News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by sjroot on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:31PM (#23252028)
I really can't fathom how this is possible. The largely young demographic (which I'm guessing warrants this valuation) has a track record of jumping from platform to platform, whichever is trendy for a given year.

With that in mind, how are investors seriously willing to get behind this company in such a big way?

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by FanaHOVA on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:47PM (#23252276)
ByteDance isn't just TikTok, which is what the headline doesn't include. They also own Toutiao (Chinese news/content platform, top 100 website in China), Helo (Indian social media, the Google Play app alone has 2.2M reviews), Lark (https://www.larksuite.com/, an enterprise collaboration platform aimed at the Japanese market).
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by georgespencer on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:49PM (#23252916)
ByteDance did $20bn of revenue in 2019. The comments in this thread are… wow. Lots of opinions from my favourite HN cameo character, "Person With Vitally Important Opinions About Complex Topic But No Time To Read Beyond The Headline."
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by tedk-42 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @08:10PM (#23253523)
Nice! My usual trick for estimating a companies value is to multiply it's revenue by 10.

I highly doubt it's operating hosts are eating into the revenue that much so I'd say they're highly undervalued.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by chvid on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:42PM (#23253345)
Given that Facebook has a market cap of 650 B the valuation sounds reasonable ... maybe even cheap.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by thedudeabides5 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:52PM (#23252940)
True, but I'm sure that Bloomberg's paywall isn't helping on that front.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by artsyca on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:55PM (#23252969)
The paywall issue is listed in the FAQ - as long as there's a workaround it's acceptable
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by mastermojo on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:05PM (#23252510)
In my opinion Tiktok is a viable replacement for Instagram, a platform that generates on the order of 10B USD revenue a year. They both have pub/sub models where you can follow topics or celebrities or content creators you care about. Instagram is more photo focused and Tiktok is more video focused. The video first format is arguably higher fidelity/more compelling for content consumers.

Yes, people jump from platform to platform. Instagram will not be king forever, but it will be generating massive amounts of money both on the upswing and the downswing.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by searchableguy on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:05PM (#23253057)
I have been watching white people hired by chinese marketing firms on tiktok. It's hilarious.

https://youtu.be/xZ3RbDTc_fY

https://youtu.be/Mrx4ld3hmmw

https://youtu.be/VC-6zkDewBQ

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by overcast on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @10:19PM (#23254234)
https://youtu.be/xZ3RbDTc_fY?t=200

"This isn't even my real hair color!"

You don't say. Holy hell, this is scary.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by sixQuarks on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:18PM (#23252633)
Tiktok is also MORE popular than instagram worldwide
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by dclusin on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:39PM (#23252138)
Facebook was able to leverage their popularity with college students into a larger platform that had mass appeal with all age groups. I don't see why TikTok can't add features and get the same results.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by coralreef on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:57PM (#23252401)
Facebook solved the core problem of real identity on the web. Extending outside colleges was a natural progression (first to workplaces, then to high schools, then publicly).

TikTok solves the problem of short form video creation / entertainment. Will their userbase be interested in creating the same type of content in 4-5 years? I think they'll struggle the same way Snapchat struggles to convince people over 35 to use their app.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by holler on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:08PM (#23252538)
> I think they'll struggle the same way Snapchat struggles to convince people over 35 to use their app.

Have you used TikTok lately? It's overwhelmed with millennial/elder millennial and beyond. I don't see this as a problem for them and in fact I think people are jumping over to it in droves.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by BurningFrog on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:40PM (#23253325)
Everyone is locked up at home with their phone at the moment.

So current TikTok trends may be atypical.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by echelon on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:43PM (#23252869)
> elder millennial

The only time I feel old is when other people tell me I'm old.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by _630w on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:56PM (#23252975)
Don't worry. You are still young and rockin'
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by echelon on Friday May 22, 2020 @12:34AM (#23268663)
Thanks :)
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by dragonwriter on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:52PM (#23253410)
> millennial/elder millennia

Is this redundant or is the latter the new term for Gen X from the people who believe that the world is divided between Boomers and Millennials, so everyone else must be a “young millenial”, “elder millenial”, or “advanced boomer”?

