News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by Freak_NL on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:29AM (#41529172)
> If you sell your body, most societies will punish you. Thats [sic] fine, […]

How is that 'fine'?

I would like to see a future where someone doing sex work to make ends meet (or even as a freely chosen profession!) is not ostracised for it. Sex is part of society whether you want it or not, and so is paying for sexual acts.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by bad_user on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:43AM (#41529266)
I would like to see a future where people shouldn't have to prostitute themselves to make ends meet.

Some cultural norms are outdated, but prostitution is still degrading and dangerous for those practicing it, especially for the women; who may not be doing so willingly, prostitution being the main incentive for human trafficking. And the online medium doesn't change that by much.

Some people may be willing to pay for sex, some people are willing to pay for many other things or activities that should be or are illegal.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by Freak_NL on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:02AM (#41529394)
Sex work will never go away. The only way forward is to make sure it can be done safely and legally.

Consider the sex workers who deal with mentally or physically disabled adults. Most people have sexual urges, and those who are unable to participate in society in the usual way of addressing their urges with a romantic partner or a one-night stand still have them. There are a good number of very professional sex workers out there who can provide these people with sex (often with specific expertise for the relevant handicaps) and generally significantly improve the wellbeing.

Are those sex workers doing something they shouldn't be doing?

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by seper8 on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:49AM (#41530291)
Would you be happy if your daughter was a sex worker?

Think honestly about what this means for your view on this.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by paulryanrogers on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:54AM (#41530796)
If she's safe, successful, healthy, and doing it of her own free will then why not be happy?
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by Freak_NL on Friday September 13, 2024 @09:39AM (#41531182)
That would depend entirely on her circumstances. Is she a professional helping disabled people like my example above? That's laudable. A self-employed dominatrix with a select clientele? Sounds lucrative. A popular OnlyFans starlet just making some money on the side during her studies? Clever. Participating in explicit forms of BDSM porn? If she does so of her own volition, with the consent of all parties involved, for a fair pay and without lasting harm? Cool as long as she's working with professionals with a good reputation.

In all of those cases I would council her to the best of my abilities on safety and long-term planning, if she'd let me. And of course, as any parent, I would worry about her safety. But hey, I'd worry if she went paragliding or mountain climbing too.

Honestly, I would be more disappointed if she became a lawyer in the pocket of, say, Amazon or AirBnB. Or a politician for some extreme right political party.

Would I be happy if she was a sex worker in some seedy part of town with a pimp hovering over her? Of course not. But that is not dismissive of sex work as such, rather of exploitation and coercion. All of the examples above avoid that.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by standardUser on Friday September 13, 2024 @12:40PM (#41532840)
Well said, and unnecessarily downvoted for such a thoughtful comment.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by AshamedCaptain on Friday September 13, 2024 @10:08AM (#41531420)
Would I be happy if after the education I paid my daughters they decide to work in public sanitation?

Think honestly about it. Do you think I have anything against sanitation employees?

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by GreenWatermelon on Friday September 13, 2024 @11:25AM (#41532088)
Bad comparison.

Public sanitation workers keep our society functioning, they're a cornerstone of civilization.

Online prostitution, on the other hand, ranges from providing 0 value, to extreme negative consequences, such as the current porn addiction epidemic, or the loneliness epidemic.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by AshamedCaptain on Saturday September 14, 2024 @03:10PM (#41542068)
The GP, trying to show how 'bad' profession A was, was making the argument that the average HN reader would look badly on his progeny participating in profession A. I simply made the argument that the average HN reader would also look badly on his progeny doing profession B. Obviously, my point is not to throw shit on profession B but rather show that GP's argument simply does not work.

The fact that you think profession B > A only reinforces my point and shows, precisely, that GP's argument does not work.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by lupusreal on Friday September 13, 2024 @02:03PM (#41533555)
Your moral compass is truly fucked. One makes a mess of their own life and contributes to making a mess of many other lives. The other cleans up messes.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by medo-bear on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:58AM (#41529662)
> Are those sex workers doing something they shouldn't be doing?

You are asking a binary question for which there isn't a binary answer. Better to ask are those sex workers doing something they will get a pat on their backs for from other members of society? In a way a builder, chef, firefighter, and even a prison guard would.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by paulryanrogers on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:50AM (#41530304)
Perhaps the lack of a "pat on the back" is society's fault.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by swagasaurus-rex on Friday September 13, 2024 @12:54PM (#41532978)
Why? it’s so easy to make content
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by paulryanrogers on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:57PM (#41535967)
Well folks appreciate different things and to different degrees. Some are born with natural talents and others work hard for it. Regardless, folks generally get at least some respect for doing the work to produce things others appreciate. Stigmatizing OF work seems unfair when so much praise is heaped on creators and workers of all other kinds.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by medo-bear on Saturday September 14, 2024 @04:29AM (#41538364)
It is not unfair if it clashes with cultural values. It is like coming to HN, going against the majority sentiment, and expecting likes
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by medo-bear on Friday September 13, 2024 @02:03PM (#41533549)
For what? For opening your legs and getting paid for it? Without criminals and sleezy execs as clients prostitution would cease to exist. The edge cases mentioned before are tiny
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by huuhee3 on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:02AM (#41529678)
I would like to see a future where people shouldn't have to do any work they don't enjoy to make ends meet. As far as I can see, working fast food (and many other badly paid service jobs) is not much different from prostitution, except in that there is no social stigma attached, and you earn much less.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by TeMPOraL on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:01AM (#41530002)
> but prostitution is still degrading

