News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by initplus on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:03PM (#28161438)
One thing that they do not seem to be taking advantage of is how specialized many of their communities are. It seems primed for letting advertisers target to specific audiences, but as a user I don't really feel like the ads I get are targeted to what I read at all? Maybe I am uninformed but it seems like an advertising goldmine that hasn't been taken advantage of.

If you are a PC components retailer, users of /r/buildapc seems like an ideal audience to target for advertising. Camera retailer, where better than /r/photography? Cookware - advertise in /r/cooking. Repeat ad infinitum across every niche interest on the site.

They should be able to enable advertisers to do really effective targeting of campaigns. Is this not possible with their current ad tools, or are they not selling the capabilities to advertisers well enough? Or is there not actually that much money in targeted ads, is all the money in generic ads like Coca-Cola & cars?

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by l72 on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:11PM (#28161533)
I tried to advertise a product to a very niche group on reddit. I just wanted to select 4 specific sub-reddits and advertise to anyone that was a member or viewed that reddit.

For some reason, reddit wouldn't let me advertise to 3 of the 4, and the 1 that they did let me advertise was very low volume (less than 100 members). I couldn't even get reddit to show a single ad, let alone have anyone click on it.

Facebook brought in way more traffic, and some of it did convert, but I feel like my advertising costs were too high there, since you can only specify more general interests. It seems like reddit, had their advertising platform actually worked, would have been the perfect place for me.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Doctor_Fegg on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:36PM (#28161829)
Yes, this. Google and Facebook make it super easy to advertise. Whenever I've tried to advertise on Reddit, nothing shows up, I have no idea why, and the advertising UI gives me no clues.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by fshbbdssbbgdd on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:45PM (#28164318)
I’m feeling bad for some unknown director at Reddit when their boss reads this thread.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by opinion-is-bad on Thursday August 12, 2021 @10:22PM (#28164601)
Well, they are kind of failing at their job in a big way, likely costing the company billions of dollars in the process. I don’t feel that bad for them. 5% of other socials in revenue per user is comically bad.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by kevin_thibedeau on Friday August 13, 2021 @01:42AM (#28165816)
Taking in $400M at this stage is already a pretty sure sign of failure and that they don't know how to run a business. Probably too many MBAs busy optimizing their career ascendancy to be concerned with pesky details like competently securing revenue streams. It's not that hard to show ads to self-selecting niche audiences.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cpach on Friday August 13, 2021 @05:43AM (#28167097)
“It’s not that hard to show ads to self-selecting niche audiences.”

Perhaps not. Honest question though: Have you tried, at scale?

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by thrwyoilarticle on Friday August 13, 2021 @12:37PM (#28171179)
Give me half a billion and I'll certainly try
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cpach on Friday August 13, 2021 @01:10PM (#28171634)
An MVP might come handy (^_^)
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by k12sosse on Thursday August 12, 2021 @10:53PM (#28164857)
I'm sure the masses they traded our demographic for makes up for it in their jaded little bubble.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by DevKoala on Friday August 13, 2021 @03:12AM (#28166341)
For years they delegated their advertising platform to a third party. Last I heard they were trying to build one in house, and I am not sure if they succeeded.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by lostlogin on Friday August 13, 2021 @04:43AM (#28166810)
Or not. More adverts and it becomes gross. Paying to avoid adverts might be an option, and while this makes it a protection racket, I’d take it over adverts.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Doctor_Fegg on Friday August 13, 2021 @05:23PM (#28174719)
Reddit has gross adverts already: Huel, some self-help thing, naff Adobe ads endorsed by some Reddit superuser from a corner of the site I never read. I’d far rather they were relevant to the subs I do read.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by lostlogin on Friday August 13, 2021 @05:55PM (#28175056)
If you could pay to remove them, would you?
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Doctor_Fegg on Saturday August 14, 2021 @04:12AM (#28178988)
I’d probably pay for a “premium” service that let me generically block stuff on Reddit - /r/popular is infested with a lot of stuff I’ll never be interested in.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cpach on Friday August 13, 2021 @05:44AM (#28167112)
I wouldn’t call it a racket though since it’s entirely voluntarily to use Reddit, or not use it. And there’s also the possibility to set up other competing forums, with or without ads.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by throwayws on Friday August 13, 2021 @04:13AM (#28166670)
They are probably too busy fighting against their own users and subreddits that keep them afloat. Too much ideology in there to make sense, business wise.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cpach on Friday August 13, 2021 @03:38AM (#28166480)
Ultimately it’s the board and the CEO that’s responsible for such an important issue. So if they are not already aware of it then I’m not really sure they are in a position to blame someone under them in the org chart.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by void_mint on Friday August 13, 2021 @03:05AM (#28166294)
If you've created something unusable, should you be in charge?
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by reedciccio on Friday August 13, 2021 @10:48AM (#28169557)
On the other hand, organic material on Reddit generates traffic and has high conversion rates.

