News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by bambax on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:56AM (#30838919)
> A cheap electric cooktop is a lot like a gas stove, except with electric heating coils instead of burners. Better for indoor air quality, doesn’t do that click-click-click thing, but less responsive.

No. Well, yes, a "cheap" electric cooktop that simply produces heat (coil or IR) is worse than burners, and less responsive. But that's not what you want. You want an induction cooktop: safe, efficient, beautiful, and more importantly, more responsive than burners.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:32AM (#30841657)
Downsides of induction burners: bottom of pan heats up very quickly, but heat propagates through the pan slowly, so food is prone to burn when you are adjusting for a certain level of simmer.

Limited heat settings left me often wishing for more nuance, especially in lower temperatures.

Hysteresis. You can see this by putting your saucepan with water to 350, then lowering it to 212 when it reaches a boil. It will rapidly cycle between boiling and not boiling, making simmering very difficult. My particular induction burner has one setting for 140F (way too low) and the next setting is 212F. Where's simmer?

It does heat water up faster than a conventional burner, so I use it for cooking the pasta while I make the sauce on a conventional gas stovetop. I also use it when temperature control isn't important, but that's not very often in cooking.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:56AM (#30841897)
It sounds like your induction cooktop wasn’t very good? You can definitely get temperature control in a higher end model.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:07AM (#30842024)
Mine has very accurate temperature control, but if I'm not using cast iron (which changes temperature more slowly), then it's prone to hysteresis. Also, just because it has accurate temperature control doesn't mean that the preset temps are actually useful. I found one burner that uses an infrared thermometer and is adjustable to +/- 1F, but it costs over $1,000 for a single burner.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by droopyEyelids on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @11:41AM (#30844058)
I have an easy time using cast iron but I do have a futuristic induction cooktop that measures temp either with a probe or a conductive thermometer.

I both agree with and disagree with your post- I agree that induction has not met its potential yet. If every induction range used the Control Freak's control systems, people would be abandoning gas in droves because it's better in every way: https://www.amazon.com/PolyScience-Temperature-Controlled-Co...

I disagree that it's specifically worse for cast iron, especially when you have a good device. The problem there is the quality of the cookware, cast iron works, and an aluminum or aluminum cored stainless steel work perfectly if they're well designed.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by collegeburner on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:04AM (#30841990)
Then this means induction cooktops are not a good solution yet because most Americans will keep their mid range gas stoves that work well instead of getting an expensive induction one to do the same.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:45AM (#30842447)
I have a gas stove but will be moving to induction soon given it meets our needs better. You already see induction in high end new builds (with gas in mid-end and older builds).
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @10:34AM (#30843045)
Having both, I miss the infinite adjustability and almost instant change when using gas, compared to the preset steps of temperature offered by the induction burner.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:24PM (#30847893)
How is induction any less responsive than gas? My gas stoves had big metal grates that themselves heated up - and took forever to cool down. There is way less mass on my induction stove cooktop for any residual/carry over heat than on the gas cooktop. You kill the power to the HOB and heat stops - immediately. And induction ramps WAY faster than gas could ever hope to, especially if you have decent cookware (i.e. solid metal/no discs welded on the bottom).

I do agree that there are far too many induction cooktops with gawd awful controls that are not responsive; that's more a matter of picking a well designed unit rather than a fundamental flaw in the technology itself. Same with granular control - higher end models offer not just finer control, but different control modes. It boggles my mind there aren't more temperature probe options for automatic temperature control. My GE cooktop had an optional bluetooth probe - but it only worked for low temps. If they had a high temp probe it would be a candy makers dream!

I only use gas when I want to cook with super high heat - like with a wok. And for that I use a left over turkey fryer burner - outside! Double bonus for all the gunk thrown off during cooking not being trapped in my house either. I don't have a restaurant style hood and make up air system; it's far cheeper and easier to just go outside for that kind of cooking.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @10:52PM (#30851061)
There's no fine control of temperature. It's in big steps. I agree it responds quickly. I didn't communicate what I was trying to say clearly.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @10:45AM (#30843228)
Again, it is just to our needs. The most important being cleanability, and then kettle speed. We mostly do Chinese cooking, so precise temperature control isn't so important for stir fry.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Reason077 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:04AM (#30841996)
> ”Downsides of induction burners: bottom of pan heats up very quickly, but heat propagates through the pan slowly, so food is prone to burn”

Have you tried a thicker, heavier pan? A good quality induction cooker should heat reasonably slowly and maintain a constant temperature if you set it to, say, 1/3 or 1/2 power.

