News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by alewi481 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:07PM (#25001475)
I'd like to give kudos to Apple for including the iPhone 5S in this security update, which was released on September 20, 2013, over 7 years ago! Supporting a product for even 3 years is rare in the smartphone world.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Y-bar on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:50PM (#25001818)
Wouldn't last official sale date be a better indicator of true device support? For example if someone bought it in an Apple store on the last day available, how long period would they have received updates for?

For example in mid 2017 it was still officially sold by Apple in India (source: https://www.iphonehacks.com/2017/05/apple-iphone-5s-iphone-s...).

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by JohnTHaller on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:58PM (#25003030)
Comparatively, no. Android phones generally get a maximum of 3 years of security updates from launch, not from last device sale date. So, within mobile phones, it's more informative to compare it to their competition. It shows you just how much better Apple is at mobile device support compared to everyone else.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Schlaefer on Friday November 06, 2020 @01:58AM (#25005588)
Well, you still get updates through the store way longer than 3 years. With more and more components (e.g. the browser) coming through the store, the picture is not as black and white anymore.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by chaostheory on Friday November 06, 2020 @11:48AM (#25009004)
Are you talking about OS level updates or just updates for individual apps?
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by anonunivgrad on Thursday November 05, 2020 @08:41PM (#25004042)
So use the last sale date for both. Your point makes no sense.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by kurthr on Thursday November 05, 2020 @09:18PM (#25004242)
Galaxy S8 on sale at Walmart, Staples, and NewEgg. Likely falls off support in 3-4 months. So Android flagships are close to zero or even negative support time?
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by TrueGeek on Thursday November 05, 2020 @10:06PM (#25004488)
This is what got me to finally switch to Apple. Updates take forever. I bought a Samsung off Amazon for testing and for some reason I still have to wait on T-Mobile. And then after a year, maybe two, there just aren’t anymore updates.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jmnicolas on Friday November 06, 2020 @02:07AM (#25005629)
Samsung makes superb hardware but they're clearly not at ease with software, it always feels like an afterthought.

If they were serious about competing with Apple software is where they should focus.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by JohnTHaller on Friday November 06, 2020 @11:19AM (#25008731)
This is why I switched to Pixel. 3 years of full updates. And you can then switch to LineageOS if you'd like as well.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by anonunivgrad on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:26PM (#25004890)
That sounds dangerous to me.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Polylactic_acid on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:35PM (#25004935)
They have no legal requirement to update. Its also not a bait and switch, they have done this for a decade now. By an iphone if you want updates.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by gruez on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:42PM (#25002326)
>Wouldn't last official sale date be a better indicator of true device support?

well in that case many cheap android phones/tablets would have negative support periods, considering they don't release any updates at all.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by loeg on Thursday November 05, 2020 @09:03PM (#25004162)
Yes? That sounds about right.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by internet2000 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @09:47PM (#25004397)
Which makes it kind of a pointlessly obtuse metric. To claim a device has negative months of support.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by lmkg on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:01PM (#25004767)
It's accurate, though. When I am evaluating devices to buy, a metric I care about is "after I buy this, how long will it remain up-to-date with security patches?" And the answer to that question is "on the day that you buy it, it is already several months behind on security patches and will not improve." That metric is not the be-all-end-all of support, but is meaningful, and low or negative values have the correct interpretation in that context.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by maltalex on Friday November 06, 2020 @05:28AM (#25006583)
It's not pointless at all. It accurately reflects the situation of buying a device off the shelf long after its official end of life.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by loeg on Thursday November 05, 2020 @10:28PM (#25004581)
Sorry, I don't follow.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by diebeforei485 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:43PM (#25002338)
Apple uses this metric as well[1]. If something hasn't been sold by Apple for 5 years (but less than 7 years), it's considered vintage and you can still get hardware service and certain critical software fixes, though not necessarily any new features.

The support for MacBooks is actually great. Certain Late 2013 and Mid 2014 Retina MacBook Pros, while considered vintage, will be receiving the Big Sur update[2].

1. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201624 2. https://www.apple.com/macos/big-sur-preview/ (at the bottom of the page)

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by ValentineC on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:10PM (#25002616)
> The support for MacBooks is actually great. Certain Late 2013 and Mid 2014 Retina MacBook Pros, while considered vintage, will be receiving the Big Sur update.

I think it's more likely that Apple's new frameworks don't require any fancy hardware features that aren't available in the Late 2013 MacBook Pros.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by diebeforei485 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:30PM (#25002799)
It's true that laptop computers have not changed as much over the years. This in large part because Intel CPU's and architecture have not changed as much, while iPhone CPU's have improved by leaps and bounds.

