News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by k__ on Saturday October 17, 2026 @10:36AM (#50131570)
We're getting to a point where we can stop boiling water for electricity.

What a time to be alive.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by OptionOfT on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:46AM (#50132103)
Well, if we want more drinking water we might start boiling salt water with electricity.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by AnotherGoodName on Saturday October 17, 2026 @02:13PM (#50133533)
That's a very obsolete desalination technique.

A cup of water with salt added doesn't get noticeably warm since there's just not much entropy difference in salt water vs fresh water. These days you can reverse the process at very low electricity cost with reverse osmosis.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by dyauspitr on Sunday October 18, 2026 @02:07AM (#50138337)
I know at some point we’re going to find that reverse osmosis is devastating from a microplastics perspective. I’m basing this on nothing except the process is essentially forcing water at very high pressure through plastic membranes.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by dzhiurgis on Sunday October 18, 2026 @11:54PM (#50148201)
> microplastics

On grand scheme of pollution, microplastics is basically a fad.

We haven't solved 10 different things that kill us every day. And haven't even started solving 10 another things that is also killing us. After that we can start worry about microplastics.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by yangm97 on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:49AM (#50132136)
99+ missed calls from millimeter wave bored geothermal
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by thinkcontext on Saturday October 17, 2026 @02:58PM (#50133965)
That's many years from even attempting to make power. They've done what, a couple inches wide hole to 100 feet?
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by tootie on Saturday October 17, 2026 @04:49PM (#50135006)
First power hit the grid a few weeks ago

https://spectrum.ieee.org/fervo-cape-station-geothermal

It's still small scale but it's up and running and the site has plenty more capacity that can be added on bit by bit.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by thinkcontext on Saturday October 17, 2026 @06:24PM (#50135741)
That has nothing to do with millimeter wave boring.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by dzhiurgis on Sunday October 18, 2026 @11:56PM (#50148211)
My country is geothermal wonder and basically only does 10% of our power via geothermal.

We have water, decent legal system, safety, talent, infinite power. Could be printing money with datacenter buildouts. Instead in upcoming election good portion of promises is anti-AI.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by gnabgib on Monday October 19, 2026 @12:01AM (#50148241)
Thought you lived in NZ, not IS (wonderest) or CA, US? (both with the same problem - ahead of NZ)
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by PaulDavisThe1st on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:46AM (#50132112)
Or as Bill Mckibben observed "for 10's of thousands of years, humanity has burned things to produce energy. The period of fire is coming to an end".
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by Andrex on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:51AM (#50132156)
I think fire is still involved in the creation of solar energy though... Just not man-made fire.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by tialaramex on Saturday October 17, 2026 @01:04PM (#50132854)
That's not fire. We might colloquially call it fire, but that's not what it is.

Sol ("the Sun") is a ball of hydrogen so ludicrously massive that its own gravity compresses it to the point where nuclear fusion occurs. The fusion produces ludicrous amounts of energy and so in some sense the hydrogen is from our point of view very, very hot, however it's not on fire because fire needs Oxygen and there is none.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by testing22321 on Saturday October 17, 2026 @01:17PM (#50132986)
When I really think about that it’s incredible that such a phenomenon is actually very common in the universe.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by Andrex on Sunday October 18, 2026 @06:43PM (#50146248)
Touché. You are technically correct... (the best kind)

I take respite that colloquially what I said is still valid.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by dghughes on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:06AM (#50131783)
That's why I hope Helion Fusion does well. The system they are developing sends power to a device that captures power directly no boiling water.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by NooneAtAll3 on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:53AM (#50132182)
wasn't there recently papers claiming helion fusion's design is literally incapable of producing energy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwB4hB9QJX8

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by pfdietz on Saturday October 17, 2026 @06:15PM (#50135667)
Yes. They argue Helion screwed up computing the rate of energy flow from fast ions to cool electrons. I have not seen a good rejoinder from Helion, which is a very bad sign.

Given this, and given the apparent failure of Zap's scheme to scale, I don't think fusion has any significant chance of succeeding now.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by NooneAtAll3 on Saturday October 17, 2026 @07:40PM (#50136253)
> I don't think fusion has any significant chance of succeeding now.

if by "now" you mean schedules proposed by all those fusion startups, then you should've known better the moment they became "viral" in a very fake way (same for quantum computers)

for a more serious timeline, ITER is coming online early 30s, add a decade to get to more-than-even tokamak and another decade for something "commercial"

and by then it will be just in time to support operations on the Moon, I guess

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by pfdietz on Saturday October 17, 2026 @10:08PM (#50137171)
> if by "now" you mean schedules proposed by all those fusion startups

No, I mean the impossible economics of their schemes. For example, the ARC reactor is about 40x the volume and mass of a fission reactor of the same thermal power output. It cannot possibly be competitive as a source of heat with a fission reactor. And fission is not competitive with renewables. So fusion is doubly cursed economically.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by Ygg2 on Saturday October 17, 2026 @11:48AM (#50132133)
Except for solar collection that boils water to generate power.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by ZeroGravitas on Saturday October 17, 2026 @01:59PM (#50133377)
China just finished building some but it's a dead end technology.

It first lost to PV for daylight generation, then it fell back on storing the heat for use generating after sunset but cheap batteries made that obsolete too.

Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by pfdietz on Saturday October 17, 2026 @06:17PM (#50135679)
It's not even competitive to use mirrors to get sunlight to heat water. PV is cheaper for that.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by toomuchtodo on Saturday October 17, 2026 @10:41AM (#50131607)
“How did humanity solve climate change? We taught sand to move electrons with photons.”
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by matheusmoreira on Saturday October 17, 2026 @07:47PM (#50136309)
Magical runes.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by pfdietz on Saturday October 17, 2026 @06:14PM (#50135652)
There could still be a great future in that from stored thermal energy from renewables. I harp on this a lot here; the estimated cost for 600 C heat available with 100% capacity factor is $3-5/GJ, just from resistive PV heat.
Re:Solar surpasses nuclear power globally for first time – p... by cbmuser on Saturday October 17, 2026 @06:22PM (#50135728)
Not going to happen.