News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by achow on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:21AM (#34865176)
> a visitor accidentally kicked its podium

In the opening crowded social event how can the sculpture be placed unsecured on a glass table - also, the sculpture had rounded smooth glossy point of contact (dog's legs).

The podium: https://dynaimage.cdn.cnn.com/cnn/q_auto,w_727,c_fit/http%3A...

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by graderjs on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:30AM (#34865235)
People should be careful, but yeah, the plinth was clear! Pretty hard to see. Especially to have situational awareness for where your foot might be going wrt to a clear thing, in a crowded social space where you're looking about. Probably it's just an accident, as galleries are experienced with displaying expensive works. But they probably should have had a larger perimeter, or the plint had a non-clear base.

> she gave unintentionally a little kick in the pedestal, which was enough to cause the sculpture to fall down.

I'm wondering, was she walking past? Or you know some women when they laugh, or angry, they involuntarily kick their feet. Cute, but kind of tragic if it was that. She must feel terrible.

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by GavinMcG on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:47AM (#34865328)
> some women when they laugh, or angry, they involuntarily kick their feet. Cute, but…

This is absurd, and sexist, and though I don’t think you meant harm by it you might reconsider your model of how biological sex corresponds with voluntary control of one’s muscles.

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by s1artibartfast on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:37AM (#34865618)
What is so absurd, sexist, or harmful here?

Parent poster knows some women who kick their feet.

Are you calling them a liar? Who is hurt by the idea that some women somewhere have tick?

Are we now getting offended by any observations whatsoever, even if they aren't generalized to all women, or even negative?

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by GolfPopper on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:47AM (#34865674)
I know somes posters on hacker news are both malicious and misleading.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by graderjs on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:22AM (#34865521)
It's not absurd, or sexist. It's just a fact. If you pretend that you can't make any generalizations or statements because of one's gender...or you even pretend that's negative. Then you're the one being sexist. It's just crazy this kind of over protected speech. You're totally reading the wrong thing into it. Haven't you ever observed this?
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by morsch on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:43AM (#34865652)
Nope. Couldn't find anything via Google, either. I thought you were making a Seinfeld joke, at first ("The Little Kicks"), but apparently not.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by graderjs on Friday March 03, 2023 @01:39AM (#35006544)
* * *
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by GavinMcG on Monday February 20, 2023 @02:03AM (#34865760)
Never once. At best you're describing children, in my experience, not adult women.

But especially if it is an involuntary expression of anger, as you say, then advancing the sexist "You're Cute When You're Angry" trope[0] is not a great reaction.

[0] https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/YoureCuteWhenYou...

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by graderjs on Friday March 03, 2023 @01:36AM (#35006526)
* * *
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by EamonnMR on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:27AM (#34865217)
Oh wow, that would be really easy to accidentally bump into. It's below eye level, invisible... yikes.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by joe_the_user on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:46AM (#34865316)
The bad thing is whoever kicked the podium must feel terrible.

Why did they put no effort into protecting this piece? Perhaps because they could easily make another one if it came to it. I mean, it's just a ceramic duplicate of an ordinary balloon dog, of which a million or so are made at children's birthday parties.

Note, Koons himself produces work at scale in what he calls a factory and which is ... a factory.

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by retSava on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:55AM (#34865368)

    A total of 799 editions of the sculpture were made. 
Ie not a total loss for humanity.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by ec2y on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:22AM (#34865527)
That’s .004%* of an increase in value for the rest of them.

*Completely made up number as I’m not an art valuer, but the point stands.

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by kristjansson on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:41AM (#34865645)
Clearly the route to infinite value is destroying all of them
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by ajdude on Monday February 20, 2023 @08:32AM (#34867887)
There can only be one.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by ASalazarMX on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:23PM (#34870330)
Now I understand better that New Yorker cartoon: “Yes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.”

https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a16995

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by sockaddr on Monday February 20, 2023 @02:10AM (#34865799)
Then I give 1/799th of a shit about this.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by xeyownt on Monday February 20, 2023 @02:58AM (#34866065)
Assuming it's totally useless, making 799 of these pricey thingies is certainly a waste.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by BrandoElFollito on Monday February 20, 2023 @03:28AM (#34866221)
> The bad thing is whoever kicked the podium must feel terrible

When my children were small, they were terrified to break things in supermarkets. I told them that it is always the supermarket fault when something is not fixed properly.

Of course this is for accidental damage.

That whoever should sue the show for anxiousness /s

Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by rolenthedeep on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:09AM (#34865453)
Yikes, that's just begging to get knocked over
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by woleium on Monday February 20, 2023 @07:12PM (#34874714)
Could it generate some great publicity and cost nothing?
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by cma on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:10AM (#34865459)
Also, assuming it is LA, what about earthquakes? Several other sculptures on podiums there...
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by mpnagle on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:40AM (#34865642)
Think the exhibit was in Miami.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by lsllc on Monday February 20, 2023 @01:57AM (#34865724)
Hurricanes then!
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by kcplate on Monday February 20, 2023 @07:40AM (#34867541)
In February?
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by cma on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:01PM (#34870044)
Opps, saw Bel Air but that is just the gallery name.
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by iamtedd on Monday February 20, 2023 @02:00AM (#34865738)
Re:Visitor accidentally shatters Jeff Koons 'balloon dog' sc... by woleium on Monday February 20, 2023 @07:11PM (#34874703)
This is why a substance called "museum wax" was invented.