Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by jauntywundrkind on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:18PM
(#50416717)
Funny you say that, I just started doing specs, planning for a river based compositor based on Niri & Umbriel. After mentioning the idea a couple months ago. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49093022
Umbriel is a Niri- like scrolling wm from the Noctalia devs, have really been enjoying it. But I do want something more configurable, easier to play with. And river certainly seems like the main go-to base for that.
Running Noctalia is a must for me. It's a great shell, from a great team. The v5 took a lot of lessons from the past & really spun a very elegant beautiful new user product with a great architecture. Great stuff, not to be missed imo. Happy convert from DMS too.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by nylonstrung on Sunday November 08, 2026 @04:04PM
(#50417236)
That's awesome, I'm excited to see what you come up with because Umbriel is definitely cool.
I def recommend studying that Triad project: it excites me because it represents the idea that if River had an extra layer on top of you'd have the WM customization potential that normally just comes with building a custom WM or compositor but through config and having Niri/Noctalia/DMS compatibility solved by default
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by silverbluep on Sunday November 08, 2026 @04:14PM
(#50417327)
When I moved from x to Wayland; I just moved from my bswpm setup to plasma because I couldn't get similar workflow that I set up in bspwm in either hyprland or sway. Then river entered my radar; but I think the development moved towards becoming a protocol rather than a WM. Nice to see river being used, might give this a try.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by irq-1 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:12PM
(#50416657)
It's made with Quickshell and "Quickshell is configured in QML, a simple language designed for creating flexible user interfaces." - https://quickshell.org/
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by m0op on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:16PM
(#50416707)
if you install it on top of gnome , the design of a show-apps gnome extension i made for myself which is android inspired would fit really nicely with this i think. https://github.com/y0av/cubby
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by jeffnash on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:17PM
(#50416712)
I was confused for a second, but turns out DMS rebranded the 'Dank' to 'Dux' a few weeks ago [1]. I've been running DMS + Niri for nearly a year now with no intentions of switching anytime soon. Given how often I've historically changed shells/DEs, this is the ricing equivalent to settling down, getting married, and having kids.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by drnick1 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:29PM
(#50418846)
Agreed, it's the only mainstream desktop with Windows 2000-era ergonomics, which I particularly like. I reluctantly use GNOME now for its better security.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by mahboi on Sunday November 08, 2026 @07:20PM
(#50419309)
Does KDE not have that? I don't know a lot about this and have just been using whatever DE comes default. GNOME 3 does seem like it's trying to be "different," kinda miss GNOME 2.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by mmh0000 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @07:29PM
(#50419378)
(I say this as someone whose been using KDE for nearly 20 years, and who LOVES KDE).
KDE is GREAT, if: you like tweaking and customizing things. The out-of-the-box KDE is lacking. It's like it wants to be a mix between GNOME's opinionated setup while giving you a lot of flexibility. This means, at least for me, KDE needs a lot of stuff "undone" to get it back to a usable point.
If you hate tweaking, and want something akin to the Win2k UI feel, XFCE will get you there effectively out of the box.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by epihelix on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:06PM
(#50420525)
KDE seems surprisingly decent now (I tried Plasma out the other day).
Personally, I'm still using Unity 7 on X11, but as that DE's project is now seemingly dead again, I keep looking for a replacement. This one also looks pretty interesting!
I would really like to find something that handles fractional scaling as efficiently as Unity/Compiz. That, the dash, and (I'm ashamed to admit) wobbly windows are what keep me using it.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by mariocesar on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:23PM
(#50416769)
I use it daily. There was a learning curve since I was used to GNOME Shell, but Niri and the ability to build my own widgets with QML ended up being the killer features for me. I've built several custom widgets and small apps, and I'm happy with my workflow
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by toddmorey on Sunday November 08, 2026 @03:27PM
(#50416815)
Currently running Noctalia and interested in anyone who has switched to Dux & can talk out pros and cons. Particularly interested in creating custom widgets.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by silverbluep on Sunday November 08, 2026 @04:11PM
(#50417299)
I was deciding between DMS and Noctalia; and noctalia's move away from quickshell due to resource usage made me decide on noctalia. But nice to see Dux developing.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by dkarvik on Sunday November 08, 2026 @04:48PM
(#50417679)
I'm always surprised by how beautiful these make Linux, but they also turn away from the minimalism I appreciate about my Linux desktop. I'm OK with pulling up a web browser to view the weather! I've historically used a variety of "bars", and being able to tailor them down to "only show me info X" has done wonders for my focus and comprehension.