Why? Especially compared to e.g. advertising/marketing? At least in the former case, all parties to the transaction are there voluntarily, for an honest, mutually beneficial exchange of value.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by mgaunard on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:20AM (#41529475)
It's not "to make ends meet". OF work allows people with no skills to get income in line with the top 10th or even 1st percentile of the population.

Would you rather be flipping burgers all day for 30k or would you rather take a few nudes every week and make 300k?

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by beaglesss on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:09AM (#41529724)
I wouldn't be surprised to find out an absurd fraction of those 300k is just straight up money laundering. Who is actually gonna be able to verify the value of someone allegedly showing their tits to a whale at 3am? The fact this all passed through traditional financial networks with a clean and reportable earnings report at the end is just pure gold.

OF is like the wet dream of a drug dealer or whoever else with a baby momma and some kind of scam/fraud/counterfeit operation.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by djtango on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:25AM (#41529810)
I agree with what you say but we know enough about youtubers and mobile gaming to safely assume that the numbers in this space are wild. I remember on Pewdiepie's first ever charity YouTube stream he was printing thousands per second via donos
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by TeMPOraL on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:57AM (#41529981)
But you can't compare with top performers in a power law / winner-takes-all setting. Comparing random youtubers or OF-ers to PewDiePie is like comparing the guy owning a fruit stand down the street to Jeff Bezos. Owns business, owns business; the same thing, right?
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by djtango on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:11AM (#41530435)
I agree that power laws are in play, but 1000 subs paying $10 a month is already a six figure income and 1000 users isn't a big number on the internet, especially when as TFA mentions you can go on reddit and advertise cosplays on subs that have audiences in the millions
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by TeMPOraL on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:16AM (#41530479)
1000 users isn't a big number. 1000 paying users is.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by toyg on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:50AM (#41529934)
Who would have thought that all those big numbers in TV deals were actually underestimated by the billions. The general public is even more desperate/gullible than we ever considered possible. And OF and YT are just the beginning.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by lotsofpulp on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:23AM (#41530132)
Source? Like all entertainment sold with near zero marginal cost, why should only fans work also not follow an extreme power law formula for compensation.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by achenet on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:35AM (#41529563)
> prostitution is still degrading and dangerous for those practicing it, especially for the women;

degrading: no. I've met prostitutes who very much like their work and find it empowering

dangerous: ...yes, because it's illegal and they don't have access to proper legal protection.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by medo-bear on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:54AM (#41529647)
> degrading: no. I've met prostitutes who very much like their work and find it empowering

It is called delusion

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by ath3nd on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:47AM (#41530735)
> It is called delusion

It's, of course, much better and far less delusional, to go flipping burgers for $30k which barely covers your housing, less alone food.

Or to go to the military to lose an arm and a leg, defending a just cause, of course.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by beaglesss on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:45AM (#41529280)
Society accepting sex work is the worst thing that can happen to sex workers. They can have their cake and eat it right now -- not terribly illegal in the west but shunned which limits competition.

When it becomes fine, it will be worth no more than someone coming to mow your lawn, and probably less than that.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by mgaunard on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:22AM (#41529485)
There are many countries in the west where prostitution is legal and taxed like any other activity.

It seems the main complain is that it brings the prices down due to competition from eastern europe.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by ithkuil on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:56AM (#41529359)
Wouldn't that put at least some pressure into pursuing other options (like mowing somebody's lawn)?
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by ithkuil on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:58AM (#41529365)
Wouldn't that be an incentive towards other career paths (such as mowing lawns)?

EDIT: brace for the lawn mowing cartels led by ex human trafficking gangs. On a more serious note, there is so much criminality involved in that field precisely because it's illegal and lucrative. You remove that and you remove a lot of abuse.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by ptsneves on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:00AM (#41529389)
Wow i never thought of that! I love this reasoning (no sarcasm intended!). Based on supply/demand, the lack of social acceptance leads to low supply which in turn makes sure the price matches the moral cost. I honestly wished it was not (considered) degrading and just as acceptable as any hospitality service, although in my culture it is indeed immoral to take or provide sex services. Even so if it still is degrading indeed there should be a matching cost, but damn economics is a tricky one.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by lennxa on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:02AM (#41530376)
not treating sex workers like crap doesnt mean they'll make lesser. one must also consider the monetary equivalents of the mental health of the worker. and the demand will increase by a lot too.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by amelius on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:53AM (#41529339)
It's fine because otherwise we'd evolve into the social structure of Bonobo monkeys, where every problem is solved with sex.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by prmoustache on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:01AM (#41529675)
> where every problem is solved with sex.

