coralreef
The short but final answer: because other people want it.
Fake zoom updates: https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/scams/2026/02/fake-zoom-me...
NPM supply chain attack targeting cryptowallets: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/blog/cloud-security/npm-sup...
More software means more complexity means more pathways to losing.
Can you do it? Sure. I'm sure there are millions of dollars in private keys stored on internet connected laptops somewhere out there. But the best practices remain the same: as little internet as possible, as little software as possible.
To continue with your example, "display sniffing" could be done by infecting trusted software or software presented as trustworthy (fake or infected Zoom binaries, Xcode binaries, etc.) or injected through open source dependencies like npm packages.
Yes, you or I might be paranoid enough to check the checksum hash to make sure the open source code matches the build. But every time, for everything?
The less connected it is, the safer. The less software it runs, the safer.
Sounds kinda clunky.
But now you need to generate a public key to send to someone so you can receive coins. How are you sending that key to your friend? Are you going to read character by character and manually type up the string?
It's all tradeoffs.
Thus the attack surface is far greater.
~70% of int'l marriages in Japan are Japanese men + foreign brides.
Of the women marrying foreign husbands, 25.7% Korean, next is 16.7% American, then 12.5% Chinese.
DJI and Insta360 offer compelling products. And budget, lower quality 1080p-4k action cams got eaten by Akaso and other clones.
You can have an opinion on whether or not AI/data centers are worthwhile, but ultimately it wasn't made by your money.
Who would be more efficient at pricing money: the market or the government?
That’s the tradeoff of an open web. When you have a limitless design space, you get lots of trash.
But saying “websites are a scam” is just disingenuous to the fact that some websites are very legit and very useful.
Hmm, maybe, or maybe a video representation of the moment, endorsed and co-branded by the league and the athletes, will come to be as valuable or more valuable than a physical photo print of that moment as represented by trading cards.
A trading card doesn’t survive a house fire or flood. How can a card be a true artifact of sports history when its also just a derivative product?
The same way you can try selling fake Rolex’s or picasso’s.
Any serious buyer would attempt to vet the items provenance to make sure it’s authentic. You might be able to pull a quick one on some, but that’s not unique to crypto.
America, it’s workers, corporations, military, etc., will happily abandon the dollar should it become necessary. No one wants to be paid in money undergoing massive devaluation.