I’ve been using a friend’s one recently and found it to be much easier to maintain a steady temperature than with my old electric cooktop.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:31PM (#30844754)
I'm specifically referring to my experience of using a cast iron pan. The bottom heats up quickly because it's being directly affected by the induction process, but propagates through the sides of the pan very slowly, which is normal behavior for a cast iron pan. That's part of its usefulness: even heat. The problem with induction is that it hyperheats the bottom, but the slow propagation of the eat means that the normal benefits of cast iron are eliminated (at least in the first part of the cooking process, until the whole pan heats up).
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Reason077 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:36PM (#30844835)
Ok, so how about either a) starting at a lower power level to let the cast iron heat more gradually, or b) waiting until the pan heats up to the desired temperature before adding food?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:42PM (#30844947)
I have used solution A, and once it heats up, you still lose fine control of heat (because my induction burner is cheap and only has 10 preset temps that are spaced too far apart).

I was excited by the prospects of induction cooking, and if I'm boiling water, or even making a slow-cook stew, it works great. But for sauces and meat (where fine temperature control is critical), I'll stick to gas or (if I have to) electric.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:38PM (#30848058)
Lack of fine control isn't a fault of induction, but of a cheaply made cooktop. I too made that mistake on my last house. My mom's induction range has half steps and they make all the difference. Getting a new house next month and I won't even be considering an induction cooktop with fewer than 18 steps.

Indeed I love to cook so much and one of the downsides of induction I didn't see talked about too much in this thread - matching pan size to hob size - bugged me so much on my old cooktop I'm tempted to get something ridiculous like the Gaggenau 400 Series that doesn't have defined areas for pans, but a grid of smaller hobs that will autodetect and adjust to the size/location of a pan. There are at least three versions of that cooktop from various manufacturers and one of the non-Gaggenau ones was something like 30% cheaper. And I just realized I didn't save it like I thought I had. D'oh!

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:35PM (#30844825)
I'm replying to my own comment here, but I wanted to clarify something with hysteresis. Heating water (or food, or a pan) up to a certain temperature takes more energy than maintaining that temperature. It appears that the temperature setting on my induction burner uses the same amount of energy regardless. So it will bring the water to a boil when I use the 212F setting, but once it's there, it requires less energy to maintain that temp, but the induction burner doesn't adjust accordingly. So, instead of turning the amount of energy down to maintain 212F, it just cycles on and off hysteritically. With a gas or electric stove, I can turn the heat up, and once it reaches boiling, I can turn the heat down slightly, maintaining the current level of boiling (because there's "simmer", "boil" or "rolling boil", for example).
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:44PM (#30848121)
I fail to see why you can't do that with induction - indeed I do that all the time with induction. The cycle is just a lot shorter with induction.

Waiting for integrated temperature control to become more of a thing with induction - higher end cooktops have it; just needs to percolate down. My GE cooktop had a bluetooth probe that worked great at lower temperatures - but usually you want automatic temp control more on the high end - frying and candymaking is what I was missing. I guess if you made lots of delicate sauces the bluetooth probe would have been a godsend and maybe that's what they were going for. Probably cheaper, easier and more reliable to only have a lower temp probe too. Just not nearly as useful for what I would have liked!

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:02PM (#30847651)
I've never once had hysteresis be a problem with induction - especially any more or less than with gas or traditional radiant electric.

If you like to cook invest in good cookware. The biggest problem with induction is cheap cookware with "disks" on the bottom. Having as much ferrous magnetic metal as possible is the real key to success with induction - and why your cast iron performs so well!

I love All Clad - triple ply stainless steel sandwich of either aluminum or (if you are feeling really extravagant) copper. Far easier to maintain than cast iron (although I love my cast iron too - can't get fried chicken just right in anything else). Cookware and More is the official All Clad factory seconds (usual some dent or other cosmetic flaw) outlet with great prices and if you get on their mailing list they have an annual sale where they take even more off. I've gotten All Clad skillets for well under $200 and they will be something I can pass on. Good cookware never dies. Took several years to get the pieces I wanted but I did it without breaking the bank.