Why pay when you can get the same for free?

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by MichaelZuo on Friday August 13, 2021 @08:39AM (#28168138)
That is truly bizzare. I’m having trouble understanding the motivations of the board, after a Series E and a clearly useful business, they didn’t bother with making more money?
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by loktarogar on Thursday August 12, 2021 @08:32PM (#28163749)
I wanted to run Reddit ads after to target users of a certain game after a big expansion launch. My site had a bunch of time-sensitive information that 1) was useful to the users of a specific subreddit, 2) would be useful for a week or so after the launch, 3) while it had a successful submission, I wanted to promote that submission for about a week afterwards to more people could see it.

I put up a reddit ad for that submission and Reddit took 4 weeks to approve it. At that point, there was no point running the ad anymore.

Another time I wanted to advertise to a new game that had a brand new subreddit to match but it was huge - 100k plus users in a week. Reddit simply wouldn't permit me to advertise to it because it was new.

In my (limited) experience it feels like Reddit isn't making the money it could be because it doesn't want to.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by whall6 on Thursday August 12, 2021 @11:34PM (#28165087)
Strange that they make it difficult to pay them
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cwkoss on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:47PM (#28161977)
Reddit should charge for all commercial posts. It would clean up spam and generate revenue.

Make a special class of commercial account, include some 'verification' badge thingy. Let subreddits ban all commercial content, unpaid commercial content, or leave open (for commercial-specific subs).

Let mods profit share in commercial posts. (And fix the moderator system so "first to register controls the sub" is no longer the case)

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by lordlic on Thursday August 12, 2021 @10:23PM (#28164607)
This is an absolutely bizarre proposal. You want moderators to willingly pollute their subreddit with ads in exchange for personally getting a kickback from reddit? Users would either migrate en masse to competing subreddits with decent mods, or they'd stay due the same old problems with moderator inertia...
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by throwaway1777 on Friday August 13, 2021 @12:22AM (#28165421)
I think they mean it would be better than the astroturfing that goes on currently
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by dcist on Friday August 13, 2021 @11:01PM (#28177452)
Agreed and it would make the mod position self-sustaining.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by hutzlibu on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:54PM (#28162047)
"And fix the moderator system so "first to register controls the sub" is no longer the case"

Suggestions?

This is a complex proplem.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by NortySpock on Thursday August 12, 2021 @06:50PM (#28162637)
"the top 20 most upvoted comments in the subreddit within the last year, with the user having more than X posts per year in the subreddit, Y karma per post and more than 1000 characters per post, are invited to become moderators"

Only really works for the in-depth subreddits, I guess it's not going to get you far on image or other media-based subreddits...

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by tux3 on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:08PM (#28162857)
That seems non obvious, the most upvoted comments are just as likely to be memes or jokes than in-depth research, and even if they are that may not correlate to a good mod very much at all.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by spicybright on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:23PM (#28163018)
You can see this in action on ANY subreddit by sorting by "Top of all time". Almost every post is either some in-joke or meme, some random brigade that happened from a sudden temporary influx of users, etc. for at least the first 10 posts.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by deelowe on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:10PM (#28162872)
Wouldn't this just turn reddit into a spam site?
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by pixl97 on Thursday August 12, 2021 @08:56PM (#28163946)
Do you mean it's not already?
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by evandwight on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:09PM (#28162863)
Do you think having all the members of the subreddit (or the entire site) vote on who the mod should be? I think there are many ways to make this efficient by statistical sampling, proxy votes, and detecting when statistical errors occur. To restrict people to one account you'd need to verify phone numbers.

I'm currently trying to build this but I'm not a programmer so it's slow going. I'm interested in your thoughts as I'm sure I'm missing something obvious.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by jimmydorry on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:26PM (#28163057)
There is nothing to stop people or groups of people from making thousands of accounts and joining the sub, and then eventually taking control. Even if these user accounts have to be X years old, or subbed for Y months, none of that matters in the long term.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by evandwight on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:38PM (#28163188)
Yes. With this system it would be important to verify identities on sign up. I think verifying phone number would largely resolve the issue (SMS short codes don't work on VOIP phones). There many other levels to reduce fake accounts that can be added if problems begin to occur.

