News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by DarkTree on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @10:52AM (#11118632)
I'm not surprised some Starbucks drinks have a ton of sugar, but the 3 cans of Coke worth definitely puts it into perspective.

I grew up drinking my coffee with sugar and cream, but eventually stopped using sugar, and then ultimately drinking it black. If you can wean off adding compliments to your coffee, you will most likely acquire a taste for the bitterness of coffee.

Once you begin loving the true taste of coffee, it becomes a much more fun experience to try different types of coffee, it's much healthier, and taste much better to me (now).

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by TarpitCarnivore on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:01PM (#11119253)
The amount of sugar you were putting in your coffee is probably not close to comparable to that in these drinks.

> Once you begin loving the true taste of coffee

The "true" taste of coffee is how you prefer to drink coffee. Don't forget that a lot of people like to drink milk based drinks (latte, cap, macciato, etc) which are technically not showing the "true" taste of the coffee being used. Yet for someone reason no one thumbs their nose at them.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by davidw on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:49PM (#11120210)
Italians find people who drink a cappuccino after about 11 in the morning a source of amusement. It's a dead giveaway that the person in question is a foreigner.

The good side: they're amused but not rude or snotty about it.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by Rainymood on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:04PM (#11120318)
I once ordered a cappuccino after 11, I got something else instead (I believe an espresso/americano?) and I was really confused as I thought the barista had misheard me. Then someone explained it to me afterwards and I felt kind of silly
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by talmand on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:20PM (#11120436)
Why is that something to feel silly about? I would think that if it is your harmless custom it is rude for someone with a different custom to make something negative out of it.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by acangiano on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:52PM (#11120713)
Some of us gave up the fight and will now have a cappuccino whenever. (Paese che vai, usanze che trovi.)
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by ritchiea on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:37PM (#11121137)
That's ridiculous, coffee has a flavor and that flavor is the true taste of coffee. Well the true taste of the particular coffee you're drinking because different beans and brewing methods create different flavors. It's equally ridiculous to shame people about not enjoying black coffee but adding another liquid to your coffee definitely diminishes the amount of coffee you taste.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by goodJobWalrus on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:29PM (#11120059)
> The amount of sugar you were putting in your coffee is probably not close to comparable to that in these drinks.

Even if you put just 2 teaspoons, that is 10gr of sugar. If you drink 3 coffees a day, that's 30gr or your entire daily recommendation as per WHO.

Unsurprisingly, I too drink my coffee black. While I can stand coffee with milk in it, and sometimes order cappuccinos at fancy coffee shops, sugar just ruins it. If you can get off it, you'll be much better off in every way.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by GrinningFool on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:39PM (#11120602)
> Even if you put just 2 teaspoons, that is 10gr of sugar. Which is about 30 calories. Which means you'd have to drink 6 cups with that amount to equal the calories of 1 can of Coke.

Add a tablespoon of half-n-half, and that's +20 calories - 50 calories per cup, which means you're still 3+ cups before you equal a can of Coke.

It's all relative. If you have a couple of cups a day with reasonable quantities of things added, it's not particularly egregious on its own.

(Doesn't count milk, but in small amount the inc

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by cvwright on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:13PM (#11119912)
> Yet for someone reason no one thumbs their nose at them.

You should come to Portland sometime. :)

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by pklausler on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:15PM (#11119936)
For a visit.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by pizza234 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:23PM (#11120002)
No one thumbs their nose exactly because they are "milk" based :-)

I agree with parent because I had a similar process, and I see the same difference in nature. I'd say that coffee-based drinks are more of a piano concerto, while milk-based products more of a strings trio, although I'm sure this is a terrible analogy.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by mrtron on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:18PM (#11120411)
The true taste of coffee is black coffee, prepared in a few different ways.

Latte, etc are all their own drink. They contain coffee.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by syntheticnature on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:17PM (#11119384)
Mind you, if you like the taste of coffee, Starbucks isn't that great, unless you like burnt flavors even in your medium roasts. I've heard their new Clover machines, at some locations, offer better flavor -- but Starbucks' regular coffee seems tailor-made to at least drive you to their espresso products, if not well into the land of sweetened drinks.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by acchow on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @03:47PM (#11121236)
The Clover is phenomenal, but if you're stuck using Starbucks beans on them it's still not gonna taste great...
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by syntheticnature on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:20PM (#11121502)
I'm given to understand the way to have it is to get single-origin beans with the Clover. I haven't given it a try yet.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by stuaxo on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:17PM (#11119382)
It helps to have coffee that is actually decent, which you don't get in Starbucks.

