News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by afavour on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:19PM (#45203047)
Don't want to talk in bad taste by going to this so early, but... this extremely unfortunate event is going to be a very telling test for the media and society at large.

A Democratic state representative in Minnesota was brutally murdered and another attacked by the same man only a couple of months ago, back in June. How many can name them? How long did their deaths stay in the headlines? How much coverage were they given, and how much coverage will Kirk be given?

My cynical side suspects we are about to hear a lot about "violence from the left" in a way we did not about the right back in June.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by mlinhares on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:29PM (#45203168)
Not even the democrats made it an important thing, the whole party is a failure and we're all paying the price for its lack of a spine.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by typeofhuman on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:50PM (#45204403)
It's a party that can't have a spine because it has no axioms, no values, no fundamental truths.

You can't build without a foundation.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by bilbo0s on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @07:15PM (#45205446)
it has no axioms, no values, no fundamental truths

That’s pretty much both parties.

It’s why we are where we are.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by tolerance on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:57PM (#45203592)
In bad taste only because what you’re questioning may have little to do with which side they were on.

The better question to ask is, how many subscribers did the Democratic state representative from Minnesota and the other have?

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by bilbo0s on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:31PM (#45204110)
This is so true and so sad at the same time that it almost portends a kind of tragic fatal destiny to the US. You can almost see factions warring for no other purpose than to gain "followers" and "likes". (Might even make an argument that we're already there?)

Just sad.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by tolerance on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:41PM (#45204271)
What you’ve described sounds like the logical outcome of Democracy in a post-digital world. I can envision a world where the future Secretary of State was a former Reddit moderator. Or worse. A Lemmy maintainer.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by amanaplanacanal on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:05PM (#45206858)
We already have a TV personality for president. I'm not sure it would be much different.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by tolerance on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:46PM (#45207133)
Well, how do you think things are going so far?
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ZeroGravitas on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:24PM (#45203993)
He was the head of a literal propaganda outfit. One with no obvious morals. They are going to milk this for all they can.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by kfrzcode on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:37PM (#45204193)
He was a Christian and a intellectual thought leader in one of the more reasonable groups of conservative youth in the USA. You can paint TPUSA however you like but political engagement is political engagement, whether it's happening with the same color uniform you decide is the better choice or not.

Welcoming and encouraging the free exchange of thought and ideas in an open forum. Free speech and American values are based directly in morality which comes to us from a higher power. This is all quite clear in the writings of the Founding Fathers and other contemporaries, but of course nowadays "American values" is shibboleth for "Nazi dogwhistles" to some population.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by Cornbilly on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @06:38PM (#45205054)
>a intellectual thought leader in one of the more reasonable groups of conservative youth

If calling for the military occupation of US cities is at all reasonable, I struggle to imagine what is unreasonable in your world view.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by kfrzcode on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @07:38PM (#45205686)
Unreasonable is killing someone because you disagree with their opinion.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by Cornbilly on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @07:58PM (#45205835)
So, deploying the military on your political opponents is fine?
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by kfrzcode on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @08:31PM (#45206125)
Give me liberty, or give me death.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by jmdwifvjmrgbj on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:37PM (#45203300)
This is not totally true. One Democratic representative was killed with her husband. The other representative was shot but survived.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by afavour on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:40PM (#45203340)
Thanks, you're totally right. Corrected my comment.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by asgeesg on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:34PM (#45207057)
Yeah, guess they really are unknown. By the way, there are 7,386 state congressmen. A lot of Americans probably aren't even aware that their own state even has a congress. You don't even know about it and you're bringing it up.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by pwenzel on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:49PM (#45203463)
Doesn't help when Trump simply responded to Minnesota assassinations with:

"you know, I could be nice and call him [Governor Walz], but why waste time?"

https://www.startribune.com/trump-says-he-will-not-call-walz...

