to down like that. It's still your baggage in a way. You announcing it's not yours before it possibly having illegal things in them isn't likely to magically make security be cool with you and let you off the hook. Chances are pretty good for the opposite.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by briandear on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:47AM (#14940915)
You can make whatever you want “clear.” But if it’s on your ticket, it’s your bag.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by qaq on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:05AM (#14940825)
if you think about it for 1 sec you will realize why it does not work like that.
[deleted]
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by switch007 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:15AM (#14940563)
"to a willing person, injury is not done...is a common law doctrine which states that if someone willingly places themselves in a position where harm might result, knowing that some degree of harm might result, they are not able to bring a claim against the other party in tort or delict."

For those who didn't study Latin or law :p

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by tajen on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:39AM (#14940617)
Ah. Maybe the best to protect the consumer would be to rename it AirGoat or AirDarwinAward. More seriously, the people using those services will probably be from a too poor background to come across this blog, and don't have the education to understand what's happening to them. Social class discrepancies at its finest.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by briandear on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:52AM (#14940927)
The lower classes don’t typically just jump on airplanes to China. It also isn’t like this company is putting flyers on the local community center bulletin board recruiting AirMules.

You still have to get visas, accommodation and such. This business is targeting the young and stupid not the poor and uneducated.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by FRex on Sunday August 06, 2017 @07:04AM (#14940822)
It's became communist (or facist, or anti-capitalist or unpatriotic or whatever the buzz word insult of the week is) in some circles to have an ounce of humanity and empathy and to dare to suggest that not all humans are completely equal in the opportunities they have and access to all the necessary information so they might make poor decisions and it's not entirely their fault.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by FRex on Sunday August 06, 2017 @05:28AM (#14940595)
I didn't study law or Latin but the amount of time I see this BS online and offline (usually translated though) is astonishing.

It's a very good principle for dangerous professions, bets, stun artists, boxers, etc. but not for average people as these crazy "free market" people try to apply it.

Jail time in China is not a reasonable risk to be expected from being a client of a legally operating company selling cheap tickets where your luggage space is "rented out".

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by whazor on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:20AM (#14940374)
Chinese people are always taking 1001 gifts back and forth. They will never run out of luggage space.