xeyownt
Without vim, your language is limited to very basic actions that you need to repeat ad nauseam.
But then I would rephrase that because it's confusing, and not doing justice to your tool.
Isn't that exactly what we are trying to achieve by re-distributing the wealth, and avoiding that few people have such huge ownership that they have more power than governments ?
We are still living in a middle-age system, where the lords don't own lands but stocks and companies, but they still dictate the laws.
Ok taking the :door:...
Something that the bot overlord didn't even think to say in its superdense page intro.
That's the problem with AI-generated text. They have no idea of what proper context is.
Initiatives will come if people care.
Never in history the solution to major crisis came from politicians or alike.
Even if your contributions is small, it doesn't prevent you to do them. By which extent is a personal choice, but personally I chose to be consistent with myself and my values, and I don't care about the choices of others.
Regarding airplane, I much prefer an 8h+5min trip in train than a 1h+2h trip in plane because comfort is way better and you are not dealt with like cattle. Of course I wish the price advantage would be different than nowadays.
Electric cars are not yet the perfect solution, but they are already way better than fuel cars. As for the rest, my government says its the way to go, then I go.
Note that in GIEC report, nuclear (fission or fusion) was not identified as a major solution to climate change (only contribute 10% of the whole). The main contributors were green energies.
The temporary transition to coal was studied long time ago and identified as the best solution even though it would increase CO2 for a small time. But in compensation it would allow to transition faster to green energy thanks to savings done on nuclear, hence overall reducing faster CO2 emission.
That zucks.
The point is that you have an AI system that claims having found a cure to cancer and passed all requirements. You can only interface with that AI system or with published results (run by the AI), you can't run experiments on your own.
Would you trust it to take the cure?
Of course, you won't.
Fair enough.
But the worrying part is that he seems really convinced that his security analysis of the vulnerability is complete, and that we should be convinced as well.
If you didn't need a strong hash, use a very fast one then, like MurMurHash.
For all practical purpose SHA-1 is a bad hash function, it's slow, it's insecure.
If SHA-1 is not a security measure, why do you even sign the commit. It doesn't make any sense. You give a strong signature on something weak.
Wrong.
Multiplicative structure of RSA is known since it was invented, and that's exactly why standard like PKCS were created. This attack is NOT applicable to these standards (as said in the article). Author shows a poor understanding of the field.
Using RSA blinding signatures is like using windows 95 and connect it directly to the internet.
What do you know about how the grid is operated anyway?
"Works for me, so must work for everybody."
Given all the sh*t that FB videos contain, I guess Meta's direction will soon be in jail.
They have to choose, safe harbor provisioning or responsibility for the content.
And you don't want to adapt.
Just watched a video of a guy ranting on Gnome 3 14 years ago, the reasons are just wtf, mentioning things I almost never used in my life.
I also had issues, but just learned to get over it and now my workflow is excellent while requiring only minimal customization.
As for the OS, everytime I tried MacOS, I find rapidly major showstoppers. It's like people are just blind to them.
If I'd qualify each platform, I'd say Windows is a toy, Mac is a piece of art, Linux is a tool. I picked my category.
Personally I don't care if the guy looks for attention or not. IMO people that do care have likely some jealousy issues ("I don't want other to get more attention than I do"). Lose-lose attitude.
Even in C, string literals are simply a sequence of null-terminated char, no pointer involved.