It was an attempt to quell the No Kings protests scheduled to happen the same day.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by HaZeust on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:20PM (#45203916)
I'm glad this was shared and that this did not go unnoticed, it made me know where things were going. Figureheads weren't even pretending to care anymore - escalations are in order way before any call for de-escalation will be made.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by sigzero on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:27PM (#45204041)
Stop trying to make this about Trump.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by xnx on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:58PM (#45204532)
> A Democratic state representative in Minnesota was brutally murdered

...and her husband and dog. The killer also had a long list of other targets.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by rdtsc on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:45PM (#45203416)
> How many can name them? How long did their deaths stay in the headlines? How much coverage were they given, and how much coverage will Kirk be given?

I couldn't have named Kirk if I saw him or heard about him before he shot and it entered the news. Not sure what that tells us -- we should know more who our representatives are, or know about various "influencers" in politics and such?

EDIT: I saw you initially mentioned two representatives who were murdered but now it looks like there is only one. So even though you criticize others for not knowing who these murdered representatives were, it seems you don't even know who they were or if they were even murdered.

> Don't want to talk in bad taste by going to this so early, but...

Well this is how usually talking in bad taste early starts ;-). It's kind of like saying "No offense, but ... $insert_offense_here".

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by PaulDavisThe1st on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:53PM (#45203516)
One key difference here is that the MN Democrats killed and injured were relatively niche/local participants in the Democratic party in MN (none of that that makes their death or injury any more acceptable or less appalling). Kirk is a highly significant figure in the right wing media world.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by germinalphrase on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:55PM (#45204490)
Melissa Hortman wasn’t a niche local politician - she was the speaker of the Minnesota House.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by PaulDavisThe1st on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @06:57PM (#45205242)
Would you care to estimate the number of Americans who even knew her name?

She had power in MN, but had not become a "national" politician (yet).

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by germinalphrase on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @07:51PM (#45205785)
I made no claim that she was a national figure. Merely pointing out that calling a politician holding one of the highest offices in state government a niche, local politician intentionally diminishes them.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by PaulDavisThe1st on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @09:15PM (#45206489)
I was not intentionally trying to diminish her.

I suspect that unless you live in New Mexico, you have no idea who the speaker of the NM House is. That's not a diminshment of the office or the person holding it, it's a recognition that while such positions come with significant power within the context of a state, they are quite hidden from residents of other states.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by germinalphrase on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @11:16PM (#45207339)
They hold meaningful office within their states. That is neither niche nor local even if they lack a national profile.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by rdtsc on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @11:03PM (#45207235)
And how many people outside of Minnesota you think would know her. I bet the majority of people in MN wouldn't didn't know who she is.

For instance do you know Brandon Ler, the Montana House of Representatives speaker? Or, say, Nathaniel Ledbetter, the Alabama House of Representatives?

Are they "niche" politicians? In their states, no. But, absolutely yes when it comes to people from other states and more so from across the world.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by bdangubic on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:44PM (#45204324)
MN Democrats were not random “niche” “Democrats” but US CONGRESSMEN
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by asgeesg on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:30PM (#45207038)
No, they weren't US congressmen. Funny you just like that other whining guy don't even know anything about the subject. "They" (actually only one) was a MINNESOTA CONGRESSMAN, not a US CONGRESSMEN. You probably aren't even aware there is a Minnesota congress.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by bdangubic on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:35PM (#45207062)
Minnesota is part of Canada now? Must have missed that… :)
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by rdtsc on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:58PM (#45207209)
> MN Democrats were not random “niche” “Democrats” but US CONGRESSMEN reply

> Minnesota is part of Canada now? Must have missed that… :)

When you've dug yourself into a hole it's good idea to stop digging and get out instead of keep digging. As the GP pointed out, a US member of Congress refers to representative in the US Congress (that one from Washington, DC).

In addition to the US Congress, states have their legislative bodies. Melissa Hortman was a member of such a state legislative body -- the Minnesota House of Representatives.