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by surbas on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:00PM (#23252447)
... yeah and Vine.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by wolco on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:25PM (#23252693)
and keek..
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by bobthepanda on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:46PM (#23252251)
YikYak is another possible path for it to go.

Feel free to invest wherever you want, but personally I don't have the stomach for it.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by echelon on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:49PM (#23252911)
> YikYak is another possible path for it to go.

People complained about YikYak being anonymous. The problem is that YikYak listened to the complaints rather than their users.

Every social media company upsets its users at some point. Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Digg. The moat, platform stickiness, and competition shape outcomes.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by hckr_news on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @11:33PM (#23254560)
TikTok is a bit headache inducing for anyone not under 20. Anyway I don't think humans should be receiving that much stimulation, and information overload in such short bursts.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by jariel on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:45PM (#23252242)
Facebook has network effect, TikTock doesn't really.

Facebook is really centered around 'everyone you might know' including friends and family, whereas I doubt parents and grandparents will ever go onto TikTok.

Most importantly, TikTok is not basic communications tool, it's a specialized communications tool honed on a timely and probably faddish trend.

Facebook may or may may not survive, but TikTok will have to transform to make it for the long haul.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by lgl on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:00PM (#23252433)
Will most likely branch out into all the other usual markets, TikTok chat, TikTok meetings, TikTok Ads, TikTok shops, TikTok news, TikTok Pay, etc. Basically another slightly different version of the same stuff we're all used to with these kinds of social platforms. Still.. >100Bn is simultaneously ridiculous, funny and sad imho.

EDIT: valuation makes a bit more sense for the parent company seeing as it has a lot of other brands that are huge in China and India

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by jariel on Friday May 22, 2020 @12:23AM (#23268605)
None of those things are a given, moreover, you could say the same about almost any digital company.

"$176.9 million in revenue in 2019" - Forbes, Jan 16.

This is another SoftBank fake unicorn.

This time, they can hide behind the smoke and mirrors of the HK Stock Exchange and non-existent Chinese standard accounting principles.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by snazz on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:11PM (#23252577)
Instagram doesn't have the same network effect as Facebook. Snapchat does have Quick Add, which shows people you might know; it's also a much more communication-driven platform.

TikTok is probably the modern Instagram replacement, not the modern Facebook replacement.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by spideymans on Thursday May 21, 2020 @12:20AM (#23254759)
The barrier to making TikToks is much higher than for Instagram posts. It takes hours to make a decent TikTok; it takes second to make a decent Instagram Story post. For that reason, I see TikTok as more adjacent to YouTube than Instagram.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by Barrin92 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:37PM (#23252099)
> has a track record of jumping from platform to platform

do they really though? It honestly seems like particular brands are very sticky with internet demographics, not just young people.

IIRC there even is more brand loyalty among ecommerce than there is among physical brick and mortar stores.

You can look at something like Whatsapp as well. There have been lots of privacy concerns after the acquisition by Facebook but the number of people who actually switch to say, Signal is very low. There are huge network effects to these social media / communications platforms, and TikTok already has 1.5 billion users worldwide.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by TheAdamAndChe on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:47PM (#23252266)
In my experience, the claim that the younger generation hops around is fair. I'm 26. Between the ages of 15 and now, my primary social media platform has hopped between Myspace, Facebook, Reddit, 4chan, YouTube, some diary site, PSN(PlayStation Network), Hacker News, and probably others. I've dipped my toes into countless other ones. I've kind of stopped hopping around as much, but other people my age still hop between newer ones like Instagram, tiktok, and others.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by searchableguy on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:59PM (#23253011)
That isn't true. Outside of teens in tech or nerdy places, most won't switch to the next hyped thing. I have been trying to get people on session and pleroma but most of them don't care.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by redis_mlc on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:46PM (#23252892)
> I've kind of stopped hopping around as much

So at 26, you're getting old? :)

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by Izkata on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:15PM (#23252606)
> some diary site

LiveJournal?