The main issue is the more difficult sign up is, the less people sign up. It's a balancing act.

With any voting system you have to detect the validity of the votes, even upvotes.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Kihashi on Friday August 13, 2021 @10:36AM (#28169411)
> SMS short codes don't work on VOIP phones

My experience is mostly with Google Voice, but I've not found that to be true. Years ago that was the case, but these days, I've encountered by few that don't work.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by evandwight on Friday August 13, 2021 @12:41PM (#28171254)
I think google voice may be the exception. Of the 6 other voip providers I've tried none could get short code sms.

https://support.google.com/voice/thread/1592118/wellsfargo-s...

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by busymom0 on Friday August 13, 2021 @12:24AM (#28165429)
Make creation of subreddits paid maybe along with phone verification?

Imo, moderation logs should all be public. Lobsters does it well:

https://lobste.rs/moderations

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by evandwight on Friday August 13, 2021 @09:20AM (#28168484)
Very cool! Thanks for the link!!!

It's even open source!

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by busymom0 on Friday August 13, 2021 @06:24PM (#28175441)
Yep. Though they don't have a concept of communities/subreddits. They rely on tags instead.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cwkoss on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:21PM (#28162988)
I think it probably needs to not be fully automatic, but users should be able to vote to nominate a moderator for removal or addition, subject to admin discretion. Ideally, any user of the sub should be able to see the 'case' and contribute why they think the mod would/is doing a good/bad job, and people can upvote and downvote reasons. Maybe kind of use AITA's style of comment voting (but with admins finalizing decisions as a check valve against gaming).
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by hutzlibu on Thursday August 12, 2021 @08:07PM (#28163503)
Not fully automating, means humans for each reddit big enough. (What is big enough?) That is expensive. So this probably means lots of decisions in short time for those administrators ... means lots of wrong decision and lots of drama.

Voting? Who has the right to vote? Anyone? Any socketpuppet account? Only verified real people? (would be a different reddit)

The base problem is called politics.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cwkoss on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:51PM (#28164365)
I think eligibility should be based on a minimum karma-within-subreddit (comments and submissions) threshold.

And yeah, this would cost Reddit some in admin labor, but they should be able to use some of this revenue stream towards those few hires. I'd imagine a team of 6 would be plenty for this purpose, maybe could get away with 2 or 3.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by k12sosse on Thursday August 12, 2021 @10:57PM (#28164896)
> I think eligibility should be based on a minimum karma-within-subreddit (comments and submissions) threshold

A million little HNs.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by emodendroket on Thursday August 12, 2021 @10:24PM (#28164621)
Practical guarantee of brigading.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Kihashi on Friday August 13, 2021 @10:34AM (#28169375)
> And fix the moderator system so "first to register controls the sub" is no longer the case

Why do you consider that a problem? As a heavy user of reddit, I don't consider that a problem at all. I would be interested to hear what problems you think exist with that system and what other solutions exist.

I'd be pretty pissed if I created a subreddit, put effort into growing it, and someone could just come along and steal it.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by dillondoyle on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:15PM (#28162936)
Will it fix onlyfans spam!!?!?!
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Seattle3503 on Thursday August 12, 2021 @11:23PM (#28165036)
They make so much money off of Reddit, and reddit captures none of that value. It doesn't seem right.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by duckmysick on Friday August 13, 2021 @04:40AM (#28166799)
Maybe Reddit could raise more funding and buy OnlyFans.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by dillondoyle on Friday August 13, 2021 @10:51PM (#28177400)
Honestly a great idea. But they are going for the prude & judgmental brand friendlily model.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by wintermutestwin on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:06PM (#28161476)
Sounds like a great way to prod those specialized communities to bail to the next diggredditetc.

People are going to those specialized communities to get real information from real users, not lies and misinformation (ads and marketing).

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by warning26 on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:41PM (#28161894)
Eh, I'd say most of the hardcore Reddit users have both old.reddit as well as an Ad Blocker, so I'm guessing that slightly better ad configuration tools wouldn't adversely impact the longtime users too much.