I wonder how much this might change when Apple Silicon comes to the Mac.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by snazz on Thursday November 05, 2020 @08:11PM (#25003874)
It feels like smartphones are stabilizing as well. I don't see myself needing to replace my iPhone 8 for a while, even though there have been three more generations afterwards. An iPhone 5 felt much more outdated at the time of the 6s/SE.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by diebeforei485 on Friday November 06, 2020 @03:45PM (#25010975)
Agreed - since 2017 the main improvements have been to the cameras, plus some improvements to efficiency, and (depending on your carrier) 5G.

I find 5G (coverage on mid-band, not the hyped speed on ultra-wideband) to be the most compelling reason to upgrade my phone this year.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by read_if_gay_ on Friday November 06, 2020 @05:01AM (#25006473)
Having owned a 5S, 6 plus, and now XR, the all screen design is a much bigger upgrade than iPhone 5 vs. 6S in my opinion.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jsjohnst on Thursday November 05, 2020 @10:43PM (#25004677)
> I think it's more likely that Apple's new frameworks don't require any fancy hardware features

Mojave and higher isn’t “supported” on the cheese grater Mac Pro’s despite it running more than fine, including with FileVault 2 enabled on the boot volume (which an Apple exec tried to claim was technically not possible).

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by miles on Friday November 06, 2020 @12:01AM (#25005047)
> Mojave and higher isn’t “supported” on the cheese grater Mac Pro

The 2010 and 2012 Mac Pros officially support Mojave with a compatible video card:

Install macOS 10.14 Mojave on Mac Pro (Mid 2010) and Mac Pro (Mid 2012) https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208898

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jsjohnst on Friday November 06, 2020 @07:07AM (#25007032)
Yeah, my sentence structure leaves a bit to be desired. The key there is including FileVault being enabled.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by mulmen on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:50PM (#25002957)
I have a Mid-2014 RMBP, there's nothing wrong with it at all. It's sad to think OS support may be dropped in the next few years.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jmnicolas on Friday November 06, 2020 @02:15AM (#25005674)
Yes, we're bombarded with guilt messages about us destroying the planet but even when we want to do the right thing there's no path available.

I have an old Samsung tablet that doesn't work anymore. I could try to change the battery for 20€ or buy the cheapest tablet on Amazon for 40€

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by chrisweekly on Thursday November 05, 2020 @06:32PM (#25003285)
Still rocking my maxxed-out 2012 mbp15r here.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by newman314 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @09:31PM (#25004319)
Ahem, rocking my 2009 MBP running Catalina =D

Although this appears to be the end of the line as there is no graphic acceleration support in Big Sur

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by swinglock on Friday November 06, 2020 @02:53AM (#25005876)
A range would be fair. For example "safe to use for 3-7 years" in the case of this phone by the sound of it.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jtbayly on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:59PM (#25001915)
No, because devices can be and sometimes are sold with software that is already out of date. The better indicator is how long software support is provided for a device from beginning to end.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by anamexis on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:25PM (#25002141)
Why is that a better indicator?

If I buy a new phone from the manufacturer and it's already unsupported, that's really bad. I don't care if it was supported for 8 years before I bought it.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Jtsummers on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:25PM (#25002145)
Hah. This bit us when I got my mother an iPhone SE (2016) to replace her iPhone 4 a year or so ago. I tried to restore from iCloud backup and it kept failing, and finally it dawned on me that the OS may have been out of date. Skipped the restore, updated the OS, and wiped the phone. The restore worked correctly.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by WrtCdEvrydy on Thursday November 05, 2020 @08:14PM (#25003897)
On the flip side, the Apple guys have a lot of patience to deal with my stubborn ass trying to activate an iPhone 4... the non-SIM servers were taken offline years ago so I popped in a SIM and off I went.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Dahoon on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:28PM (#25002168)
Sure but that doesn't change how long they supported after end of sale which wasn't in 2013 but at least until 2017. So ~3 years of software updates from end of sale. Still OK but not anything special.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by simonh on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:15PM (#25002672)
To not be special, there must be many phones out there getting the same or better support. What are they? Who sells these many other smartphones that have had 3 or more years of updates from last sale?

Certainly not the Pixel phones, they get 3 years support from first launch only, and they're supposedly the gold standard for Android software support. It's pretty much the reason they exist. Yet after last sale support for the 5S matched the Pixel's from launch support, and we don't even know that this is the last update the 5S will get.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by philistine on Thursday November 05, 2020 @07:24PM (#25003616)
You decided to count the days of support in a completely uncommon way that no one usually discusses but decided that three years was ok based on the common way people count, which is since initial release.