A lot of low quality food and drink seems way less satisfying, so people make it up with quantity.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by Someone1234 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:54PM (#11119709)
I don't drink Starbucks (too expensive for me) so this is a legitimate question: I thought Starbucks coffee was meant to be good/high quality? If it isn't why are people spending over $3/cup when McDonald's and others has $1/cup coffee?

I'm legitimately asking, I'm not into the whole Starbucks scene.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by fsociety on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:15PM (#11119926)
If you take a shot of espresso from Starbucks and compare it to a shot of espresso from a cafe which roasts their own beans, you'll taste the difference quite immediately. Starbucks beans are over-roasted by a large margin.

Their coffee has the same story. Grinding Starbuck beans results in what looks like ashes from a campfire, and doesn't release those wonderful smells from the oil. Just smell the difference when you grind a higher quality bean, never mind how much more appetizing the texture looks.

My understanding, from working in the industry for a short time, is that Starbucks roasts the largest quantity of beans in the world and that is why their coffee is so burnt. It's impossible to control the temperatures when they roast these large quantity of beans with much precision, so they compensate by over-roasting them.

That said, coffee snobbery isn't a good thing, and their drinks aren't that bad when you put in tons of sugar or milk. But without the dressings, it's pretty terrible quality.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by alaskamiller on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:52PM (#11120229)
Most people can't taste the difference between the two, that's the difference.

Third wave independent coffee shops harp on the idea it takes months of palette training for their baristas to calibrate tasting minute differences and somehow every other person comes in here to opine about how burnt or nasty tasting their cup of bean juice is.

Starbucks optimizes for different things than other shops. They over roast as a signature, to create bolder flavor. Over the past decade they have great control over their supply chain and beans yet they still over roast beyond the flavor signature because when most of their products are milk-based drinks the extra flavor of the espresso comes through.

It's meant to be that way, not because of some conspiracy to deliver mediocrity, but because it's their culture. And ignorance paired with pretentiousness in coffee culture is on whole other level cargo cult-iness.

Besides, when one really wants to talk about bad coffee and they're not mentioning Philz then they have no clue.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by ceejayoz on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:30PM (#11120520)
It wouldn't shock me if Starbucks over-roasts because people (incorrectly) believe that the bitterness is the caffeine. It tastes "strong".
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by rdancer on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @07:57PM (#11122876)
> It's impossible to control the temperatures when they roast these large quantity of beans with much precision

You're trolling, right?

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by tsomctl on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @08:49PM (#11123100)
You realize that there is much more to roasting coffee than just heating them up to some pre-specified temperature, right?

You have your bean temperature, air temperature, and drum temperature, all of which are controlled separately. You also need to bring them up at the right speed. You also control how much you circulate the air versus venting it. And all of these things are interrelated, adjusting one will change the others. I help maintain the roaster at a small coffee company, and the head roaster likes to manually control each roast. The PLC can automate an entire roast, but since there are so many variables, he likes to run it manually.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by rdancer on Thursday February 18, 2016 @12:49AM (#11123955)
I'm really sorry if not doing things by hand offends your artisan sensibilities. Why pick on Starbucks, though, there are plenty of coffee producers who have been roasting coffee on industrial scale for much longer than the company exist.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by jsprogrammer on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:40PM (#11120145)
Surely Starbucks can afford an engineer to design and manufacture a roaster that can properly handle their volume?
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by fluxquanta on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:01PM (#11119792)
People don't pay $3 for plain Starbucks coffee. They pay $3 for the atmosphere of the shop and the availability of a halfway decent public bathroom.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by csixty4 on Thursday February 18, 2016 @08:54AM (#11125705)
And reliable wifi.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by navait on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:58PM (#11119764)
If you are really into coffee, mass produced is cool to hate on, and the best is what you make yourself. I enjoy the coffee, but it's not the best I ever had. Of course, in my area it's the only option over Dunkin Donuts or Mcdonalds, which I do not like.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by stcredzero on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @07:30PM (#11122754)
Hacker Dojo used to have Dunkin Donuts coffee, along with a precise posted procedure for brewing it, which seemed to work quite well. ("How to brew coffee like a BOSS!")

For me, for DIY: Aeropress and recently roasted beans. Grind yourself.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by gyardley on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:54PM (#11120732)
It's better than all the available alternatives in about 99% of America by area. There's no shame in going to a Starbucks in the suburbs, or when traveling in another country without a good coffee culture.

