I really can’t see many people fitting either of those categories, unless they were already going to get rid of their car. And I’m a big fan of e-bikes.
Most e-bikes cost around $2-3k so it’s basically a $1k subsidy where you pay the other $1k for a bike.
This is certainly true. Not sure if the one we had in Norway a few years ago can be classified as 'lame'. But it did more harm than good I think, as electric bikes became associated with a government subsidy for the rich. Most of the money went directly to the richest areas in Oslo (which are the richest areas in Norway probably). The subsidy gave buyers of electric bikes 5.000 NOK (~$500), but bikes were hard to come by and very expensive at the time (2016), so only the rich got on waiting lists for bikes and swooped up all the subsidies.
Source (in Norwegian):
https://www.aftenposten.no/oslo/i/O3Vl/el-sykkelsubsidier-gi...
What needs to be done is:
(1) End subsidies for electric cars, and give them for e-bikes instead. With the 4k on a 70k you're barely making a dent, and you can use it instead to give e.g. 5× 800€ subsidies on 1000-1500€ e-bikes.
(2) Lump sum instead of percentage. say 800€ on a 1000€ bike or 800€ on a 5000€ bike.
(3) Give the money directly on the purchase instead of returning it later. This latter mode essentially blocks out people who don't have the money upfront. With solar panels this is especially grating: in my country you can get 85% subsidy on solar panels, which is just ludicrously efficient (I installed mine for ~500€ 6 months ago and they have nearly paid themselves back). But for that to work you need to have >5k€ lying around that you don't mind only being paid back in the end of the year! That excludes ~80-90% of people, according to statistics.
Instead of subsidizing e-bikes, install bike infrastructure. Because bike infrastructure helps literally all people on bikes, including e-bikes. Because lets be honest, for most things you would use a bike for, normal bikes work perfectly fine and they are available to the very poor.
And such infrastructure would likely also improve live of pedestrians.
The US builds roads far to wide anyway, and thanks to all the work in Europe we know how to build good bike infrastructure. A new federal code for roads, bikes and pedestrian. This could also massively improve road safety in general.
Or lease the car and let the car company take it for you.
If it was an above the line credit, I would have highly considered it.
Per https://ttlc.intuit.com/community/tax-credits-deductions/dis...
The purchasers of the plug-in Pacifica are not usually going to be in that demographic. I couldn't get to the $7500, so the Sienna wins.
Otherwise you just accumulate credit that you may never use. Or you create new electricity use which defeats the purpose (but great if you actually sub pre-existing fuel consumption, if you have it). I wonder if nano-markets emerge where you invite your neighbourhood to charge their stuff at your home or run extension cords around…
Better to have a feed in tariff where you’re encouraging to conserve and produce.
Batteries are going to get better regardless and even if they don't, the current state of the art is by far good enough for 99.9% of practical uses for e-bikes.
We’ve had some Canadian content requirements, but it ends up being the mounting equipment and wiring. We haven’t developed capacity to put together our own core inverter components or panels themselves: too cheap to assemble overseas.
Ultimately the question is: did the electric bike program meet its goals? If one of the goals was to improve access to transportation for the poor, it sounds like it fell short. If the primary goal was to reduce the use of cars, it may have still been a success. (That said, I do question the commitment of those who had the money but choose not to until there was a subsidy.)
And the bikes they're trying to encourage people to buy probably aren't the high end ones, or even the mid-range bikes. I'm guessing someone did some research at some point.
A lot of these programs are made to sound good on campaign platforms but don’t do much at all IRL
Finding a way to subsidize conversion kits + local shops to do it would be a good way to actually help poor people https://www.autoevolution.com/news/skarper-s-revolutionary-e...
This was probably made targeting some specific category that isn't the one you're thinking.
Better give some money to people who don't need it than make some overly complicated plan that requires a specialist to access and only targets some friends.
I personally agree with that. But then it always ending up hurting the politicians that came up with that policy because medias will broadcast 24-7 examples of the few people that received it that did not deserve it. Even 2 years after COVID stimulus, McConnel keeps repeating that people are still so rich from receiving thousands and thousands of dollars and that was responsible for 2022 labor shortage... (for $2000 distributed now more than a year ago)
They never say how it made people able to avoid joining black market jobs or crime. They just show restaurant owners crying because they can't find (greatly underpaid) workers.
[0]https://www.costco.com/jetson-bolt-pro-folding-electric-bike...
I bet you'd get less resellers, but you'd definitely still get a lot of them.
If "France is now offering a €4k e-bike subsidy" is 96% the cash they got from selling their car, then it's a strange turn of phrase. It's more like "the secondhand car market is offering a €4k everything-subsidy if you give up your car"!
