News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by nkrisc on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:59AM (#31502749)
The touch screens are the only thing keeping me on dino juice cars. I want to go electric, but they all have these awful touchscreens! I don’t want to navigate a menu to change the temperature or turn on a seat warmer.

I’m just not buying an EV until there’s one that doesn’t rely on a giant touch screen for everything or I can’t buy an ICE vehicle anymore.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by baobob on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:23AM (#31504163)
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by musesum on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:57AM (#31504583)
This! Was fiddling with a Tesla touch screen to do something basic. During those few seconds, autopilot decided to steer me off the road - with no shoulder - at 80 MPH (it was during a sunset). Fortunately, I caught it in time.

After the panic subsided, I decided to learn the voice commands. It seems that each device, now, has its own language, which we have to learn in order to function. A modern tower of Babel.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by digitallyfree on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:36AM (#31506058)
Speaking of Teslas, the SpaceX spacecraft also use touch screens heavily in the cockpit (maybe it's just something the company prefers) and only have a very small button panel. This is in comparison to the large array of controls normally seen on most aircraft and spacecraft. Obviously they state that the technology is well tested and that the astronauts train a lot with them, but in my mind you simply won't have the muscle memory and response you can get with a tactile interface.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by frosted-flakes on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @04:01PM (#31509778)
Astronauts are passengers though. There is very little they can do to control their spacecraft during launch, as the flight path is complex and cannot really be flown manually. Rockets have always been this way, it's just that before they had no choice but to put everything on toggle switches.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tablespoon on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:30AM (#31504264)
> Luckily the tide seems to be turning: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/23/opinion/touch-screens-car...

We can hope, but there's reason to be pessimistic:

> With traffic fatalities spiking over the past few years and with no real plan for how to make screens less distracting, we seem to have entered into the type of brutal acquiescence that’s common in the tech era; car manufacturers will keep putting bigger and more complicated screens in cars without much thought to safety or even functionality, and we, the consumers, will continue to buy them.

> ...

> The incentives of carmakers are pretty clear: Touch screens are cheaper than designing and installing a mechanical panel. And given that most cars today are reliable, come with lengthy warranties and an array of mostly uniform features, a big screen becomes a way for a car brand to distinguish itself from its competitors, especially on the showroom floor before potential buyers have a chance to really immerse themselves in just how annoying the screen will be.

One of the weaknesses of the market is that it doesn't necessarily give consumers what would work best for them, it just lets them pick from what they're given. Barring regulatory action, I don't see device-makers moving away touchscreen maximization.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by _jal on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:35AM (#31505158)
> we, the consumers, will continue to buy them.

Who's this "we"?

I'm in the pre-buy stage, it looks like my record of non-car-ownership will end at 23 years. (My last car was stolen from a SOMA lot in 1999.)

It does look like I'm buying used and IC, because I will not have a touch screen. I've driven basically every model of car you can rent, and some of them are less offensive than others, but they're all ass. Backup assist is vaguely nice, but I learned to parallel park before they existed, so I don't really care. And everything else about them is actively worse.

The UI is such a weird thing to cheap out on. As far as I'm concerned, keep your butt warmers and solenoid-driven seat adjustment, I want physical knobs I don't have to look at to use.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by nkrisc on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @02:10PM (#31508317)
> As far as I'm concerned, keep your butt warmers and solenoid-driven seat adjustment

My car has these things, controlled by physical buttons and knobs. They're nice features and they don't require a touchscreen to use.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by ClumsyPilot on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:53PM (#31507147)
' I'm buying used and IC, because I will not have a touch screen'

That's not a solution - you have to look at market of brand new cars, as whateber is avaliable now will replace all the used cars.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by _jal on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @01:15PM (#31507478)
Of course it is a solution. I end up with a car that doesn't have a touch screen.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tablespoon on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @02:12PM (#31508334)
>> That's not a solution - you have to look at market of brand new cars, as whateber is avaliable now will replace all the used cars.

> Of course it is a solution. I end up with a car that doesn't have a touch screen.

The point is that solution is only a band-aid. Cars wear out. New cars turn into used cars, which turn into "classic cars", which then turn into museum pieces. Especially with the later two steps, supply drops and maintenance becomes harder.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by _jal on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @02:29PM (#31508582)
And my point is, humans wear out. They stop driving cars and eventually die.

There is a reasonable chance I won't buy another vehicle, so I don't care what the rest of the market does.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tablespoon on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @03:37PM (#31509474)
> There is a reasonable chance I won't buy another vehicle, so I don't care what the rest of the market does.

