News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by e40 on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:04PM (#12481468)
but some toothpaste additive

About 9 months ago I stopped using toothpaste (my Dentist said it was fine) because I read the canker sores I had been getting for years and years were caused by an additive in tooth paste: Sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). Sure enough, I have not had a single canker sore since I stopped using tooth paste!

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by PKop on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:07PM (#12481495)
Don't leave us hanging... what was your substitute?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by e40 on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:21PM (#12481632)
Nothing. The toothpastes without SLS made me gag. My dentist said using no toothpaste was fine. My Sonicare toothbrush and flossing does the job just fine, and the floride in the water handles the rest.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by BigThrowaway88 on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:22PM (#12482262)
Turns out the benefits of flossing are not backed by research. Largely manufactured by industry:

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f7e66079d9ba4b4985d7af350619a...

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by e40 on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:29PM (#12482329)
I really don't believe this. The spaces between my teeth are very small, and without flossing, brushing can't clean out the food that gets wedged in there. I've actually flossed after brushing (with a Sonicare) and I still remove food with the floss.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by skyyler on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:52PM (#12483083)
And going right back to the original topic here, those bits of food wouldn't be as big a deal without all of the added sugars that we have now, right? Isn't tooth decay caused by sugar-eating bacteria?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by e40 on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @04:45PM (#12492072)
It's damn near impossible to remove all carbs from your diet, even if you try. So, in the very theoretical case of having absolutely no carbs, then you're right. For the vast majority of people on earth, it's simply not true.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by MaysonL on Monday September 12, 2016 @06:02PM (#12484067)
I picked up a pack of 10 (count them 10) interstitial toothbrushes at the 99ยข store. One of the best dollars I ever spent. Brand name: "Aim interdental brush". They work just about as well as flossing (I still keep some floss stick around for the occasional piece of stuff that gets stuck that these don't get out). Their business end looks like a tiny artificial Christmas tree, with a small plastic handle.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Frondo on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:08PM (#12482686)
Heh, anecdotally, I used to get a couple cavities a year, pretty consistently, never flossed. I started flossing religiously a few years ago, and after a week of spitting blood out in the sink afterward, I got used to it. Haven't had one since.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by glandium on Monday September 12, 2016 @07:56PM (#12484704)
Anecdotally, my wife has been flossing forever and has cavities all over the place. I, on the other hand, never ever flossed, rarely brush my teeth more than once a day, and have no cavities.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Retra on Monday September 12, 2016 @07:20PM (#12484452)
Just because nobody bothered to research it doesn't mean it isn't true.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by M_Grey on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:20PM (#12482245)
You can even use some salt, or baking soda if you feel like you need a "deeper clean" or the like.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by enraged_camel on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:45PM (#12483018)
Yep, this is in fact how the nobility did it back in the day!
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by M_Grey on Monday September 12, 2016 @06:33PM (#12484216)
IIRC, they used something like the Arabic 'miswak', a twig with a sort of shredded end. Is that about right?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by LoSboccacc on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:53PM (#12481968)
I'm using pressure water (with a pinch of moutwash) - really brings out the white out of teeth. also no matter how much I brush and floss, there's always stuff coming out of gums while watering. I don't do it often as it's quite intensive, but hey, it helped me a lot.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by voidz on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:39PM (#12481814)
Fluoride isn't exactly healthy either though, is it?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Karunamon on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:46PM (#12481885)
The dose makes the poison - there's a pretty dramatic correlation between low level fluoridation like the kind that's added to water and oral health, with not much at all linking it to health issues.

http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/fluorid.htm

http://www.nature.com/bdj/journal/v192/n9/full/4801410a.html

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by sleighboy on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:26PM (#12482856)
I would not say that is dramatic or even meaningful. The findings are full of statements on how the the studies they considered were "of moderate quality, but of limited quantity". And they conclude with saying basically that they have no conclusion.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Karunamon on Monday September 12, 2016 @05:21PM (#12483796)
I think we may have read different studies. From the conclusions on the second link:

From the evidence available, it can be concluded that fluoridation of public water supplies does prevent caries and is associated with fluorosis.

Personally speaking, I'd call 15-25% reductions "dramatic".

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by sleighboy on Monday September 12, 2016 @08:00PM (#12484733)
From the summary: "The authors were surprised by the small amount of work identified. In particular, there were very few studies that followed the same individuals longitudinally, there was lack of analysis of confounding variables and there was failure to undertake appropriate statistical analysis."