As for other users, they are already seeing incredibly random and irrelevant ads. Seeing actual photography themed ads on a photography themed forum doesn't seem that bad IMO (provided that they are clearly marked as ads, of course.)

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by spookthesunset on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:31PM (#28164235)
Naw. The new Reddit design is much nicer than the old. There, I said it. It is much easier to use. It took them a while to iron out the bugs but it is way better.

Now their new mobile app video player… ho boy…..

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by potamic on Friday August 13, 2021 @01:56AM (#28165899)
Some things I think are objectively bad design -

1. Images open by default on my feed and videos and gifs autoplay as I scroll. It's a massive distraction. I'm trying to find content I might be interested in, but here I'm forced to scan pretty much every post out there.

2. On similar lines, showing a (cropped) summary for text posts. Again a distraction when you're trying to find content. The cropping makes it worse since you have to change the page after reading halfway through.

3. Having to click on view discussion to open the comments each time. This is a forum. The only reason I go there is to discuss.

4. Lack of borders for comments. It looks like one continuous feed and reduces grouping between individual comments.

5. Large avatars, icons on the reply bar compete for attention on every single comment. The reply bar on old reddit is so nicely blended away into the background. You don't see it unless you want to reply.

6. Hover popups on the large icons trigger unintentionally all the time. Very rarely do I need to see somebody's karma. What's the point of this feature even?

This is basis design considerations for a discussion forum. I completely understand where they are coming from though. They are not interested in this being a discussion forum. They want to optimize for post views. The more views a post gets, the more they will be able to monetize. Engaging in discussion is time consuming and that time could be better spent in viewing more posts.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by alexgmcm on Friday August 13, 2021 @04:12AM (#28166658)
I really dislike the new design, it feels super-bloated like it's trying to be a social app (and indeed they force the awful Reddit app on you too).

I use Reddit Enhancement Suite and the old design and I find it far superior. It feels more compact and efficient, like HN.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by pitterpatter on Thursday August 12, 2021 @11:43PM (#28165159)
> Naw. The new Reddit design is much nicer than the old. There, I said it. It is much easier to use. It took them a while to iron out the bugs but it is way better.

I'm curious what you like better in the new design? I personally find the floating bar at the top annoying. Not to mention the fact you have to click another button to actually see all the comments. Not to mention my biggest annoyance, clicking on the empty space on the sides when viewing a post will navigate to the subreddit?? Why?

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by cuu508 on Friday August 13, 2021 @02:03AM (#28165941)
> Not to mention my biggest annoyance, clicking on the empty space on the sides when viewing a post will navigate to the subreddit?? Why?

A/B testing shows it generates more engagement

/s

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by paulcole on Thursday August 12, 2021 @06:20PM (#28162328)
>People are going to those specialized communities to get real information from real users, not lies and misinformation (ads and marketing).

Those specialized communities will cease to exist without something funding them.

Either users get ready to get out their wallets or get used to ads and marketing (which are not wholly lies and misinformation). And more importantly remember it's Reddit's choice how users pay, not the end users.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by colinmhayes on Thursday August 12, 2021 @06:25PM (#28162398)
I'm not sure that's true. No one is paying the moderators currently. It's not like hosting costs of a forum are that high. Not that difficult to migrate all your users to a competing service if the community is un happy with the monetization scheme.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by ahtihn on Friday August 13, 2021 @03:49AM (#28166535)
Migrating might not be that hard. Retaining existing users and attracting new users is much harder.

For niche topics I tend to add "reddit" to google search queries, because there's a high likelihood of finding actual information. If those subreddits move to other services, they may not even show up in the sea of blogspam results.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by IncRnd on Friday August 13, 2021 @02:21AM (#28166033)
> Those specialized communities will cease to exist without something funding them.

And this very article embarassingly shows that after 16 years it is still investors who are funding those specialized communities.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by wintermutestwin on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:10PM (#28162873)
How much money does it really cost to provide a discussion forum for a specialized community? Not so much as to warrant advertising pollution.

Advertising is diametrically opposed to information sharing.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by paulcole on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:52PM (#28163348)
Not necessarily how much it costs but more how much the provider wants to make. And w/ VCs involved in Reddit they're not looking for pennies.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by shuntress on Thursday August 12, 2021 @06:24PM (#28162382)
If you will suffer a brief crash course on ad terminology, you are describing "placements". A placement with an ad in it shown to a user is called an "impression".

I agree that advertisers would pay reddit more for better ad space (also called "inventory") but that doesn't just happen automatically.

