News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by MichaelGG on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:14PM (#12481568)
SLS is organic.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by awqrre on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:48PM (#12481905)
There's plenty of organic compounds that are toxic to humans (not saying that this one is or isn't) ...
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by adrr on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:46PM (#12482505)
SLS isn't that toxic, its just overly an effective surfactant that strips all the natural oils from your skin/cheeks. Its why your hands free dry when you wash dishes with dish soap. Also strong enough to remove crude oil from birds.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by MichaelGG on Monday September 12, 2016 @04:49PM (#12483523)
Sure, just saying that "an organic toothpaste" doesn't rule out SLS.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by allwein on Monday September 12, 2016 @01:49PM (#12481910)
So is arsenic.
Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by kefka on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:28PM (#12482320)
I didn't know that elemental Arsenic (As) was made of chains of elemental carbons (C)...

The more you know??

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by dredmorbius on Monday September 12, 2016 @02:56PM (#12482587)
Incorrect.

Arsenic is an element. Elemental arsenic, as with elemental carbon, or hydrogen, or any other element, is made of protons, neutrons, and electrons.

Its chemical properties are defined largely by its valence electrons, and atomic mass.

There is no more carbon in arsenic than there is sound in light. They are different things.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenic

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by prewett on Monday September 12, 2016 @03:31PM (#12482887)
Your parent poster was well aware of that, and also assumed his parent was aware of that as well. His post was a subtle version of "arsenic can't be 'organic' because cannot be composed of carbon chains because it is an element which is not carbon."

The advantage of his version (especially in spoken conversation) is that you can tell someone they are wrong, and typically if they have such a gross misunderstanding, it will go completely over their heads, and they won't realize that you are telling them they are wrong.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by dredmorbius on Monday September 12, 2016 @04:55PM (#12483587)
Whoosh! </self>

Yeah, I managed to miss that.

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by kefka on Tuesday September 13, 2016 @09:31AM (#12488000)
Yeah, I was trying to be nice :)

In all honesty, I was thinking that allwein's post was an example of "Not even wrong" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong )

Re:How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat by Retric on Wednesday September 14, 2016 @07:33AM (#12495797)
Water is considered an important part of organic chemistry by everyone, but pedantic chemists. Original poster may have been thinking of cyanide but As is often found in plants and animals and is not man made. Which fits the casual definition.