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by TheAdamAndChe on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:24PM (#23252679)
Nah, some other one. I know what it is, but I don't want it to leak in case someone associates this account with my real identity.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by chosenbreed37 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:50PM (#23252317)
1.5 billion users already. That's staggering!
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by goodside on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:06PM (#23252517)
The tendency of young people to jump from platform to platform is partially an illusion caused by the fact they don’t remain young. You see this especially in dating sites — people used to think OkCupid could never make money because it was dominated by 18-to-25-year-olds. Now it’s mostly people in their 30’s, and the prior king of 30-somethings, Match.com, is for people over 40. The same thing happened with Tinder, PlentyOfFish, etc.

TikTok isn’t a dating site, but it’s certainly “flirty”. It has specific appeal to socially active teenagers and nearly all of the content shows off suitability for dating: looks, dancing, fashion, wit, etc. I could imagine adding paywalls to men contacting desirable women, or of course just padding the feeds of less valuable users with ads.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by echelon on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:52PM (#23252946)
> padding the feeds of less valuable users with ads

This is horrifying when you consider this happens in every avenue of life and will only become better targeted as technology progresses.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by goodside on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:03PM (#23253033)
It’s less horrifying if you think of it as a treadmill — MySpace is sort of the logical extreme, where the owners realized its days were numbered and made the experience so ad-heavy that everyone left for other platforms. You sow growth for some number of years, then you reap. Sometimes it’s subscriptions, sometimes it’s sponsored full-page branding.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by echelon on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:09PM (#23253081)
Sorry, I wasn't making the claim about a product.

People that are more socially valuable are given a better experience and are treated better; kind of the social media "red carpet" treatment. Those that are less valuable are mined and exploited.

I can imagine an insidious future where social networks assign an "intelligence score" to users and advertise snake oil to those with less capacity to evaluate risks. There might even be a market for those users. A number of companies in the mobile gaming space profit from exploiting "whales". Imagine buying and selling them as targets.

Similarly, networks might evolve to give positive experiences to users that create content. We already have that in the form of monetization and karma. The economy rewards value creators.

But imagine being algorithmically put in place.

That gives me the creeps.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by walterbell on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:46PM (#23253363)
What makes you think this hasn't already happened? Advertising can both create and meet demand. A large portion of social media advertising came from mobile gaming companies, relying on the targeted profiles available on social platform, to find people who could be converted into whales.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by vander on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:50PM (#23252311)
The valuation is for TikTok's parent company ByteDance which has a large number of products and investments including a really popular news aggregation app in China.

Also, TikTok in China, which is its largest market, is popular with everyone, young and old. It got to the point of threatening WeChat. CEOs of Tencent and ByteDance had a huge spat a while back.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by yRetsyM on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:35PM (#23252085)
Wasn't the same said about Facebook?
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by inimino on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:40PM (#23252156)
TikTok is fun. If you're not on it, it's hard to understand.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by xiphias2 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:46PM (#23252893)
I tried it multiple times, but I've always got low-quality-video fatigue when after have seen the same dance moves 20 times by different people for the same music.

With Youtube I can watch conference videos that contain genuinely new content forever, but I don't see that happening with TikTok. Also it spams my mobile notifications, so I had to delete it, even though I don't delete too many apps.

For young people who have their friends on it, it's probably fun to see them, but for me I just hope that forced TikTok integration won't be the next one on Tinder.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by inimino on Friday May 22, 2020 @12:01PM (#23273496)
Scroll past the ones that bore you, or long press and hit "not interested", and the for you page will improve.

> conference videos

TikTok is for killing time and having fun. If you're learning on TikTok it's by accident. The videos are limited to a minute, ffs. That's why it's fun and it's good that people who take it too seriously are put off by the format and leave.