You can’t have your cake and eat it as well.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by als0 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:13PM (#25001520)
The 5S is still the perfect iPhone.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by bradlys on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:19PM (#25001565)
Well, let's not get crazy. It's fine (I'm using it currently because my Samsung S9 died) but it's definitely no perfect phone. It doesn't even have water resistance and the screen to body ratio is pretty bad, IMO.

Only upside is the thing is built in such a way that it has barely taken any damage from the years of abuse I put it through.

I'm likely getting an iPhone 12 Pro Max very soon and will continue to only use the iPhone 5S I've had since 2013 as a backup.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by radicaldreamer on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:47PM (#25002931)
You're going from a 5s to a Pro Max? That's almost a jump across product categories... like switching from an iPhone to an iPad Mini.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by philistine on Thursday November 05, 2020 @07:26PM (#25003626)
Or from a Commodore 64 to a first-generation iMac.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by silly-silly on Friday November 06, 2020 @01:14AM (#25005377)
I remember the first generation imac, but i dont remember them being that bad.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by samoa42 on Friday November 06, 2020 @04:23AM (#25006287)
> the screen to body ratio is pretty bad, IMO

if rated against _my_ body, the ratio is damn near perfect

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Tepix on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:16PM (#25001542)
If the 5S is perfect, what's the iPhone SE (2016)?
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by mikepurvis on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:11PM (#25002624)
I love the 5S form factor as well. I only updated from it earlier this year to get iOS 13 to use the COVID Alert app here in Canada (and my upgrade was buying a smashed-screen iPhone SE for next to nothing, of course, and swapping the old phone's screen onto it).
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by rosstex on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:33PM (#25001677)
My current phone.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by gumby on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:15PM (#25002054)
The price is definitely right -- cheaper than an upgrade!
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by CalChris on Thursday November 05, 2020 @08:28PM (#25003963)
What's in your back pocket? Seriously, love my SE. I just got the battery replaced, $49 taken from a MacBook trade-in value, so basically free since I can't use that money any other way.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by encom on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:12PM (#25002030)
The last iPhone with proper headphone support.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by saagarjha on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:25PM (#25001621)
Not chamfered :(
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jdhawk on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:58PM (#25001895)
sure they are, they're just matte finished.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by als0 on Monday November 16, 2020 @09:38AM (#25112133)
A replica.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by nbzso on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:24PM (#25001604)
The last iPhone that I use.:)
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Tepix on Sunday November 08, 2020 @04:32PM (#25029273)
I have one also. Love it as a secondary phone
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by ezekg on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:16PM (#25001545)
How do you still have one that's running OK? My Apple products almost always "die" after a few years. I had the 5S but one day it crashed and would not turn back on no matter what I did. The iPhone I had before that did the same thing.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by reaperducer on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:58PM (#25001894)
How do you still have one that's running OK? My Apple products almost always "die" after a few years.

Consider yourself unlucky and never buy a lottery ticket.

Apple is well-known for making products that last longer than most others in the industry.

I have a launch day iPhone 5 that gets daily use and still works fine as of this morning. Launch day was in September of 2012.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by snazz on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:25PM (#25001615)
Is that a common issue? I've certainly heard about devices losing battery life and cameras progressively getting worse, but complete death is very uncommon unless you use it without a case and drop it all the time or something.

I still have a working iPhone 5 (no S) with a home button that spins and a slightly broken screen bezel but no other issues.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by CuriousSkeptic on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:32PM (#25001673)
I have a 4S still running.

At one point I thought it died permanently. But it turned out to only be the screen dimming to much. In bright light it auto adjusted enough to be visible, allowing me to rise the brightness.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by wiredfool on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:40PM (#25001742)
I had a 5s die at one point, it got reset to the point where it needed to activate, and couldn’t.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by hbbio on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:04PM (#25002569)
The list of old Apple devices that still work well is impressive: I still have one original iPad, an iPhone 3GS, several iPhone 4. Same goes for the more recent ones, with the exception of the few devices that I dropped on hard floors over the last 10 years...
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by mattkevan on Thursday November 05, 2020 @06:28PM (#25003261)
Still have a first-generation iPod Touch running iOS 3. Works like a charm, can even download some apps from the App Store. Bit of a shock how both primitive and advanced the early versions of iOS were.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jmnicolas on Friday November 06, 2020 @02:19AM (#25005711)
I had an iPad 1 running iOS 5 I think, but in the end I stopped using it because Safari would "crash" on most websites due to it running out of ram I guess.