Good for you, but why do you feel you need to weigh in on the new car market when you have no intention of ever participating?

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by _jal on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @03:41PM (#31509516)
Why do you feel the need to play conversation-cop?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tablespoon on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @04:44PM (#31510286)
> Why do you feel the need to play conversation-cop?

Because we're discussing a complaint about modern cars, and "always buy used ones that predate the change, and plan to die before those become unavailable" doesn't really address the complaint. It's a rather idiosyncratic and radical way of avoiding it, and bends the conversation to discussing that personal idiosyncrasy.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by _jal on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @05:14PM (#31510658)
I suppose you now know better than to waste your time talking to me in the future, then.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by rob74 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:20AM (#31504899)
I think that's true only as long as the only electric cars you have driven are Teslas. The BMW i3 has pretty much resisted this tendency. Ok, it's already a pretty old design at this point and getting phased out, but it has lots of physical buttons (even for the seat warmer!). And I don't think electric cars that are variants of existing petrol cars (which are more and more common) will eliminate the physical controls just because they put an electric engine into the car. Or, otherwise said: if you buy an electric car from a tech company (or somebody trying too hard to emulate them), you get a touchscreen. If you buy an electric car from a car company, you get physical controls...
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by franga2000 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:41AM (#31505246)
I regularly drive a variety of electric cars (renault, smart, bmw, ford, VW) and besides the Smart For* series, which is cost-down so much that it doesn't even have a touchscreen, all of the cars have at least one feature available exclusively through the touchscreen. One of the most infuriating is Reanult's ZOË, which has really good physical controls for absolutely everything, except volume. That's the one not-driving-related thing I need to be able to adjust while moving! Even the 2008 Scenic dinosaur-burner that I stupidly bought during the pandemic has better controls than that...
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by pnw on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:16AM (#31505757)
The Tesla Model S has a physical volume control on the steering wheel. I’m not sure about the other Tesla models.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by speedgoose on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:35PM (#31506875)
The Model 3 and the Model Y has one two. I would expect the Model X to have one as well. I’m not sure about the old roadster but the lotus interior was not high tech.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by olyjohn on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:29PM (#31511557)
The Lotus interior was one of the most glorious interiors of all time. Simple, light and somehow it was so ergonomic, you can road trip in it and not get sore and tired. A true driver-centric design.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tomxor on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:38AM (#31505198)
Made me check that one out, it's actually not an insane price, it competes with most new normal-person petrol cars... I mean I still wouldn't buy one new, and that's still a bit of a dodgy range, but maybe in ten years there will finally be an affordable 2nd hand market and some infra to make it reliable. In the mean time I will continue to run my petrol car into the ground like a good holistic environmentalist.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by ThunderSizzle on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:13PM (#31506596)
Would anyone trust a 2nd hand market for an EV when the battery is basically guaranteed to be dead long before more affordable ICE vehicles?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tomxor on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:49PM (#31507091)
It's a good point, a 2nd hand market assumes the availability of a cost effective battery replacement or serious maintenance scheme... it's not exactly on the same scale as a cam belt change which is the common todo upon acquiring a 2nd hand petrol car.

Also worth acknowledging that the battery makes up a huge chunk of the car both physically and in terms of cost, and yet is a consumable, so I guess this lowers the resale value of EVs significantly? I wonder if it's even worth any of the remaining savings on the rest of the car after fitting a new battery. Maybe the next stage is scaling up lithium-ion recycling to drive down battery replacement and general battery cost to a point that "everyone else" can join in the EV game.

It would be a big step backwards for society if a new wealth gap is created when oil becomes too expensive to continue running cheap ICE cars and only moderately wealthy people can afford cars priced exclusively at "new" values without a 2nd hand market.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by antisthenes on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:26PM (#31511513)
> It would be a big step backwards for society if a new wealth gap is created when oil becomes too expensive to continue running cheap ICE cars and only moderately wealthy people can afford cars priced exclusively at "new" values without a 2nd hand market.

That's coming whether you want to or not.

Once we start pricing in the externalities of climate change into road vehicles (which is beginning to happen, slowly), cars will become increasingly unaffordable to those in the bottom quartiles of income.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by speedgoose on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:37PM (#31506899)
The old EVs used market is dynamic in Norway.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by digisign on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @03:36PM (#31509463)
They are replaceable, are they not?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by sfink on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:29PM (#31506787)
Musk created a battery tech company and used it to power giant cellphones on wheels.

I don't want to drive—or negotiate with AI to drive—a giant cellphone on wheels.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by yakshaving_jgt on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @02:21PM (#31508454)
> If you buy an electric car from a car company, you get physical controls...