If All Clad, even factory seconds, are still too pricy - I'm not paying $500 for a stockpot no matter how wonderful it may be - then Made In has very nice pieces competitively priced. Got my stock pot from them for under $200.

Finally Tramontina has great induction ready clad cookware pieces and can be found at regular big box stores like Costco or even Walmart. Not quite as heavy/well constructed as All Clad or Made In, but still leaps and bounds better than anything with a disk.

Good, better, best - just reject anything with a damn disk welded onto the bottom of it and you will find induction a LOT more enjoyable. As good as your cast iron :)

Fine control comes with higher end units that have more settings. Didn't pay attention to that at my last house and got a cooktop with only 11 choices. My mothers induction range has double that and it's amazing what a difference makes, especially at the lower end - as you note. Getting a new house next month and won't be making that mistake again! Something with a at least 18-20 steps from low to high will be mandatory for me. 11 just isn't enough.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by kumarvvr on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:39AM (#30841724)
I see that as an opportunity for business.

Induction heat transfer is basically generating a magnetic field in the bottom coil, which is then picked up by the vessel, currents induced in it causing the heat.

Cheap induction stoves emulate lower power levels by turning the heat on and off, averaging the heat.

One solution is to use a thick bottom vessel that retains enough heat between the cycles to allow simmering.

Or buy a smooth controlled stove. But I dont think there are any such ones in the market.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by alaties on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:57AM (#30841910)
Would cast iron pots and pans count as thick-bottomed in this case?

I usually use these with electric stoves since they retain heat pretty well. They take a while to warm up though, so there's both time and energy lost in that warming process.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by kumarvvr on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:08AM (#30842041)
The best vessel is a flat bottomed one with at-least quarter inch thick bottom.

Cast Iron ones will do too.

If you have to cook something to simmer and hold heat for long, best use thick bottomed ones.

What could be done to mitigate the slow heating issue is to use a small amount of water initially, on high settings, allowing it to boil. Then you can add your contents, reduce the power setting and allow it to simmer.

What many dont know is that you can keep a cast iron or steel plate between the vessel and the stove, of a suitable thickness, that converts the induction stove to a "heater" stove (the plate gets heated through induction, but the vessel only sees the heat). However, a word of caution. If the plate is of a very large size, it will have un-even heating and may warp. Best size is one that is slightly smaller than the circular marker on the stove.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by prometheus76 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:05AM (#30842004)
I primarily use cast iron for cooking, and it does help with the hysteresis, but I still have a problem with the bottom of the pan being way too hot and tending to burn food.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by SAI_Peregrinus on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:39AM (#30842384)
They work fine with induction.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by rocqua on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:43AM (#30839900)
I have one, and I love it with one exception: woks.

The induction stove only heats the bottom plate. Whereas with a gas stove around a large wok, there is a lot of convection heating the thin walls of the wok as well.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by zcw100 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:10AM (#30841475)
I found an unexpected downside of induction cooktops. They make an ultrasonic squeal that only my kids can hear and it drives them crazy. I read a while ago that some shop owners were using devices that purposely made the noise to keep kids away. I don’t know if it was specific to that particular model or if there are some that don’t make the noise.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by avianlyric on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:30AM (#30841626)
Likely an issue with the hob you have. The squeal will be caused by the high frequency components running the induction ring. Cheap capacitors and inductors will vibrate as the oscillating signal passes through them because the alternating electromagnetic field will cause the windings to gently push and pull on each other.

Problem is solved by either using better components, or better matching the control frequency to the components used so there a no frequency modes that happen to match up with the resonant frequency of components used. Thus eliminating the transfer of electrical energy into mechanical energy.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by pwr-electronics on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @11:04AM (#30843510)
To expand on the source of noise and possible solutions ...

Regardless of price, multilayer ceramic capacitors are piezoelectric - meaning they physically vibrate. Inductors and transformers are electromagnets powerful enough to noticeably vibrate and move themselves. In fact, if you test them during assembly before taping them, the two halves of the ferrite core will snap together like magnets. Most noise comes instead from the windings, but that gives you an idea of their physical power. The biggest winding in an induction cooktop is the induction coil itself.

