Even seemingly simple issues can turn into never ending money pits that consume thousands of hours of your life spread over months or years.

If you’re really committed to something then you should evaluate how much time and money you’re willing to put into pursuing it. Unless both of those values are uncomfortably high numbers, just move on.

I think I have uploaded a hackernews post about the documentary about patent trolls but it of course didn't get any traction but its still worth a watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4NIFzG8NcU

I don't know if I agree that that is correct every single time, but it strikes me as a very useful heuristic at the least.

Danny DeVito

My wife is a lawyer so I collect amusing statements about them ;-)

We're already all dead in geologic time. Make the biggest ripples in the pond.

I think we're just trying to keep busy on this lonely planet amist all these stars.

At the end, the only thing that ever matters is the good we tried to do and the love we shared between ourselves and strangers.

But even this doesn't matter. If all goes to dust, even the good we do or the love we share. If we do evil, or if we hate the strangers, it makes no difference. We might as well do that if it satisfies us.

This whole thread is a question for a lawyer.

But for real...just change the name of your project. It sucks, but the ruling was handed down, you lost the dispute.

Nobody's going to mind that the name changed. Firefox used to be called Firebird and changed due to trademark disputes. Dozens of open source projects have changed their names when they forked off of a corporate project, like LibreOffice and MariaDB.

I know that OP may be fond of the name but it's just a name.

It was first called Phoenix, then a trademark dispute forced them to rebrand to Firebird, then a trademark dispute forced them off that name too. Firefox was the third public name for that project. I'm surprised they didn't also get sued by Clint Eastwood[1] and have to change again.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_(film)

Attachment is discontent.

- Dune, the gom jabbar's test for humanity

Julian Bashir: "It's not your fault things are the way they are."

Lee: "Everybody tells themselves that. And nothing ever changes."

Bashir's statement is a true one, made out of compassion. Lee's statement is almost comically/logically/obviously false in a real Universe, unless you're in a fictional TV series designed to not ever change. Except of course for the plot arc, which again, true to Bashir's statement is not anyone's fault.

Maybe. For me at least, the art is in what you choose to value in different contexts, rather than in absolute terms. Thinking about this specific case, I might value my own peace of mind, money, and time much more highly than justice or retribution.

Other times, something we value is taken from us and living in the past, spending our days wishing for it, etc. can prevent us from "moving on". It can become an anchor or baggage.

For my part, I feel that there's value in critically examining parts of your life and deciding what really matters. If something matters, fight for it. If it turns out something didn't, or it doesn't any more, let it go so you can make room in your life for more important things.

To ignore something means choosing not to notice, acknowledge, or respond to it — even though you’re aware it exists.

Peace is a perfectly valid option for people to pick. If they can master it, they can weather any depredation the world throws at them. Which may be many if society continues to slip slide into fascism.

However I believe most good things in the world came at the behest of violence - again not necessarily physical, but at minimum people sacrificing personal peace. Woman's suffrage, black suffrage in America, the civil rights act, LGBT rights in the UK, the overthrow of the kmt military dictatorship in Taiwan. Endless examples.

I'm still thinking about this all the time, I wrote about it a while back: https://blog.calebjay.com/posts/accept-or-reject/

Absolutely. I would further assert that path of least resistance is very often not the right one. The art, as I think you imply, is in "knowing" when to pick up a fight and persist, vs. when not.

I think you're right on this, and if I implied it I think it's because that's where my thoughts have been heading without me realizing it.

When I wrote that blog post I was still in a mindset of "expend maximum effort at all costs." A new review strategy of my day to day and month to month life made me realize that this way of doing things wasn't making me more effective, just leading to peaks and troughs.

I've recently accepted that energy is a finite resource that needs to be recharged. Practically, that meant I needed to figure out what costs my energy and what renews it, and as I plan my days and weeks, schedule around this paradigm.

I think my activism is one of those things that's trickier because it energizes to an extent because it actualizes my values, but also it's tremendously energy draining because it takes time and huge amounts of willpower to do any given action - like overcoming my poor local language ability and nervousness to confront an illegally parked car blocking pedestrians.

So that's another aspect of this peace vs violence dynamic you've got me thinking about in a new light - yes, you need to choose your battles, if nothing else temporaly so you can put the battle at a time you'll have the energy to deal with it.

Maybe, just maybe, it's time for the greedy rich to let go.

Besides money and hours, it will also affect your psychological wellbeing as it will dominate your mind every day.