Not sure I agree with that. Even Porsche are doing touch screens, unfortunately.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by potatochup on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:45AM (#31506177)
My chevy bolt is a nice mix I find. It has physical buttons for: climate controls, cruise control, media volume, media channel, lane keep assist, sport mode, gear selection, park brake. There are also voice commands, which I use for selecting navigation destinations.

Touchscreen for other things: android auto, apple car play (which provide maps) and more complicated user settings (such as whether you want the lights to stay on after you turn off the car for a while)

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by wcfields on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:23PM (#31506716)
I fully agree, the 2019-2021 Bolt [1] has been my gold standard for the right combo of touch and tactile. Climate and radio preset buttons fully separate and easy to see/touch.

It's a shame they went more "slick" with the 2022 refresh, still tactile, but just more flush and less accessible without a glance. [2]

[1] https://cdn.motor1.com/images/mgl/OYAqe/s1/2020-chevy-bolt-e...

[2] https://electrek.co/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/02/2022-...

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by jrussino on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @03:11PM (#31509147)
Wow, I'm jealous of the control panel in your first link. In contrast, my 2014 Chevy Volt-with-a-"V" has an absolutely aweful interface. It's a combination of small, laggy touchscreen and a bunch of also-laggy, haphazardly-arranged touch-sensitive buttons:

https://www.automotiveaddicts.com/25445/2012-chevrolet-volt-...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x73W4jZpkf0

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by akeck on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:27AM (#31505008)
I believe Mazda has a policy of no touchscreens in their vehicles.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by malfist on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:48AM (#31506233)
They have touch screens, but it's minimal, pretty much only usable in the GPS view.

They do have a rotary dial and push button that controls the display, so no touching it. Makes it a lot simpler when your UI designers are restricted to left/right movement and button push. Can't hide things all over the place and under deeply nested menus.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tanjtanjtanj on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:45PM (#31507027)
The 3 2021 Mazda models I test drove had no touch screens at all, I believe they included an option between the two for a couple years but have now phased out the touch screen.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by windowsrookie on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @01:52PM (#31508044)
The new Mazdas have no touchscreen and in my opinion it's worse.

Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are designed to be touched. Navigating either without a touchscreen is a horrible experience and requires significantly more steps than just touching the item you want on the screen.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by izacus on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @04:49PM (#31510360)
I found no serious issues using Android Auto with my Mazda, what kind of things are you doing during your drive that are so impossible to do with the rotary controller?

The only thing I can remember might be the address entry, but that can easily be done with the keyboard on the phone itself (click "phone" icon in the on-screen Auto keyboard to handoff).

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by nkrisc on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @02:12PM (#31508330)
Funny you say that, because a 2018 Mazda3 is what I currently drive. It has a screen, a small one, and every common cabin control is still a physical button. The only exception is the radio, which is software, but can be controlled with a knob. But I just leave the radio on the same station always so it's not a problem for me.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by jws on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:24AM (#31505885)
For a Tesla at least, you can use voice commands for the common functions and keep both hands on the wheel.

That said, people I know have a strange resistance to using voice commands with their cars and phones.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by malfist on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:42AM (#31506138)
Because voice commands have insane latency, require you to memorize a certain syntax, and hope the computer processing your audio understands you.

Like if I want to tell my alexa to turn the temperature up on the thermastat I have to remember this exact phrase: Alexa, tell the ecobee to turn the temperature [up, down], [ecobee name]. Anything else and alexa tells me "ecobee doesn't support that". And alexa/siri/google are all top of the line, offline processing inside a car's CPU is measurably worse, and syntax is even more esoteric.

Ever try to use voice commands to tell your car to give you GPS directions to the nearest walmart? Basically impossible unless you have the street address memorized, and even then it's a 10 minute ordeal with a lot of stops and starts because the processor wasn't listening as soon as you started speaking to it so it only caught the end of an address, or it misheard a number or street name, etc.

Voice control is far from being an acceptable alternative to physical dials and switches.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by aidenn0 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:39AM (#31506090)
Two reasons to resist using voice commands

1. Do not want to talk in the loud-clear voice needed for them to work (e.g. someone else in car is on their phone, kids are sleeping).

