InitialLastName
InitialLastName on Hacker News
> a system where each President appoints (with Senate consent) one and only one justice to SCOTUS.
This is my only significant disagreement with you. This should be two justices:
1) An 18-year (9*2) term is more compatible with age limits than a 36-year term
2) Each Senate class gets to participate in the appointment of one justice.
Your latter point belies the former: The the trade-off is only worth it if the data centers are used for purposes that benefit humanity. As yet, all we've seen them used for is wealth consolidation (through labor force reduction), mass surveillance, hacking, and other antisocial behaviors. There's no reason to believe those won't persist as the profit-maximizing use cases.
You can get LTSPICE to do the simulation for you, but it will be much harder to understand why an interesting circuit works (such that you can adjust it or implement it with real components) without understanding some of the calculus behind the simulation.
Plenty of places operate much more dense transit without that level of security.
Trains, even HSR have essentially zero hijacking risk relative to airplanes, and proper safety interlocks make them very difficult to use the vehicle as a weapon.
At that point, your terrorism risk is approximately on level with any other dense transportation interconnect.
The biggest difference to hijackings post 9/11 has nothing to do with pre-boarding security: Locking the cockpit door.
That's how both the SBS buses in NYC used to work (before tap to pay), and how the NJ Transit light rail still works.
Your last point was that some people prefer to rent. I don't think it's irrelevant to compare that to the number of people who would prefer to own.
Assuming the same homes, which group do you think is larger:
A) Households who are currently renting who would prefer to own their home
B) Households who currently own who would prefer to be renting
I'm going to guess A >>> B, but I've never seen the data.
What's wild about this is that it makes really obvious how limited our perspective on dinosaur biodiversity is. Our best view on the best-known dinosaurs comes from a few places that were really good for finding fossils from specific eras.
Presumably the browser still has to fetch the page in that case, right? From a "surveilled net traffic" perspective, how is that different than clicking the link?
What's the market share for non-system-default browsers and/or email clients?
My watch (Garmin VivoActive 4) lasts ~1 week. The charger is one less thing I have to:
- keep on my nightstand
- take with me if I go away for a few days
It wouldn't be the worst thing to build charging it into my daily routine, but it sure is liberating to not need to.
Not just ethnic groups. Schools mostly can't say "we only want rich people" but they definitely want to prefer students who will contribute to the donation revenue stream either themselves or through their parents. Signals like "doesn't have a job to take up their time in high school" and "parents can afford (and have the free time to enable) expensive, time-consuming activities" are really good proxies for that.
> Drug users don't seem to be overly preoccupied with what drug they use.
What? In the case of opiates (which is the most significant drug problem we have at the moment), users are often physically addicted to a specific substance and that addiction was often initiated by legitimate medical usage of that substance. They'll certainly care if you say "hey, you can't use heroin any more, have some weed instead".
In the US, we usually refer to "paying someone to borrow a car" as a car "rental" and "borrowing money to finance a car purchase" as a car "loan".
Lettuce has a shelf-life of ~4 weeks from harvest, the parasite can incubate for ~2 weeks from consumption, and it may take a week or two for the infected person to see a doctor, get positive test results, and have those results reported to the tracking bodies. That means tracking could easily lag distribution of the bad goods by 2 months.
In addition to the direct interview, there are other advantages of authorization that often allow the author a much deeper access to research the subject:
- Access to records, correspondence, and journals in the subject's possession
- explicit endorsement from the subject encourages their family, friends and colleagues to work with the author.
- Opportunities for the subject themselves to fact-check and contextualize the research.
That must be balanced against the fact that authorization also often provides the subject an opportunity to review the content, giving them a hand in crafting the narrative and/or suppressing unflattering details.
> David will always, in the long run, win against Goliath.
Every Goliath may, in the long run, meet a David that beats it, but this premise ignores all the thousands of Davids that don't win.
That would be hell on everybody's box-cutters (and fingers). I already cut myself too often on shipping boxes.
I did that for a long time. It works, but it's very difficult to match the ease of using a console:
- Steam's Big Picture mode works, but there are lots of sharp edges (launcher support being the biggest).
- PC versions of games frequently have no way to switch to a couch-friendly UI (loading menus designed for PCs)
- The power management and hardware setup is not at all streamlined
- Controller management can be painful
- Streaming apps mostly need to work in a browser, which won't have controller support.
Young people often have low expenses, few external demands on their time, and poor living conditions. If they are smart, motivated and lucky they can sometimes take advantage of that situation to do extraordinary work.
Note that a growing range of professions (law, medicine, finance, journalism,, politics) have developed career paths such that they take advantage of that condition and demand that level of commitment out of their entry-level employees.
I wonder how much of that is selection bias? In my (admittedly limited) experiences around the labor and delivery process, c-sections were (apart from when requested) advised for high-risk pregnancies and as a recourse for something having gone wrong in the L/D process. One could reasonably expect that both of those situations would indicate a higher risk for mortality from surgery.
Note that per Wikipedia [0], death by abdominal surgery in general in High-HDI countries is on the order of 100-1000/100k.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perioperative_mortality
Note that the power estimate for the build above is only 325W. The power supply is beefier than that for headroom and economics.
It wouldn't be surprising if Valve's efforts at integrating the unit (putting the relevant chips on a single board, eliminating anything unnecessary, and improving cooling) could shave a significant amount of power.
I just did one [0], mostly with regards only to specs and price (rather than quality). It comes out to $150 more, roughly 4X the volume, and about 3 hours more of my time in effort, all to get something that won't be as well-supported by games. What am I missing?
[0] https://pcpartpicker.com/list/KY3VW9
To be fair, GP said that FIFA is corrupt, not that FIFA is either profit-maximizing nor out to light the goose that lays the golden egg on fire.
I know it's hard to imagine in the US, what with our quarterly-profit-maximizing corruption, but it is possible to be corrupt and still have to balance long-term concerns like "keep the graft flowing".
What I don't understand is why search is so broken.
If I do a search of my inbox with a lot of results, it gets lazy-loaded. Fair enough. But why, when I scroll to the bottom and it loads the new batch of email, does the view need to jump back to the top of the list?
Why has Gmail been able to recognize and properly group/deduplicate prior conversations in top-posted email threads for 20 years, but Outlook can't bother? That also breaks search, since every email with the result somewhere in its body (even prior emails) will appear.
That and a way to recursively commit/push (i.e. make a change within a submodule, commit in one step with the same message in the parent submodule).
Right now, if you want to push a change to a file in a submodule such that it propagates to the users of your repo, you have to:
1. Change the file
2. Commit within the submodule
3. Push the submodule
4. add the submodule change in the outer repo
5. commit in the outer repo
6. push the outer repo
He's had more than 2 decades to reject that opportunity.