The people who are snotty about it (including me) are generally located in the few enclaves, like Portland, where there's genuinely better alternatives. Going to Starbucks in Portland is like eating at the Olive Garden in Times Square.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by mattdotc on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:59PM (#11119772)
>If it isn't why are people spending over $3/cup when McDonald's and others has $1/cup coffee?

I can't speak for every Starbucks customer out there, but I always assumed the reason is that it's a status symbol.

To some degree, they want to be seen with the cup. They haven't tried the competitors, so they assume Starbucks must be very good to justify the price. If they really enjoyed coffee for coffee's sake, they'd probably be going to an independent shop for their drink.

I think Starbucks' coffee isn't terrible, but I definitely prefer to brew it myself or spend the same amount at a smaller cafe, preferably if they roast their own beans.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:44PM (#11120168)
That doesn't really make sense, it's like saying people want to be seen eating Big Macs. Starbucks isn't really a status symbol in the states, it is simply a guilty pleasure/luxury/drug to those who are addicted. They don't go to indies simply because it is not convenient (sbux is everywhere) and they know what they are getting. Believe me, would love to try an indie, but in my neighborhood, the only alternative is Costa and Pacific Coffee, which are just as bad UK and HK brands.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by talmand on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:24PM (#11120475)
It makes perfect sense, if being seen eating Big Macs were to become trendy then you would see more people eating Big Macs. It happens for all kinds of things in popular culture. Why do people buy the expensive famous name brand stuff when the no-name clothing would be just as good for their needs?
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by rdancer on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @05:06PM (#11121846)
> if being seen eating Big Macs were to become trendy then you would see more people eating Big Macs

I grew up in a poor country. One Christmas Season, I took a part-time job at a bank's back office. The full-time employees would go to the McD across the street from the office building, and get a take-away. The journey cut their 60-minute lunch break by half. I remarked how expensive it was, but my colleague told me: "Remember how much they're making, they can probably afford it!"

:-)

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by seanmcdirmid on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:09PM (#11121431)
You would be embarrassed if you were seen eating a Big Mac, the same is almost true with Starbucks. It is anti-status right now: better to be seen with a hipster indie coffee than the McDonalds-like Starbucks cup!

People buy the expensive branded clothes because...they know what they are getting. No one really wants to walk around with a swoosh on their chest! Going for no-name clothing, there is no reputation to go by, how can you tell if that shirt is going to feel good or wear well? Muji does no-name well, you can trust their quality even if they don't put their name everywhere, but even that is a "brand."

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by ferrisford on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:09PM (#11119869)
You're paying for the brand and for consistency. People love Starbucks because they know what there getting, you can order a Starbucks drink in Colorado and have it taste the same as if you ordered it in Tokyo or Prague etc. (so I've heard)

You can also end up with something that's pretty much a milkshake with caffeine but instead of walking around looking like a fatty with your DQ blizzard cup you can be cute and trendy with your Starbucks cup.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by kuschku on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:49PM (#11120209)
Funnily, ALDI/Trader Joes also roasts and sells coffee (they are only testing selling of freshly brewed coffee in some locations). They’re everywhere, and their quality is actually very high.

It will be interesting to see how Starbucks is going to react when a big player like ALDI is going to take their territory.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by messick on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:07PM (#11119848)
At least in Los Angeles, the prices for a medium sized coffee at Starbucks vs. McDonalds is: $2.25 tax included vs $1.29 tax not included.

So, the prices aren't as different as you think.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by Kluny on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:02PM (#11119800)
I think the beans that they use are decent quality, but they seem to over-roast them, which leads to excessive bitterness, as well as killing some of the richer and more subtle flavors. Starbucks coffee does have MORE flavor than McDonalds/Tim Hortons/Dunkn' Donuts. Those other chains seem to just serve their coffee really weak. But the extra flavor you get from Starbucks is just a higher intensity of that burnt flavor. It makes you feel like you're getting a bigger caffeine hit (you're not), but it doesn't taste that great.

My personal theory, anyway.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by artimaeis on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:23PM (#11121531)
No one is spending $3 on a cup of regular brewed coffee at Starbucks to my knowledge. Maybe there's a strong regional difference? I can't find anything online to support that, though.

McDonalds:{12oz:"$1.00" 16oz:"$1.50" 20oz:"$1.80"}

Starbucks:{12oz="$1.75" 16oz:"$1.95" 20oz:"$2.25"}

If I want to enjoy the drink on-location I'll pick Starbucks every time. The ambiance is generally pretty okay. If I just need a quick brew and can grab it in a drive-thru then McDonalds will do just fine.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by dragonwriter on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:07PM (#11119855)
> I thought Starbucks coffee was meant to be good/high quality? If it isn't why are people spending over $3/cup when McDonald's and others has $1/cup coffee?