The reason you hear them is because they're being used at audio frequencies. Considerate designers choose higher switching frequencies above what humans and household pets can hear. Induction cooktops are kind of a special case where it's tempting to dip into the audible frequencies. Frequency choice alone doesn't eliminate all noise, so there are other mitigations like materials selection and assembly, to name a couple.

Overall, it's largely due to being cheap about the design and manufacturing processes.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by giraffe_lady on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:04AM (#30841993)
Neither of these are solutions available to an actual user of these products though. I worked with these things constantly for years and even the high end commercial line ones make the squeal after a few months of heavy use.

Used to be able to hear it but can't anymore so either they all got better the last few years or I aged out of being able to hear it.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by HPsquared on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:29AM (#30841616)
It's an annoying feature in some power electronics, they design the switching frequency to be outside of most peoples' hearing, but not high enough to be completely outside.

I pity the dogs and cats especially!

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by avianlyric on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:33AM (#30841663)
I suspect the switching frequency is completely outside of any humans hearing range. But there are probably components that have resonant frequencies that are both within human hearing range, and happen to be closely divisible to the switching frequency, and thus will couple to the switching signal and vibrate.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by npteljes on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:04AM (#30841994)
You read that right about the shop owners. One of such device: https://mosquitoloiteringsolutions.com/
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by seanmcdirmid on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:58AM (#30841924)
There are induction burners made specifically for woks, with the contact surface being curved.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by unkoman on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:00AM (#30840002)
Kenji Lopez-Alt has a good hack for this that uses a torch https://youtu.be/u2MJzEuI0vI?t=481 Not the same, but good enough for me.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by rozab on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:06AM (#30841440)
For those of us still with gas, Kenji has also recommended removing the the diffuser. Looks absolutely terrifying, no idea if it's safe

https://youtube.com/shorts/JOoaKt4u-gk

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by giraffe_lady on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:06AM (#30842017)
lmao holy shit kenji
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by willcipriano on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @05:25AM (#30840479)
If only the torch could somehow be placed into the cooking surface.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by neurostimulant on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:06AM (#30840033)
First time seeing someone cook a fried rice with a butane torch. Is this actually work?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by unkoman on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @05:12AM (#30840417)
Lopez-Alt recently released a book about wooks [1] where this is mentioned and in my experience it works well for getting the wook-taste and smell.

[1]: http://www.kenjilopezalt.com/books

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by UncleMeat on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:45PM (#30847446)
The winning strategy for serious wok cooking is an outdoor propane burner. Basically no indoor range has the heat output you actually want for the restaurant-style wok cooking.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:09PM (#30847737)
Also if you are performing true restaurant style wok cooking you doubly want to be outdoors for the offgassing/smoke. Restaurants have hoods that are paired with make-up air systems. That 600CFM (being generous!) "hood" built into your over the range microwave is NOT going to be able to keep up with normal cooking, let alone real wok cooking!

The lack of adequate kitchen ventilation is pretty underrated by most people. Picked up a WYND Halo indoor air quality monitor out of general curiosity and was astonished at just how quickly indoor air can sour when cooking if you don't have adequate ventilation.

I cook a lot more outdoors than I used to now!

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by JJMcJ on Thursday March 31, 2022 @04:29PM (#30871865)
Similar issues for blackened food not such a big fashion now.

Ordinary domestic kitchens did not have the ventilation to do it properly.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by pronlover723 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @05:44AM (#30840589)
Maybe you need a different kind of induction stove?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGBP3sG3a9Y

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by gnramires on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:25AM (#30842230)
Free idea to anyone out there: a self-heating electric wok. It shouldn't be too hard to put heating elements spread across the under surface of a wok and make it fully electric.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by vel0city on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:51AM (#30842512)
Electric woks have existed for a long, long time. You can get cheap ones for ~$40USD or go pretty high end and spend >$100USD.

https://www.thespruceeats.com/best-electric-woks-to-buy-4138...