> I had to delete it

You can curate the apps allowed to notify you on your phone. For me, my phone makes a noise when someone is calling me (a good old-fashioned phone call) and that is the only notification I allow. If you're deleting apps for that, you're missing out.

> young people who have their friends on it

You're thinking of snap. Young people don't have their friends on tiktok, they are mostly hoping not to meet people they know on there so they don't get in trouble for how they use it.

When a platform captures the leisure of young people, it develops a culture with its own conventions and art. TikTok is the first platform I've been excited by since early Twitter. The fact that old people don't get it is a huge benefit. TikTok doesn't want your boring conference videos.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by ngokevin on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:14PM (#23253122)
You need to be really careful how you tailor it (what you like, hashtags you look up, who you follow, what videos you watch all the way through or multiple times).
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by underwater on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @11:01PM (#23254425)
Repetition paired with a slight twist is much more addictive than novel content. See: memes, pop music, MCU, etc.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by kenhwang on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:50PM (#23252315)
Snapchat is fun. If you're not on it, it's hard to understand.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by inimino on Friday May 22, 2020 @12:03PM (#23273510)
I am on it. As a platform, it doesn't hold a candle to TikTok.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by skookum-skuad on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:51PM (#23252935)
X is fun for the next 4 days. If you're not on it, you're uncool and don't jump on whatever is popular because it's popular.

X =

Email#

IRC#

ICQ

AIM

Yahoo Messenger

Friendster

MSN Messenger

MySpace

Flickr

Orkut

Google Talk

Skype

Google Wave

Facebook

Youtube#

Twitter#

Vimeo#

G+

WhatsApp

Periscope

Vine

Instagram

Snapchat

TikTok

Zoom

# Only exceptions, so far

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by leonidasv on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @10:31PM (#23254284)
Tumblr, Discord, Slack, Ello, Telegram, Badoo, FormSpring, iTunes Ping, FriendFeed, Diaspora, Bebo, Path, Meerkat, VK, Google Buzz, CryptoKitties... The list goes on and on.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by knolax on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:09PM (#23253073)
I wouldn't list IRC as an exception. Every IRC channel I've ever tried using has been dead.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by wolco on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:34PM (#23253281)
Periscope was never fun
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by wolco on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:32PM (#23253270)
I've been on it. It's kinda boring, the videos are so short and are like gifs.

I've been getting into more ig live lately. It seems to be the latest popular thing. Live long videos of stars are hot.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by mattlondon on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:55PM (#23252380)
Yeah I wonder about this too.

This time last year (or was it the year before that?) it was Snapchat (remember Snapchat? Kids don't) that was going to take over the world and be bigger than Apple + Facebook + Google combined etc etc. I don't think that worked out really.

I am guessing that investors just pile in wherever the "youth" are without paying too much attention to what it really is they are investing in... just hoping to get in early on the next big thing I suppose

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by identity0 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:24PM (#23253197)
Snapchat is still massive and influential. My snapchat username is still probably the first thing people my age will ask me for. Yes of course it’s not as influential as facebook or google, since it only has one product, but don’t act like youth no longer use snapchat.

Source: I’m youth

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by hkyeti on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @10:14PM (#23254216)
It's mostly a US centric thing though
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by technion on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @08:13PM (#23253539)
Ironically I just took a look at Snap and out of five consecutive advertisements, four were for Tiktok.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by nopriorarrests on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:57PM (#23252986)
>remember Snapchat? Kids don't

And yet, SNAP stock is up YoY.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by intro-b on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:53PM (#23252955)
I think Twitch could be a valid comparison to TikTok. Both are content-focused platforms that draw in audiences from a variety of somewhat non-overlapping demographics, but exist in the same space. They've already branched out into livestreaming, and I think a logical next step would be leaning even heavier into Twitch-style community building features while simultaneously promoting the app's base of viral social media video content.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by nelaboras on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:46PM (#23252262)
i see four scenarios:

1. insanity 2. lies about numbers 3. massive invasive data siphoning and thats actually the basis for the valuation 4. tiktok now has a license to vast raw video and personal data that users granted them the right to use and resell in perpetuity. They obviously don't just keep edited but also raw data, videos never published, maybe even entire camera rolls. So much data held by a company sheltered behind the Chinese state's protection from legal repercussions.

or of course all of the above.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by georgespencer on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:40PM (#23252850)
Scenario 5: you didn't read beyond the misleading headline to see that it's ByteDance, who own TikTok, and who did $20bn of revenue in 2019 (implying a 5x multiple on valuation).
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by duxup on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:35PM (#23252084)
I'm largely with you, although maybe they're thinking of YouTube in the scene that it has stuck around for a while.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by pwdisswordfish2 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:09PM (#23253074)
Nothing else to get behind.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by knackfuss on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:40PM (#23252160)
This was my first reaction also but making a quick google search it seems that TikTok has 500 million users. That's a lot. Doing a pretty simple calculation of a dollar per user per day, you arrive quickly at 180 billion dollars of advertising monetization a year. It is really just another scale. But yeah, maybe i am way off and the valuation is still absurd.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by mynegation on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:47PM (#23252269)
Where did you get that “simple calculation” from? If Average user is worth to TikTok a dollar per day that means that ad buyers are willing to give it to TikTok from their advertising and marketing budget. Which means that the average user should spend at least few grands each year on advertised products and services, which does not seem likely.

Also, this is not how valuations are estimated. 180 billion _per year_ is a huge amount (for comparison Apple revenue for 2019 is 260B). One applies a revenue multiple that depends on the stage of the company and industry but for early booming social media site is in the range of 20-40. So the estimate of 105-110 probably comes from the range of 3-5 B yearly revenue estimate

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by knackfuss on Thursday May 21, 2020 @12:38PM (#23260719)
Yes, that's correct. A dollar per day is huge, and that would bring the valuation close to a revenue multiple of one, which is madness by market standards. If you would make it 10 cents per day, which seems more reasonable according to people more informed than me, that would become simply a multiple of 10, which is still low, as you pointed it out. We can keep changing the variables, divide it by 2 even, but the point i tried to make is that it seems not that crazy of a valuation after all if you consider 500mi users as an average
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by wolco on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @07:35PM (#23253294)
An averge tiktok user doesn't make a dollar a day not sure they have the most valuable userbase.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by bllguo on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:51PM (#23252328)
let's not quibble over semantics of "simple"

anyway the valuation clearly must include investor perception of their growth trajectory.

Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by dsmithn on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @06:57PM (#23252984)
I think the more appropriate wording would be "completely pulled out of thin air and not relevant calculation"
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by vikramkr on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:53PM (#23252352)
One dollar per day!? That's an obscenely high level. Facebook is one of the highest revenue per user social media companies by orders if magnitude and they made worldwide an average of 7.26 per user in an entire financial quarter, which is like 8 or 9 cents per day. If tiktok is outdoing facebook by a full order of magnitude, and has 1/5th the users, even with identical growth expectations they'd be twice the valuation at like 1.2 trillion dollars. A couple billion in revenues plus investor belief in growth potential is more than enough to justify a 105 billion dollar valuation (nobody said investors can't overvalue companies either, look at wework). I dont think they're anywhere near as obscenely profitable as making a dollar per day across all international users, they're going to be orders of magnitude removed from that.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by harrisonjackson on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @11:24PM (#23254536)
I wonder what the amount spent by users on advertised products per quarter is... presumably more but that seems like a lot especially if that is worldwide.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by pjc50 on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:52PM (#23252343)
$1/user/day is a huge overestimate. Facebook manage a fraction of that.
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by nelaboras on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:48PM (#23252288)
180b/0.5 = each user (including inactive ones) worth 1$/day?
Re:TikTok has recently traded at valuations of $105-110B on ... by FanaHOVA on Wednesday May 20, 2020 @05:53PM (#23252349)
200M DAU so way above 500M users