Keeping something the way it is, is super hard in tons of ways a lot of us probably don't understand. We appreciate you.
HN design is simply the best thing out there. "Moving slowly and preserving things" - I would get this engraved on my grave. This philosophy has died unfortunately and with it went robustness, simplicity, elegance, poise, beauty, accessibility, elegance, maintainability and practicality.
Thanks dang for your gandalf-like wisdom and your resilience. I like Alligators over goddamn mosquitos that have taken over the internet.
Please dang!
I second the other commenter, don't do anything. Or get someone really good to help you!
Edit: my fault. I have too many dark mode addons/stylesheets enabled at the same time.
Midnight lizard (chrome) https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/midnight-lizard/pb... is a good extension that can create a dark theme by changing the contrast & things like that. It does it in a way that the same theme will work on a lot of sites. They do have more dark (& light) themes on their site & you can create your own by entering a few colors & it will create a theme based on that. Stylus is good (NOT stylish), but Midnight lizard creates themes in a way that are compatible with a lot more sites that Stylus.
None of the extensions I've tested can match the dead simple CSS override I used in qutebrowser.
old.reddit.com comments are mostly unreadable, and it cripples gmail, but I've learned to take advantage of Options-Shift-D to flip it on and off when needed.
It's now part of my web browsing workflow.
Edit:
To clarify what I mean is maybe toggling which style sheet HN gives you in settings would be ideal for all. Web standards are nice but they dont help in the minimalist ideals of HN too much.
https://caniuse.com/#search=css%20variables
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44271920/css-variables-w...
Could you imagine if we entrusted every website to independently implement scroll bars and zoom? What a mess that'd be.
The color pallete of a page is important, and maintaining a consistent look and feel across normal and dark mode can only be done reliably by each website's designer.
So I guess we need both the ability to have the browser auto-calculate a default dark mode, and a way for aestetically-conscious web designers to override it, and that's what we're moving towards.
In fact it's already in chrome on android, no work needs to be done (other than enabling it). Here's an image gallery guide I made: https://imgur.com/a/njNTO6T
This is the right approach, it should be solved at the browser level. In fact, it already is.
The only responsibility of web developers should be to not go out of their way and do silly things that break this.
High contrast is very useful for people with visual difficulties, but might even be counter-productive for certain types of eye strain.
I'm under the impression people asking for dark mode are looking for something that will emit less light off their screens, not necessarily make it look nore contrast-y, and the two are more often than not opposite.
I don't know how to feel about that.
What’s the tool chain manager look like for managing the build process manager?
Thanks!
Truthfully, there is some Javascript. For example, onclick(). Voting without Javascript requires some extra effort.
While I understand and agree with your point, I have personally found this quoted portion to be a false assumption.
To me, "works" means I can retrieve the content of the page without using JS. If the websites we are discussing are ones where the primary purpose is reading, like HN, most will "work" for me without JS, so long as I do not rely on try using a "modern browser" to retrieve the content. In fact, I cannot even think of a single website meant for reading that I cannot read without a Javascript-enabled browser.
That's not much readable without some trickery
Name any newspaper website you think is "not much readable" without Javascript or cookies and I can prove that is a false assumption.
Thanks for the riddle! I guess you could use iframes?
Edit: Ohhh and you could use data-urls as iframe src, so as not to make a large number of requests.
Seems like a fun project, so I may start planning it when I have time.
[1] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/09/victory-ruling-hiq-v-l...
I was more thinking about a local web-app that consumes the site and then outputs it in a nice mobile layout, without actually archiving or saving anything.
In comparison, the pure-CSS ideas that some people are posting would work automatically if your browser supports dark mode, and would enlarge the (cached with long ttl) CSS file only very slightly.
Pure CSS would be quite cool, but we'd probably also need a snippet of JS to add a button allowing to switch between light and dark mode. (There's probably a way to do it without JS that someone will hopefully comment too.)
A separate subdomain:
- Requires separate TLS certificates to be maintained.
- Doesn't play nice with caching.
- Doesn't play nice with password managers.
- Doesn't work with any existing links. Users would have to manually add the `dark` prefix.
- Is generally a bad user experience.
> Doesn't play nice with password managers.
Check your password manager settings. Most have options to match on domain, subdomain, port or have the ability to set equivalent domains either globally or per credential.