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by stephen_g on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:07AM (#30842036)
You can get induction wok burners that are shaped for a proper wok (not with a flat bottom).
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by causi on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @07:49AM (#30841325)
Pick up a butane camp stove. They're cheap and the size of a dictionary.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:27PM (#30847943)
not going to have the power for true wok cooking. Burners from Turkey friers are perfect. Also do it outside. True high heat cooking will expel all kinds of smoke and other stuff into the air. Unless you have a high flow hood with a make up air system (similar to what restaurants have - and yes, there are systems made for home/non-commercial use), you do NOT have adequate indoor ventilation to do that kind of cooking indoors.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by linsomniac on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:46PM (#30845013)
And, Induction is much easier to clean and keep clean. Food does not burn onto the cooktop, the cooktop is solid surface, and temps stay lower. Boil something over? Move the pot, wipe it with a towel or sponge, put the pot back. Or put a paper towel or regular towel down between the pan an the cooktop, you can boil water without burning the towel.

Also, it throws off way less heat than a gas burner. Almost all of it goes into the pan, where gas tends to throw a lot up around the pan.

I've never run into the problem mentioned by another in this thread about cycling when simmering or burning. My range is a $3500 Samsung range, more than a cheap electric, less than many gas, but not exactly cheap. Well worth it for me.

However, one downside I didn't expect is: My inductive range is more disposable.

Where a regular range, if it breaks, you can probably have a repair guy come by and do some simple troubleshooting and identify a burner element or knob that has failed... The inductive cooktop the repair guys tend to just want to replace the whole thing, to the tune of $750 parts, plus labor. At which point they start recommending you just replace the range, because most people don't want to spend more than a cheap range on a repair.

A year ago my range had two of the burners stop working. Thankfully, it was a well known problem, a blown solder joint on one of the boards deep in the cooktop. I was able to repair it for $0 in 3 hours (my son was helping, probably could have done it in half the time if I wasn't also teaching him), and we were back in business.

But no repairman would have wanted to spend 90 minutes on a "maybe" repair with no warranty and another 90 minute service call or potentially $300 board replacement or $750 cooktop replacement, and an angry customer because their fix didn't work.

No problem for a DIYer.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by moistly on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @01:22AM (#30839044)
Much discussion about induction cooktops here : https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30654693
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by foobarian on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @10:55AM (#30843378)
I had a chance to cook on a friend's induction stove. It beeped angrily any time I lifted the pan to shake it around. And I had trouble finding the touch buttons on the flat surface due to lack of contrast and the food bits on the surface.

I get the principle but the UX leaves a lot to be desired. Other than boiling water it's a step down for me.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @05:03PM (#30848334)
Not all beep crazily like that - and not as many as I like have physical controls. I loathe the obsession with capacitive touch dominating design these days :p
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by tomp on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @10:02AM (#30842646)
> You want an induction cooktop: safe, efficient, beautiful, and more importantly, more responsive than burners.

and loud

I prefer non-induction electric.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @05:04PM (#30848339)
Loud?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by dustymcp on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:26AM (#30839790)
I dont find them better to be honest ive had more than a few, lifetime on them are very short compared to a regular stove.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by LesZedCB on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @01:01AM (#30838952)
and finer control - lower lows
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by LunaSea on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @01:47AM (#30839209)
Induction cooktops are however not compatible with self-consumption of electricity produced by solar panels.

The required draw is too high.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Ballas on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:06AM (#30839348)
Only if you use the higher settings, which you typically don't unless you are boiling water. Source: I have induction and solar and my stove-top is 90% solar (with BESS). The oven is a different story.

Another thing to keep in mind: with gas about half the energy heats the air and flows around the pot or pan, so it ends up being about 50% efficient.

But with all said, the carbon monoxide buildup issue was what swayed me in the end.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by LunaSea on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:10AM (#30839370)
I definitely think you are right about efficiency.

I was rather talking about the required instantaneous draw which is usually too high for an average household's Solar setup.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by biztos on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:16AM (#30839728)
Is there a simple trick to make this work?

I’m planning to install solar and was thinking around 3KW with battery backup. I definitely want induction cooking.

Should I get more capacity? Bigger batteries? Fewer burners?

[Edit: bigger batteries seems to be the answer, also because of cooking at night.]

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by namibj on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:35AM (#30842337)
If you can get the required parts in the single quantities you'd need, you may want to consider a battery voltage suitable for the induction stove to run directly off of, so you wouldn't need the dance with a bigger inverter and that.

Just need a grid-powered charger for the battery to replace the sun with if you worry about running out of electricity to cook.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by biztos on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @09:13AM (#30854738)
Thanks, I will keep voltage in mind. I have ample wind so my long-term plan is solar plus small windmills on the roof. For bigger cooking sessions I will have an outdoor grill, might add some burners too. This is Spain so big LPG tanks for the home are totally common.