So on one hand you sound like you know a lot about her and want her to be more well known, on the other hand you don't even know what legislative body she was a representative in. So that's pretty confusing.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by asgeesg on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @10:42PM (#45207112)
You missed the part of your education that taught you the difference between a state representative and a US representative.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by zug_zug on Thursday September 11, 2025 @12:56AM (#45207932)
The other thing you're leaving out is that Charlie Kirk was actively provoking people with outrageous takes, perhaps as a social media strategy.

It doesn't justify death, but it certainly makes it less surprising and more understandable.

Imagine if a democrat went into the deep south and said "The confederacy was a stupid joke you should be ashamed of, it only existed for 4 years, get rid of the flag already." etc etc and posted it to social media while talking over people trying to engage in debate.

Then that would be an apples-to-apples comparison. Not an elected representative.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by yonaguska on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:24PM (#45203980)
The motives in that case don't seem to immediately be as clear cut yet. I've been waiting for this trial or more information myself because that shooter has made some very bizarre claims. He admitted that he was a Trump supporter and pro-life, but that had nothing to do with why he did it. He then made the claim that Tim Waltz had hired him to carry out the execution. It's very odd- but I can't say why media orgs didn't cover it for very long at all.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by bena on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:23PM (#45203085)
We fail this test over and over and the fact that you don't realize it is telling in and of itself. Not as a remark on you, but on the media in general.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by waterTanuki on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @07:51PM (#45205786)
You already see it everywhere in this thread. People completely whitewashing Kirk's image as a "peaceful debater", and gaslighting anyone who had even the slightest disagreement with his politics to "behave" themselves. Remember when the sitting U.S. president said contacting the Gov. of Minnesota (Tim Walz) after Melissa Hortman's assassination was a "waste of time" not just a few months ago? And it couldn't be more ironic that Kirk at this very same event said people dying was the price to pay for a completely unrestricted 2A.

This isn't a "both sides" issue. One side has shown time and time again it will resort to cruelty, violence, and severely harmful rhetoric. That anyone here would try to wave their hands around like it's "everyone's" fault is insane.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by russellbeattie on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:58PM (#45203596)
Those were my thoughts exactly.

There was no presidential message expressing sympathy and outrage then and complete radio silence from Republicans in general. And the amount of misinformation from the right was incredible. Even in this thread of nominally intelligent people, they're still repeating falsehoods.

Any expression of shock and dismay from conservatives now is pure theater. The right wing is absolutely fine with violence. Accusations of the violent left is of course a talking point projection as usual.

[dead]
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ceejayoz on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:34PM (#45203266)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/19/us/minnesota-shootings-va...

> Mr. Boelter developed a strong distrust of government, especially Democrats. According to Mr. Carlson, he believed that the criminal prosecutions of Donald J. Trump were politically motivated, and that a victory by the Democratic presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, would lead to civil war. He followed the Infowars website founded by the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.

Mmkay.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by antonymoose on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:36PM (#45203289)
[flagged]
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by johnmaguire on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:39PM (#45203335)
It's not so much a matter of who "knows better." There's an element of whether you trust a murderer, or are all the facts and evidence around their case, more.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ceejayoz on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:40PM (#45203344)
> Direct from the horse’s mouth…

That's about the worst place to get your answers here.

[dead]
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ceejayoz on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:43PM (#45203385)
The… NY Post is far left now?
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by jawarner on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:40PM (#45203342)
Take a look at the next sentence from your linked article.

“I am pro-life personaly [sic] but it wasn’t those,” he said, using the jail’s internal messaging system. “I will just say there is a lot of information that will come out in future that people will look at and judge for themselves that goes back 24 months before the 14th. If the gov ever let’s [sic] it get out.”

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by dttze on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:42PM (#45203372)
You’re a fool if you think he is telling the truth.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by kennywinker on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:39PM (#45203332)
I’d believe him if he said that before he’d lawyered up.

