During Canada’s Rogers outage in 2022:
> In Toronto there was some dependency on Rogers. One quarter of all traffic signals relied on their cellular network for signal timing changes. The Rogers GSM network was also used to remotely monitor fire alarms and sprinklers in municipal buildings. Public parking payments and public bike services were also unavailable.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Rogers_Communications_o...
As it was summer, I recall some park programming for kids had to be cancelled because the employees were required to have a phone capable of calling 9-1-1 (but sounds like that at least still worked here)
Their ops are critical enough you'd expect better from them.
Not the kind of shortcut Canadian banking takes for core stuff.
Unfortunately they failed to notice that this was a reseller for Rogers lines.
Offline road maps are subject to construction/seasonal/holiday route closures/deviations too, and so is transit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assisted_GNSS
Edit: You can think of it as a CDN for the GPS almanac.
My Garmin watch gets a GPS lock in way less than 5 minutes without any cellular connection.
I think that because Huami/Amazfit/Xiaomi smartwatches already do that. We know this from reverse engineering efforts in Gadgetbridge, but support for Garmin is still new and so there isn't as much info about it; either way it probably works in the same way.
If the receiver has recently (last few days) gotten a fix and hasn't moved too much from that fix, it'll be in at least warm start mode. It still needs to download ephemeris data, but this usually takes 30ish seconds to fix.
If the receiver has seen a fix very recently (last few hours) or a recent network connection, it can fix from hot start like you saw, which only takes a few seconds and may not even be observably slow depending on how the system is implemented. Phones go to great lengths to minimize the apparent latency.
https://www.bevhoward.com/TripMate.htm (Not me)
Back then, just getting a GPS fix at all was exciting. Then driving around with it propped on the dashboard or rear window.
It's not as simple as you think.
I have Google offline maps downloaded for areas I end up in just in this case. Gotta do traffic rerouting the old fashioned way though.
Or have an old-school GPS map thingy in your glovebox.
(Also have kiwix and a whole archive of Wikipedia on my phone).
I wonder if meshtastic communicators sales took off during this. How’s LoRa traffic these days?
You click a few buttons to download OSM tiles and then it does routing. The latest OSM even has a decent amount of stores, restaurants, etc., listed.
Thankfully I’m in Canada where it’s not impossible to end up in the sticks with no service.
Chewing through your handful of gigabytes/month of data wasn’t hard. Only in the past year or so have double digit gigabyte/month data plans become cost-effective.
And our roaming prices are extortionate, so for jaunts over the border (or internationally), I’ll sometimes go “naked”.
Do they? I know there are a lot of old units out there but I figure people would have tossed them.
At least I’ve found Waze has been pretty good at starting off with wifi and loading the map of the whole journey after coverage was lost with some resilience for stops/detours.
But even if it doesn’t, there are a ton of offline map apps that use OpenStreetMap data.
You can also install Organic Maps on your phone.
I make sure to have this around my usual area and anytime I travel to an area with poor coverage, plus my Garmin watch has offline maps and GPS everywhere, but this is not typical.
OSMand usage is even less common.
I think it's off by default, and I'm guessing most people haven't thought to turn it on, or are even aware of it.
Anecdotally, I’ve made it to a remote destination using Maps, then hopped back in the car an hour later (with no signal), and it couldn’t load anything. This seems to happen quite often.
I'm not sure that is a thing. The vast majority of drivers are on familiar routes and are not navigating via electronic means.
Better question: How are the autonomous cars doing? Are they parked by the side of the road unable to navigate without cell coverage.
I've been rerouted due to an accident many times, and I've seen the detours get backed up because of people taking more optimal routes (without traffic being redirected via other means).
I'd be curious to see more data on it, but I would speculate it's less than the "vast majority".
> Better question: How are the autonomous cars doing? Are they parked by the side of the road unable to navigate without cell coverage.
Yeah, that falls under my point about Uber/Lyft/taxis. I would speculate there is broader impact from those vs. autonomous cars (that are probably still relatively uncommon).
If I need to drive 20 minutes with most of it on the expressway, and they’re prone to accidents and there are multiple viable routes, I’m 100% going to load it up on Maps every trip, if it will save me being delayed 10-60 minutes every few weeks.
But if I’m going mostly backroads, probably not worth it, since you can more easily go around accidents, and they’re less common.
But again, I’m guessing more city expressway commuters use navigation daily than you think.
(Well I could be happier if they supports TOTP, but I'm not holding my breath)
TOTP or stronger, please.
TOTP just "feels" more secure.
TOTP is more secure because it isn't tied to a phone number. You're right that it's still phishable but that's not the point.
In both cases, the primary benefit to the general population is to have a rotating credential that, if one website is hacked, is useless on another website.
You fully control how to store the TOTP seed and how you compute the value, so it is far more secure.
Yes, it can be phished if you fall for that, but it removes several attack vectors.
How was the first factor (the password) compromised?
Assuming the user is using site-unique passwords, in 99% of cases where an attacker obtains a functional password they can get at least one TOTP code or the seed in the same manner. (ie, if I can steal your password DB, odds are pretty good for me stealing your TOTP seed DB as well.)
