I bought a case for the Raspberry Pi camera that has a LEGO-compatible back and a small LEGO set (10692) specifically for making things to hold the camera where I want it. It has worked great.

Question for LEGO geeks: my set only has one L-bracket, and it is quite small. Looking at other sets at local stores, they also only have one or two small L-brackets.

Is there some way other than L-brackets that people use when they want some LEGO assembly to connect perpendicularly to some other assembly?

Or should I just order an assortment of brackets from a third-party LEGO brick marketplace site, like this [1].

[1] https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catStrin...

1: https://swooshable.com/snot

I'd honestly just order what you need from bricklink. Alternatively get used Lego by weight from ebay. Around here you get a kilogram of unsorted, good quality Lego for €20.

1: https://www.bricklink.com/catalogList.asp?catType=P&catID=22

2: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3937...

3: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3036...

4: https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?P=3038...

Or try the local Goodwill Auction site (if you drive to pickup you save on shipping and can outbid others).

Two flat pieces back to back are very very close to the width between the sides of two rows of bricks separated by one row of empty studs.

Here is a photo [1]. Here it is with the three top braces and the cable holder removed so you can see everything [2].

This the LEGO compatible case I'm using for the camera [3].

[1] https://imgur.com/a/ggNe5uM

[2] https://imgur.com/a/jz525N7

[3] https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B01F19WI0O/

They'd only need create a few 'scientific' bricks to make them work. Not that different from Mindstorms.

Lego: Ok.

https://home.cern/news/news/experiments/using-lego-study-bui...

[0] https://twitter.com/lego_group/status/842115345280294912?lan...

However, a kit without Lego names or logos, and without Lego-figures, and without any branding or copy of existing Lego-kit, should be ok.

But no. In some way, our customs withheld the package and we had lawyers for Lego threaten to sue us if we claimed rights to the package. They attached the Lego figure patent with the threat. We said, burn it, forget it, and acknowledge that we can sleep at night again please, but they forgot the last part.

It was a kit worth about 10€, and we have hundreds of €'s of Lego. Now we've stopped buying Lego. Also, less plastic crap.

Not to sound bitter, but the big friggin majority of kids toys industry is shit and the world would be a better place without it. Sorry for the steam :S.

you tried to privately import a single box? i can understand lego going against commercial importers, but private shipments of individuals who don't have any resources to defend themselves, that's just ridiculous.

However, a kit without Lego names or logos, and without Lego-figures, and without any branding or copy of existing Lego-kit, should be ok.

and they are. but you have to make the effort to defend yourself against the accusations, which a commercial importer can do, but it's totally unfair to put that on individuals for a single set.

which set exactly did you try to import?

there are a few large importers in germany, you may consider those. avoids the hassle...

And to add to Lego's sis each set includes unnecessary unique bricks so that you can't remake a set without buying these custom parts. There are tens of thousands unique bricks so far and this trend is going strong.

I understand why the LEGO corporation does it, but it's their problem, not ours, and we don't really need unpaid lego consultants running around lecturing people about the "correct" way to refer to them.

WHAT? DOESN'T EVERYBODY SHOUT WHEN THEY SAY LEGO??

>"Legos" is clearly in common usage

Given that I don't ever hear people using it.

Personally I get faintly annoyed by people saying "legos" the same as I would by people saying "sheeps" instead of sheep when referring to multiple, although I don't think I've ever corrected anyone over it.

I certainly do. The people around you are not a uniform sample of all communities on Earth.

I think americans started calling lego legos because they were already calling eggos eggos. In the uk and europe generally we don't have eggos, so we don't have legos.

I checked the wiki page and thought the contrast between the two approaches is interesting.

Also (child of the 70s) I am certain that I was calling mine Legos before I even knew about Eggo waffles. Third - boy I'm really piling on, sorry - I don't think I've ever referred to multiple Eggo waffles as "Eggos", probably because there's already "waffles" for that.

btw: german seems to have developed two terms. i don't know where it originated, but bluebrixx (and i don't know who else) uses the term "noppensteine".

we'll have to see which term becomes more popular. both are descriptive, but "noppen" is a rather rarely used word which feels a bit wierd when you are not used to it.

There is a wikipedia list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_generic_and_genericize...

I and everyone I know has been calling them LEGOs since I was a kid in the 70s; that’s good enough for me.

One of the most fascinating things about HN is how people will come out in droves to bash the environmental impact of mining cryptocurrency, but legos are just wonderful - nevermind the plastic waste.

There must be a name for this phenomenon.

Obviously this post will get downvoted with no real rebuttal - more idiosyncracies of the quality platform that is HN.

> I prefer it when the commentary on Hacker News does not extend to hot takes.

Seems like you don't speak for the hivemind. Hot takes get upvoted on the regular around here. Just not when they don't conform to the echo chamber.

I found a name for the phenomenon that I was looking for, I think.

I think it is probable that many people think the benefits of Lego far outweigh the benefits of cryptocurrency mining.