Now, looks like building a defense to me.

[dead]
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by tstrimple on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:50PM (#45203477)
For every single conservative each mass shooting was done by a transgender illegal immigrant Democrat until thoroughly disproven through dozens of means. Then they will just ignore the "lone wolf" white male Christian and just expect everyone else to move on with them in thoughts and prayers. It's time to stop engaging with conservatives as if they were serious people worthy of serious replies.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by throwmeaway222 on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:13PM (#45203820)
that is simply not true, and have you seen the news in the last 5 years?
[dead]
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ceejayoz on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:42PM (#45203368)
https://www.fox9.com/news/minnesota-lawmaker-bca-shooting-su...

> Federal prosecutors confirmed 45 Democrats were listed, including dozens of Minnesota lawmakers and members of Congress such as Rep. Angie Craig, Rep. Ilhan Omar, and Sen. Tina Smith. It also included members of Planned Parenthood, philanthropist MacKenzie Scott, who has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the organization, and several healthcare centers across the Midwest.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/16/nx-s1-5433748/minnesota-shoot...

> Authorities in Minnesota said Monday that the man arrested in a Saturday attack that killed one state lawmaker and left another wounded had a "hit list" of 45 elected officials — all Democrats.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by kennywinker on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:53PM (#45203520)
Whataboutism?

Nobody is whatabouting any of the violence. They are however pointing out that media isn’t an impartial observer, and that skews everyone’s perception of what is happening.

Anyway someone else responded with citations for the dem hit list, which backs up everything i said except “he voted for trump” which is impossible to know because we have secret ballots but he told his friend he voted for trump. (Citation: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/vanc...)

Now tell me honestly, if the guy who shot charlie kirk turns out to have no known political affiliations but a hit list of republican politicians and activists - you’d be saying it’s complicated?

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by jmye on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:59PM (#45203613)
> Please provide sources for all of your claims, I made sure to verify what I wrote before I wrote it.

And then provided none of those supposed “verifications” for what are probably very honorable and honest reasons.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by like_any_other on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:01PM (#45203644)
> How many can name them? How long did their deaths stay in the headlines?

I don't know - how long did these stories stay in the headlines?

A 26 year old man from Irondale, Alabama was later arrested and charged in connection with the bombing. Prosecutors stated that prior to the bombing, the suspect had been spotted placing stickers on government buildings, displaying "antifa, anti-police and anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement sentiments" and had expressed "belief that violence should be directed against the government" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Marshall#Bombing

Man, 80, run over for putting Trump sign in yard, say police - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1rw4xdjql4o

Alabama Antifa Sympathizer Pleads Guilty to Detonating Bomb outside State AG’s Office - https://www.nationalreview.com/news/alabama-antifa-sympathiz...

a man armed with a pistol and a crossbow showed up at Fuentes' home - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Fuentes#Alleged_murder_at...

Attempted Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Assassin Identifies As Transgender; Hoped To Kill “Nazis” - https://wsau.com/2025/01/30/doj-filing-attempted-treasury-se...

10 arrested after ambush on Texas ICE detention facility [..] When an Alvarado police officer arrived on the scene, one of the individuals shot him in the neck. Another individual shot 20 to 30 rounds at the facility correction officers, according to Larson. - https://abcnews.go.com/US/10-arrested-after-ambush-texas-ice...

Last but not lest, there was also an assassination attempt on Trump, though I concede that one did get plenty of attention.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by mrtksn on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:34PM (#45203263)
Think of it as a hardening. From outsider perspective, IMHO your left is very weak and inconsistent and it's not even left from a European perspective.

The far right developed stars, stallions and philosophers that are effective in the popular culture no matter how vile some of those can be. There are up and coming leftist Americans but they will need to hustle to develop intro strong leaders. The mainstream figures from the American left like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez or Bernie Sanders are just too lightweight.