Starbucks is widespread enough to count on and convenient almost wherever you are, and for many good enough and better than McDonald's, etc.

Now, its been quite a while since I had a McDonald's coffee drinks, but when I have, its been bad, far worse than anything I've had a Starbucks.

At the same time, there are plenty of independent coffee shops that have better coffee, and, if I am someplace where I know one, I prefer them. But Starbucks is good enough, and reliable and consistent enough when I am somewhere where I don't know what the good local independents are (and, when I am near my home, its a lot more convenient than the nearest preferable independent.)

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by sp332 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:40PM (#11120137)
McDonald's coffee improved drastically when they switched to Newman's Own.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by pkaye on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:58PM (#11119757)
I'm not a coffee drinker but I guess people go there for the convenience and consistency.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by alistairSH on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:02PM (#11120299)
Personally, I drink Starbucks once in a blue moon as a treat - not for superior coffee flavor, but because I want a giant, sugary dessert beverage. At one time I drank a large cup/week, but then I came to my senses.

My normal morning coffee is brewed at home using fresh, but mass-produced beans (usually one of Trader Joe's varieties).

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by randycupertino on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @04:02PM (#11121364)
> At one time I drank a large cup/week, but then I came to my senses.

I'm going through this right now with trying to wean myself off a bubble tea habit. There are just so many amazing options near my office and I have at least one giant one per week. The struggle is real.

How did you successfully cut down?

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by alistairSH on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @07:21PM (#11122710)
I cheated...

Last year, I was diagnosed with celiac disease, so I could no longer eat Starbucks food. I often grabbed my large coffee along with a pastry or sandwich.

Will power not required. Sorry I can't be of any help.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by rorykoehler on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @01:01PM (#11119795)
I drink a ton of coffee, rarely Starbucks or any other Corp coffee, and I think mcd coffee tastes miles better.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by mikeash on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:23PM (#11120464)
I'm not sure many people actually order just "coffee" at Starbucks. When I've been in one, virtually every order is some weird-ass fancy drink, to the point where I feel a little out of place just ordering a coffee.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by jonesb6 on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:22PM (#11120451)
Anecdotally Starbucks is the only coffee I enjoy taking black, other blends I'll usually add milk or half and half.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by agentgt on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @02:50PM (#11120693)
I would have to sort of disagree that black coffee is always going to give you more of a "true" coffee taste.

Adding fat and sodium for most things generally exemplifies the taste and flavor (not sugar). For example adding tarragon mixed with butter and you can really taste that tarragon.

I have noticed this with coffee. Adding a little bit of cream definitely brings out more subtle flavors in the coffee (depending on the coffee and also no where near the level that starbucks adds.. just a little will do).

But I generally drink my coffee black as well for health reasons.

Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by miseg on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @11:44AM (#11119097)
I've tried weaning myself off strong milky coffee, but I like the taste of the milkiness. I get what you're saying, and will try to reduce the milk content over time.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by stcredzero on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @07:27PM (#11122740)
IIRC, the amount of sugar a typical drink has in it has gone up by 100% since the 80's. I'd swear that soft drinks had about 20 grams of sugar in them back then. Now there's typically almost 40 grams in a soft drink, and Honest Tea passes as a "lighter" drink with only 19 grams.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by baldfat on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @11:51AM (#11119164)
I put a ton of sugar in my tea, but tea is so diverse I enjoy all the different kinds. I think I am now down to only one teaspoon per 8 oz.
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by agumonkey on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @11:24AM (#11118909)
My body rejects processed foods nowadays, I'm somehow forced to eat raw everything. It's funny how so many tastes there are. Now I now there's enjoyable tastes outside the usual junk food. But, I miss the feel of carb + sugar + fat, it really does push all your brains button :)
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by hissworks on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @11:56AM (#11119205)
How do avocados fare as a substitute?
Re:Starbucks has 3x the sugar of a whole Coke in some drinks by agumonkey on Wednesday February 17, 2016 @12:50PM (#11119681)
Pretty fine, but it's not a common thing to eat though. Raw salad, carrots and tomato, with a pinch of salt and vinegar. A bit of meat. One thing I recently discovered is that whole grain mueslies do feel nice on your mouth without triggering pain in my case. Maybe more fibers that help feeling satiated.