Last I checked, only at the high end and Google devices, and substantially less true in non-US markets.
Careful with proclaiming such a bubble to be universal. I am sure in mountain view some PMs make decisions based on "oh but we killed the SD card years ago" but they don't have actual power to do that.
You used to be able to say the same for phones without holes in their screen or TV sets without internet connectivity.
The previous phone I had, since I had been burned repeatedly by phones I was otherwise happy with but the internal battery didn't last a year, I decided to shop around for the few remaining Android phones with decent performance that had an easily replaceable battery. I had to pick a model from late 2016.
What I ask of manufacturers is that at least the battery isn't glued or soldered in, and that there are clear instructions on how to unscrew the back of my phone to replace the battery after it starts dying out. That, and make it easy to take off the back (no adhesives (looks at you apple), and no taking out the front screen to access the battery), and make it easy to buy a genuine battery from the manufacturer's website.
I think that's a good compromise of thinness, ease of manufacture and ease of replacability.
That is a sad comment.
Yesterday's battery technology ensured sufficient energy density to make _all-week_ long battery life a reality. Yes, those were much weaker phones computationally, but I'm fine with staying with just phone calls, SMS and calendar when I'm low on battery, for an extra week...
However there are certain features that a smartphone gives which I wouldn't give up. Navigation with google maps, being able to do banking services on the go with my bank's app, being able to review flashcards with the Anki app, having my railcard/tesco clubcard/nectar card on my phone and never losing it, being able to check any important emails, checking the news if something breaking happens and I need to know instantly.
Heck, we praise Apple for bringing services like calling an ambulance for you if your pulse shows a certain pattern matching a heart attack (via the apple watch), and we also praise smartphones for actions like alerting people for emergencies like a terrorist attack or issuing weather warnings. I wouldn't give up any of those features just to have a dumb nokia phone with a week-long battery life.
Highly recommend you check out this: https://www.blloc.com/
Also - Smartwatches are silly IMHO; and people can be alerted just fine with a voice or text message.
So companies like Samsung[1], Sony[2], Motorola[3], Xiaomi[4] and LG[5] don't make smartphones anymore?
[1]: https://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s20-10081.php
[2]: https://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_1_ii-10096.php
[3]: https://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_edge-10133.php
Maybe TV manufacturers care about this, but in mobile it's a non-event.
Maybe Microsoft could open-source MSDOS in order for FreeDOS to have a rejuvenating moment.
MSDOS 6.0 might be interesting. Windows 3.1 too.
And MS-DOS 4.0/4.1, not to be confused with 4.00/4.01, which had multi-tasking features:
They're arguably invalid patents, in the sense that the filesystems concepts within are not remotely novel and the application to FAT is trivial and obvious.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/0407899...
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/0407898...
(Maybe that rule changed with the big changes around first to file and expiration based on application instead of grant date.)
¹ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/003701d56d04$470def50$...
I know it doesn't help others, but in my experience people using such software actually like this retro look (and I agree it does have some appeal to it - function before form).
When will we get a proper performant journaled cross platform filesystem that doesn't require additional software on Windows, MacOS, and Linux? I can't believe we still don't have anything like that.
Previous discussion on WinBtrfs https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15177002
Journal is about obviating fsck, just do journal replay to make the fs consistent again. I think for most media like USB sticks, the most platform interoperable file system is UDF. The gotcha that trips most people up I think, is that you shouldn't partition the media device. Just format the whole block device as UDF. I do this with mkuddf using defaults and it works fine across all three operating systems with similar performance as FAT32.
The GRUB Btrfs driver is pretty small considering the Btrfs feature set. And yet it understands all the multiple device stuff, the logical and physical device abstraction, and snapshots and subvolume navigation.
I like always on checksums for every block, both metadata and data. It's a good fit for the cheaper flash media out there including USB sticks which non-deterministically report back garbage, rather than a discrete read error.
I use it on my laptop with 0 issues. It’s really not that complicated...
Remember SOAP interoperability? Me neither. It was too complex for its own good. That's why REST is used everywhere today and experienced web developers smile every now and then when they remember they don't need to use it anymore. Well, most of them at least...
It basically upends the entire separation of layers and requires a completely different approach to use.
Hope you never had to store files larger than 4GB otherwise FAT32 would not work for you. (Before you respond with "that's what archive files / files splitting are for", not every device that takes files on an SD card and supports FAT32 has a way to join files on the fly/a way to read archived files.)
For those of us who lived through the "Linux is cancer" days, we are truly living in interesting times :-)