I think it's great that the year of the Linux Desktop has come and is beautiful, but it's not for me.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by sysashi on Sunday November 08, 2026 @05:00PM
(#50417810)
Been using this and niri since the inception of both, 0 complaints, 0 maintenance. I had a period(s) of going completely crazy with customizations, tons of dot files, i3, bspwm, way (and other) bars, modules, all of it and I probably forgot 90% of it. and just suddenly I settled on these 2 and kept using it.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by ttytty on Sunday November 08, 2026 @05:20PM
(#50418021)
anyone have extended thoughts using this (DMS?) vs Noctalia? i’ve been running a Noctalia fork for like a year now and I’m quite happy with its development. easy to upstream PRs too!
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by loremdifr on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:52PM
(#50419056)
depends on when that fork happened. noctalia v5 moved away from quickshell and is way more performant and lightweight than DMS even if a bit more limited in what you can do
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by Pxtl on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:05PM
(#50418539)
How is it for resource use? I tried to make labwc+lxqt work for a low-gpu desktop to free up GPU for local LLM but lxqt is very not good without Openbox and I don't like switching back to X.
(I prefer KDE Plasma generally but it uses more GPU)
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by diabllicseagull on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:21PM
(#50418737)
I love what these shells do for the linux desktop, but on laptops it makes me bit concerned about battery life. The last time I checked out Dank Material Shell, I saw an impact on power consumption over vanilla Niri.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by Zambyte on Sunday November 08, 2026 @11:24PM
(#50421060)
Have there been any notable incidents where mistrusting a curl | sh was the cause? I hear people say not to do it way more than I hear people talking about actual incidents it's caused.
> Using an LLM to help write code is fine. Submitting its output unread is not.
> * You are responsible for every line you submit. You have read it, tested it, and can explain it in review.
> * Say in the PR when a meaningful part of the code was AI generated.
> * Write PR descriptions, issues, and comments yourself. No AI-written or AI-rewritten text. A few plain sentences in your own words beat a page of generated summary. PRs and issues with AI-written text get closed without review.
> ...
> * PRs that read like unreviewed output, with narrating comments, invented APIs, or style that ignores the file they are in, get closed without review.
That looks very clearly non-vibe coded to me. (Also, it's a mature project with 79 releases over the last year and a bit, and 321 contributors.)
As much as I respect the abilities of agentic coding LLMs, I don't think we're yet at the point that you could vibe-code a novel Wayland DE. This is not trivial stuff!
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by WD-42 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @10:42PM
(#50420801)
There’s a new vibe coded Wayland shell every week now. It’s actually unfortunate DMS renamed when they did. I saw this and assumed it was just another vibe coded abandonware without realizing what it was.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by OuterVale on Sunday November 08, 2026 @09:28PM
(#50420250)
I'm not saying you do this, but I do enjoy complaints about piping cURL to shell when so many people are giving LLMs full access to do whatever they want on their computers.
Sometimes they're the same people such at it is fun seeing the mental gymnastics to draw the line just under one's self.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by greatgib on Sunday November 08, 2026 @06:57PM
(#50419102)
It is so crazy how normal it looks that a random website suggest you to do a "curl -fsSL https://install.duxlabs.dev | sh" to install anything, and most people would stupidly do it without even thinking about it.
Someone coming from 10 to 15 years in a past would think that people are crazy now. And looks like that he would be right when you see the amount of vulnerabilities and stupid breaches like people being pawned just by doing an update with npm or so.