Right now, I would assume they are integrating with some third party ad network and probably use fairly generic targeting information. The cost in time and money to either deepen that integration or rip it out and make a custom ad network is probably significant.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by bwship on Thursday August 12, 2021 @06:29PM (#28162435)
Well they have the money part of that equation solved, at least for a while. How quickly can one blow through $410 million? 18 months?
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by deanclatworthy on Friday August 13, 2021 @02:57AM (#28166242)
Unfortunately I think the core audience of Reddit is probably somewhat well informed and probably running an ad block. I’d love to see the percentages.

It makes total sense to be able to target communities and I think they need to just stick a banner on the right hand side and be done with it. Let moderators maybe even take a small cut in exchange for providing info and meta data on their community.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by yissp on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:21PM (#28161663)
I just checked /r/linux, which I browse on occasion, and the three sponsored posts I saw on the front page were for Intel vPro, Adobe Creative Cloud, and Google Chromebooks. Those all seem at least reasonably relevant.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Dah00n on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:59PM (#28162110)
Really? I'd say they are closer to unreasonably irrelevant. Maybe I could stretch myself to see a Chomebook being interesting and relevant. To me seeing the other two would make me look negatively on the brands/products. If those who sees an add get nothing out of it except wasted time I'd say they are spam. Those sound like 100% spam to me in /r/linux.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by sgerenser on Thursday August 12, 2021 @06:55PM (#28162684)
Agreed, Adobe creative cloud doesn’t even run on Linux!
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by themacguffinman on Thursday August 12, 2021 @07:39PM (#28163200)
Not sure why vPro would be irrelevant, vPro can work with Linux AFAICT and there's some overlap between /r/linux and /r/sysadmin [1].

[1] https://subredditstats.com/subreddit-user-overlaps/linux

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by Doctor_Fegg on Friday August 13, 2021 @02:35AM (#28166123)
Adobe and Chromebook ads are all over Reddit. I don't read any tech or design subreddits yet I get them all the time. I doubt what you're seeing is targetted at all.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by alexgmcm on Friday August 13, 2021 @04:13AM (#28166665)
Yeah, it's weird as if I'm browsing /r/buildapc I wouldn't even mind seeing relevant ads - same for stuff like /r/books etc.

It does seem like a huge missed opportunity.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by tootie on Thursday August 12, 2021 @05:53PM (#28162036)
I think the problem is that reddit culture is virulently anti-consumerist and throw a fit every time they see an ad. I'll bet they get terrible conversion rates.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by LivelyTortoise on Thursday August 12, 2021 @08:06PM (#28163493)
Thing is, I see a reasonable number of ads on Reddit, they're just rarely relevant to the subreddit I'm on. I think they could keep the same number of ads and target them better, and the results would improve.
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by kevinmchugh on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:14PM (#28164111)
There's a lot of redditors who sense a corporate conspiracy anytime a brand name is mentioned, but there's tons of subreddits entirely about consumption. Media, food, hobbies. I was active on r/homebrewing for years and people talk about products they want to buy all the time.

The trouble with those types is they all have very strong opinions and think most products are crap. They're not opposed to buying things, just shitty things.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by heartbreak on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:24PM (#28164196)
There are also active subreddits for specific brands like /r/djimavic and /r/SonyAlpha
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by missedthecue on Thursday August 12, 2021 @09:08PM (#28164060)
This is true. I can easily burn through all my daily ad spend on Reddit at rates of between $0.50 and $1.00 CPMs. And the click through rates are awful.

On Facebook or Google, you've often got to spend at least $5-$10 per mille to be competitive in most verticals. $25 to $50 in some verticals like insurance. And it converts.

The reddit userbase just isn't as monetizable.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by TeeMassive on Thursday August 12, 2021 @11:08PM (#28164952)
> One thing that they do not seem to be taking advantage of is how specialized many of their communities are.

Their default subs are utter crap and full of influence campaigns accounts; in addition to being nearly impossible to post to without punished in some way.

Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by monkeydust on Friday August 13, 2021 @03:37AM (#28166463)
True - I more frequently search for '<my question> + Reddit' on Google
Re:Reddit raises $410M in new funding by paxprose on Friday August 13, 2021 @01:39AM (#28165804)
bundle that with a profile that easily identifies cross markets by other interests too. you get to double dip. millions of targetable demographic profiles all self sorted and prepackaged for whomever.