The outcome of a single successful authentication is a longer-lived session cookie. Once an attacker has that they can reset your creds (usually just requiring re-entering the password) and the account is theirs.
IMO, the only 2nd factor that matters are those that mutually authenticate like PassKeys / FIDO keys.
Sorta. The seed still needs to be issued to you in some way.
One of the biggest weaknesses with TOTP apps I've tried using is that you have to remember to transfer them to a new phone before you get rid of your old phone. I once got locked out of a domain registrar because I set up TOTP on an old phone many years back. That was long gone by the time I wanted to do something with my domain.
TOTP is fine, but always give me recovery codes I can print and out and keep with my other important documents. Too many services don't do that.
TOTP -> Time-based One Time Password SMS -> Delivery mechanism.
You can deliver TOTP over SMS.
Obviously, SMS shouldn't be used, but I was under the impression that the code generation mechanism and the code generation algorithms are completely disparate concepts.
I wish for an economic system in which all causes could be backpropagated to the source and the source be held responsible.
If for example I lost 2 hours of my time today because I had to fight with Comcast, Comcast should be charged for 2 hours worth of my hourly salary.
If I lost a job offer because of bad interview performance because of heating issues because of bad maintainence on part of landlord, landlord should be charged for the difference in time until I get my next job offer or the difference in salary until the next job offer.
If I had to fight health insurance for 5 hours on the phone due to incorrect bill and that caused me additional stress that caused my condition to worsen, health insurance should be held liable for the delta effects of that stress.
In this case the cellular operators in question would be held liable for the lost incomes of those drivers plus the lost incomes of passengers who lost money because they couldn't get to their destinations on time or missed flights and had to rebook them.
I know this level of backpropagation is hard to implement in the real world but it would be awesome if the entire world were one big PyTorch model and liabilities could be calculated by evaluating gradients.
Just having that map on the wall isn't going to do any good since without regular use, no one's going to be able to use it effectively. And it's doubtful that people can be forced into using it.
Modern trucks have cell modems tied to a private APN that are used for updating vehicle firmware & doing telematics. They also typically have a route to the internet that provides a WiFi hotspot in the cab.
Depending where the fault was in the telco stack, that APN may have still been functional
Not saying this was a significant resolution, but at least a possibility.
This might explain a huge random traffic jam I hit in the middle of my town this morning.
I had no idea any kind of an outage was happening because I've intentionally scaled back my dependence on my phone. I always used to automatically pull up Google Maps to navigate no matter how short the trip. At some point I realized I was losing my ability to travel without being completely dependent on some company tracking my location and telling me what to do, so as part of my phone de-Googlification I switched to Organic Maps. And even then I try to navigate on my own without any GPS assistance as often as possible. I feel like navigating is a skill you can actually lose if you don't practice doing it.
After running an errand across town this morning, I decided to try getting back home via the biggest arterial through the city that I know about, and I immediately hit a huge westbound backup stretching at least a mile. It was a total standstill. I peeked ahead trying to see if there was some kind of accident or something and didn't see anything. Everyone was just sitting in this traffic jam, and I couldn't for the life of me figure out why.
I immediately flipped a u-turn and went 3/4 of a mile north to another westbound road I knew about. That one was completely clear of any traffic at all, and I was able to drive the speed limit all the way back.
The most-used navigation apps I know of suggest alternate routes when there's congestion, so why were all those people just sitting there in that jam while a parallel road less than a mile away was clear? Maybe it was this cascading effect of too many people conditioned into being told what to do by their phones while their phones couldn't tell them to take the other route.
radio is pretty good with traffic news, but how many people would even think of local radio?
Yeah, I get that there can also be a bit of a sunk cost thing along with regret minimization going on too. I think game theory suggests that you should switch routes the instant you hit significant congestion though, because P(congestion on the current route)=1 as soon as you hit it.
There is a lot of people who couldn't navigate to a neighboring street without a direct directions even if their life depended on it.
Add to that what the most people doesn't have a slightest idea where are they, where are the cardinal directions and what they need to get from point A to point B.
And I'm only going off of examples I have heard. These outages are very damaging.
I think Sears around '04-06 (?) was the last time I saw one of those used. I think I bought a dehumidifier or air purifier.
When they started rolling out credit and debit cards without the raised numbers I thought fondly of those and how they were definitely done for now.
What is/were the cascading effects of this, particularly for drivers?
Many people in buildings were unaffected, as they could fallback to wifi. But I imagine this had a pretty broad impact to drivers.
Just a few things I can think of:
- Packages delayed (UPS, FedEx, Amazon, truck drivers, etc.) for drivers that relied on their phone's mapping apps to get them to their deliveries
- Uber/Lyft/taxi/etc. drivers not able to get directions to their pickups/dropoffs
- Traffic worsened because drivers weren't able to optimize their routes, or even get directions to their destination
Maybe larger companies have their own infra for this, or have redundancy in place (e.g. their own GPS devices)?
I'm curious to hear thoughts on whether these (and others) were impacted, or if there are ways they're able to get around this.
Also, unrelated to drivers, I can imagine there is/was a higher risk of not getting treated for emergencies due to not being able to make calls (I'm not sure whether/how emergency calling was impacted).