The whole report has a tone of being the best they could conclude with poor data which is stressed repeatedly. Those numbers put in context of the opinions of the source data makes them not so impressive.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by imglorp on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:46PM (#12481884)
A pinch of baking soda will have the same abrasives.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by liquidwax on Monday September 12, 2016 @08:37PM (#12484883)
Chewing neem twigs
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by pkaye on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:52PM (#12482560)
Whenever I have canker sores I stop using toothpaste and dip my toothbrush in a cup of mouthwash and that helps the sores heal much faster.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by brockhaywood on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:05PM (#12481477)
So, what is the alternative you are using? Water and brushing? Or some organic toothpaste alternative?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by ChoGGi on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:06PM (#12482088)
I use Green beaver toothpaste http://greenbeaver.com

Calcium Carbonate, Aqua/Water/Eau, Sorbitol, Glycerin, Hydrated Silica, Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) leaf Oil, Menthol, Xylitol, Citrus Medica Limonum (Lemon) Extract, Xanthan Gum, Coco-Glucoside, Calcium Ascorbate, Melaleuca Alternifolia (Tea Tree) Leaf Oil.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by tiglionabbit on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:16PM (#12481576)
I still use toothpaste, but I've found that using a sonicare toothbrush made a huge improvement in preventing cavities. Also flossing is important.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by BigThrowaway88 on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:20PM (#12482246)
The benefits of flossing are not backed by data. Seems it too is a myth manufactured by industry:

The FDA had to remove the recommendation from daily hygiene guidelines, as law requires them to be backed by legit science.

That said, I still do it. Makes my mouth "feel" cleaner".

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f7e66079d9ba4b4985d7af350619a...

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by switch007 on Monday September 12, 2016 @05:12PM (#12483732)
The cited references studied cavities, plaque, gingivitis and gum disease. I see two other benefits in flossing: combating halitosis and comfort (meat stuck between molars for me is extremely irritating).
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by skyyler on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:53PM (#12483092)
How have you found a sonicare toothbrush to help cavities?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by e40 on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:22PM (#12481645)
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Cerium on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:12PM (#12481542)
I just use water and a toothbrush. It works well.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by MichaelGG on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:14PM (#12481568)
SLS is organic.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by awqrre on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:48PM (#12481905)
There's plenty of organic compounds that are toxic to humans (not saying that this one is or isn't) ...
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by adrr on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:46PM (#12482505)
SLS isn't that toxic, its just overly an effective surfactant that strips all the natural oils from your skin/cheeks. Its why your hands free dry when you wash dishes with dish soap. Also strong enough to remove crude oil from birds.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by MichaelGG on Monday September 12, 2016 @04:49PM (#12483523)
Sure, just saying that "an organic toothpaste" doesn't rule out SLS.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by allwein on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:49PM (#12481910)
So is arsenic.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by kefka on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:28PM (#12482320)
I didn't know that elemental Arsenic (As) was made of chains of elemental carbons (C)...

The more you know??

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by dredmorbius on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:56PM (#12482587)
Incorrect.

Arsenic is an element. Elemental arsenic, as with elemental carbon, or hydrogen, or any other element, is made of protons, neutrons, and electrons.

Its chemical properties are defined largely by its valence electrons, and atomic mass.

There is no more carbon in arsenic than there is sound in light. They are different things.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenic

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by prewett on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:31PM (#12482887)
Your parent poster was well aware of that, and also assumed his parent was aware of that as well. His post was a subtle version of "arsenic can't be 'organic' because cannot be composed of carbon chains because it is an element which is not carbon."

The advantage of his version (especially in spoken conversation) is that you can tell someone they are wrong, and typically if they have such a gross misunderstanding, it will go completely over their heads, and they won't realize that you are telling them they are wrong.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by dredmorbius on Monday September 12, 2016 @04:55PM (#12483587)
Whoosh! </self>

Yeah, I managed to miss that.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by kefka on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @09:31AM (#12488000)
Yeah, I was trying to be nice :)

In all honesty, I was thinking that allwein's post was an example of "Not even wrong" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong )

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Retric on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @07:33AM (#12495797)
Water is considered an important part of organic chemistry by everyone, but pedantic chemists. Original poster may have been thinking of cyanide but As is often found in plants and animals and is not man made. Which fits the casual definition.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by jaymoorthi on Monday September 12, 2016 @09:13PM (#12485001)
In my (limited) experience, canker sores are an allergic reaction. Raw pineapples make the inside of my mouth tingly, and then voila: canker sores. I stopped eating raw pineapple, and I've not had a canker sore since.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by jschwartzi on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:19PM (#12481610)
I used to have to use lotion on my hands constantly until I switched to castille soap instead of SLS-based detergents.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by akavlie on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:15PM (#12481574)
I use Sensodyne for the same reason โ€” it's a widely available toothpaste that doesn't have SLS.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by dgjfe on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:17PM (#12481593)
Actually, most types of Sensodyne have SLS in them too. The "Extra Whitening" type doesn't, so I use that.

Once I switched to that, I stopped getting so many canker sores almost immediately.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by stepanhruda on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:22PM (#12481648)
Thanks for the tip
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by jotato on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:07PM (#12481497)
so what do you use now? Coconut oil or something similar?
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by lukeschlather on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:18PM (#12481600)