[Edit: it's off the grid, only gets water, and I want to keep it that way in principle.]

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by namibj on Wednesday March 30, 2022 @09:47AM (#30855162)
Yeah, if it's already off-the-grid, just combine batteries with a DC microgrid if you're aiming for cheap and efficient.

If you have the charging top voltage at/below the peak of 240V mains (which is sqrt(2) higher than the rms of 240V), you can get away with using the load's voltage-adaptive power supply to handle the varying battery voltage. This will work with resistive heaters (no simple thermostats, though; "electronic trailing edge phase cut dimmer" is the technology needed, but with adapted control to work like a normal PWM), but resistive light bulbs would burn out.

There are plug standards similar to the ones used on computer power supplies that are rated as DC variants.

Feel free to stay in contact; I am looking for making use of local solar power for electronic loads that make up most of my electricity usage once I can spend the appropriate money on it, and combining it with UPS functionality as that's rather cheap to add.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by hadlock on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:33AM (#30839837)
Induction cooktops are wildly popular on solar powered sailboats, do you have any sort of information to back this claim up? There are tens if not hundreds of sailing vlogs on youtube who are exclusively using induction cooktops because they don't want to carry propane onboard.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Angostura on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:11AM (#30841484)
I find that quite surprising. I don't have an induction hob, but I do have an electric fan oven, and I find my batteries, charged from solar cope with that just fine, or a 3kW electric kettle.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by namibj on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:29AM (#30842274)
They are particularly suitable to be run directly off of a battery with no inverter, because they are essentially a switched mode power supply with the pan as the secondary winding. They already have a rectifier front end.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by chii on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:20AM (#30839431)
Wouldn't a battery bank/wall be the buffer that would solve this problem? The battery bank could be supplied by an electric vehicle, plugged in when at rest for such a purpose.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by LunaSea on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:43AM (#30839553)
Don't quote me on this but usually, regular batteries usually don't allow for such an instantaneous draw.

Lithium batteries like you find in electric cars probably can support this but it does require a certain additional upfront investment.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by chii on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:12AM (#30839706)
fair enough - i did just assume that this could be built "easily".
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by kwhitefoot on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @06:42AM (#30840913)
It can be built easily, but perhaps not yet cheaply. Just buy a Tesla PowerWall or similar.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by pjc50 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:45AM (#30840258)
That's a very categorical statement for a comparison of two quantities, both of which vary (cooktop power and solar power). And ultimately if you're using a lower-power cooktop it .. won't cook properly.

The all-electrical all-self-produced setup probably isn't viable without a large enough battery and inverter.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by BatteryMountain on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @03:56AM (#30839982)
This doesn't sound right (correct me if wrong)... but we've ran a small one plate cooker off of a camping solar system + battery kit & off of a petrol generator and it all seemed fine and working as normal. Usually when putting heavy load on the generator you can hear it work harder, but with this plate it barely makes a difference.

I have to note that it is rated at 2000w at max setting (6), but due to it being so potent, we've never had it set to more than 3 out of 6, anything above that is way too aggressive. So make it 1000w typical draw.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by jrapdx3 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:35AM (#30839511)
That may be true but gas cooking isn't available everywhere. So if electricity-based cooking is necessary, induction is likely more efficient than conventional resistance coils.

In our kitchen we have both. Items heat faster with less heating of nonessential surrounding areas vs. standard burners.

My guess is cooking aside solar generation is probably not going to be by itself a sufficient source of household power for the foreseeable future. In any case optimizing use of electric energy requires taking advantage of the best available technologies.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by jvvw on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:12AM (#30840061)
We have solar panels on medium sized house in the UK (15 panels - half east, half west roughly) and an induction hob and use it without needing power from the grid!
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by ZetaZero on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:48AM (#30841800)
Induction stoves are anywhere from 1200W to 3800W for the larger ones at full power. Looks like the size just needs to be considered when building it out.

https://www.inductioncooked.com/how-much-electricity-does-in...

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by jgtrosh on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:03AM (#30839328)
Induction is way more energy efficient than electric though (and therefore draw less), so what are you suggesting?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by LunaSea on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:07AM (#30839351)
You are talking about overall power consumption, not the instantaneous draw which is the one I was thinking about.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:16PM (#30847804)
If you are concerned about instantaneous draw you can always start low and ramp up.