Not worth it.

We met her ex once randomly on the street, and the first thing he asked was if she was still in her lawsuit.

Since the other part in the lawsuit lived in another part of the same house, you became paranoid about whether they would hear what you said through the walls, and you would be made painfully aware of the conflict every morning on the way to work.

It felt like a curse.

I would never wish for anyone to end up in a lawsuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5XfYTgm4x8 (that’s only part of a longer scene, where he basically tells the guy not to proceed).

If you’re up against a behemoth, figure out how to get out ASAP.

But I’ve learned that small claims lawsuits can actually be quite fun! Earlier this year I sued a former landlord in small claims court. He had entered my rented space while I was away (without notice, multiple times) and then refused to return my security deposit when I moved out.

I went into it with a “let’s have fun and learn” attitude. I had never sued someone and I’d never represented myself in court. I read a lot, had some good conversations with LLMs (and then fact-checked them!) about the laws and case history in my area, then filed my suit.

After he dodged the summons three times, I discovered I could file a motion for alternative service (post on his front door, post in a newspaper, etc). When I went to court to argue for that motion, he actually showed up in court! So I asked the judge if he could be served right there, and he was!

Our trial was highly entertaining, I caught him in a bald-faced lie, then looked at the judge and said I’m not sure how both of these things he said could be true, I can’t figure out how it adds up but maybe you can.

I won the case, the judge awarded me less than I was asking for, but more than I was actually owed.

I was kinda hoping he would not pay (that’s common) in which case I was looking forward to learning about how to garnish his wages or put a lien on his property. But he’s actually paying me in monthly installments for the next very many months. He could pay me all at once so he’s being a bit of a jerk, but at least he’s paying.

All-in-all, I knew I had a solid case, had fun along the way, and didn’t spend more than a few bucks on court fees. In that specific context, it made sense for me and I’m happy I did it.

> So I made my landlord pay me rent, with the help of some LLMs....

If he has assets to his name and the action was against him, I don’t see him doing that. In most countries you can hire private recovery, so the process will be very fast to collect.

I’ll admit enjoying my newfound knowledge. I’m not actively looking to be litigious, but it’s great to know I’m ready if it comes to that again.

On a more practical note, the whole process was lengthy, but very clear and fair. We have a justice system, someone committed fraud against me, so I turned the cranks on the machine and got some justice. fwiw, I was also mentally prepared to lose, and learn what I did wrong if that happened. Not being too emotionally attached to a legal situation is a very good policy.

Nice job anyway, and an interesting read. Let's hope he'll be more honest hereafter (although I doubt it)

I paid with my time. If I was sour about it, I might say “that’s time I’ll never get back”, but I consider it a wonderful learning experience and time well spent.

I'm happy it worked out for you, and that you had fun doing it. I could imagine going your route.

But for most people, sifting through legal papers and preparing for court is neither enjoyable nor affordable.

There was a case before mine, an elderly couple swindled by a landscaper who took a bunch of money, did a tiny bit of crappy work, then disappeared.

Landscaper didn’t show up at trial and they won a default judgement; but good luck collecting from a ghost.

It took 4 years of legal process before he saw a penny as the other party tried to wriggle out of everything... even so far as fake lawyers and wrongly claiming to have moved out (which the judge did not look to kindly upon).

Recently he received a cheque for the remaining balance - 8yrs after he sent his first letter by registered post which is the first step in a small claims court.

And then the loser may request a next level court to consider the case, potentially leading to more stressful years and a lot of additional financial risk.

Sounds like it was maybe about custody for children?

Then it is hard to walk away, I think. What to do, if the other party does not cooperate and you still want to see your children?

Best advice for both sides still is obviously, avoid the need for lawyers in the first place and maintain basic level of communication.

You may get more attention this way, because it can affect the company more than the optics of a legal dispute. It’s not revenge, and you shouldn’t have that intent, if you want it to work.

However this method, and other similar methods used in the U.S. such as filing BBB complaints, are mostly used for harm done to consumers rather than businesses affected by disputes, so it may not be the best advice.

Ironically this HN post will probably be higher in search results for their name.

OP it looks like the company is French -- maybe try contacting their local elected representative? Open by stating you are not a constituent, but worried about the impact to their district if the dispute is not handled well.

In parallel, reach out to a local library in Paris and state that you're looking for pro-bono trademark law assistance.

I used to work in public policy, and you'd be surprised how one or both of these methods can yield results.

This is the best advice you can get.