That bike looks like one of those mini circus bikes that clowns ride
The most annoying PITA stuff are:
- theft. I worry a lot and have to fix the e-cargo on a fixed point everywhere. It's not always easy to find a good parking spot. But we got a long motorbike chain and you get used to it. Get insured though.
- flat tire, in the middle of nowhere... You gotta be prepared and either have a spare 'flat' tube or do the quick repair on the wheel, cause the back wheel is hell (for me) to handle. After a bad experience, now we have the kit (xiaomi portable compressor for <50eur, some spare tubes, some gluestuff, and the right strategy) always handy.
The dutch manage to do it (minus the elderly). Why is it so strange that a 40 year old dad and a 7 year old kid bike to work/school respectively?
But yes, suburbs make a car required for most people outside of Europe, but we have to start somewhere.
And you are out a car?
Two wheeled also wins when there’s little space or the track is bad. What’s better really depends on your cycling proficiency, your intended use case and the road network you’ll likely use. And whatever you do, test-ride a few different ones to figure out what works for you. Avoid buying something off the internet without ever trying. (Things are different if you’re buying your second, third,…)
See video "The Car-Replacement Bicycle (the bakfiets)"
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQhzEnWCgHA
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_bike#Long_John_bicycle
This makes modern 3-wheelers much more agile. They still have certain disadvantages- they’re wide and bulky, you’ll have trouble avoiding potholes etc., but they’re nowhere as bad as those boxes with wheels (tough you can still buy those - their upside is their low price)
And if you have four wheels, people stop considering you a bike.
https://www.5280.com/2022/07/everything-you-need-to-know-abo...
And be careful with such subsidies: when they created the 600eur subvention for e-cargo in Paris I observed a (maybe uncorrelated) substantial increase in price of e-cargos...
Drivers licenses are a lifetime thing: no need to renew every X years, because it’s not your photo ID.
Another thing they do well (from a US/Canadian point of view) is identify their people.
It’s all national: very little is state by state or city by city.
Need a birth certificate or police report? Just sign in with your national ID and they’re in your mailbox in under a week.
None of this North American garbage where you need to provide fingerprints or further details because you share a birth date with a criminal or have the same name as someone else born somewhere else on the same day.
And when claiming a tax credit, that should make it straight forward, because it will be difficult to make the claim multiple times by varying your demographics.
Tax returns are bloody simple if you’re a non-billionaire: log in and verify that, yes, the information that the government already has about your income and housing situation is correct and click Accept. Done.
More Difficult to cheat on your rental property taxes since every property needs to be declared as an own-use or income property, with further details required for the latter.
What possible reason do they have for that? All it does is encourage people to buy a more expensive bike.
A $2000 ebike will cost you $1200. A $4000 ebike will cost you $2400. A $6000 ebike will cost you $3600.
I'm any case 4k is huge as most ebikes are cheaper than that... I suspect this is just to generate headline with a big number...
It's limited to one per person anyways, it's not like the mafia was going to buy 500k cheap cars and get 500k brand new free electric bikes.
No. All it does is the 2000€ bike is now sold for 3000€.
Virtue signalling and a half disguised way of increasing sales and consumerism
If they really cared about climate they'd find proper ways (more/cheaper public transport, state sponsored bicycle sharing, &c.). This is "green capitalism", just slap an "electric" sticker on it and continue with the good old ways
Kicking the poors while they're down and/or pulling the rug out from under people who are just barely doing better is not a sustainable way of decarbonizing society and it seems like every decarbonizing policy does just that. We can get away with a few such policies but when they're all like that it doesn't work.
It's not the same use case and in congested places like central Paris people who need a motor have scooters.
Feedback stats on these schemes are important but rarely conducted or published in a transparent way as the government obviously has a vested interest in claiming that they work great.
I am sure some people will use the scheme but probably because they were thinking of getting an ebike anyway and a replacing their car for a new one...
It's the usual and main issue with those schemes: they are political decisions and don't always make practical or economical sense.
Instead of renting an uber&co bikes (companies which use public infrastructure yet pay virtually no local tax) you'd rent state owned bikes, parked on official bike parkings. It could be part of your existing public transportation package &c.
It really doesn't take a genius to see how the current mayhem could be improved on so many levels
This is the next step when you already have that.
Emphasis on "lower income", the cap is 13k euros per year, which is under the annual min wage if you work full time. If you earn above that you get nothing at all
Also, all the options (lump sums and trade-ins) are capped to 40% of the price of the bike. So you'd have to trade your car for a 6000+ euros electric bike to get the full 3000 euros