2muchcoffeeman
That’s very different from saying everybody can now have a life style that is above the poverty line and never have to work to keep that.
All the pricing is bad everywhere.
They should absolutely cop the criticism. It’s not like they don’t have the resources to make their software better.
When you find a good provider it’s a real pain to have switch.
I’m in Australia though. Switching is cheap and easy.
It’s not as though people who cheat the system aren’t reported or found out. Academics that lie in their research and companies that use loop holes are found out all the time. Maybe there is no will in some countries to do anything about it, but they are found out.
* Could the AI solution be somehow misaligned by exploiting a weakness in the trial process or its math models?*
Maybe it’s a clumsy example but I think the difference is humans would follow the spirit of the trial process.
Could an AI find flaws in the process and then use them to get its drug passed? I think that’s the question.
Are you saying that the trail process is good enough that we shouldn’t worry about it?
We basically cannot trust America anymore since its people have, as a whole, have lost the ability to reason and think critically. And the people in power want it that way. They prefer do disenfranchise most of their population so they can win elections using their core base who will believe anything.
Even a good emulator might fix bugs that some piece of software relied on.
It’s certainly a shame if they got rid of Rosetta forever so hopefully it’s still available as an optional download.
So I want a harness that I can use with multiple models.
I’m stating that the Windows problem was very different. Your machine would be loaded up with software for various vendors that the manufacturer did deals with to lower the price of the machine. They were all trials.
Keep in mind this is the second time they have switched arches and the second round of complaints of Rosetta removal.
This is a fully functioning feature that people don’t like for what ever reason.
This is quite obviously true whenever you hire trades people. I had a guy just cut into a pipe behind some dry wall. I’m uncertain how after looking at hole and the pipe.
I remain convinced that anyone enterprising could build a very lucrative trades business simply because so many trades people are bad.
And if you can’t sympathise with any of those cases, I hope you’re never called upon to decide anything involving other people.
You only got max speeds where the noise was low enough.
Maybe 4 participants is too few to clearly see what happens.
Imagine A ranks X and Y in that order B ranks Y and X in that order
Both X and Y rank A and B in that order.
A will propose to X and match. B will propose to X and get rejected. B will propose to Y and match. Y will never get a proposal from A.
You’re never going to match with people who aren’t actively looking.
You’re only ever going to match with the people who are looking at the same time as you.
Your criticisms are true of real life without apps. That’s why we have this thing called “divorce”.
Comments like these always seem to miss the point. They aren’t trying to solve marriage. They are trying to create social lubricants to get young people more interested in dating. This algorithm tries to ensure that at the very least your core values at the time match up.
I’ve been thinking about something similar to this but D2 wasn’t totally open source until now.
My core group will backstab each other gleefully and when the game is over, that’s it. We’re done. Because none of this is real. We wouldn’t even help each other if we played with other people. We’re all trying to win.
Although I suppose you’re right. If I played with two people, and the role of one of them is simply to help the others game, I’d never play with them.