carlob
carlob on Hacker News
Nah, the point of journalism is also commentary, opinion, satire, not just correct info.
> schools
not sure if this is sarcasm or if you've been living under a rock for the past month.
> Stop getting your business/economic news from BlueSky/reddit.
And where should they get them? From Twitter?
Maybe I don't understand exactly what you are saying, but if I do: there is a fundamental difference between Gypsies and homeless people, you are born a gypsy by no fault of your own, but most people are not born homeless. As such racism towards Gypsies is far more heinous because you could have any education, profession, income, housing situation you'll always stay a Gypsy and face the same prejudice, whereas you can (somewhat) more easily stop being homeless.
Now we could have a discussion on whether being poor is a choice or a consequence of societal inequality, but I think more people agree on racism here...
still less tedious than ads or no background play
can someone figure out the right invocation of defaults write to script it? I think it would be pretty ironic if that same person used an LLM to achieve it :)
so Australia is in Europe, but Spain, the Netherlands and Ireland are not?
> Although, no joke, a lot of peoples first reaction is: "They need to compete in Eurovision first. Otherwise they should wait for Australia to join first."
What? First time I hear of this. Honestly, Eurovision doesn't really have anything to do with the EU. We all know the main sponsor is from a non-EU country whose participation is much more controversial than Canada anyway.
I don't think killing people solves world hunger, we already produce enough food to feed everyone, it's just not evenly distributed.
and that has definitely improved everybody's experience at concerts /s
The fact that corporations have more privacy rights than people is dystopian.
A great example of this triad is driving a car: many people choose to do so every day and a small but not insignificant fraction of them will die because of it.
> Nobody is forcing people to risk their lives to infringe on other people's rights.
Except poverty, ignorance, hunger, addiction, untreated mental illness...
Or you could have a society with a welfare safety net or even viable forms of transportation other than a private car. It appears that places where that happen also tend to have much lower crime rates as an added benefit.
let's set aside for a second the fact that this is not how things work, but you are off by an order of magnitude
EDIT: parent comment was edited: it used to say $15
...on openai request to spin up some critihype
a non-peer-reviewed preprint with an high schooler as the first author is the best citation you can come up with?
at this point I'm just confused whether you are talking about north korea or the us
> trying to stay cool
FTFY
I'm pretty sure no Marxist considers Piketty a fellow Marxist, he's much closer to social democracy and Keynes. Piketty advocates for market economy and a global capital tax, Marxists on the other hand advocate for the violent overthrowing of capitalism and collective ownership of the means of production. Can you spot the difference?
500 TB/25 GB = 20.000
if some have more than one layer it could fewer but that's the order of magnitude
Sweden is one of the countries with the lowest salary inequality in the world. In Eastern Europe 100k a year puts you at what 10x minimum wage? I think that would be considered a pretty high salary in France or Spain as well. I think your friend reaction is warranted, but I don't think it would happen often in Sweden...
I'm curious: I do cycle in jeans and a t-shirt while in the city. Up to 45 minutes I'm perfectly fine, but if I'm on the saddle for over one hour I really start to miss the chamois. What's your experience with that?
> 'war'
> anytime a person in power feels like assassinating a leader or taking out a dissident
I don't really see much of a difference nowadays
Right, it says exclusive rights, which does not translate to "we siphon everything and you get a tiny percentage of our profits", it means I can choose to say no to all of this. To me the matter of compensation and that of authorship rights are mostly orthogonal.
> What have Governments ever created except for laws that stifle innovation/progress every single time?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qc7HmhrgTuQ
In all seriousness without the government you would have no innovation and progress, because it's the public school system, functioning roads, research grants a stable and lawful society that allow you to do any kind of innovation.
Apart from that, you have answered to a strawman. I said redistribute, not give to the government. I explicitly worded things that way because I don't think we should not be having a discussion on policy.
I think we are moving to an economy where the share of profits taken by capital becomes much larger than the one take from labor. If that happens then laborers will have very little discretionary income to fuel consumption and even capitalists will end up suffering. We can choose to redistribute now or wait for it to happen naturally, however that usually happens in a much more violent way, be it hyperinflation, famine, war or revolution.
Why settle on some private agreement between creators and ai companies where a tiny percentage is shared, let's just tax the hell out of AI companies and redistribute.
The 'long' code for checking apples is shorter, but it's missing the external for loop. So I guess you could say it's not (ahem) an apples to apples comparison.