News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rl3 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @03:51AM (#14940268)
>Calling a company "Airmule" seems to be a particularly bad choice, since the term "mule" is commonly used to denote a person who carries smuggled drugs (sometimes concealed inside their body).

No kidding. One has to wonder how the founders can't be aware of that. Perhaps it was intended as a tongue-in-cheek name?

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by notahacker on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:48AM (#14941514)
If I'd have wanted to satirise the worst elements of the "gig economy" and SV founders' wilful exploitation of grey areas in laws, I'd probably have bought the domain name Airmule and set up a Smuggling As A Service marketplace. Of course, to make it a bit more obviously a Very Bad Idea and not just a neat little hack I'd focus my "areas of operation" on a country which executes drug smugglers and gives no preferential treatment whatsoever to naive Western backpackers whose parents and embassies can get them good lawyers.

I'm still hoping they're not actually in operation and this is just a PR stunt to promote their actual business of selling Chinese Visa arrangement services (also on the website), but I'm not holding out too much hope.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:29PM (#14941938)
Hah this would make for a great satire site with that domain name. Or maybe not. Clearly it wouldn't have gone far enough since this seems real.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by greenyoda on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:25AM (#14940392)
Perhaps it was. But security and customs officers aren't known for their great sense of humor, so it's probably best to stick with names that don't suggest drug trafficking.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by madeofpalk on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:04AM (#14940680)
Side note: Just a few days ago I flew domestically within Australia just a week after some anti-terror arrests and increased security screening (which has since been lifted). As my bag went through it got flagged and the security officer flagged the aerosol can. I was already pretty nervous already, so I apologise profusely for the mistake.

Turns out the security officer was just a Regular Person, claimed deodorant cans are his "bread and bitter" and had a little chuckle as he found it in my toiletries bag.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by gtirloni on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:44AM (#14940779)
What airport security had to say about a regular person impersonating security agents?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by JadeNB on Sunday August 06, 2017 @08:47AM (#14941076)
> What airport security had to say about a regular person impersonating security agents?

I initially read madeofpalk's comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14940680) as it seems that you might have, so that it seemed to say that the supposed security agent was not actually a security agent; but a second reading suggests that the meaning is instead that, in addition to being a security agent, the person in question was a Regular Person, and had a sense of humour.

Repeated readings still do not reveal whether an Australian security agent referring to something as his "bread and bitter" is a typo or intentional. :-)

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by matt4077 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @09:37AM (#14941245)
A bread & bitter is a typical Australian breakfast of stale bread and (when available) an anise liquor.

It's derived from the continental "existentialist breakfast" of a black coffee, cigarette, and Aspirin–but had to be adapted due to the bad availability of commercial products in the past, as well as the higher activity levels the Australian bush requires and the resulting danger of a breakfast completely devoid of calories.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by jonah on Sunday August 06, 2017 @10:01AM (#14941357)
I had to look it up to see if you were serious or not. There does happen to be a brewpub by that name in Nottingham though.

http://www.castlerockbrewery.co.uk/pubs/bread-and-bitter/

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by skinnymuch on Sunday August 06, 2017 @12:25PM (#14941930)
I can't tell if this is real or not. I guess the joke is on me for not knowing if you're satirizing with bitter and liquor or not.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by matt4077 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @01:11PM (#14942180)
As @jonah found out, it's just a joke–only the "existentialist breakfast" is a real thing that probably started as a joke, and that I've seen on one or two menus of cafes willing to skirt the rules on selling pharmaceuticals.

But the joke is most definitely not "on you". As in: It wasn't meant to expose anybody's shocking lack of knowledge of arcane Australian trivia.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by stephen_g on Sunday August 06, 2017 @11:40AM (#14941721)
The idiom is definitely "bread and butter", perhaps madeofpalk was making a joke about his accent?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by alanh on Sunday August 06, 2017 @03:59PM (#14943157)
U and I are adjacent on QWERTY. Easy typo. Even worse pick-up line. “Hey baby, I prefer QWERTY because it puts U and I together.”
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by rl3 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @04:51AM (#14940486)
I agree completely. In fact, I'd wager every time customs hears the name it's bound to trigger further scrutiny, even if subconsciously.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by ptero on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:58AM (#14940805)
I remember an article at WSJ years ago on how many startup founders choose such tongue in cheek / humorous names and how that is almost always a bad choice. But calling this airmule is insane.

On the risks, I wonder if making the person carrying an extra bag the temporary owner of it (and showing him the packing of the luggage) so he can always say no would help making it safer for the user. But I personally would never do this even in this setup.

Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by sorokod on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:12AM (#14940705)
Perhaps to allow self selection to do its thing and interact only with those stupid enough.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by DonHopkins on Sunday August 06, 2017 @06:09AM (#14940698)
If they wanted a tongue in cheek name, they should have called it RectalExpress.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by pkaye on Sunday August 06, 2017 @01:33PM (#14942323)
Maybe change the company name to "Brokedown Palace"?
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by x0x0 on Sunday August 06, 2017 @02:18PM (#14942571)
Customs officials are well known for their senses of humor.
Re:Cheap Beijing Flights With a Dangerous Catch by pkulak on Sunday August 06, 2017 @01:05PM (#14942146)
Airmule is people?