Re:Dux: Free, open-source Wayland desktop shell with file ma...
by hefner1456 on Sunday November 08, 2026 @07:30PM
(#50419383)
I have been using a pretty basic DWM I customized with the old #! Linux keybindings I love so much for years now. I have been very reluctant to change this setup but Wayland does seem much better these days. I feel I may need to switch up soon. Kinda feels like the end of an era lol.
I've been wanting to try Noctalia with this River-based multi-paradigm compositor (which supports DMS) https://github.com/greenm01/triad
Umbriel is a Niri- like scrolling wm from the Noctalia devs, have really been enjoying it. But I do want something more configurable, easier to play with. And river certainly seems like the main go-to base for that.
Running Noctalia is a must for me. It's a great shell, from a great team. The v5 took a lot of lessons from the past & really spun a very elegant beautiful new user product with a great architecture. Great stuff, not to be missed imo. Happy convert from DMS too.
I def recommend studying that Triad project: it excites me because it represents the idea that if River had an extra layer on top of you'd have the WM customization potential that normally just comes with building a custom WM or compositor but through config and having Niri/Noctalia/DMS compatibility solved by default
[1] https://duxlabs.dev/blog/v2-0-release
KDE is GREAT, if: you like tweaking and customizing things. The out-of-the-box KDE is lacking. It's like it wants to be a mix between GNOME's opinionated setup while giving you a lot of flexibility. This means, at least for me, KDE needs a lot of stuff "undone" to get it back to a usable point.
If you hate tweaking, and want something akin to the Win2k UI feel, XFCE will get you there effectively out of the box.
Personally, I'm still using Unity 7 on X11, but as that DE's project is now seemingly dead again, I keep looking for a replacement. This one also looks pretty interesting!
I would really like to find something that handles fractional scaling as efficiently as Unity/Compiz. That, the dash, and (I'm ashamed to admit) wobbly windows are what keep me using it.
Rather, I couldn't imagine using a closed source one.
(We're talking three decades ago now)
KDE: The Documentary — The Story of Free Software Underdogs
https://youtu.be/1Vyzla9mx4g
It also just added official support for atomic distros like Bazzite; it was previously kind of an annoying gap given the popularity of those distros.
Plus, dux is the person who came top of the class.
It's been turning into a very complete desktop env for a while now, surprising it doesn't get talked about more. Glad to see it get exposure on HN.
I think it's great that the year of the Linux Desktop has come and is beautiful, but it's not for me.
https://denialwm.org/mobile
(I prefer KDE Plasma generally but it uses more GPU)
I assume this project is all vibe-coded?
You know what happens when you assume, right?
https://github.com/duxlabs-dev/dux-shell?tab=contributing-ov...
Quoting in part from that:
> Using an LLM to help write code is fine. Submitting its output unread is not.
> * You are responsible for every line you submit. You have read it, tested it, and can explain it in review.
> * Say in the PR when a meaningful part of the code was AI generated.
> * Write PR descriptions, issues, and comments yourself. No AI-written or AI-rewritten text. A few plain sentences in your own words beat a page of generated summary. PRs and issues with AI-written text get closed without review.
> ...
> * PRs that read like unreviewed output, with narrating comments, invented APIs, or style that ignores the file they are in, get closed without review.
That looks very clearly non-vibe coded to me. (Also, it's a mature project with 79 releases over the last year and a bit, and 321 contributors.)
As much as I respect the abilities of agentic coding LLMs, I don't think we're yet at the point that you could vibe-code a novel Wayland DE. This is not trivial stuff!
Sometimes they're the same people such at it is fun seeing the mental gymnastics to draw the line just under one's self.
Someone coming from 10 to 15 years in a past would think that people are crazy now. And looks like that he would be right when you see the amount of vulnerabilities and stupid breaches like people being pawned just by doing an update with npm or so.
Eg https://hn.algolia.com/?q=curl+sh