My review of Google's new Inbox, based on two hours of use (thanks [redacted] for the invite).
First the good parts: 1. I really like bundles. The idea that I can "Sweep" all the promotional emails I get in one click fills me with glee (and marketers with anxiety, I imagine). It's also nice to have all the travel related emails in one place. Never again am I going to be confused whether I should be going to SFO or SJC.
2. I like the new compose. My emails are too long (both those I write and those you do), and I'm praying that showing just one line to write a response will make emails briefer.
3. Snooze/procrastinate: How I like the idea of "someday". Combined with my own future discounting, I'm not going to feel guilty about not responding anymore.
The not-so-good parts:
1. Boy is this opinionated software! There is an inexorable push to empty your inbox. I guess I'll like it if I get with the program.
2. It's too pretty. No, seriously. The title-bar is too bright, there are too many people's faces, too many colors and font styles. I like my email drab so I can focus on what people are saying and not get distracted by the colors.
That's all I see with two hours of use. Oh, also, I don't know how to invite people yet. If someone tells me, I'm happy to invite y'all.
edit: formatting.
#. I hate Bundles. I rarely if ever have more than 5 emails in my inbox. Hiding things from me is counterproductive.
#. WAY too bright and big. Regular gmail fits 3x as much information in the same space, and I was already unhappy with how bright and big regular gmail is.
#. Love snooze. I've been using boomerang for ages.
#. No idea where the compose-suggestions are coming from; they're for people I haven't communicated with since before gmail even came out.
#. In general, just feels very clunky compared to Gmail.
I can not imagine what'd happen if it doesn't work all of the times?
I like the colors aspect though and and would love to try it out.
If you still have some invites left send out one to [email protected]
Its from the create (+) button, but I don't think you necessarily start with invites right away, and I don't think it shows the Invite option after you hit the create button unless you have invites.
At least, I'm assuming that's why I've never seen the invite button in my Inbox (app or web) even though I've seen the instructions on the support page.
On the plus side, it only took me a few hours to get an invite from Google just by emailing [email protected].
https://support.google.com/inbox/answer/6067582?p=invite_req...
Once you get Inbox, you'll have invites to send to your friends. Here's how to send an invite:
1. Open Inbox. 2. In the bottom right, go to the Create button . 3. Choose Invite to Inbox .
If you could do that for me, I would be grateful! (banderon1 "at" gmail "dot" com)
I would really appreciate an invite at inglor at gmail dot com?
bertrand dot chardon at gmail dot com
Thank you very much.
If you can spare an invite, I'd be glad to try it out: ozhozh at gmail dot com -- thanks in any case.
Thanks,
Thanks, Alex
Edit: "Across" in the sense that everything comes in one workflow, and isn't two separate workflows. I dislike having to back out and select a new account to see each set of emails.
Weird that Mailbox/Dropbox manages to do it with Gmail, but Google doesn't.
But a 'advanced options' ability with a stern warning would be useful to many.
ToDo's based on emails, chat, sms, (or any other msg obj) and metadata based filters are very useful.
I created dozends of advanced filters in GMail in 2006, as my first account grew to 5 GB (thanks to about 20 of mailing list) in 2009 my GMail account got unbearable slow. I had to create a new account (the advanced filters are still there, but there is no intuitive UI anymore, you have to type in their syntax). I occacionally login to my old account and it is still dog slow - so I have my doubts that advanced filter scale in GMail/Inbox.
Two apps using the same backend data (you can switch between Gmail and Inbox if you like) seems a better fit.
As I see it, it lets people wanting to try the new thing do so, but has zero effect on people happy with what Gmail does now who don't want to be distracted either by more option clutter or the features themselves.
Further, it lets people wanting to use the new workflow do so without clutter from the regular Gmail interface (and being a more focussed interface is the key "interesting feature".)
That's exciting to hear, since I've recently started turning Mailbox into a combination email client/to-do list/evernote replacement. I've found that having all those concerns in different apps meant that I never wound up using any of them often enough.
The shared concern seems to be the triaging of things that hit an "inbox" of sorts. Email hits the literal inbox, to do's hit my "stuff I need to do" buffer, and notes hit my "categorize these notes later" buffer (I compulsively note things down for later). Ultimately triaging things as their hit the Mailbox inbox is most effective for me, so I've turned it into my single source of triaging.
I'll definitely give this a shot if/when I ever get an invite ...
Got the invite for my google apps account, tried to sign in and was denied - because it was a google apps account.
This is very important. I've started using Evernote, and thought, "I really want to keep track of what gets done and who is doing what via email, without adding any complexity or forcing others into a system." I hope Inbox does this for me.
my username is my gmail
FWIW, I really like it, and use it exclusively for my work and personal accounts. Inbox functions very much more like a ToDo list than it does an email client. Here are the workflows I have:
Work:
I filter all mailing lists into different clusters that I have appear at 7AM every morning. I then scrub through the subject lists to see what happened yesterday, pinning things that require my attention, and then sweeping the rest. At this point, everything pinned in my Inbox is now "something I need to look at". I then read the email, and decide if it has an action item or not. If it's actionable and I intend to do it today, I'll leave it pinned. If it's not something I'm going to do today, I'll Snooze it until I think I'll have time to do it, or at least evaluate another Snooze time.
To make sure I don't miss important emails, I have a cluster that I put all email that has myself explicitly in the To: line, and have that appear whenever anything arrives. I do occasionally miss things that didn't have me in the To: and went to my 7AM clusters, but this is few and far between, and I hazard happens less than my Gmail inbox where I had far more cognitive load on managing the emails there.
Home:
The defaults are tuned well for home, and I use the clusters (like Travel, Purchases etc) like I do for work, having them appear at 7AM each day. Most things get swept immediately, and again I pin things that require my attention and are maybe ToDo items.
Inbox is really opinionated about its workflow: if you struggle against it, you'll have a bad time, and you'll prefer Gmail's flexibility. However, if you are Inbox Zero or GTD minded, I think you'll love Inbox. Inbox is my ToDo list, and replaces Wunderlist/Things/Evernote/Google Tasks for me. I set reminders to myself for work items that don't have an email attached.
I encourage everyone to give it a week to see if it suits them, but I'm afraid I'm all out of invites for now :(