News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by spaniard89277 on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @07:41AM (#31503113)
Some korean brand was moving to physical buttons again, but I can't find which.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by zwirbl on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @08:46AM (#31503755)
I guess it was Mazda, so Japanese instead of Korean https://www.motorauthority.com/news/1121372_why-mazda-is-pur...

Though I don't know if they followed through

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by neogodless on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:29AM (#31504247)
https://www.autoguide.com/manufacturer/mazda/2022-mazda-cx-5...

> Like most modern Mazdas, the CX-5 uses an ultra-wide, non-touchscreen infotainment system.

Buttons and knobs for HVAC

https://www.autoguide.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/20...

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by meristem on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @11:43AM (#31506147)
Between 2019 and 2022 Mazda improved the truly atrocious latency linked to screen operations. All operations are physical, but you still need menus to find what you want. The latency was quite impressive. The 2022 has less latency and seemingly different menu trees to go with the ultrawide ( but narrow height) screen.

HVAC is screen-independent. So is volume, thankfully.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by fomine3 on Thursday May 26, 2022 @12:12AM (#31514430)
Except MX-30. They use touchscreen for AC for unknown reason. Maybe because the car is designed to be weird on their lineup?
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by frxx on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @10:21AM (#31504911)
As far as I know they're sticking to it.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by kube-system on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @09:21AM (#31504139)
Hyundai/Kia have had some horrible interfaces lately.

https://youtu.be/EREg2XtohTg?t=7m

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by tomtheelder on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @03:50PM (#31509655)
My 2022 Kona EV has an amazing, mostly physical button based interface fwiw.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by sosull on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @07:53AM (#31503224)
I think Honda have returned to at least partial physical controls for heating, air, and music for the Honda e. But it still has a lot of screen.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by thfuran on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @08:16AM (#31503422)
Backup cameras are legally mandated on new us vehicles. The screens are not going anywhere so they're going to get used for other stuff too.
Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by nkrisc on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @08:27AM (#31503546)
I don’t mind a small screen that isn’t involved in common cabin features.

I have a 2018 Mazda3 and I like the backup camera. But I can control the climate control and temperature with physical buttons. The seat warmers have buttons. I can control the volume with a knob or on the steering wheel.

The radio, unfortunately, is software. Seems like that much is unavoidable. But the small screen that is there is secondary to everything else I want to control while driving and I don’t ever need to use while driving. I’m typically using Apple CarPlay (or previously Android Auto) so if I do need to do something, I can use voice controls and at least keep my eyes on the road.

I don’t mind small screens, as you said, they’re not going away. What I don’t want is a giant screen that controls everything.

Re:The benefits of “low tech” user interfaces by ThunderSizzle on Wednesday May 25, 2022 @12:18PM (#31506661)
My backup camera screen is embedded in my reear view mirror. You wouldn't know when it's not on. Sure, it's small, but sufficient, considering it's not a replacement for mirrors and area awareness.