GolfPopper

Women in Paris were only legally allowed to wear pants in 2013.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-21329269

>If we assume LLMs will continue to advance at a pretty rapid pace (relative to the current rate of advancement; so, same or faster

https://xkcd.com/605/

From the user guide[1], it appears to be a dual-WAN setup that uses both cellular and broadband. Not as good as decent POTS, but better than just cellular or broadband.

https://www.att.com/scmsassets/support/other/att-phone-advan...

Perhaps they should be hiring more Scottish nationals?

>I never got why it can also be used to mean a very curvaceous/attractive woman.

Q: How do you build with bricks?

A: You stack them.

It's been one of the biggest ways the media has helped him since the beginning. (Including outlets supposedly on the "left".) They spend so much time on how he's a terrible human being that it helps obscure that he is grossly incompetent and unfit to lead anything, much less a country.

Even now, it seems like more time is spent on his looks or his health or his pettiness than on his crimes and his destruction.

>The only thing anyone cares about is whether the (economic)math works on put AI in space.

This is a greater fool market. The only thing anyone cares about is whether they think someone else will believe the math will work out.

I guess the Post would need to help start a war that kills a couple hundred thousand people before they're seen as respectable.

https://fair.org/home/20-years-later-nyt-still-cant-face-its...

I.e. NYT readers prefer their propaganda with a hefty side of snobbery.

Nah. Probably not even RIP cryptocurrency exchanges.

What exactly does "better" mean? Both are tools for manipulating public opinion. The NYT is better at inflating it's own reputation.

If NYT was honest, at some point in the past decade it would have acknowledged that one of the primary reporters on its Donald Trump beat was the daughter of an executive VP at the long-time PR firm of Fred and Donald Trump.

https://archive.is/dOHL1

Are you talking about American religious conservatives in power, or Iranian ones?

They really are turning into something like the Stasi:

https://www.wired.com/story/ice-is-running-one-of-the-larges...

"Oh, better that her shattered hulk

Should sink beneath the wave;

Her thunders shook the mighty deep,

And there should be her grave;

Nail to the mast her holy flag,

Set every threadbare sail,

And give her to the god of storms,

The lightning and the gale!"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Ironsides_(poem)

That was the original meaning, yes.

In casual conversation in America English, it a derogaty term used to mean "poor and lacking in quality of life, freedom, and/or democratic governance."

>It is important work, but we have yet to find an economic model to effectively support it and the people doing the work.

We had an economic model that supported both the people and the work; the current economic model supports neither.

I would submit that this one of a great many reasons why the current economic model is problematic.

You left out one...

The already shaky economic system (and associated political systems) can't take the strain of every man woman and child in the western world devoting a substantial portion of their income (like 5-10%) to LLM fallout, and we end up with a collapse scenario of some sort. (Which, to be clear, is near-certain to be worse than either of the above.)

>best guess is he plans to deflate the currency to make the debt worthless

That might be the best possible intended outcome, but it also seems unlikely that Donald Trump and his government are involved in anything so far-sighted. Just look at the man's public behavior over the last year; either he is an incredible actor, or this is not a government where anyone in power cares about anything beyond the Big Man's whims of the moment and their personal benefit.

"Hate AI"? Not at all.

Hate marketing BS and wealth extraction? Absolutely.

I see OpenAI, Anthropic, etc (the whole LLM-hype/boom) leaning far more towards being the latter than the former, in which context the dislike makes perfect sense.

Even if they are, watch the video I linked. We, as a species, were conducting an average of dozens nuclear detonations on or near the surface annually. And we stopped. IMHO, that ranks right up there with the Montreal Protocol as one of modern civilization's great accomplishments. (Or perhaps I should say late 20th-century civilization's accomplishments. Now there would probably be a huge movement calling for destroying the ozone layer to get more of the amazing ultraviolet.)

Interesting. It makes me think of J.R.R. Tolkien's Tengwar script:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengwar

While the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty [1] has not entered into force, it has created a world where nuclear testing has ended. There were almost 2,500 nuclear detonations between 1945 and 1998.[2] Since then, the only nuclear detonations have been North Korea's six tests.[3] This is one of humanity's most impressive achievements, and I really don't think it gets enough attention. There's an old video on Youtube that has an animated map of all the tests (except North Korea's): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Nuclear-Test-Ban...

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nuclear_weapons_tests_...

Phone carriers can't be bothered to police their networks to mitigate flagrant bad actors, who can't be shut down by state law enforcement, so your software company needs to take control of your device away from you. "For your own safety."

It's just a public confession that none of these organizations - not the carriers, not the government, and not Evil Google, are fit for the responsibilities they've claimed.

They were actually doing this already. When you bought the premium plan, they just lied and pretended their in-house ads weren't ads and served you those instead. You still didn't get to just watch the content you wanted.

So, what's the high value perspective that leads to penguins always riding bicycles from left to right?

>All these institutional problems have been stacking up for the past twenty years, they're only continuing to get worse

You're right about "continuing to get worse", but our institutions have been failing for more than 20 years. I think it's more like that Hemingway quote about bankruptcy, “Gradually and then suddenly.” in turn, that always makes me think of an exponential growth curve... and I think America, if not the entire world, is headed towards the vertical. Ib other words, when it comes to how dysfunctional our institutions can get, I think we've just begun.

I'll just say that I work in a heavily regulated industry.

Came for the Peter Watts reference, glad to see it! Starfish (1999) focused around this idea and it and it's sequels are well worth the read, IMHO.

As with anything LLM-related, I feel compelled to ask, is that actually what's happening, or are they just successfully convincing their users that's what's happening? I truly cannot tell.

I'm not using any LLMs directly (my workplace still bans them in-house) and my experience on the receiving end of contractors using them is quite poor. That includes one major, "we'll replace your ancient software with shiny new stuff"... with significantly reduced capability that in turn makes everything far more difficult than it was or ought to be. The UI appears much more user friendly, but really is just broken in multiple ways where the much-patched 1980s software it replaced was user-unfriendly but largely worked.

This all could be the result of poor coding, regardless of LLM use, of course.