Would it be a problem?

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by sulandor on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:56AM (#41529974)
obviously better than fighting
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by zakki on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:22AM (#41530520)
Yes. Till this day Bonobo has no invention.

Do you like this kind of society?

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by prmoustache on Friday September 13, 2024 @09:16AM (#41530976)
Well it depends what kind of society brings the most happiness out of our lives.

I can't say, I have never lived as a Bonobo.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by ath3nd on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:53AM (#41530785)
One could argue that it's better to have no inventions than inventing the following:

- the Spanish inquisition

- jihad/crusades

- guns

- PFAS

- agent orange

- iron maiden (not the band, the torture device)

- the atomic bomb

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by Der_Einzige on Friday September 13, 2024 @12:33PM (#41532784)
This is exactly what everyone means by “return to monke”
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by sheepdestroyer on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:31AM (#41529542)
Not following why that, if true, would make the current situation better ("fine").
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by smolder on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:15AM (#41529760)
> Sex is part of society whether you want it or not, and so is paying for sexual acts.

Yes, and this seems to be a discussion of whether people want it or not. I don't think paid sex acts ruin the world. Some people probably need it in place of real intimacy, for their own mental health. I still think it's generally scummy and unproductive. Then again, I think all sorts of businesses can be described that way. Snake oil has been killing it for as long as commerce has been around. Another example: if you go around gutting productive companies to line your own pockets, e.g. buying & dismantling competitors to stop competition, I see that as a greater moral failing than baiting lonely people with sex appeal.

It's common that people forget or fail to understand that business is a way to cooperatively shape life into something desirable, and instead see it as a way to win at others expense.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by lynx23 on Friday September 13, 2024 @04:36AM (#41529212)
Thats also fine. You can "like to see" everything you want. Question is, what the rest of society believes. Oldest bussiness and all that, I am actually on your side. But that doesn't mean I can ignore what overall society feels and thinks. Besides, there is a difference between consuming payed sex, and having a relationship with a (ex) sex worker. The difference is quite huge.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by medo-bear on Friday September 13, 2024 @05:46AM (#41529605)
I would certainly not like to live in a future where selling your body to make ends meet is considered normal. To me it is already concerning that normalization of prostitution is happening to some extent in mass media.

Sex is in all (?) human cultures viewed as most intimate and private expression of civilized love. It is also how we teach our kids about sex. Pornography and prostitution serve only our primal desires which goes against all this. Does it really surprise you that society will shun people that partake in these things? To me it is obvious as day.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by kwhitefoot on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:43AM (#41530251)
We all have to sell ourselves in order to live. I'm sure that there are plenty of people working at jobs that they thoroughly dislike. Shouldn't we concentrate on making sure that people really have a choice rather than on discriminating against people who make a choice?
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by medo-bear on Friday September 13, 2024 @01:59PM (#41533523)
Discrimination against people making the wrong choices is natural. Discriination against people repenting for the wrong choices is wrong
[dead]
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by sulandor on Friday September 13, 2024 @06:58AM (#41529988)
probably that sex has little negative externalities and hence criminalizing it is not right
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by mihaic on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:00AM (#41529993)
If you want to take purely moral grounds, there's nothing to make prostitution or Onlyfans "wrong", except if done with exploitation. At the same time, it contributes to the demographic crysis, and if you care about results, you have to put pressure against the lifestyles that are nudging people away from starting a family and having kids.

Drug dealers are also part of society, yet we still frown upon them.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by I-M-S on Friday September 13, 2024 @07:14AM (#41530073)
An individual has no obligation to respect a societal order that doesn't respect them back.
Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by mihaic on Friday September 13, 2024 @08:38AM (#41530658)
Why do you say that? Most individuals that aren't respected by society had that respect, yet lost it through some action (like dealing drugs).

I think we're seeing things in different frameworks, and I'm considering the end result more important than the principles here. If you don't accept that some seemingly individual decisions have a cumulated effect on society long-term, and that shaming is the only mechanism to make changes here, there really is no discourse possible.

Re:Breaking Down OnlyFans' Economics by matrix87 on Friday September 13, 2024 @09:45PM (#41536846)
> I would like to see a future where someone doing sex work to make ends meet

It's better to have a future where people don't have to do SW to make ends meet

A future where more people get forced into sex work because of economic reasons is not desirable. Consider the diseases, conflict with cultural norms, potential for rape and abuse

Sex should be freely given. "Free laborers" aren't freely giving their labor, they're forced to for economic reasons