You don't always have to start out with every burner on high!

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by avianlyric on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:37AM (#30841697)
What do you mean by instantaneous draw?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by bocytron on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @07:55AM (#30841381)
I would like to know what is your point here? You can't consume locally produced gas either, can you? Or are you comparing with non-induction electrical stove?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by tenuousemphasis on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:51AM (#30839598)
Neither is gas, or I assume resistive electric. An energy storage system solves that problem.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by idontknowifican on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:35AM (#30841687)
lower draw than IR or coil
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by YATA0 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @01:59AM (#30839295)
I've ran our induction range on our solar panels for about five years now. This is news to me.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by JKCalhoun on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:30AM (#30842283)
Seen RV build-outs with an induction cook-stove (and solar). I think the issue has more to do with battery capacity/current-delivery than with your solar capacity.

Maybe a home however is lacking the battery intermediary.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by LunaSea on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:05AM (#30839342)
What solar capacity did you have installed?

If I remember correctly, my comment was based on an average household with about 4 to 5 KW installed in western Europe.

This represents about 12 panels which is roughly the maximum amount of panels a regular house has space for.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Zanfa on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:21AM (#30839442)
That’s still enough for a peak of 2kw for an average induction range. Granted you can’t probably run a heater and a vacuum on full power at the same time.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by sokoloff on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:39AM (#30840212)
If the peak power is only 2kW (8.3A @ 240V), why do most induction cooktops have a 40-50A beaker (32-40A/7.5-9.6kW continuous)?

The first one I looked the specs up on at my home center has a 4.8kW largest element and 8.6kW total. https://images.thdstatic.com/catalog/pdfImages/d9/d92c8678-a...

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Zanfa on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:57AM (#30840328)
2kw per element is plenty of power, though you could definitely find more powerful ones. In my 3 years of owning an induction cooktop, I don't think I've ever had more than 1 element at full power at one time, it's really only useful for bringing water to boil, waaaaaaaay to much heat for anything else.

I'm not even sure if my entire house has a breaker for more than 32A.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Gravityloss on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @07:16AM (#30841118)
Yeah, indeed, this is not esoteric physics. If you have a 10 kW electric induction stove (you can see the rating from the specs) and you want to operate purely on solar panels, you need at least 10 kW of solar panels and inverter etc.

Also maybe you want to use the oven and AC and charge the car at the same time etc. As far as I understand, it's a plus and minus calculation. It's not any kind of compatibility issue...

Naturally big electric power sinks need bigger voltages, otherwise the current and thus the cabling would get very thick.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by namibj on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:31AM (#30842294)
If you want to run it just on solar, use one that can be legally fed with DC (almost all work fine, anyways), and hook a battery with suitable voltage between it and the solar panels.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Gravityloss on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @10:16AM (#30842813)
Random model from Ikea: https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/samfaelld-induction-cooktop-bla...

Cooktop with induction cooking zones:

Right front: 8” – 2300W, booster 3200W.

Left front: 8” – 2300W, booster 3200W.

Left rear: 7” – 1800W, booster 2600W.

Right rear: 7" - 1800W, booster 2600W.

Center: 10” – 2500W, booster 3800W.

Voltage: 240/208V.

Connection rating: 15400W.

Current: 40A.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by EricE on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:13PM (#30847786)
If you are running the burners flat out. Which you only do when getting water to boil or preheating cookware. Once up to temp, induction requires far less energy to cook with since it is way more efficient - directly heating the pan.

So yeah, if you are in the habit of routinely maintaining four pots of water at a furiously rolling boil you probably will have problems. The rest of us are likely to be pretty safe.

Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by Gravityloss on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @05:22PM (#30848547)
Yeah, I wasn't intending that, it was just shown to get some feel for the numbers. It was the biggest Ikea cooking top as well.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by dTal on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:48AM (#30840276)
Yeah, 2kW seems low for a multi-burner stove. That gets you an electric kettle or a large toaster. Maybe a single element might draw that.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by reissbaker on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @08:10AM (#30841476)
Would using a whole-home battery in conjunction with the solar installation solve this?
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric” by YATA0 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @02:08AM (#30839361)
Roughly 15kW, so quite a bit more than that.