goodJobWalrus
goodJobWalrus on Hacker News
Who is Bobby the article keeps talking about? Her business partner's name was Sunny, and her husband is Billy.
ha, ha, and they say AI does not hallucinate anymore!
I looked it up, according to Google:
This phrase is a direct quote from the 1955 play (and 1960 film) Inherit the Wind, spoken by the character Henry Drummond (based on Clarence Darrow) regarding the teaching of evolution. It frames scientific education and intellectual freedom as the ultimate, pure progress of human civilization, contrasting with dogmatic resistance.
Context: The line refers to the 1925 Scopes "Monkey" Trial, which debated the legality of teaching evolution in Tennessee schools.
Significance: It serves as a dramatic defense of modernism, science, and freedom of thought against traditionalist views.
Cultural Impact: While based on historical events, the play uses this line to argue that intellectual inquiry is the cornerstone of advancement.
No, I feel the same. Calendly link is a major turn off.
I see older very skinny women who look old and frail due to being very skinny. You need some fat under that skin to plump it up to look youthful. Catherine Deneuve I believe was the one that said that after the age of 40 you have to chose between your face and your ass. I say all of this as a 40 something woman.
For me it’s uncomfortably dry skin on my cheeks.
In case the author is reading this, I am wondering why Dad did not have a succession plan, and was it ever discussed in the family what should happen after? What was dad’s plan?
All money is our money, and our number one financial priority is our child. We are both on the same page on this.
You’d be better off the hire a broker / M&A firm do deal with this on your behalf.
I read "Sent from my iPhone" as "I apologize for brevity and typos" and don't get offended.
They are not trying to get it for cheap though, they are paying large premium to what it would sell for individually. But, of course, there is a limit to what they can pay. So, either everyone gets more than they would individually, but if they are too greedy, no one gets anything.
8 out of 10 can work if the 2 are at the ends, and that often happens, greedy one makes herself an island. Doesn’t work if they are in the middle. Then they ruin it for everyone.
No, they don't do slowly. Very few of them will buy and hold, it's money being tied up doing nothing. And you have to be fast, longer you wait greedier people get, we've done this many times, the same story repeats itself every time.
As per what is land worth, for a developer, it's a an x amount per buildable square foot (which they need to approximate based on the guidance of their planners, before they rezone).
Posted by
goodJobWalrus on Friday April 15, 2022 @08:13AM
from the self-post dept.
I thought HN crowd might enjoy noodling this. I am a commercial real estate broker working with a large developer in a major North American city. This is the type of prisoner's dilemma I face.Let's say we try to assembly a lot that consists of 10 properties with different owners (different sized lots). Developers can pay around x per buildable square foot, and that amount is higher for each...
Was Peugeot ever sold in th US?
didn't give them $5,900 monthly, that was annual. $5,900 monthly would be more than most people in US make after tax.
There certainly is causality here. If you are patient and invest your money long-term instead of spending it all, you will literally be wealthier than if you spent it all.
Of course, there is causality the other way round as well, that is, a basic level of stability and wealth allows you to save.
For some reason I find this really beautiful.
It's tough, because you are a pain in the ass, and not even realize it? (especially if coupled by arrogance).
I remember reading about these guys years ago. I'm so glad that it worked out for them, and they still maintain high salaries.
So what is the best replacement for fast food and takeaway purposes? Bamboo cutlery?
> When a spermatozoan buries into the egg a reaction is caused which prevents other sperm from being able to penetrate.
This is an explanation I was looking for. Thanks.
My question here is: why is this so rare? Given how many spermatozoids are involved in every sexual contact, why doesn't it happen much more often for two of them to fertilize one egg?
We’ll have to disagree here. The ‘why’ thing is based off scientific research on goal setting and motivation. As such there is an essential distinction from motivational quotes.
I fully agree with the him, and I don’t understand why would you think it was a troll comment.
All great topics. I have subscribed and looking forward reading each of those.
I don't think so, I come from a country where a housewife is not a thing, and I didn't know any growing up. We all went to child care and people socialize a lot, then and now.
No, but it could implement hefty property tax on properties owned by non-residents.