Edit: funny how this comment fluctuates between 0 and 2 points. This edit will probably tip the balance though :)

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by heyjamesknight on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:21PM (#45203939)
> and it's not even left from a European perspective.

This is a meme that needs to die. Its just not true.

The Democratic party in the US is right in line with Labor/Socialist/Whatever Mainstream Leftist Party you want to point at in Europe. It has members who end up on various sides of the left-wing spectrum. There are no "far left" parties in the US because we have a two party system.

There are obviously topics where this is not true. But that goes both ways: almost no country on Earth has the level of abortion access that the Democratic party in the US demands. And there are examples of European right wing parties who fight for zero abortion access, which is not the GOP platform currently.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by Amezarak on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:47PM (#45204367)
Yeah, there are just so many mismatches it doesn't make sense.

- Nearly all European countries have and support a very high consumption tax (VAT). In the US, nobody would be really for this (although some conservatives favor such taxes), but US liberals would be extremely against it due to the regressive nature of consumption taxes.

- The majority of EU countries institute voter ID laws, something supported only by conservatives in the US. States with voter ID laws almost always allow some valid voter ID to be gotten for free, but they are still opposed by liberals.

There are plenty of other examples when you start thinking about it.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by p_ing on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @06:05PM (#45204637)
We have entire 100% Democratic-run states that use regressive consumption taxing to fund the State government.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by acoustics on Thursday September 11, 2025 @12:34AM (#45207810)
Democratic Party voters seem to be more aligned with Euro-style socialist policies, but among elected Democrats this is a small minority view.

European socialists usually advocate for direct state ownership of certain industries, sector-wide union contracts, universal (not means-tested) child allowances, fully public health care, wealth taxes, free college, etc. There are a handful of elected Democrats that sign on to some of these views, but these have never been in the actual party platform, since the mainstream of the party roundly rejects these. Democrats are only somewhat radical in certain social/bioethical issues like abortion and LGBT rights (although the latter is being tested, with some influential Dems defecting); otherwise, the better European analogue would be Macron's Renaissance party (formerly En Marche), the UK's Lib Dems, the Nordic countries' social liberal parties.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by Amezarak on Friday September 12, 2025 @05:37AM (#45220409)
I don't think there's particularly good alignment even on that "axis" (it isn't really an axis, because most things are not inherently one or the other.) A good example of that is the "sector wide union contracts" thing. The default "leftist" position in the US is that things that apply to an entire sector should be legislated rather than negotiated by workers

The US does have child allowances, by the way - during Covid, it was even increased and paid out monthly instead of annually. Increasing it as of late seems to be an "R" policy, at least on the Trump wing.

Are there European countries that offer free college regardless of academic achievement during high school?

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by dns_snek on Thursday September 11, 2025 @08:45AM (#45210899)
What is actually a meme is this need to squash the entire universe of unrelated political beliefs into a single axis of "left vs right".

The Democratic party is just as, if not more socially progressive than many European "left wing" parties on certain issues, that's true, but that's not what anyone is talking about. Issues like abortion and LGBT rights concern personal freedom, they're orthogonal to the left-right axis.

When we say that the Democratic party is to the right of every European left-wing party, and to the right of most right-wing parties, what we're talking about are the economic policies that affect the lives of everyday people.

US democrats can't even get behind table stakes leftist issues like universal healthcare, social safety, progressive taxation, and wealth inequality. They know who pays for their re-election campaigns and who controls the media - it's not the working class. Democrats aren't leftist, they're liberal, which is a night and day difference.

Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by lotsofpulp on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:13PM (#45203825)
The far right likes listening to despots and falling in line, so they would be expected to develop “stars”, whereas others are skeptical of know it all lecturers and aim for consensus.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by mrtksn on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @05:21PM (#45203927)
Europe does have left wings pop stars like Zizec and Varoufakis though.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah by ken-m on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @04:35PM (#45203271)
This is in extremely bad taste. There is no "but".