2. Completely soured on the experience due to things like this[1]

1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMS2VnDveP8

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by frosted-flakes on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @04:12PM (#31509894)
Also, what if you have the windows open or the roof down? Or what if you're using your radio the way it was intended to be used?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by foobarian on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:13AM (#31505713)
Nit: oil formed way before dinosaurs from simple marine organisms.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by nkrisc on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @02:13PM (#31508350)
You mean "dino juice" isn't the scientific term?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by typon on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:19AM (#31505802)
How come we find it underground then?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by hnbad on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:00PM (#31506424)
Is this a sincere question? If so: "underground" was "above ground" (or sea floor in this case) at the time. Additional layers formed and became the new "ground". Tectonic shifts moved places up or down (or on top of eachother), canals were formed or drained, water evaporated or froze, and so on.

What I think is a lot more weird is that archaeology works: i.e. you can dig in old European cities and find the remains of older cities underneath. The short answer is that stuff like dust, decaying plant matter, erosion from nearby mountains and debris from the buildings themselves can effectively create this new layer on top, but it still feels counter-intuitive because we're not used to thinking in these timeframes: https://www.straightdope.com/21341986/how-come-archaeologica...

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by t-3 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:02PM (#31506451)
Geography and sea levels have changed over the course of Earth's history. Perhaps you've heard of things like Pangaea, or found fossils while digging in the dirt as a child? Many areas now inhabited were below oceans at points in the past billions of years.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by olyjohn on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:28PM (#31511539)
In the US, all cars will have screens now of one sort or another. Laws were passed requiring the installation of backup cameras in all cars. So, you will never see a new car that doesn't come with a screen of some sort. And if it's going to be required to have a screen, they're not going to make it a single use only for backup cameras.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by Tiktaalik on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @06:40PM (#31511733)
I don't necessarily disagree with you in general, I do think we're going to continue to see touch screens dominate, but I thought I'd point out a significant outlier to anyone who like the OP doesn't like touch screens: The Mazda 3.

On the latest Mazda 3 (2019+) it does seemingly only use the screen for info and back up camera. There's a big wheel in between the seats to move about the menus. I test drove one recently and it is very nice and intuitive.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by spaniard89277 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @07:41AM (#31503113)
Some korean brand was moving to physical buttons again, but I can't find which.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by zwirbl on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @08:46AM (#31503755)
I guess it was Mazda, so Japanese instead of Korean https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1121372_why-mazda-is-pur...

Though I don't know if they followed through

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by neogodless on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:29AM (#31504247)
https://www.autoguide.com/manufacturer/mazda/2022-mazda-cx-5...

> Like most modern Mazdas, the CX-5 uses an ultra-wide, non-touchscreen infotainment system.

Buttons and knobs for HVAC

https://www.autoguide.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/20...

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by meristem on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:43AM (#31506147)
Between 2019 and 2022 Mazda improved the truly atrocious latency linked to screen operations. All operations are physical, but you still need menus to find what you want. The latency was quite impressive. The 2022 has less latency and seemingly different menu trees to go with the ultrawide ( but narrow height) screen.

HVAC is screen-independent. So is volume, thankfully.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by fomine3 on Thursday May 26, 2022 @12:12AM (#31514430)
Except MX-30. They use touchscreen for AC for unknown reason. Maybe because the car is designed to be weird on their lineup?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by frxx on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:21AM (#31504911)
As far as I know they're sticking to it.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by kube-system on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:21AM (#31504139)
Hyundai/Kia have had some horrible interfaces lately.

https://youtu.be/EREg2XtohTg?t=7m

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tomtheelder on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @03:50PM (#31509655)
My 2022 Kona EV has an amazing, mostly physical button based interface fwiw.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by sosull on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @07:53AM (#31503224)
I think Honda have returned to at least partial physical controls for heating, air, and music for the Honda e. But it still has a lot of screen.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by thfuran on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @08:16AM (#31503422)
Backup cameras are legally mandated on new us vehicles. The screens are not going anywhere so they're going to get used for other stuff too.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by nkrisc on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @08:27AM (#31503546)
I don’t mind a small screen that isn’t involved in common cabin features.

I have a 2018 Mazda3 and I like the backup camera. But I can control the climate control and temperature with physical buttons. The seat warmers have buttons. I can control the volume with a knob or on the steering wheel.

The radio, unfortunately, is software. Seems like that much is unavoidable. But the small screen that is there is secondary to everything else I want to control while driving and I don’t ever need to use while driving. I’m typically using Apple CarPlay (or previously Android Auto) so if I do need to do something, I can use voice controls and at least keep my eyes on the road.

I don’t mind small screens, as you said, they’re not going away. What I don’t want is a giant screen that controls everything.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by ThunderSizzle on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:18PM (#31506661)
My backup camera screen is embedded in my reear view mirror. You wouldn't know when it's not on. Sure, it's small, but sufficient, considering it's not a replacement for mirrors and area awareness.