IIRC there's 128M of ram on the fist iPad.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by zimpenfish on Thursday November 05, 2020 @07:08PM (#25003501)
I have a 4S that's still running perfectly happily. Can't do much with it, mind, given that everything is wildly out of date but it may yet get repurposed as a webcam when I get some free time.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by JohnBooty on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:02PM (#25004769)
I believe you but I've honestly never heard of anybody suffering "random cellphone death" - Apple or otherwise. Everybody seems to break them or upgrade them long before that.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by fpoling on Friday November 06, 2020 @03:49AM (#25006101)
I had it with Nexus 5x. It died after 1.5 years when I used an app to get a train ticket. It turned out it was a known hardware bug judging by forums. It was in Norway so the phone was still under warranty and it was “repaired” - the motherboard was replaced. Still not much later I bought the original iPhone SE. I just did not like the idea of phone stopping working for no reason.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Tepix on Sunday November 08, 2020 @04:34PM (#25029287)
Yes, the 5X has a known nardware issue.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by wil421 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @06:43PM (#25003363)
I have an iPhone 3GS and an iPad 2 that still work. They are very slow and most apps don’t support their oses. I’d still have an iPhone 7 Plus if it wasn’t at the bottom of a river rapid. My wife has a white MacBook somewhere from 2009/10.

The only problem I’ve had was a 2011 MBP have a gpu issue.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by abawany on Thursday November 05, 2020 @07:04PM (#25003480)
I fired up an old 5S as a result of this post and was sad to find that it appears to be dead.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by chews on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:25PM (#25001618)
The 12 mini is gonna be my next daily driver.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by ChrisMarshallNY on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:57PM (#25001890)
Same here.

I write iOS software, so I have a whole bunch of test units.

My "low-end" test unit is an iPod Touch (last gen). Basically, a skinny SE (Apple doesn't even have an iPod simulator -you're supposed to use an SE sim).

My regular daily phone is an Excess Max (XSMax). I'm sick to death of it. I don't have much use for all that screen real estate, and it's a big honkin' monster.

Every time I use my Touch, it makes me envious.

I'll be placing an order for a Mini, tomorrow.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by texasbigdata on Thursday November 05, 2020 @07:22PM (#25003606)
Some YouTube gadget reviewers agree with you and predict some “revivals”.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by namanaggarwal on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:18PM (#25001554)
Also to Google for finding majority of them
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by curt15 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:22PM (#25001587)
If only Google could put this much effort into supporting its own Pixel devices, which stop getting updates to the base OS after just three years.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by dmitrygr on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:33PM (#25001685)
I promise you, people inside google are equally frustrated with this unjustifiable top-down decision. (am Xoogler)
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Polylactic_acid on Thursday November 05, 2020 @11:37PM (#25004941)
I know a google dev who says they wouldn't trust the security of an Android phone as far as they could throw it.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by silly-silly on Friday November 06, 2020 @01:17AM (#25005389)
I know an apple dev who thinks the same about their product, lol.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Shared404 on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:19PM (#25002093)
Depending on your usecase, GrapheneOS may be of interest.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jmnicolas on Friday November 06, 2020 @02:23AM (#25005727)
No support for Pixel 1, Pixel 2 are marked as obsolete, so I'm not sure it's better than Google as far as EOL is concerned.

https://grapheneos.org/releases

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Shared404 on Friday November 06, 2020 @02:11PM (#25010244)
Ah, I take it back then. It's been a little while since I looked at it.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Dahoon on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:29PM (#25002183)
>after just three years

The 5S was sold from Apple stores in India in mid 2017. So that's 3 years of updates from end-of-sale and this is an OS update for a 2 year old OS. So two years of support. Less than the Pixel.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by irae on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:36PM (#25002259)
When someone buy a 5S in 2017 they surely know already, or should, that it is a cheap buy to last less than a newer model. So 3 years in this case is actually a great deal.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by majormajor on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:43PM (#25002337)
I had a Pixel 1, launched in 2016, and it lost support in 2019. 3 years after start of sale, not end of sale.

