Jellyfin is good aslong as the content is not HDR and needs subtitles.... Also the chromecast support is very non-wife friendly
But if you use ASS subtitles, which are entirely unspecified and unsupported and only have a single working implementation that requires half of Wine to work correctly, well, then you're fucked.
Works on Android devices like the shield or libreelec on something like a pi.
Those native Android apps, be it jellyfin or plex dont handle subtitles wel, be it .srt or .ass
I've used clients on all classes of Apple devices, LG WebOS and browser. They're all quite problematic.
I still run it alongside Plex and give it a go every month or so but the same or new problems always arise.
I really like the Chromecast model, browsing on a mobile device to select content is just a much better UX. I'm planning to implement Jellyfin (on NAS) + Kodi (on TOX3 streamer), and I just found Yatse [1] which claims to be able to control them. Has anyone here tried a combo like this?
[1]: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.leetzone.a...
I feel the same. I have a Kodi setup with LibreELEC and I just feel like it does too much and is inconvenient for my use. I don't really want to build and manage a "media library" on the device that's playing back content (small NUC-like computer connected to a projector). I wish I could just send a file to it from my computer or phone and instantly play it back without having to go through the whole media center style UI thing.
It looks like that repo hasn't been updated in a while, although it might still work. It's an offshoot of peerflix [1], a Node CLI that streams video from a torrent to an h264 playlist. So without peercast I would just open my browser to the local network address where peerflix was hosting the h264 playlist, and use the Cast button to stream it to my device (which I believe technically means Chromecast "takes over" downloading the playlist, rather than my laptop pushing the video to it, so I just needed to use a URL with the LAN IP of my computer).
I couldn't disagree more. Non-touchscreen remotes (RIP Harmony hub) are far superior as is browsing on the TV. I like the separation of concerns, others in the room can see what I'm doing on the screen, and I'm never scrambling to open an app to pause/rewind/etc.
My pet theory is that people who feel this way have only used low-end set-top boxes (or ones built into the TV which are low-end) and/or have used crappy remotes.
Yes I was thinking about this when I wrote it. All the set top boxes I've seen are crap with terrible UI latency and are slow to load new data. I'll admit that maybe it's possible to make it slightly less crap. But there's no way in hell typing out something on a remote with left-left-left-left-left-left-left-down click right-right-right-right-right-up click down-down-left click up-left-left-left-left click is remotely (ha) a good experience compared to a phone keyboard. And if I'm gonna have a device with a whole damn keyboard on it... it might as well be my phone.
It's a shame that Harmony has left the remote business. Sofabaton is the closest to what my Harmony's can provide but they have a screen on the remote which I'd really rather do without. If my Harmony Hubs died today I'd probably get an X1 (though I actually like the design of the U2 way more) but I'm really hoping that I can ride the Harmony wave a little longer until a real spiritual successor comes out.
You can also try jellyfin-mpv-shim (headless target player, stellar codec coverage because mpv) and/or "casting" from Jellyfin Android or Web.
If your only media library is going to be Jellyfin, I'm not sure Kodi is worth it unless you have a preference for its UI/UX.
They define uniqueness as "${filename-with-extensions}-${filesize}".
How many times does your system have IMG_4223.jpg? I got many. Different cameras, iPhones, etc, all started at IMG_0000.jpg.
How often does the file size collide? I don't have stats, but the reason I know this is because I had multiple occasions of failed backups and imports.
What would Plex gain from collecting information about user content ? Is Plex capable of collecting user content information if requested by authorities ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.plex.tv/en-gb/about/privacy-legal/
Plex collects the following information:
Personal Data Individually identifiable Usage stats (what, when, where) Debug info (logs, metadata, devices, media) Device info Opt in info through the software
Plex Media Server - Config data (may include IP address and the name of a Plex Media Server) - Application info (unique application ID) - Debug info - Usage info
Plex does not collect - Content titles (of personal content) EXCEPT for debugging - Metadata (of perosnal content) EXECEPT content syncing, metadata matching (anonymous) or third parties. - Data through Plex relay service EXECEPT for buffering (but is end to end encrypted)
They actually don't. Open this link and CTRL-F for "Plex does not collect:"
This is also why Plex isn't tied into the Apple TV features like universal search and deep linking into the "Uo Next" feature that shows you what you're watching in all your apps. They'd have to break this to provide that data to Apple
After years without a media server, I've started using Jellyfin and it's great. It's self-hosted but still has decent client apps. And there's no sketchy corporation watching my server, which just runs on my laptop and streams to my phone via my local network.