At work I can only use Firefox or IE so no brainer there - I use Firefox. At home I use Firefox but generally have Chrome open to play the odd Facebook game. The thing that puzzles me is I really don't notice any difference in performance between Chrome and Firefox and never have. I have a 4mb internet connection at the moment but noticed nothing different when I had 8.
The only reason I use Chrome is to play around with any HTML5 stuff and simple curiosity. With Firefox's huge add on libraries, Firebug, Tab controls etc I honestly cannot see why so much fuss is made about Chrome!
The only problem is I don't remember Flash or FF crashing before, except some rare occasion. Now I see Flash crashes somewhat often.
In every tab, all flash elements become gray. I'd rather just one tab crash that parts of many tabs crashing.
Note: Firefox used to crash the entire browser when Flash crashed so the method that Chrome and Firefox now use is an improvement.
I enjoy the speed and simplicity of chrome. For development work, I actually prefer the webkit DOM inspector to firebug. I was never a heavy plugin user to begin with, so firefox never tempted me much there. I think that if you're not planning on using plugins, the core browser features of chrome are more polished (again, this is just my opinion). If you're a heavy plugin user though, ff or opera is the way to go.
Firefox is quite the opposite.
The difference was enough for me to forgo the whole list of extensions that I used in Firefox (this was before Chrome even had extensions)
I switched about a couple of years ago - maybe things have improved since.
That gives you an Opera-style widget on the left side for menu functions and moves tabs to the top.
edit: And Alt will bring the normal menu into view if you need something not on the widget.
edit: why the downvotes? I'm at work on my rickety WinXP corporate box, and FF4 definitely does not behave as described above. (Do really think I didn't try that?!)
edit: Oh, Windows XP. You'll have to disable the menu bar to get it to work there, I think.
edit: "this" appears to be as yet undefined. Unless ... can someone point me to whatever "maximize" is?
edit: FF4 does not behave as you describe on my WinXP box at work.
Note that tabs will appear in the titlebar when maximized on Windows only, for Firefox 4, and only if you have the menu bar hidden. (It's hidden by default in Windows Vista and 7.) Tabs in the titlebar are planned for Mac and Linux too, but weren't ready for this release.
Here's what firefox 4 looks like running on windows XP: http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/460/20110322144851800x600...
This doesn't work on Linux, due to window manager issues. Perhaps Firefox can do something like Chrome does as a workaround, although Chrome's workaround is awfully heavyweight (it basically reimplements all the functions of the WM).
The 'title' is the meta element, that is incredibly useful! It deserves attention. Not to be lost.
That's not to say tat I don't like slim tool bars.
I also prefer uniformity across the desktop and this feels like a deviation. Much in the way that a tabbing interface was alien when opera introduced it.
I like tabs, but I'd rather my window manager work with them. But that's just me.
I'm running minefield, and I've noticed some issues in Gmail, with dragging selected text - I think the browser assumes I'm dragging and dropping. Firefox still doesn't squeeze the tab size to fit the window width, which irritates the hell out of me.
Having said that there doesn't seem to be a radical UI overhaul - which is a shame.
I don't mind losing the title bar, since I've long been in the habit of alt+dragging to move windows anyway.
(This is a linux-ism, but well worth installing 3rd party software on OSX/Windows for -- particularly for alt + middle/right-button resizing: no need to screw around landing your mouse on a corner of the window.)
I guess you could run the browser in full screen mode. Though full screen doesn't suit everyone.
> The browser's way faster;
That's awesome. Maybe I can go back to using firefox instead of chrome.The top menu left button in FF now looks exactly like Opera's menu button. Of course, now all browsers look basically the same with almost all UI chrome gone.
I was pleasently surprised. The browser's way faster; launching it doesn't take that much time; the UI is way more responsive; and all the add-ons I've been using in the past are compatible with 4.0 (Web Developer, Firebug, Colorzilla, etc.).
I'm currently using it as my primary browser again, and it looks like it will stay on that podest for awhile.
It's awesome to see a browser resurecting with that many improvements, despite the fact that some people have almost written it off due to some annoying issues in past versions, the most prominent one being performance.
I'd really recommend you to give it a try.
Disclaimer: I've been using Opera 11 as my primary browser before I decided to give FF 4.0 a try