It's part of why I went back to Apple.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by ponker on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:09PM (#25001490)
This is why Apple makes the cheapest smartphones, as long as you avoid dropping them.
[dead]
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by hokumguru on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:51PM (#25001821)
Wasn't the purpose of that throttling to extend the life of older phones? Throttling the CPU let them stay within the limits of the worn out battery and let the device continue to be used without crashing.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Y-bar on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:55PM (#25001865)
It was to extend the battery life, which was a workaround for the flawed battery design (contra CPU power draw). I bought an iPhone SE in the first month available and it started throttling by month 10, I'm not a battery designer, but I did not buy a device marketed as 2x the speed of 5S only for it to silently drop to 0.8x the speed of the 5S less than a year later.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by jeron on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:17PM (#25002069)
In which they had a whole year of really cheap, highly subsidized battery replacements to correct their error. I think Apple should be forgiven for this
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Y-bar on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:31PM (#25002214)
I was unable to benefit from the battery replacement due to a chip in the screen they discovered after I got a CS code to do it: https://i.imgur.com/Gr1bPTU.jpg
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by tdonovic on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:19PM (#25002710)
What is a CS code?
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by Y-bar on Thursday November 05, 2020 @05:39PM (#25002872)
Effectively a coupon code issued by a customer support representative.

Apple did not actually offer the replacement program within ~600km of my home, but I managed to convince them that an Apple Authorised Service provider in my town at least do it. They agreed and gave me a CS Code valid for the the battery replacement to be done.

But it was ultimately denied because of a tiny chip in the glass on the screen.

I really liked every other aspect of this phone though.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by reaperducer on Thursday November 05, 2020 @04:00PM (#25001921)
the flawed battery design

I'm going to play the odds and guess that you're not a battery designer.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by mikestew on Thursday November 05, 2020 @07:04PM (#25003481)
I wish they gave those odds in Vegas: OP said right there in their comment that they're not a battery designer. Now, granted, perhaps OP should have not run their fingers on the keyboard about topics they know little to nothing about...
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by wnevets on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:55PM (#25001861)
That may have been their public explanation after being caught throttling the hardware.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by thebruce87m on Saturday November 07, 2020 @07:19PM (#25021318)
You just need to look at the evidence:

* Only handsets with degraded batteries were throttled

* Replacing the battery returned the handset to full speed

* The only thing that changed after the fine was that you now have an option to stop the throttling and have unexpected reboots instead.

* All iPhones since then, including brand new iPhone 12s will throttle when the battery degrades.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by supernova87a on Thursday November 05, 2020 @08:04PM (#25003845)
This is just great, and you see why it's so hard to be a product manufacturer.

Not only does the person not understand why it was done, and that it produced a phone that would be functional for longer lifetime than if it hadn't been implement, but he also continues spreading unhelpful information to others.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by wnevets on Friday November 06, 2020 @01:19AM (#25005403)
>but he also continues spreading unhelpful information to others.

They were forced to pay over 500 Million Dollars for doing it

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by thebruce87m on Friday November 06, 2020 @12:22PM (#25009269)
They were forced to pay that for not saying that they were doing it.

The feature still exists today. The brand new iPhone 12 will do the same thing on a degraded battery.

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by supernova87a on Friday November 06, 2020 @06:08AM (#25006749)
That doesn't mean the penalty made sense.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by ponker on Thursday November 05, 2020 @06:49PM (#25003393)
I turned off this feature when they shipped the option and promptly turned it back on. I use Apple because they make reasonable decisions instead of requiring endless configuration, and they made the right decision here. The lawsuit feels like pure power politics... Apple can handle the cost, I don’t feel bad for them or anything, but I see it as a pure money grab rather than any culpability for Apple.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by wnevets on Friday November 06, 2020 @01:19AM (#25005409)
>I turned off this feature when they shipped the option and promptly turned it back on.

They didn't add that option until AFTER being caught

Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by ponker on Friday November 06, 2020 @04:39AM (#25006373)
I disagree with the framing suggested by the word “caught.” After they were sued, they shipped this option, I tried it, it sucks.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by wnevets on Friday November 06, 2020 @11:35AM (#25008872)
having to pay out over 500 Million Dollars says otherwise.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by RotANobot on Thursday November 05, 2020 @09:51PM (#25004420)
My 8 (or 10?) year old AppleTV just got an update today. I was excited because the YouTube app pause function stopped working after the previous update a couple of weeks ago. Alas the problem remains.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by gcheong on Thursday November 05, 2020 @03:56PM (#25001868)
Since this is a security update I think it’s more about support of an OS which is only 2 yrs old than the class of device as that class was supported with the initial iOS 12 release.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by evad3r on Thursday November 05, 2020 @06:04PM (#25003072)
I think it's more a testament to the length of time they support their devices for.
Re:About the security content of iOS 12.4.9 by PopsiclePete on Friday November 06, 2020 @11:36AM (#25008893)
This is what I try to explain when it comes to "why are you paying so much for Apple". Because when you buy a cheap Android phone from Xuoiamiaeoi or whatever, you get some custom crippled OS in god knows what ways in close to 0 long-term support from them.